F5 Acquired NGINX For $670M (zdnet.com) 38
Long-time Slashdot reader skdffff quotes ZDnet:
F5 Networks on Monday announced that it will acquire NGINX, which provides popular open-source software of the same name, for $670 million. The deal advances F5's aim of capitalizing on the trend toward multi-cloud deployments.
F5 plans to enhance NGINX's current offerings with F5 security solutions and will integrate F5 cloud-native technology with NGINX's software load balancing technology. This should accelerate F5's time to market of application services for containerized applications. Meanwhile, NGINX will benefit from F5's global salesforce, channel infrastructure and partner ecosystem.
The acquisition adds "the power of NGINX's open source innovation to F5's ADC leadership and enterprise reach," NGINX CEO Gus Robertson said in a statement
F5 plans to enhance NGINX's current offerings with F5 security solutions and will integrate F5 cloud-native technology with NGINX's software load balancing technology. This should accelerate F5's time to market of application services for containerized applications. Meanwhile, NGINX will benefit from F5's global salesforce, channel infrastructure and partner ecosystem.
The acquisition adds "the power of NGINX's open source innovation to F5's ADC leadership and enterprise reach," NGINX CEO Gus Robertson said in a statement
Here's how much you should care (Score:5, Interesting)
Read this, straight from PR Newswire hell:
"By bringing F5's world-class application security and rich application services portfolio for improving performance, availability, and management together with NGINX's leading software application delivery and API management solutions, unparalleled credibility and brand recognition in the DevOps community, and massive open source user base, we bridge the divide between NetOps and DevOps with consistent application services across an enterprise's multi-cloud environment,"
That's quite a sizeable collection of buzzwords in one single sentence. The reality of course is, nobody knows who F5 is, and nobody cares about Nginx non-free offerings. So in short, nobody cares.
Re: Here's how much you should care (Score:2, Informative)
Canâ(TM)t speak to how much you care, but if you donâ(TM)t know who F5 is then you donâ(TM)t do anything with networks and this probably isnâ(TM)t relevant to you anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Here's how much you should care (Score:1)
Your failed apostrophes indicate you aren't using a real OS, so why should anyone listen to you?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Here's how much you should care (Score:5, Funny)
and will integrate F5 cloud-native blockchain technology with NGINX's deep learning software load balancing A.I. technology.
~ FTFY
Congrats on an F5-powered first post (Score:5, Funny)
The reality of course is, nobody knows who F5 is
Last I checked, F5 was the key you press to reload Slashdot's front page to see if there's a new article where you can get first post. Congratulations.
Re: (Score:2)
...The reality of course is, nobody knows who F5 is, and nobody cares about Nginx non-free offerings. So in short, nobody cares.
F5 is most known for its hardware load balancer solutions. People care about those and have heard of F5 in that context most likely.
Re: (Score:2)
The reality of course is, nobody knows who F5 is
While I agree with you on the PR-speak, many of us in IT that need a load balancing solution know who F5 is. Even if ultimately another solution was chosen. We originally went with the OSS version of NGINX before switching to HAProxy.
Re: Here's how much you should care (Score:1)
If you have never heard of F5, you have not been an IT professional very long, or you're a software developer? They make hardware load balancers.
Re: (Score:3)
The people who use Nginx commercially know _very well_ who F5 is, and we people who bring internal open source solutions to production environments know them both very well. Please believe me that we care, in much the same way we cared when Oracle bouught Sun and took over MySQL and Java copyrights and licenses.
Boy are they gonna be pissed (Score:5, Funny)
Will they rename it? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
They already do. I worked as a software engineer at F5 and the web server that delivers the BIG-IQ UI is called "webd"...which is a recompiled version of NGINX
Re: (Score:2)
Not here, it isn't.
Re: (Score:2)
It was literally years before I found out it's supposed to be read as "Engine-X". I was pronouncing it "n'Jinx" (like "N'SYNC" I guess). Names are stupid if you need someone to explain how to say them. If they write it line N-gin-X or nGINx or something, it might be more intuitive. But I don't know anyone who worked it out without being told.
nginx is dead (Score:3, Funny)
apache is dead. big monolithic webservers are dead.
Our block-based SV startup spins up an AWS instance, turns on the docker, and runs:
while true ; do node ./app ; done
We're a unicorn and our CEO is a thought leader.
Re: (Score:2)