AOL Canada To Offer VoIP 130
Lev13than writes "The Globe and Mail reports that AOL Canada will today announce plans to launch a VoIP service, starting with Toronto and expanding to the rest of the country by the end of March. It will be the first AOL unit to sell VoIP anywhere in the world. "TotalTalk" will sell for $30 a month after a three-month discount, including unlimited local calling, 60 minutes of North American long distance, call display, call waiting, three-way calling and call forwarding. A premium service that includes 1,000 minutes a month of North American long-distance time will sell for $45 a month after a three-month rebate.
In comparison, Bell service in Toronto costs about $50/month for similar features and a few hours of Canada-only long distance. I wonder if this will be available over AOL Dial-up?"
In comparison, Bell service in Toronto costs about $50/month for similar features and a few hours of Canada-only long distance. I wonder if this will be available over AOL Dial-up?"
In what currency, though? (Score:3, Interesting)
$24USD sounds more in line with what US based VoIP companies like Lingo [lingo.com] charge.
Re:In what currency, though? (Score:1)
Did you think that Canadian companies bill their customers in foreign currencies? Do you figure that Canadian newspapers quote US dollars in their Canadian stories?
Arawak
Re:In what currency, though? (Score:2)
Also, the official news release can be found here [marketnews.ca].
Re:In what currency, though? (Score:1)
For cost of living stuff, don't bother converting. That would give you a better idea of what the true cost is relative to salary.
For example, DSL is $30 USD in US, $30 CND in Canada.
Re:In what currency, though? (Score:2)
AOL Dial-up? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:AOL Dial-up? (Score:2)
It's not like, everyone uses broadband because it's available everywhere.
Re:AOL Dial-up? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Dial-up? (Score:2)
Bullshit. I live in a village of less than 1000 people. Cable modems have been here for a few years and DSL is coming soon. Smaller places already have DSL because we already had access to cable modems. The only places that don't have high speed access are truly rural areas that are too far from the CO. That'll probably change once wireless starts to be rolled out.
Try and ex
Re:AOL Dial-up? (Score:1)
>having a higher penetration (i.e. available in
>more areas), it's because the Canadian
>population is more urban-centered than America.
Actually there is almost no difference between the two countrys regarding urban VS rural. The only recent statistic I could find pegs the US at 75% and Canada at 77%. Not a huge difference in that regard.
>"Rural" Canadians have no higher access to
>broadband than Rural Americans. It's just
>percentage wise,
On dialup? (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, but only if you talk very s..l..o..w..l..y..
Re:On dialup? (Score:1)
Re:On dialup? (Score:1)
How about inf minutes for $0? (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm also considering buying an IP phone. Both options have a $0 monthly subscription cost and $0 for infinity minutes if I make calls to other IP phones or PC clients (as is the case for most of my overseas relatives).
The tech "savvier" will always beat the curve.
Re:How about inf minutes for $0? (Score:2)
Re:How about inf minutes for $0? (Score:2)
True, when it doesn't work it doesn't work at all, though I've only had 1 call in my first week of usage that was not usable...about the same as my cell phone.
Re:How about inf minutes for $0? (Score:1)
Re:How about inf minutes for $0? (Score:1)
Cheaper from Comwave (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Cheaper from Comwave (Score:1)
http://broadband.spectravoice.com/index.php [spectravoice.com]
$21.99 CA$
- Unlimited local calling
- 500 Minutes North American Long Distance
- All features included (Voice Mail, Voice Email, Call Display... etc)
- Jeff
AOL Canada? (Score:3)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:2)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:2)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:4, Funny)
Chris Mattern
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:2)
Company names are brand identities that can't be shifted as easily as the winds: there's a reason why 20th Century Fox isn't now 21st Century Fox, the BBC's overseas operations are still branded BBC, etc, etc.
ummm... no. (Score:1)
Sorry to pick nits, but shouldn't it be COL?
Ummm... no. You know, America is the name of a continent.
I give you a few examples for countries on this continent: Brazil, Canada, Chile, Mexico, the USA (United States of America).
Re:ummm... no. (Score:1)
So we merged with South America?
NAOL (Score:1)
So we merged with South America?
Ah, I didn't know it's actually North Ameriacan Online (NAOL).
Re:ummm... no. (Score:1)
Actually, Brazil is part of South America. South and North America are different continents.
I think the classification of continents is kind of arbitrary. E.g., America gets only one ring in the olympic flag.
Geographically, there are good reasons that they're actually two continents.
But then, there are not so many reasons that Europe should be considered a continent...
AOL Germany (Score:1)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:2)
No one uses it though.
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:2)
Re:AOL Canada? (Score:1)
Contrary to popular belief, not all Canadians use AOL.
VoIP over dialup?? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:VoIP over dialup?? (Score:2)
Re:VoIP over dialup?? (Score:1)
Re:VoIP over dialup?? (Score:1)
ALL carriers have a lower upload than DL (by a long shot) except if you are running a T1 or OC. that is the reason of fibre, full bandwidth both ways.
Re:VoIP over dialup?? (Score:2)
BTW, my cell phone won't work out there unless pointed in a partic
Re:VoIP over dialup?? (Score:1)
VoIP over dialup... umm, NO!!!! (Score:1, Interesting)
local calling? (Score:1)
Maybe they just have better deals with the Toronto telcos.
Re:local calling? (Score:1)
The traffic will be carried over their national fibre network - has nothing to do with a 'local' telco...
Not the best price (Score:1)
For example, I use Lingo (http://www.lingo.com) and pay $20 for unlimited calls inside the US and to a few places in Western Europe. Mainly I just call the U.K., and had 6200 minutes logged there last month. And the company that owns lingo (Primus) isn't too tiny either...not that I'm saying AOL is.
Crossing AOL, Canada, and voice communications? (Score:1)
Golly gee, I can see that already.
*ring ring*
(luser A picks up)
Rip Off, total (Score:4, Insightful)
This is timeless though, a technology is proposed, supposedly it will revolutionize the field for which it has been concieve because it is so unexpensive, so cheap. A company launch the service with the new technology and instead of the consummer paying less it's the company that makes more profit, VOIP, banking machines...
capitalism really sucks
Re:Rip Off, total (Score:1)
Re:Rip Off, total (Score:2)
If you want to 'call' someone using the Internet only, use one of the free programs out there or Skype and just call them.
Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:3, Insightful)
1) Voice over IP should cost LESS not a bit less, it's not like they have to built a network or something
How much do you know about running a VOIP business? Have you been running models that demonstrate the enormous cost difference? I bet if you did, you'd notice that ISP-level providers generally pay backbone carriers on a flat-rate PLUS a per-byte basis,
Re:Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:2)
Most companies offering cheap long distance to consumers - whether via VOI
Re:Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:1)
You know, I was with you right up to that point. Anyone, and I mean _ANYONE_ who defends the actions of a bank in the 21st century, needs to have their head examined.
Instead of paying a Zillion (tm) dollars a year in staffing wickets, the computer automated 90% of customer interaction. What did the banks do with the newfound savings? Well, they pocketed it of course. And
Re:Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:2)
Well, don't you give them your money to manage it in first place? You still can store it in your mattress and it won't cost you a penny to access it.
I'd rather than say you are yourself arrogant telling them they should not charge you for the service they provide. Perhaps you were never confronted to the situation to need to access your money while being 1000 miles away of your mattress.
And I don't see how they s
Re:Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:2)
Well, don't you give them your money to manage it in first place? You still can store it in your mattress and it won't cost you a penny to access it.
I know that here in Australia at least, if you have a real job (not some shady cash-in-hand arrangement), or even if you're on welfare payments, you need a bank account for the money to be paid into, otherwise you don't get the money.Re:Capitalism is fine. You suck. (Score:2)
See, when you're negotiating bulk traffic like this, you buy based on capacity and availability, not on a per-line basis like a consumer would. You can get asymmetric service.
Re:Rip Off, total (Score:2)
All the major providers measure bandwidth in and out of their networks, the differences are settled something like once a month.
packet 8 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:packet 8 (Score:1)
They don't offer local termination in Canada. Sure I could get an american phone number and call people in Canada, but what good is that?
So far right now the Canadian competition is:
Primus TalkBroadband [primustel.ca] (19.95 for free local calls and 300 minutes to Can and US, 911 available everywhere).
Yak Communications [yak.com] (1000 mins to can, us, china, hong kong, free local calls, for 19.95 USD + 31 set up fee + 1 year contract! BOOOO!)
Vonag [vonage.ca]
Re:packet 8 (Score:1)
Re:packet 8 (Score:1)
WebCall [webcall.ca]
A little more expensive than most, and very limited area for local numbers (Alberta and BC) though you can sign up from anywhere.
Disclaimer: I do work for SaskTel which owns Navigata (who provides WebCall). I've done some work on the service. One thing I like about the webcall setup is the fact that you plug a regular phone into it. Not sure how many other VoIP providers do this - I'm sure some do
Re:packet 8 (Score:1)
Every single one of the providers listed in the parents post allow this.
I was going to ask you about some information regarding webcall, ie how does their service compare to that of others, but apparently you've no experience in this area.
Also, this webcall service sucks really huge. 29.95 for 400 minutes with no 911, and no phone number porting! Not only is that MORE EXPENSIVE than a regular POTS line with a winback pricing pl
Re:packet 8 (Score:1)
Yes, it is expensive. Webcall wasn't launched to be a major competitor in the market. It was launched to get SaskTel IN the market. There's a lot of
Couldn't resist... (Score:1)
Re:Couldn't resist... (Score:1, Informative)
Crazy americans.....
Dial-up voip=dumb (Score:1)
Vonage in Canada (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Vonage in Canada (Score:1)
Re:Vonage in Canada (Score:1)
Local minutes aren't free. 500 minutes means 500 minutes.
Check out:
http://broadband.spectravoice.com/index.php
$21.99 - Unlimited Local, 911 service, Voice Mail, Voice Email, etc... etc... etc...
-Jeff
Re:Vonage in Canada (Score:1)
That's their very base plan ($19.95). They also offer free in province and 500 min. north america for $34.99. - 500 minutes means 500 minutes!
Rogers has the best deal, if you're their customer (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Rogers has the best deal, if you're their custo (Score:2)
Not the first AOL unit (Score:1, Insightful)
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20
They've been running commercials for it in Houston for months.
CDs everywhere again (Score:3, Funny)
aol.CA (Score:2)
Re:aol.CA (Score:2)
They've consciously stuck to AOL in most contexts for a long time, and in the UK at least that is what most users recognise them as. I don't think many users in Europe at least think of AOL as any more USA centric than other US owned services sold here.
Re:aol.CA (Score:1)
Primus Canada VOIP (Score:1)
That's not cheap! What about babyTEL? (Score:1)
Strange that they're not mentioned in the article - they're the third-largest provider in Canada, after Vonage and Primus. I use them myself and can't get enough of them, after some nasty experiences with Vonage.
Re:That's not cheap! What about babyTEL? (Score:1)
Doesn't sound too good to me. (Score:2)
Comparison of VOIP providers? (Score:2)
- Background noise that starts before you even dial (coming from the linksys VOIP router I guess)
- Significantly more lag than a normal phone line - perhaps 500ms vs. 100ms or less for a normal phone line
- One person talking often cuts out the other person talking - I want to say that it is sort of 'single duplex' but there are definite
Re:Comparison of VOIP providers? (Score:1)
Dial-up (Score:1)
I hope that was a joke!
Bell Canada rolling out VOIP soon instead of POTS (Score:1)
The Bells Strike Back (Score:2)
What's to prevent the traditional phone companies from rolling out their own VoIP services? They have all they infrastructure for regular phones and DSL, so why not? They could see whether VoIP start-ups are successful, and roll back the curtain on a whole new secretly-installed VoIP infrastructure.
The Problem is... (Score:1)
So, unless you have a cable modem, this isn't even a viable option.
What we need up here are worthy competitors in the DSL market.
Available Over Dialup?? (Score:1)
What about bandwidth? VoIP starts at around 30kB for a modestly decent signal. 50kB for solid, better than any phone, 90kB you're talking mid-nineties motorola single-cel along the ocean (no interference from the mainland, low mid-tones, breathy audio)... Dialup? Never.
What did you say, it sounded like crackle, burp, hiss? Oh, my email client was polling the mail server, oops. That's exactly what happens with a dsl connection and VoIP set to 30kB. At 90kB on a twice-as-fat pipe, it's stunning, not a landli
Re:Costs (Score:1, Interesting)
If I make a phone call from my VoIP phone to a regular land-line phone, then at some point my provider has to dial a real number on their end and connect me. The more I talk, the more I'm using one of their modems, or PBX cards, or whatever (I'm not an expert), which means they have to have more equipment to service my needs. Multiply this by thousands of users and it does cost them more.
Charg
Re:Costs (Score:2)
What is funny is the fact that a local call is pretty much arbitrary. You could be in Vancouver or Tokyo, order the service and say you are local to anywhere you damn well please.
Re:Costs (Score:2, Interesting)