Looks like a premature law. There are many cases where you don't want your OS go online.
Who does not want Mr. Gates get his own nukes?
I would want it, then we could finally build a windows subsystem to Linux
Incidentally, the characterisation of ribbon-style interfaces as "modern" or "standard", used by several users, is not based on any objective usability parameter or design principle, but is the result of Microsofts dominance in the market and the huge investments made when the ribbon was introduced in Office 2007 as a new paradigm for productivity software.
Before this, LibreOffice had also criticized its competitor OnlyOffice, accusing it of being "fake open source" because it believes OnlyOffice is working with Microsoft to lock users into the Office ecosystem by prioritizing the formats mentioned earlier instead of LibreOffice's own OpenDocument Format (ODF).
Where is Antitrust law when it really matters?
Maybe European law could chime in?
I am waiting for J.D. Vance to tell the security conference that Microsoft is a worse threat than Iran for censoring Microslop online. This is how tyranny starts.
Furthermore I think it is time for Mr. Nadella to open source windows.
Neither Norway nor US-organisations like the EFF are part of the EU constituency.
The EU Digital Fairness Act proposal will be presented soon and would address exactly that, plus dark patterns.
There is hardly a thing in the world that some man can not make a little worse and sell a little cheaper.