Internet Traffic Still Growing Quickly 164
linuxscrub writes "I guess the previous articles about internet traffic doubling/[time period] being wrong were wrong? A new IDC report states that internet traffic will nearly double annually until 2007. They even use /.'s favorite unit of capacity/storage, the LOC. They predict that internet traffic will be 64,000 LOC/day! Wow, 64000 LOC, that sure sounds impressive!!"
and research shows (Score:5, Funny)
Re:and research shows (Score:2)
Re:and research shows (Score:1)
Tell a non techie (Score:5, Interesting)
And in the article they talk about petabits. Im confused
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:5, Informative)
"the entire printed collection of the Library of Congress amounts to only 10 terabytes of information"
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:1)
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:2)
so that's 3.6LOC's then?
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:3, Informative)
1 000 000 000 000 000 bits
Or roughly a billion megabits (125 million megabytes)
HTH HAND
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:2)
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:2)
Re:Tell a non techie (Score:2)
But seriously a petabit is ~12.8 LOCs.
Nicely written! (Score:5, Informative)
If you're gonna use an obscure acronym three times, write it in full the first time.
Re:Nicely written! (Score:1, Informative)
Also one that's commonly used to mean something else in computer circles (or perhaps I've been spending too long with the suits).
Ahem.... This is what Google tells me (Score:1)
so I took it you meant Lines Of Code?
And it's not even a stable measure! (Score:2)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:4, Funny)
Pointless unit (Score:3, Insightful)
They might as well talk about the total mass of all electrons and photons (you never know) ammounting to the waight of 29 elehpants with the number growing to 30 elephants and two donkeys. Have these people hear of SI units?
Re:Pointless unit (Score:2)
I mean; whenever the order of magnitude difference between things exceeds a threshold (whatever it may be for the person in question; anything from 2 to 6), there is just no way to really put things in perspective, by using silly analogies. And LOC seems like just another such analogy (perhaps even worse than the older "page of text" used instead of kilobyte... assuming 8-bit chars).
Re:Nicely written! (Score:2)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:1)
What's interesting with Capacity (Score:2)
At the same time the price of hard drives and RAM keep falling to record low. Nowadays it is routine to have 1GB of RAM and 100's GB for hard drives, soon we will be counting in TB.
Really it was no wonder that IDC predicted traffic will continue to increase. How could it be otherwise !!! In this view, perhaps the LOC will become the basic term for bandwidth/storage in the long run ?
Re:Nicely written! (Score:2)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:2)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:2)
Somewhere all the internet traffic is being turned into shareware?
Like it makes more sense that this would be put in the Library of Congress. What's the Dewey Decimal for 'Flamebait'?
loc is also line of code (Score:2)
Re:Nicely written! (Score:2)
they use LOC... (Score:5, Funny)
Wow, 64000 LOCs... (Score:5, Funny)
Every tradition has to start somewhere, right?
Re:Wow, 64000 LOCs... (Score:2)
Not as many helloworld.pl's!
I know why... (Score:5, Funny)
over and over and over... guys, there is no command.com on my system. Give it a rest!
Someone wrote one ages ago (Score:2)
- install the necessary MS patch to prevent the exploit
- set the computer up to display an explanatory message halfway through next time it booted
- shut down Windows
Not legal to use, of course, but if you're going to use the exploit, you might as well do it constructively
http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jhtml?containerId=pr2003 (Score:5, Informative)
IDC Finds that Broadband Adoption Will Drive Internet Traffic Growth
27 Feb 2003
FRAMINGHAM, Mass., February 27, 2003 - IDC predicts that the volume of Internet traffic generated by end users worldwide will nearly double annually over the next five years, increasing from 180 petabits per day in 2002 to 5,175 petabits per day by the end of 2007. To put these figures into perspective, the entire printed collection of the Library of Congress amounts to only 10 terabytes of information. By 2007, IDC expects Internet users will access, download, and share the information equivalent of the entire Library of Congress more than 64,000 times over, every day.
"Some industry observers have speculated that slowing growth in Internet traffic is at the root of the current telecom malaise, but IDC research shows that not only is Internet traffic growth strong, but it will continue at near triple digit rates over the next five years," said Sterling Perrin, senior research analyst, Optical Networks at IDC.
This has some interesting implications for telecommunications equipment suppliers, particularly in the optical market. "As long as the total amount of voice and data traffic on the network continues to increase, then the need will arise for carriers to buy equipment, such as next-generation optical, that transports and manages it cheaper and more efficiently than the earlier generation of pure SONET-based products," said Perrin.
The IDC study finds that, although growth in the number of Internet users will continue to be an important traffic driver, the migration of those Internet users to bigger access pipes will be even more significant. In particular, broadband adoption by consumers around the world will make this the fastest growing and largest segment in terms of Internet traffic volume generated. By 2007, IDC believes that consumers will account for 60% of all Internet traffic generated, versus roughly 40% for business users. Mobile Internet users are expected to have only a minimal impact on overall traffic volume during the forecast period.
IDC's recently released study, Worldwide Bandwidth End-User Forecast and Analysis, 2003-2007: More is Still Not Enough (IDC #28875) provides a five-year forecast of global Internet traffic growth over the next five years, broken down by business, consumer, and mobile user segments. The study, which quantifies how much Internet traffic will be generated by end-users, draws on a wealth of IDC survey data including IDC's Internet Commerce Market Model, version 8.3, as well as IDC's forecasts for broadband and mobile access
To purchase this document, call IDC's sales hotline at 508-988-7988 or email sales@idc.com.
Re:http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jhtml?containerId=pr2 (Score:2)
Elections and cable (Score:3, Interesting)
None of them are inspiring. I was thinking maybe I could run for election next time with just one promise, "I will work to lay the backbone for a fiber optics network to eventually reach into every house in our electorate!". Then we'll see the amount of data sent over the internet more than doubled each time :)
First Math Post (Score:2)
-Mark
Re:First Math Post (Score:1)
Johan Veenstra
Re:First Math Post (Score:2)
Thanks for informing us of this vital information Johan, we really appreciate it.
Cue a horde of morons saying otherwise.
No! Don't cue them... too late. What did you have to go and do that for Johan?
No, it *is* exponential growth (Score:2)
Doubling every [year, week, nanosecond] means x = A.2^{kt} for some suitable constants A and k; that's equivalent to x = A exp{kt log 2}, so it's also exponential growth.
(k depends on the unit you measure time in, and x=exp{kt} is exponential growth for any value of k: otherwise you'd get things that were exponential growth when you measure in years, but not when you measure in months or decades or Mars years or something
In fact, that's how you define raising to any power, formally. The "definition" by repeated multiplication ("a^5 = a*a*a*a*a") starts to break when you want to raise to the power of a complex or irrational number, so you *define* a^b
(If you don't think this is necessary, please try multiplying a by itself pi+sqrt(-3) times and explain how you did it
HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:4, Funny)
Okay. So let me get a couple of things straight. LOC = Library of Congress, right? And they're moving 64,000 of these around PER DAY?
THAT'S ASTOUNDING!!! Have you ever been to their main building, the Thomas Jefferson Building [loc.gov]? It's freakin' HUGE!
Where'd they find 64,000 of these buildings and just how exactly are they moving them around??
Maybe I should've posted this as a question to Ask Slashdot [slashdot.org].
Re:HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:2)
That's correct. You may hear people talk about bandwidth in terms of OC units, as in, "We just got another OC3 pulled into our cabinet."
That stands for "office cubicle", and it's a standardized unit of bandwidth measurement. The reference OC is a volume 6' x 8' x 8', with a certain distribution of solid matter (excluding the worker, of course). An OC3 allows you to transfer 3 standard cubicles per hour. Actual transfer speeds depend on density, of course. The building core will take more time, and things like corridors and auditoriums take a lot less.
Re:HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:2)
And here I thought PPPoE and the like were causing packet sizes to down....
Howl's Moving Castle (Score:1)
[This is a book reference]
Re:HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:2)
Re:HOW ON EARTH?? (Score:1)
I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:5, Insightful)
Which makes me wondere if the Next Big Thing won't be Internet TV.
Not crummy little windows, mad pixelation, and choppy frame rates, but real, HD-quality, big-window content-on-demand, bypassing the satellite and cable companies entirely.
Good-bye "channels". Hello IPv6 URI's.
Re:I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:2)
Maybe your IPv6 URIs takes care of that, I have no idea what that is, but it sounds like a difficult situation at best.
Re:I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:2)
Not only that, but it can make 'start up' easier, and even make censorship harder. You want to start a TV station out of your garage? All you need is a server and enough bandwidth to handle the viewers. You don't need an FCC license, a 1000' tower, a megawatt transmitter...
The problem is that this will REALLY suck for people like CNN, who suddenly need some insane amount of bandwidth, maybe like a megabit a person (if it's high-res, with sound)... I suppose this is where IPv6's support for multicast will become really helpful?
The other really cool thing is that you can see exactly who's viewing your station, when, etc. With TV, short of the viewer ratings (polls done via telephone), you have no idea who's watching. With this, I can say "Exactly 1,348 people watched my show," and even do what people do with websites and try to extract more information: "most of them seem to be in California." (Heh, maybe we could even have referrers: "I got a deluge of people watching my show today, after SlashdotTV mentioned my site.")
Plus, it's easy to pass along alternate languages (prefer the news in Spanish? Just set that in your TV's preferences), 'closed captioning,' etc -- maybe even something like Slashdot's "Related Links." ("In today's news, Microsoft Corporation has filed for bankruptcy..." would allow you to go to Microsoft's site if they made it a 'link'.)
I can't predict the future, but I sure hope that this is the next "big thing." (And that no idiots at the MPAA/RIAA/etc. try to apply DRM all over it.)
Re:I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:2)
Codecs have gotten better and bandwith has increased. 500 kbit a sec streams look pretty good if encoded properly (read 2 pass) as in VHS but different artifacts. 1 Megabit which most DSL boxes could deal with would be nice but in reality the best way to get multicast working in the near run for this is DSL to the TV delivered to there POPS via a sat multicast this could be a great serive add on for a telco.
Re:I think I know what the new driver will be. (Score:2)
Nonetheless, there are plenty of forms of content that can survive exhorbitant connection costs and terrible connection quality (jennycam, anyone?)
As the demand for things like on-demand reruns of Survivor episodes increases (don't even imagine that it won't increase, it will grow to fill the bandwidth left by live-sex-show porn TV) it will cause the telecom (and, yes, cable) companies to increase their bandwidth, build new infrastructure, the whole industrial revolution.
All it'll take is some high-end overhyped semi-related proof-of-concept demos (uh, like this [slashdot.org]) to get the investment $$$ flowing.
size? (Score:1)
Re:size? (Score:2)
So how much is one official LOC? :)
You want that in interior decorator measure? Broken down into shelf-yards of leatherbound, shelf-yards of bluecloth, shelf-yards of reds?
So what, now we know (Score:1)
that given 64000 LOC a day the world's major Internet routes are still peered on 1200 baud modems or Joe Hacker hasn't made his quota for many moons. Where do we go from here?
In all seriousness, they can't mean Lines Of Code, surely?
$4,5000 to read the article! (Score:5, Funny)
The document itself can be yours for the tiny sum of $4,500, surely an absolute bargain considering is contains an amazing FIFTEEN pages!
Re:$4,5000 to read the article! (Score:2)
Re:$4,5000 to read the article! (Score:2)
Internet Traffic... (Score:5, Interesting)
I wonder if the traffic can be correlated back to the actual number of "transactions" that are being done on the Internet? Like when I visit a website, a lot of the traffic (large banners, pop-up, etc) aren't really what I am doing or after.
Is this simply a bandwith increase or are we talking about more real transactions? Probablly a bit of both...
Re:Internet Traffic... (Score:5, Interesting)
One example I like to use is uo.stratics.com [stratics.com]. Check out how this site looked a few years ago [archive.org], courtesy of the Wayback Machine. It was about a 60KB download even then, but it's grown extensively since. I just saved the current version of the site as a "Web archive, single file" (.mht) in Internet Explorer, and it comes out to 491KB. That's without the two Flash ads - I have IE set not to load that junk, and it didn't save in the
So, over the course of 4 years or so, a page that was once about 60KB is now >500KB if you add in the Flash banners. Is it any wonder that internet traffic keeps doubling, when the sizes of common web destinations keep increasing so much?
New much more interesting unit of measurement (Score:5, Interesting)
Johan Veenstra
Re:New much more interesting unit of measurement (Score:1)
Re:New much more interesting unit of measurement (Score:2, Funny)
So, what do we call that, a terra-bit?
64000 lines of code per day? (Score:1, Funny)
--
Account, no thanks, got enough already
Lifetime of thoughts = 37Gb (Score:5, Interesting)
If the Library of Congress is 10 terabytes that's less than 300 lifetimes' worth. (Which 300 people should be included?)
Another useful measure is the EB, or Encyclopaedia Britannica, which is about 200Mb. So one LoC = 50,000 EBs = 300 lifetimes.
hmm (Score:2)
Re:hmm (Score:2)
Re:hmm (Score:2)
IF the brain tried to store every detail it would become unnecessary to ever study or re-read something as a student, a time when the brain is most able to learn new things.
Great... (Score:2, Funny)
So now we have to figure out if we think in jpeg, gif or png?
Re:Great... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Lifetime of thoughts = 37Gb (Score:2, Funny)
E.G., this post contains one PoS, and so I've fulfilled my quotient.
Re:Lifetime of thoughts = 37Gb (Score:5, Interesting)
From 1986 to 2000 I worked part-time/full-time in the stacks in the Adams Building. I worked in the General Collections which, when I left, had 240 miles of shelving assigned to it. (The General Collections was/is contained in the Adams and Jefferson Buildings as well as several off-Capitol Hill storage facilities.) In all three buildings there were about 530 miles of shelving for all of the collections (General + Special Collections.)
Trust me - when I left we were shelving books on the floor on every deck in both buildings. The 240 mile estimate for the General Collections is low. I only viewed two of the Special Collections up close - some of the Music Division & Law Library, and they too had storage problems - they routinely took some of our shelves for their own overflow material. But, of course, not all shelves contain the same amount of data, so (again) the memory estimate of the "LOC" is going to be suspect - don't think I didn't try many times (in those long ago hours of boredom shelving those books!) to quantify an average. Its close to impossible.
The Library did try an estimate - they even asked us to suggest "typical" shelves in the General Collections with which to measure - but the final estimate did not satisfy me and I fear the typical LOC unit measure is itself low.
If you ever get stack-access go down to Deck 8 North and look through the Encyclopedias - I would estimate the length of one set of EB to be 10 feet. There are 2,798,400 feet in 530 miles, so there are 279,840 EB's per LOC (and again that LOC measure is suspect...), or 1679 lifetimes.
What about Broadband? (Score:1, Insightful)
Destination DoS (Score:1)
Just take a friendly guess where they are all going! Slashdotting anything and everything stepping on their way..
Oh NO!!! (Score:5, Funny)
What happens when it goes past 65,535 LOCs/day!!!
Does IPv6 fix this?
RE: Oh NO!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh NO!!! (Score:1)
Is that compressed or uncompressed (Score:2)
What storage format are they basing this on? 1 LOC from Microsoft word compare to 1 LOC from say Open OFFICE would have radically diffrent sizes..
If they are going to pull some value out there rear and name it, the least they can do is provide full technical details on that unit of measurement.
Re:Is that compressed or uncompressed (Score:1)
Since a fair amount of the LOC is text, compressed OCR could cut the size of an LOC by a factor of 1000.
OTOH, if everything is hypothetically rescanned with a nice 48-bit, 2400dpi scanner into PNG format, it could go up by a factor of 500.
Glenn
source of traffic? (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder what percentage of that astounding amount of traffic was actually created (written, composed etc.) by the sender.
These days, most people know that "multimedia" and "software demos" make up a large chunk of internet traffic. Most of this is copyrighted by someone else.
If only there were a practical and legal way to store this information in a central depository. With widespread multicasting, the sheer amount of internet traffic would be greatly reduced.
New users vs. bloated downloads (Score:1)
Just from the increase in graphics, flash, and java in web pages alone could acount for a doubling in bandwidth per year. Back in the Mosaic days Web pages were so light compared to what they are today.
How to Propel the Internet (Score:2)
Look at peering statistics (Score:5, Interesting)
LINX - London - 25Gbit/s [linx.net]
AMSIX - Amsterdam - 11Gbit/s [ams-ix.nl]
DECIX - Frankfurt - 10Gbit/s [de-cix.net]
If you look at it most of them double traffic even faster than in 12 month. I think it's closer to 9 month.
--
Andre
Bizarre math? Fuzzy math? (Score:5, Interesting)
Just to give you an idea, I work for a large IP carrier, and we peak around oh, 200Gbps aggregate traffic entering the network. Gigabits/second is a good measurement of traffic, as is total gigabytes/terabytes... but to use the term petabit, implies they're using bandwidth, not data, and that asks where that was measured and how? There's not a lot of 200Gbps networks in the world.
Re:Bizarre math? Fuzzy math? (Score:2)
It's all so clear now.
Didn't you know that's what carn/omnivore is all about?
So aliens can watch us downloading porn, or something. Oh and quell the uprisings before they start.
(BTW, I'm not serious here)
before anticompetitive DSL ruling (Score:2, Informative)
Slight potential issue here... (Score:3, Insightful)
Early estimates didnt include spam (Score:3, Informative)
Disclaimer: Spam includes mail, popups, popunders, etc.
Some Calculations (Score:4, Interesting)
180 petabits/day = 22.5 petabytes/day = 273 gigabytes/sec.
Presuming 250 million people using the Internet, that's 1118 bytes/sec for each person, or 92 MB/day. Are you doing your part?
2007 prediction:
5,175 petabits/day = 650 petabytes/day = 7.66 terabytes/sec.
Presuming 1 billion people using the Internet, that's 7,850 bytes/sec per person, or 647 MB/day. An average of one CD per day per person.
P2P (Score:3, Insightful)
If that is true, and all continues more or less the same, by 2007 consumers traffic will count for more than just 60%
should be enough (Score:4, Funny)
*ducks
LOC? (Score:2)
(attempt at humour)
Meal stop! (Score:3, Funny)
Thanks!
Petabit nonsense... (Score:3, Funny)
64000LOC? (Score:2, Funny)
Whole internets, brainfulls. (Score:2)
So you right now, a $200 hard drive could store, maybe, 46 picoWOIs, and in the future, a $200 hard drive might still store 46 picoWOIs, since the size of the internet goes up!
Or how about 'brainfulls'? About the amount of information that can be stored in a human brain. That would be kind of cool
a more useful unit (Score:2)
would be the juggernaut full of DATs, to renew the old adage about bandwidth.
Re:What is a LOC? (Score:2)
Re:Before you ask WTF a LOC is.... (Score:3, Redundant)
Lines Of Code.
A particularly clueless method of "measuring" the output of a programmer, motivated by the fact that "we're paying her to write lines of code!"
This ignores such trivial objective matters as the difficulty or quality of the code, as well as the obvious subjective matters (I can write 5 good lines one day and 1000 the next).
When a suit starts talking LOC (and kLOC), it's time to break out the code generators: M4, YACC, LEX, and most importantly custom-built programs that write programs. All of these enable the programmer to leverage effort to create LOC (to use a turn of phrase said suits might understand).
And that's just plane wrong in this context;
LOC == Libraries of Congress