

EC Dumps Open Source Conference 103
jaruz writes "MERIT is no longer organising the conference on the topic of Open Standards and Libre Software in Government at UNESCO Paris, November 24-26, 2003. Until now, MERIT was responsible for the logistics and through the FLOSSPOLS project, EC funding for the conference. This is now wholly withdrawn. They 'have taken this decision in consultation with the European Commission, whose support for this conference was earlier being provided through the proposed FLOSSPOLS project at MERIT.'"
Re:Get bent (Score:1)
Sounds like... (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like... (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like... (Score:1)
And we're not alone - from what I know, there are plenty of FS-companies in germany and some in the other EU countries too (hm, in my town in Sweden, I thenk there are 5 or so FS-based buissnesses).
The only ones NOT wanting this are US companies like M$...
What is thier reason? (Score:2)
$omebody $poke to the UN about it... (Score:2)
Huh? (Score:4, Insightful)
It is true (Score:1)
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
Gerv
Confirm - received the same email. (Score:2)
Having said that, it could be a bizarrely accurate spam as I didn't trace the mail back
Re:Microsoft must be behind it! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Microsoft must be behind it! (Score:2)
Re:Microsoft must be behind it! (Score:1)
(don't forget to grab his wire hat before you flip him to the Grays...
It's all greek to me... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It's all greek to me... (Score:1)
Re:from MERIT's front page (Score:2)
Looks like you are trolling, but I'll bite anyways. By the way, when you have to resort to insults, you know that your argument is weak. If you paid any attention to modern economic theory, you would realize economists do acknowledge there are many external factors. They just do not try to include them in their theory and models because they overly complicate trying to understand what is going on. Remember
Re:from MERIT's front page (Score:1)
More rambling, misguided standard
Way to change the world, buddy.
Where from? (Score:3, Insightful)
This is at least partially correct (Score:5, Interesting)
Originally I had been asked to participate at this conference primarely to talk about recent work in developing free software solutions built around GNU Bayonne to enable e-government access for the blind. I knew they were having some type of difficulty with sponsorship and funding. I think it is unfortunate this happened, but I have seen no facts to indicate what precisely had gone wrong, although I am naturally curious.
David
Re:This is at least partially correct (Score:1)
Too many acronoymns ...What the hell are you sayin (Score:1)
Can you story submitters please speak some damn english !
DAMN == Don't Argue Mookie News.
The Future of Open Source Software (Score:1, Funny)
What is the future of Open Source and Free Software? I asked myself that very question because Open Source and Free Software is the most revolutionary movement today. It is changing everything.
To answer this question I went to slashdot.org, this website, since slashdot is known across the internet when it comes to Open Source and Free Software. I read the stories and the comments. I read the comments at the -1 threshold because I wanted to read real people's opinions and knowledge on Open Source and F
Switch suppliers! (Score:2)
Libre software? (Score:1)
Re:Libre software? (Score:1, Informative)
"Free", in English, is confusing; does one mean free as in cost or free as in freedom? "Libre"/Livre (Spanish) has no such immediate ambiguity; although, since the Air France lavortories advertise themselves as "Libre" when available also, I
Re:Libre software? (Score:3, Interesting)
"libre" = free as in speech, but also available (as in seats, meeting rooms, restrooms, parking spaces, timeslots, and yes, girls ...)
"gratuit" = free as in beer
If you see "gratuit" on a restroom door, you'd be in Belgium. Indeed, in Belgium most public restrooms charge a small admission fee, and it's worth pointing out if one doesn't
Re:Libre software? (Score:1)
Checking my Larousse dictionnary, all connotations of the French "Libre" relate to freedom but the one you mention. This particular connotation applies to what is not busy or not held up by something/someone. This connotation could be translated by "
Re:Libre software? (Score:2, Informative)
'Libre' in French only means free as in freedom and not free as in free beer. It is
Re:Libre software? (Score:1)
Re:Libre software? (Score:2)
"Frei" usually means free, as in speech, whereas "umsonst" (or sometimes, "gratis") means free as in beer.
However there is one notable exception: Freibier!
Re:Libre software? (Score:2)
Why "umsonst" and not "kostenlos" though?
Re:Libre software? (Score:1)
Why "umsonst" and not "kostenlos" though?
To me, at least, "kostenlos" (literally: without cost) implies really not having any cost at all. That is not true even of most free software: While you have to pay nothing to obtain the software, you still have to administer it, and that costs you. So kostenlos would be TCO==0.
Re:Libre software? (Score:1)
But "libre software" is just clunky. How about "software libre", or even "software libre!" - preferably accompanied with a rum and coke?
Libre software? You betcha (Score:1)
Most Americans already know that the Spanish word "gratis" (no cost) would translate into English as free. Funny that became better known before "libre", the Spanish word (and probably other romance languages) for "free as in freedom" that would unfortunately also just
Re:Slashdot is a bunch of ho's (Score:1)
Hey kiddo, did your mummy pay for that low Slashdot ID when you bought it on eBay?
Re:Slashdot is a bunch of ho's (Score:1)
My initial post is a pretty good example of why not to post on Slashdot drunk. People with a life go out on Friday nights.
Still, it is interesting, because that's what I really think.
Makes me wonder why it's my second bookmark on Safari, right after Google.
Oh, and I'm 28. I started reading slashdot after mandrake (mandrake.net) mentioned it on his website.
As Taco's little fun website, it was pretty cool. As a business that targets an audience that uses Internet Explorer,
FLOSSPOLS Project? (Score:2)
EC cleanup? (Score:1)
BTW, typically the EU never tell what particular institution that pays for a project
Good thing (Score:2)
The European institutions are about throwing large amounts of money at people who's only real skill is to be good candidates for large subsidies. I once spent a day in Luxembourg getting information on various EU projects for IT research and development. _Never_ _again_.
Large sums of money, or even the remote promises of large sums of money, do not produce good software nor do they promote good
Re:Good thing (Score:4, Interesting)
But you're right, certain people have come to believe that it's their god-given right to live on public largesse. Others take a more cynical approach and commit blatant fraud to get these subsidies. It's not hard: set up a firm to research, well, cold fusion for instance, and get the inevitable subsidy. Spend lavish amounts of cash on equipment and consultants' fees, which of course you purchase through your other firm (or a friends', if you're careful). When people start expecting results from your research, declare the whole thing a failure and file for bankruptcy. Then start all over again. It's easy and low-risk.
The heart of the problem is lack of oversight of all these EU committies and bureaus, which leads to a tendency for these bodies to bloat and increase their span of control. One way of doing that is, yes, increasing your budget and extending the range of causes you spend it on. The USA has the same problems, though to a lesser extend. Read P.J. O'Rourke if you don't believe me.
Re:Good thing (Score:2)
Re: Good Thing (Score:2)
Wow. Those are probably the most insightful words I have yet to read on this site. Thumbs up.
Inside information (Score:1)
Anyway, poi
EC? (Score:1)
Re:EC? (Score:1)
Re:EC? (Score:2)
New agenda: patent policy (Score:2)
[ EPIP 2 ] Copyright and database protection, patents and research tools, and other challenges to the intellectual property system
Maastricht, November 24-25
On November 24 and 25 of this year a conference will be held at MERIT in Maastricht on the topic "Copyright and database protection, patents andresearch tools, and other challenges to the intellectual property system". This is the second meeting of the EPIP (Europ
Re:New agenda: patent policy (Score:2)
Considering what is found here [threeseas.net] and here? [debian.org] and also here. [freshmeat.net]
Re:New agenda: patent policy (Score:2)
----
Hey look, one of my pet troll is back...
coincidentally Euros folded on Iraq this week (Score:1)
This happened the same week that France and Germany voted in the UN Security Council to approve of US rule in Iraq.
Now Freedom Fries can go back to being called "pommes (de terre) frites" and French Fries.
No more anthrax in Le Gare du Nord, they hope!
I guess.... (Score:2)
(ducks/)
Re:STOP Racism in Open Source Software (Score:2)
I used to feel indecisive too... (Score:2)