Comment Re:Other new military branches⦠(Score 2) 150
I hope that after I die, the one word people use to describe me is "resurrected."
I don't recommend it.
Comment Re:He writes like a Nigerian scammer (Score 1) 150
Covfefe
Comment Re:I wonder... (Score 1) 150
Actually, AI hallucinations could explain a lot of the random stuff we hear being spewed by the president.
Comment Re:Other new military branches⦠(Score 1) 150
Other new military branches being proposed by the administration include Diesel Force, Tariff Force, and Iran Force.
By our powers COMBINED!
Comment Want to be Part of Something Bigger? (Score 1) 50
https://www.flocksafety.com/ca...
Maybe you can still get in before it goes under.
Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 4
It's easy to reach that conclusion if you have never been active in a party. The democratic party does have a good local ground game that is run by volunteers who actually have beliefs and principles. The problem is that at the end of the day the candidate who wins in the one who can pull in the most money, and that's true no matter what. Where do you see a situation where an independent candidate can pull in enough money to win an election? The message is important, but getting the message out is what brings in votes. Just as the democrats need a more coherent message than just "we're not Trump", an independent needs a better message than just "I'm not a democrat or a republican" - and they need backing in order to get that message out.
There have been some democratic candidates who have been able to get some local traction without taking special interest money, but that's only possible if they had a large war chest of money ready before they announced their candidacy. An independent would face the same challenge.
There have been some democratic candidates who have been able to get some local traction without taking special interest money, but that's only possible if they had a large war chest of money ready before they announced their candidacy. An independent would face the same challenge.
Comment Re:and now i'm reminded of.... (Score 1, Informative) 17
Somewhere, Chris Cornell is hearing about this story and smiling.
Comment Nope. (Score 1) 2
Come back when it passes peer review.
Comment Another grift? (Score 2, Insightful) 103
How long until this guy makes his own AI startup for "responsible AI"? What are the chances he's being paid to do this? Remember, AI companies are a trillion deep in AI without any keeping any of their promises and they've hit a developmental brick wall which means the jig is almost up. What better way than to lower expectations than claim it's too dangerous/powerful to push further?
Submission + - Major Media Outlets Banned from White House (bbc.com)
hadleyburg writes: BBC is reporting that "US President Donald Trump has announced that he is "immediately" banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House".
"Trump said that the outlets "constantly write or report fiction or lies" about his administration, although he provided no examples".
"Trump said that the outlets "constantly write or report fiction or lies" about his administration, although he provided no examples".
Comment Re: Backups? (Score 1) 214
He's never seen her face.
Comment Re:It's a tale of two viruses (Score 1) 129
There's a pattern here folks.
People inclined to conspiracy theories tend to see them everywhere?
THAT'S NOT TRUE! Wait... are you one of THEM aren't you! I KNEW IT! I'll never stop seeking the full truth*!
* Truths may be imaginary, non-extant, based in an unreachable reality, or total bullshit. Truths are single use and non-refundable. Exclusions may apply based on locality. All truths are void where prohibited by law. Truth may result in mild irritation or and intense rash. Seek medical attention immediately if truth rash begins to swell. Truths are not intended for consumers under the age of 21 as it may lead to psychosis and permanent blindness. Do not consume truths if you are pregnant or may become pregnant. Ask a physician if truths are right for you.
Submission + - U.S. almost attacked Chinese ship over hallucinated AI nuclear arms report (cnn.com)
fahrbot-bot writes: CNN is reporting that an AI hallucination of Chinese nuclear components almost led to US military attack on a Chinese ship.
The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program.
The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode. According to two of the sources, armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said.
It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying. CNN was not able to learn what the misidentified cargo was.
The report, according to one of the sources, was “entirely false.” But it also “almost started a war,” the source said. Any US operation against a Chinese vessel could have risked spiraling into an armed conflict between the two nations.
The kind of “hallucination” that the tool used by the analyst in this case conjured has not been an isolated incident across the intelligence community since these tools began proliferating across government, according to one of the sources.
The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program.
The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode. According to two of the sources, armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said.
It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying. CNN was not able to learn what the misidentified cargo was.
The report, according to one of the sources, was “entirely false.” But it also “almost started a war,” the source said. Any US operation against a Chinese vessel could have risked spiraling into an armed conflict between the two nations.
The kind of “hallucination” that the tool used by the analyst in this case conjured has not been an isolated incident across the intelligence community since these tools began proliferating across government, according to one of the sources.
Comment How? (Score 1) 129
Please explain/describe the various ways you think that AI can actually kill me?
Comment The glasses are 100% on-brand for facebook (Score 1) 179
Some people seem surprised by the glasses and how they can be used in perverse ways. These people seem to have forgotten what the original aim of facebook was. The website itself started as a way for "bros" - who would have been called incels had the term existed then - to trade pics of women from their campus. How many of those pictures do we think were taken with consent? Even if they were taken in public they still could have been creepy. This is just the same mindset, applied to technology that didn't exist at this scale in the early 2000s.
