P2P Contact Info Service From Napster Co-Founder 117
scrm writes "Plaxo is an interesting new service from Sean Parker, co-founder of Napster. It's a P2P-based add-on to Outlook that confronts the old problem of keeping contact lists up-to-date. Mozilla mail support is on the cards, and yes, the company does 'take privacy very seriously'. Check the press here(1), here(2) and here(3). You can also access your contact list over the web."
Damn! (Score:2)
Trust factor (Score:3, Insightful)
Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
If the P2P element of this is written correctly, then all your doing is sending out a request for data and having validated data returned, just like a web service. You only receive data you request, and you only return data that you've approved the request for. Period.
While I can see that you're worried about Outlook itself, most holes in it are the result of scripting vulnerabilities
Re:Why? (Score:1)
Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)
>> zero trust factor for Napster...
Do you not care about your business? Try Eudora [eudora.com], because friends don't let friends use Outlook.
As for zero trust for napster, thats great, this isn't Napster, nor is it Napster 2.0.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
You run one of the most unstable and insecure pieces of software available, trusting that it won't infect your entire network with the "Outlook Worm of the Week" (tm), yet you won't trust a piece of software just to do address book searches? Wow, that's pretty stupid.
especially since plaxo cracks your outlook passwrd (Score:4, Insightful)
"Plaxo contains a hack that mines your Outlook profile password so that it can retrieve your contacts unhindered. Although Plaxo claims that it does nothing with your password once it retrieves your contacts, I don't like this, because it makes child's play out of accessing passwords;"
So not only are they mining your personal data for later resale to the highest bidder, they're compromising your machine while they're at it!
But, really, they respect you and your privacy. Really.
Re:especially since plaxo cracks your outlook pass (Score:1)
Re:especially since plaxo cracks your outlook pass (Score:2)
"I was wrong about Plaxo's supposed ability to break your Outlook password. Company officials confirm that it doesn't do that. I was misinformed, and I apologize for passing along erroneous information."
errr.....right (Score:5, Funny)
Re:errr.....right (Score:3)
Re:errr.....right (Score:1)
Re:errr.....right (Score:1)
Re:errr.....right (Score:1)
geek gear [wabshirts.com]
Finally good legal P2P use (Score:1, Flamebait)
I think this is a first!
Good ideas --
Good for them and the everyone else.
Everyone can use benefits of P2P and not even know it
Really, I'm looking forward to this!
Pfft... (Score:5, Funny)
Good point... (Score:1, Interesting)
Given that, there's no reason why you could write a simple application creating a directory of contact names for all your MP3's and attaching the relevant files. You could even add tag info using custom fields too.
Now whether this P2P system allows you to transfer custom fields remains to be seen - I'd wager a big no on that one. But
Madster (Score:1)
But someday someone is gonna figure out that the best way to share files is with people you know, which means people in your address book. Build a P2P system on that and you're sorted.
Want contact list based P2P file sharing? Try Madster [madster.com].
It's good the company takes privacy seriously (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's good the company takes privacy seriously (Score:3, Insightful)
Hey, what could possibly go wrong?
Re:good the company takes obSimpsons seriously (Score:2)
READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY (Score:5, Insightful)
"In the event Plaxo goes through a business transition, such as a merger, acquisition or the sale of a portion of its assets, Your Information and your membership in the Plaxo Contact Networks(TM) will, in most instances, be part of the assets transferred. You will be notified of an ownership change pursuant to Notification of Changes section of the privacy statement."
See that? They consider your information to be an asset. So, I wonder how long they're going to farm data before selling themselves to doubleclick? Imagine how valuable that data will be. Your surfing habits, matched with your personal information, matched with the personal information and surfing habits of all your 1st-degree friends, and all your friends' friends...
(Also notice that Plaxo (purposely) makes its full privacy policy difficult to link. It's a javascript popup)
Re:READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY (Score:2)
Couple that with a user-installed back-door straight into your email program and all the data held within:
You really want this email right now, and it should pop-up over everything else and should not be filtered out under any circumstances!
Re:READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY (Score:1)
they're up to something.. for sure.
i think i got it.. they're trying to take over the world. call 911!
geek gear [wabshirts.com]
Re:READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY (Score:3)
here's a quote from the article:
"Plaxo contains a hack that mines your Outlook profile password so that it can retrieve your contacts unhindered."
isn't this circumventing a security device?
wouldn't this qualify as punishable under the DMCA?
Re:READ THEIR PRIVACY POLICY (Score:2)
#2 "I was wrong about Plaxo's supposed ability to break your Outlook password. Company officials confirm that it doesn't do that. I was misinformed, and I apologize for passing along erroneous information." [pcmag.com]
P2P add-on to Outlook? (Score:1, Funny)
this is such an obviouse attempt (Score:1)
Re:this is such an obviouse attempt (Score:1)
Only problem is that on Outlooks that are connected to MS Exchange servers like mine, it slows it down to a crawl. I've no idea what it's doing with so much bandwidth - I think it checks my entire address book against the 300 addresses I have in Plaxo every time I o
Re:this is such an obviouse attempt (Score:1)
there is an easter egg in there that allows for MP3 sharing.
the screenshots (Score:1)
Re:the screenshots (Score:1)
<div style="pedantic: 100%; offtopic: yes;">
The file name extension isn't relevant, the Content-Type HTTP header is. (Or, in case of Internet Explorer, the file contents, which is Wrong and Comdemnable!) My browser can read dynamic web pages just fine even when it sees odd file extensions like .pl or .php or .cgi or .aspx, or, as I prefer my own mod_perl apps, no file name extension at all.
</div<
Not new (Score:1, Informative)
Privacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Worst of all, Plaxo users upload their contact lists containing personal information about others. That is without their acknowledgement.
Re:Privacy (Score:3)
Phonebook? (Score:1)
Interesting, but frightening... (Score:3, Interesting)
It is unique in that it has the possibility of accomodating users across mail services, platforms, and other traditional barriers.
However, being the paranoid schizo that I am, I can't imagine I would ever subscribe to or accomodate such a service. Not to be a conspiracy theorist, but such a centralized system has an incredible ability to be abused by sources internal and external.
Nice idea. But so is RFID for every human.
justen
Re:Interesting, but frightening... (Score:2)
Say you meet someone you think can help your career and you exchange business cards (say, oh, i don't know, the CEO of Media Lab Europe). When you get back to the office, maybe you enter his data into your PIM, maybe you don't. In either case the contact loop ends there (more or less).
Now lets say you have Plaxo. Now you have a mechansim that not only keeps you up to date on his cont
Re:Interesting, but frightening... (Score:1)
by the way, friendster is not a good place to pick up chicks
geek gear [wabshirts.com]
Sweetness (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks Plaxo!
Yawn (Score:5, Informative)
worms.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Wait for the next MS worm that can use this software to spread faster than ever. Woo!
Distributing your address list (Score:4, Funny)
Rus
Why bother build something new from scratch? (Score:2)
Re:Why bother build something new from scratch? (Score:2)
Cardscan Accucard (Score:5, Informative)
Cardscan's Accucard [corex.com] already does this- and has for quite some time. When you scan a card, you get the option to add it to Accucard, and the owner of the card(provided they have an email address) gets an email asking if the info is correct and if they'd like to keep their info up to date in the future. Any future copies of their card that get scanned automatically get the new info, I believe.
This is important, because Corex(makers of Cardscan) already have one big thing the P2P companies don't- they have their foot in the door already with their Cardscan units, which are owned by people who need this service the most- sales people and the like. It's like trying to sell gas to car owners, the two just go together. While some sales people may have P2P software on their systems, it's unlikely given the crackdown on p2p apps by many companies....and they're not about to put client information into some two-bit p2p program.
This isn't P2P (Score:3, Interesting)
P2P usually implies a bit more distributed networking. Either completely distributed (and unworkable) like the original Gnutella, or mostly distributed with SuperNodes like Kazaa, eDonkey, and the new Gnutella. Napster was always a client->server metainfo server.
--
Re:This isn't P2P (Score:2)
Add it to your spam filters (Score:4, Interesting)
If some kid had written this in his spare time, it would be called a virus. Because Plaxo is a company, it's called an innovative application. There are several other startups all doing the same thing (search on Google), and when they go bankrupt their privacy polices will mean nothing.
Re:Add it to your spam filters (Score:1)
I feel complaint about privacy that are cited above reflect a lack of time and attention spent to reading how Plaxo works. I am not affiliated with them, but I was developing a similar tool when I saw that they were far ahead and had ALL the right ideas either in-place or on their futures list.
My embrace of Plaxo is provisional at the moment.
Plaxo is not fully "there yet", but I
Foaf already is similar (Score:4, Informative)
Furthermore, using PGP, trust values could be assigned to the information.
- Serge Wroclawski
Re:Foaf already is similar (Score:1)
Re:Foaf already is similar (Score:2)
Yes it stinks but it's the only reasonable anti-spam measure that works right now.
- Serge
P2P-based add-on to Outlook (Score:2)
No chance of virus or worms here. I guess it will be installed by the same people who wonders if dropping a lighter into your cars gas tank could cause any problems.
P2P Vs Spam (Score:2)
Of course this also could lock in email where if you dont use the product then you cant send to any of your friends or new people becuase they're trashing everything else. It would be better if this was a Open Source project where it would be more of a guarrentee that it's available to all operating systems.
P2P in calendaring is not the P2P you think (Score:4, Informative)
For instance Exchange, until a few versions ago was considered P2P, because all it did was store the outlook calendar info. I have never managed exchange but I believe people who have for a while may remember a time when you use to be able to use calendar on outlook without exchange. This has changed recently ( I've been investigating calendar apps and that was what I was told )
At any rate; If you create an application that uses IMAP to store the calendar info in a special calendar folder, and you have the clients themselves check and resolve conflicts, then your calendar app is P2P.
I'm guessing they're applying the same definition to addressing as well.
Re:P2P in calendaring is not the P2P you think (Score:1)
If you ever find such a thing, please let us know! IMAP calendars would be a magical thing!
AKA Yahoo Address Book (Score:2)
Fundamental flaw with plaxo (Score:2, Interesting)
About a month ago, a note showed up in my inbox saying:
> Hi [my name], [plaxo user's name] wants to
> make sure that he has the correct address
> information for you. Please take a moment to
> fill out the following form.
It really pissed me off that a friend of mine would send me an automated message rather than a quick note.
To those who don't see the annoyance, imagine that someone you knew had their secretary call to ask you for the s
Re:Fundamental flaw with plaxo (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Fundamental flaw with plaxo (Score:1)
no manual entry for here (Score:1)
No manual entry for here in section 3
Thanks for the offer... (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't care how much time this saves how many people, it's a fundamentally bad idea that will only at to the overall dehumanization of the internet.
In the last few years, email has quite reasonably overtaken traditional mail as the dominant form of written communication. The consequences have been numerous, but tolerable up until this point. Programs of this nature are one thing in the business world, but when companies start to market this "s
Other good Outlook add-ons (Score:1)
Providing through LDAP (Score:2)
The problem is that most mail clients have a pretty crummy LDAP implementation: they don't support user logins (so you could only offer one global directory - bad idea), LDAP+SSL or writing changes to the directory.
*sigh* Still so far from my dream PIM setup.
NO NO NO!!! Bad!! (Score:5, Informative)
One person in another part of the company installed it, and it emailed everyone in his contact list without asking, apparently. Two people under me showed me the email and asked about it; I did some research and decided that it sounded not only like a virus, but definitely against company policy as departmental contact info is sent outside the company.
Here is a rather critical article about Plaxo, followed by an update after speaking with the Plaxo people:
PCMag Article by Bill Machrone [pcmag.com]
Follow-up article that backs off a bit [pcmag.com]
I don't trust it, and it sounds like it would violate every large company information policy in existence.
The irony is that my company has an LDAP directory that each of these people use everyday, so WTF are they doing with a contact manager?
A Text File is My Contacts (Score:1)
1. an online account for storage.
2. a plain text editor.
3. the clipboard is my friend.
Other than those three things, I need no floppy disk, no LDAP, no Outlook, no Mozilla, no proprietary format, no software incompatibilities, nothing like that.
I n
This is nothing new (Score:1)
Turn it around and get rid of spam... (Score:1)
How much does Mozilla know about you? (Score:2)
Has it found your driver's license number yet? Your social security number? Your credit card numbers? Your birthdate? Your mother's maiden name? Click on "Personal" and see what it knows about you. Mozilla silently collects that info.
All that juicy info, just waiting there for an exploit that
Plaxo is Banned-o (Score:2)
They muttered something about customer contact info being confidential information...go figure.
It's good idea but unfortunately (Score:1)
check www.onepin.com
My Experience : Companies won't allow it (Score:1)
A much greater risk is
googlize (Score:2)
Accessing contacts unhindered (Score:2)
So? I can access the contacts in Pine by just reading a plain text file. No hack required.
Having said all that, I like the idea of having my contacts kept updated. I thought about writing something that did a mass email to my contacts with their details asking them to correct anything that is wrong.
An electronic solution would be substantially more elegant but I'm wary of using Plaxo. Any su
Third time's the charm? Color me skeptical (Score:1)
P2P teledildonics (Score:1)
Teledildonics [teledildonics.com]? You mean like F__kU-F__kMe [fu-fme.com]? That'd be an interesting P2P application.
Re:Applications for P2P (Score:1)
Normally you'd need high-speed broadband for this kind of thing.
What really needs to be transmitted in a sexual intercourse simulation? The current number of millimeters of penetration at any given instant, sampled a couple dozen times a second? That wouldn't take too much bandwidth, but I can see where latency issues would come into play.
Re:Applications for P2P (Score:2, Insightful)
Still, I have no idea how much bandwidth haptic data would consume. Like, how much data is sent to your brain each millisecond by your nerves when someone blows ... hot air across the thousands of tiny hairs on your neck? (I feel an offtopic mod is due).
--