Nike and Google launch Joga.com 216
hpcanswers writes "Given the increasing popularity of social-networking sites among the young and affluent, Nike has introduced a new site dedicated to the world's most popular sport: soccer. While Nike provides the content (via its army of sponsored athletes, among others), Google provides the technical expertise. Orkut has been very popular in soccer-crazed Brazil, so Google may be able to make a brand extension here. Joga.com is currently invite only, though a form at the bottom of the home page takes requests for invitations." I actually found the launch of a site like this interesting not because of the content, but because of the trend in "private label" sites. It's a Shake'n'Bake Social Network, and you helped make it.
Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:1, Offtopic)
Oh, and check out the latest FIFA rankings, USA is ranked shockingly high!
Not off-topic (Score:2)
Nike launched an ad saying 'something was coming' this is the something.
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
It's gonna be interesting to see how the US does against Germany this week. Anything but a Germany win and I think Klinsmann is gone. You can't lose twice right before hosting a World Cup. A win for the US would be a huge morale boost and a tiny revenge for losing the quarterfinal to them in the last world cup.
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
>I like that commercial with Cantona, but am I must admit I wonder if he was thinking of skills, heart, HHHHonor, joy, and team spirit when he drop kicked that fan during the Crystal Palace game in 95.
Nowhere near his first offense either. Definitely the poster boy for the catch phrase that soccer is, "a gentleman's game played by hooligans." Footballer of the century my ass!Play Beautiful (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Re:Mes Ami slashdotter (Score:2)
Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:5, Funny)
Why is this a bad thing? If I'm going to buy a wicking running shirt, I'd like it to be made by someone who understands perspiration.
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Re:Mmm... (Score:3, Insightful)
Why not? Humor is the best way of dealing with the ugliness in the World - especially with things that are beyond our control (yeah, like not buying their products will make a difference when there are millions of folks who don't give a shit and buy it.). That's why there's so much comedy and humor around death. It's the folks who have the attitude of "It's not funny! Don't laugh!" who really worry me and who I stay away from.
Re:Mmm... (Score:2)
Re:Mmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Mmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
However, in parts of the world where this is rampant, these "sweatshops" are also the best thing that happened to the people who are employed here. It is permitting them to nudge their way out of abject poverty and sustain themselves. This is very serious.
While activism and human rights efforts have hel
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:1, Redundant)
This is the first thing that crossed my mind when I heard 'Google and Nike'.
No, not everyone at Nike is evil, but the company has proven again and again that they will employ sweatshop labor and child labor. Those making decisions at the top of Nike are apparently making evil decisions.
The China thing is a good contrast here. Google has adequately supported their reasons for activity in China. They're up to providing the people with as much information as they can, and are working with
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:3, Insightful)
At least those people have jobs and can feed their families (although with the population problem over there, breeding is debatable).
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
So... you're in favour of slavery too? Or you would be, if it was still around and everyone had slaves? After all, if everyone has slaves, it's not your personal responsbility, right?
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2, Insightful)
They are paid employees.
It is not Nike's fault those people are in the situation they are in. If they really feel oppressed, they should stand up to their oppressor and take over but they're not.
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
It is Nike's responsibility as supposed human beings to prevent sweatshop attitudes.
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Nike is not the cause for sweatshops or child labor.
It exists as a resource just like local water/coal supplies are nearby for power companies.
Because that resource exists, Nike can use it to manufacture their product and have a competitive product.
I don't think that Rockport, Keds, Reebok, Converse, BK, and cheepie no-name brand manufacture their shoes in an uptown skyscraper in Manhattan on the 53rd floor. Their shops are probably right down the street from the Nike factory or maybe even the 3rd shift i
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Just because others do it, doesn't mean that it's right. But your logic already allows you to equate human lives with lumps of coal, so I doubt very much that your moral compass will wiggle at all when you think about this.
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:3, Insightful)
I fail to see how Nike is the cause and not any other shoe or textile manufacturer. Do you wear shoes and if so, where are they made?
How is buying a wooden pair of clogs from the Netherlands from a kid who carved them any better?
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Is Nike offering better conditions *in comparison to other area industries*? Are those conditions so good that academics are leaving to work at these plants (as a seperate post pointed out with an Intel plant)? The key here is to raise the bar, but not to be disruptive about it.
Is the condition around Nike's factories been improving? Are the employees seeing an improvement in their stand
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Should we invoke the "Do No Evil" clause here? (Score:2)
What's really interesting about this article is that we are seeing the Tip of the Iceberg in what could wind up being a powerhouse of technical services offered by Google.
Just like the Google hosting.
I had been predicting (to my self and a few friends only) what I was expecting to see from Google as the logical steps in their development:
Goog
Please name the sport correctly (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:5, Insightful)
For fringe group sports that go by the same name, you add the nation or region that practices it. Like AMERICAN football.
(Waiting for the flamebait-modding to roll in)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's see if I can make this clear: in just about every country that plays this sport, played almost exclusively by kicking the ball with your feet, it's called "foot" ball.
Here we have a sport played almost exclusively with your hands. It's called.. uh... "foot" ball. Brilliant.
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
Almost exclusively? Name a footless player in the NFL.
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
No ball either (Score:3, Funny)
One rumor I heard is that it's called football, since the "ball" is one foot long.
Of course, real balls don't have length, they have diameter.
What the rest of the world calls it (Score:2)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
If America wants to fork the language, then I'm sure that's fine, but recall that American is a fork. Besides for the rest of the world, (i.e. 5-6 Billion or so) a football is a round ball.
I suppose that depends on who you invite to your "world series" though?
BTW it might be worth remembering that the internet is not confined to America, so speaking of "this country" needs to be done with care. The world is becomming more inter
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:1)
Why would it be metric football? There's a 6 yard box, an 18 yard box, the penalty spot is 12 yards from the goal (which is 8 yards wide, by 8 feet high) etc. Sizes are admittedly often also quoted in metric, but this is simply because much of the world doesn't understand imperial measurements, and as a result you end up with silly measurements like a goal that is 7.32 metres wide by 2.44 metres high, but the original sizes are quite definitely imperial.
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:2)
Re:Please name the sport correctly (Score:1)
Instead of Joga.com - Soccer-themed social networking website, you could say Joga.com - Football Where A Bunch Of Guys Attempt To Kick A Round Ball-themed networking website.
For the last time... (Score:2)
Eh? Never heard of it. (This not ignorance on my part, it is a health issue, apparently there are places in the UK where you can get beaten to a bloody pulp for even uttering that word).
Football:
A game that is usually played on a rectangular grass field with a goal at each end using a round leather ball. Football involves two teams of eleven players of whom one player in each team is the goalkeeper. The goalkeepers are the only two players on the field allowed to touch the ball with their hands. The
Re:For the last time... (Score:2, Interesting)
Yeah, but you'll get beaten up there for whatever pretext they can come up with.
I know rugby fans who insist on making the distinction between Association football and Rugby football.
In a related story ... (Score:1)
joghurt.com
Google web development (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this becoming a threat to "traditional" web development companies like the one I work for? Will Google be eating up development work for some of the larger sites?
Re:Google web development (Score:2)
You have no need to worry if your company writes applications which some day make it out of beta.
A first for google (Score:2)
Then again, maybe they will do the same for football, tennis, videogames and so on and in no time everyone will be included. Sp
Social networking and IM (Score:2)
You could add Jabber (Google Talk) mapping [slashgeo.org] to the bunch, which is closer to social networking, such as this joga.com is, than Google Local.
Re:A first for google (Score:2)
You are not going to get much bigger an audience. Aside from the USA and a very small group, the whole world plays this game and they call it football, not soccer.
Perhaps not everyone is enthusiastic - but that still leaves you a few billion who are. It is a global link from S America, Australia, Middle East, Europe and everywhere else. The World Cup is not named after some forgotten newspaper. It concerns the whole world - except, perhaps the USA.
Re:A first for google (Score:2)
Beaten at a game we invented*. Man, now I know how England feels.
* If the true inventors of baseball wanted to play, England would have sent over a team of schoolgirls to play rounders. They didn't.
Football (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Football (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Football (Score:2)
Also, if you'd read the article you linked to you would have read that it's the confused americans who started calling it soccer:
originally called the U.S. Football Association, and was formed in 1913 by the merger of the American Football Association and the American
Joga = play (Score:2)
Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
Many other web sites are. So what is your point? It is like you see Microsoft technology as evil.
Google is well known for their clean Web design, using open standards. They are also well known for their use of open source servers. It is very notable, then that they are using Microsoft based, proprietary solutions for this particular site. Does this indicate a change in Google's methods? Does this indicate the site was outsourced? Does this indicate a new team within Google? Does this indicate that Google
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
As long as it works on all browsers, why does it matter?
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
I'm willing to bet they have a standard fully compliant template they can use when a browser is encountered they can't produce code for. For the moment it is good engineering sense to optimise the design as much as possible.
Following the rules just because they are the rules only leads to incompetence, jobs-worth-ness and general fuckwittery.
As soon as this causes someone an actual problem and not
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
"Google is well known for their clean Web design, using open standards."
The first part of that sentence makes sense; the second part does not. I responded to the notion that Google uses "open standards" with a remark that Google's web site does not adhere to any published standard of which I'm aware. I understand and agree with the notion that standards for standards' sake is a stupid pursuit, but one should not credit Google with an achievement the
Re:Google using microsoft technology? (Score:2)
Yes, I'm aware of what Mono is. There is also an ASP module for Apache. What does this have to do with the discussion at hand? The servers in question are almost certainly running IIS based upon the profiling mentioned in this thread and than means closed source servers. This is pretty different for Google. Further they are server up ASP which is a pretty big change fro AJAX. These facts indicate that this site is anomalous, hence the comment and the speculation.
strange stuff (Score:1, Interesting)
Looks like a special Orkut server mixed with Google stuff. The nike reference seems casual.
Superb marketing! - NO "gsports.com" (Score:2)
No "gsports.com" for Google Sports instead they use "joga.com". The 'g' in joga stands for Google like Gmail stands for Google Mail!
Oh you marketing overlords I am at your service.....
Re:Superb marketing! - NO "gsports.com" (Score:2)
I mean, we wouldn't want any confusion between that and G-Sports, would we?
Also, note that this service does not have Americans as its primary target market... so why use the English word "sport"? How about G-Deportes?
Obligatory sweatshop reference (Score:2, Flamebait)
New tagline (Score:5, Funny)
Re:New tagline (Score:2)
Considering that the site is .aspx, I'd rather replace that final l with tse.
Fortunately (for them), the site is invite-only for now, and the login technology seems to be Google Accounts based (i.e. not .asp).
Does anyone else think (Score:1, Flamebait)
- Andrew
Re:Does anyone else think (Score:2)
How do you pronounce that? (Score:1)
Re:How do you pronounce that? (Score:2)
If they got the name JOGA from the portuguese verb JOGAR (== to play), you can say JOH-GA, with an very open sound.
Re:How do you pronounce that? (Score:2)
Keep up the good work!!!
Re:How do you pronounce that? (Score:2)
At least use proper grammar.
How much easier to spell than a 4 letter word that contains two consonants and two vowels, and no 'i before e' or silent letters?
If this were actaully an english word it would probably be in a grade 2 spelling book. In fact, it is probably in grade 2 spelling books across Portugal and Brazil.
Google getting into bed with Nike.... (Score:5, Funny)
Commericials will be changed forever.
[OPENING SHOT. CAMERA PANS OVER GREYING, SLIGHTLY ROTUND GENTLEMAN CALMLY TYPING AT HIS COMPUTER. HE IS SITTING AT HIS DESK, IN A SUNLIT HOME OFFICE. IT IS EARLY MORNING AND THE EXTERIOR SHOWS WAVES CALMY IMPACTING AGAINST THE SURF]
[VOICEOVER (John Lithgow)] : Meet David Random. Today David will walk a total of twenty-five feet. But just because he'll barely get out of his chair doesn't mean he won't be active. David will correspond with thousands of people, write seven hundred lines of code, recompile his kernel, download five Styx CDs, and write a major post in his blog. All the while, he won't miss a second of the Brazil-Argentina Futbol game. How will he do this? David utilizes the power of Google/Nike.
[THE MAN LEANS BACK IN HIS OFFICE CHAIR, PUTTING HIS HANDS OVER HIS HEAD AND SMILING]
[VOICEOVER] : With Google/Nike, you'll never need to visit more than one website... that would be like needlessly running around... [THE MAN LEANS BACK TOO FAR, FALLING TO THE GROUND IN AN EXPLOSION OF PAPER, COFFEE, AND OFFICE SUPPLIES]
[VOICEOVER] :
[FADE TO BLACK, SHOWING THE GOOGLE/NIKE LOGO AND THE SLOGON : "Google/Nike, we own you."]
[WOMANS VOICE] : David? You ok?
Where's the nerd stuff? (Score:3, Insightful)
Is Google still geeky enough for it to "matter" for us, even when their products and services doesn't mean anything at all besides that their servers are rolling?
Joga = Boobs (Score:2)
Shake'n'Bake Social Network (Score:2, Funny)
Definition (Score:2, Informative)
here's how i imagine this works... (Score:2)
Joga invite (Score:3, Interesting)
"Joga is unique, because it's an organically growing network of trusted friends. It is one of a kind network that focuses solely on a common interest around the game of soccer. Joga will help you connect to people who share the same passion for the game and also access exclusive content around athlete profiles, video clips and photos.
If you know someone who is a Joga member, he or she can invite you to join as well. If you don't know a Joga member, you will still be able to join the network by visiting www.joga.com.
We look forward to having you join us in the Joga community."
Uhm, ok, so I have to find someone who is on Orkut/Joga to even get into the community? But how can I find someone if I can't get into the community to do a search?
Then I recall that Gmail account invites were for sale on eBay, and sure enough, you can get Orkut on eBay [ebay.com]. It's only a matter of time before Joga account invites are available on eBay.
Anyway, if you have a Joga account, I'd love an invite. My first dot last name @ google.com.
What is truly interesting about Joga (Score:2, Insightful)
How many of you will go to a site because of a tv advertisement? Probably quite a few, given my audience. Compare that number though to the amount of people who would join a website/visit a website after recieving an invitation from someone you know. Many more.
It works on two levels:
1. We trust our friends/acquaintances more than other forms of advertising, word of mouth advertising, viral advertising, virulent memes a
Not soccer... (Score:3, Informative)
open source social networking? (Score:2)
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:3, Informative)
Defense isn't always a bad thing, the same people that tell you soccer is too defensive will rave about shutout pitching in baseball and redzone defense in American football.
I thought soccer would catch on here once the national team started beating legitimate countries, but they've been very good for years now (currently ranked 5th by FIFA) and still nobody cares.
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:2)
FIFA rankings are as accurate as a tarot card reading. The way points are calculated is flawed. If a lower ranking team beats a higher ranking team in an important game, they get a score multiplier (1.5 to 2.0, or something like that). It's the same if the last place New York Yankees beat the top spot Boston Red Sox and instead of their 2 points for the standing they get 4 because the rangers were a better team. Not to mention previous year scores also count. As if the Red Sox
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:2)
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:2, Interesting)
I agree that a draw in a playoff shouldn't be resolved via penalty kicks, that's awful. I'm for the golden goal, but for some reason it didn't success..
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:2)
Not many people have the endurance to keep running up and downfield for a long time. A football game is 90 minutes plus 30 minutes extra time (if needed). Running up and down 120 minutes is very tiering, and there are genuine health concerns why the FIFA doesn't extend extra time.
The problem with penalty kicks is that they are random. No skill involved. Ironic
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:3, Informative)
Soccer IS catching on in the US.
It's the fastest growing sport in the US.
It's also the world's most popular sport.
Why is baseball the favorite sport in the US?
Because we're a bunch of lazy turds who like
to stand around doing nothing. That's baseball.
Tell me that you actually consider a baseball
play an athlete and I'll laugh at you.
Play a real sport: soccer.
Your generalizing that "we" think soccer is a bad
sport, etc.. is just that: generalizing.
Get out of the house and away from th
Re:Soccer sucks! QWZX (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't let the erratic scoring system fool you, American football is very low scoring, and has touchdowns no more often than soccer has goals. Didn't the latest superbowl have only four touchdowns in four hours? Maybe if a goal in soccer was worth twelve points you'd think it was more interesting?
You neglect the fact that a low scoring game makes the scoring much more interesting, notice how a goal in soccer is a massive event, whereas scoring in basketball is completely irrelevent? A defense-orientated game is much more tactically interesting than where teams score every time they go forwards.
Do you know why Soccer doesn't catch on in the US?
Do you know why baseball doesn't catch on in Nigeria? The answer is just as irrelevent and uninteresting. For the record, more Americans play soccer than gridiron, which is largely just watched on TV. So much for American football being a 'sport', unless in America watching TV counts as a sport.
You know that in America, when talking about a sporting event, people spend more time talking about the adverts, sponsors TV channels, half-time shows, announcers etc than they do the actual game? That just about says it all.
We know that soccer sucks, because we have sports to compare them to.
You know that other countries also have other sports? Some countries even play baseball and basketball, and are actually better at it than Americans. But then in other countries, sport is about sport, it's not just a TV circus.
but almost every child here plays soccer. We know soccer. We just know that it's a bad sport.
They play it even though it's a bad sport? If it was that bad, why aren't all the kids playing gridiron instead? Maybe they've been brought up with the American ethic that gridiron is something to be watched on TV rather than played.
The solution? I've always thought that widening the goals posts would do a lot for the sport.
Yeah, that just about reinforces the stereotype of Americans having low attention spans. The only thing your idea would do is to dumb down the game to make it appeal to Americans, but we don't want people like you watching the game. We want people interested in the sport, not a Hollywood-style Entertainment Spectacle with cheerleaders and half-time shows, where the sport itself is just a sideshow.
Ever been to an NBA game? They have to pipe music over the tannoy throughout the entire game otherwise all the fans fall asleep. Great sport that eh?
Soccer has potential
If being the out and out, undisputed biggest and most popular game in the world is 'potential', then what exactly is the finished product? A few niche sports played almost entirely in North America?
Re:Barefoot soccer (Score:2)
Does any Soccer or Rugby player actually drink Coors?
Re:Curious (Score:2)
As for baseball, well it's supposedly pretty damn big in the Carribean and Latin America.
See Also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_hockey [wikipedia.org], which points out that you have to have ice to play.