
Wireless Wales 123
phich65 writes "People could soon be sending e-mail from the hillsides, roadsides and rooftops of the south Wales valleys with the expansion of Europe's densest wireless internet network.
See this BBC story for details."
Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? (Score:2)
Re:Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? (Score:2, Funny)
Indubitably. Rumour has it that Alan has a 802.11b base station hidden in his beard.
Don't you know this ? (Score:1)
Re:Doesn't Alan Cox live in Wales? (Score:1)
First thing that came to mind... (Score:1)
Looks like (Score:2)
Re:Looks like (Score:1)
They went up a hill, and came down a WiFi tower.
Too cute for your own damn good. [imdb.com]
It's compensation for having a language that... (Score:1)
So... (Score:1)
free wireless internet (Score:1)
Free broadband? Free wireless broadband? This could be put to great use, especially for dense urban areas. Its too bad that so many ISPs in North America are fighting wardriving, whilst overseas it seems to be a non-issue.
Let's try that in Welsh (Score:1, Offtopic)
If anyone wants to assist in pronouncing that other than "it sounds like you're trying to talk after stuffing an entire jelly donut into your mouth," be my guest.
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:3, Informative)
It's interesting that the previous translation used the word "rhydd" (used above in the imperative form "rhyddha") for "free", since it means "free as in speech", as opposed to "for no cost" ("am ddim" - lit, "for nothing"). Yet another language that makes the distinction; pity there isn't a simple way around the ambiguity that exists in English.
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:2)
Oh, I used the GNU/Welsh translator! I hope that clears things up.
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:1)
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:1)
Ignore this guy - what would someone named "dafydd" know about Celtic languages, anyway?
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:1)
Wel, efallai fyddai "broadband rhydd" yn iawn, achos chi'n gallu cysylltu gyda fe heb cytundeb - yn union fel mae rhaglenni GPL yn rhydd ac am ddim hefyd. Wrth gwrs, dylai dysgwyr fel fi ddim ceisio pregeth am ramadeg achos fydden ni'n anghywir, mae'n debyg.
Synnwn i ddim os chi'n gallu dyfalu does dim pwnc go iawn gyda fi i wneud. Ond dwi'n methu gwrthwynebu cyfle fel hwn i siarad (wel oce teipio).
Gyda llaw, ydy'r postiwr yn siarad sbwriel am y rhaglen cyfieithu, neu ydy hi'n bodoli'n wir?
Re:Let's try that in Welsh (Score:2)
Re:free wireless internet (Score:1)
In the US? (Score:2)
Re:In the US? (Score:2)
There are many places in the US that are larger then England that have coverage.
Re:In the US? (Score:2)
Re:In the US? (Score:1)
Re:In the US? (Score:1)
Why not in the US? (Score:1)
One question... (Score:3, Insightful)
One answer (Score:1)
Re:One question... (Score:3, Funny)
Just kidding, I've been to this lovely town and all I'm saying is that there's not _that_ many people living in Wales.
Re:One question... (Score:1)
WRT Llanfairpwll (as it is abbreviated), although the name
Re:One question... (Score:2)
Re:One question... (Score:1)
Re:One question... (Score:3, Informative)
And you can have 3 channels, and/or multiple transmitters on the same channels (widely spaced using directional antennas) those tricks would multiply up the capacity further.
By ADSL standards the capacity is huge.
Of course each wireless node can probably only handle about 15 nodes on it, depending on the equipment you plug in, but then you network the nodes together.
That's Great, Except (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:That's Great, Except (Score:1)
Typing Llantrisant, Aberystwyth, Clarach are all much simpler than coding PERL!
Wales vs. Whales (Score:1, Redundant)
Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:2)
Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:1)
Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:2)
Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:2)
Seriously, if you want to you could probably set up your own wireless network. It's not *that* difficult.
Re:Why is the U.S. so far behind..... (Score:1)
The whales? Really? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The whales? Really? (Score:2)
Then I had the more sober thought that this was probably some kind of research project so they could know the temperature of a whales rectum 24/7 ...
Then I realized we were talking about Wales and not whales and I could care less about this story :)
Re:The whales? Really? (Score:1)
finally! (Score:4, Funny)
Wales will be the proud location of the first portable web-server on a sheep. You could even design a sheep cam and check were your flock is heading or which bastard is shagging your herd!
cool!
Re:finally! (Score:1)
Oh dear, those poor 3G companies... (Score:1)
BTW, if you work for a 3G venture, i'll go with the first network that gives me an IP address. I'll roll my own content, thanks.
Re:Oh dear, those poor 3G companies... (Score:2)
They don't want to screw with things, just an IP address via 3G1X. I believe it will be 64-128 Kbps, but would have to double-check.
They eventually plan to move it to all their coverage areas.
Wireless Wales....? (Score:4, Informative)
Of course, the rub is, for rural exchanges (like where *I* live) they won't tell you what the target is.....
Therefore, they can alter the 'majic' target at will, so that rural communities will almost certainly never get wired-broadband, hence the move to wireless networks - not only in Wales, but elsewhere in the UK, as it is seen as the only economic way to get better than a POTS dial-up (and don't even ask me about Satellite access in rural UK - uk£1,200 setup and uk£99/month? No thanks!!!)
Re:Wireless Wales....? (Score:4, Informative)
See http://www.adslguide.org.uk/availability/btprereg
for the current 'league table'.
I'm so excited now! (Score:1)
People in Europe can send e-mail ( and even receive, yeah! ) from any hillside, roadside or rooftop they want using the GSM/GPRS network, there must be something more interesting that you can do what public Wi-Fi networks?
Re:I'm so excited now! (Score:1)
Well, yes, but GPRS isn't exactly cheap, so sending and receiving big e-mails can become quite expensive.
And using the cellphone provides e-mail, yes, that's possible, but if you're stuck with T-Mobile D like me, you have to pay for the mails you receive.
So yes, it's possible, but if you use it often, it'll cost you a lot of money
There is one catch... (Score:1)
This might make things tricky. As they say in Wales, "If you can't see the hills, it's raining. And if you can see the hills...it's about to rain."
Re:There is one catch... (Score:2)
Re:There is one catch... (Score:2)
A pedant speaks! I think.
Re:There is one catch... (Score:2)
Re:There is one catch... (Score:1)
Re:There is one catch... (Score:2)
Cwl! (Score:3, Funny)
Oh no ! (Score:1)
Errr nothing, never mind, just carry on, nothing to see here :-)
What about NORTH wales? (Score:1)
Re:What about NORTH wales? (Score:2)
Wireless whales? (Score:2)
From the cwms too (Score:1)
pointless (Score:1)
i expect burnings of wireless transitters as english cultural intrusion by welsh nationalists.
it'll be like burning man [burningman.com] crossed with the wicker man [stomptokyo.com]
Wireless wales (Score:1)
The Colorado Connection (Score:1)
A couple of months ago I was visiting a client in Old Colorado City (a suburb of Colorado Springs) and he mentioned his next-door neighbor, a wireless ISP named Old Colorado City Communications [oldcolo.com] ISP, was providing technical assistance in this project. Old Colorado City Communications is owned by Dave Hughes, who was a columnist for BoardWatch [boardwatch.com] magazine back in the early 90's.
Dave gave my client a nice color brochure talking about the wireless initiative, printed in both English and Welsh.
Regards,
Aryeh Goretsky
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:4, Informative)
Then you add in Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and all the Channel Islands, and you've got the United Kingdom.
Please don't mention Sealand or Rockall, they're just a pain in the arse.
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1, Redundant)
Close... Actually, England and Scotland are seperate countries.
Odd...Neither the CIA Country Factbook [cia.gov] nor the UN Stat. Division [un.org] lists Scotland as a country.
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1)
To the other poster who said they were separate provinces but the same country, I have no idea which is more correct - I don't know if there's a legal or official definition of a country but I imagine it's more a historical thing.
In Scotland (where I am from) we have our own monarchy (which sort of bit the dust), our own parliament (a horrible, puppet organisation of scrounging bastards who use therir position to get perks and free lunches but have little real power), a border (as far as I'm concerned the most important thing to define a country!), and although we have similar money, it's not exactly the same. Pound notes are still legal tender here although they have long since stopped being used in England.
I think to be honest the individual provinces' definitions are a metter of opinion, unless someone knows better...
I wouldn't think the CIA or the UN stat division would bother separating them for their purposes anyway, so I don't think that helps.
We do have our own football team though. They are the worst in the world.
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1, Redundant)
Wales is completely dependent on the mainland. Its 'Assembly' is just a talking shop with no real power.
The separate provinces make up the single country of the UK, or 'Britain'.
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1)
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
Actually, as the full title is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are part of Great Britain, not just the UK. You're also missing a few [politicalresources.net], such as Gibraltar and Bermuda.
</pedandry>
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
And which website was that from, then? Try something like the United Nations [un.org], or the CIA World factbook. [cia.gov]. The name comes from the Act Of Union in 1801, when it was titled the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". After partition, the name was changed to reflect the change to "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
Being part of the British Isles is irrelevant, as Eire is also part of the British Isles and no longer forms any part of Great Britain or the UK. The other dependancies that you mention are part of Great Britain (the names - British Indian Ocean Territory, etc) often give a suble clue to this. You seem to be mixing geographical (British Isles) with political (Great Britain). The latter includes all of the dependent territories that you mentioned.
For instance Bermuda [bermuda-online.org].
"Bermuda is one of the fourteen (14) Overseas Territories of Britain." It's part of Britain, not just the UK.
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:2)
The other dependencies are NOT part of Great Britain or Northern Ireland, they are dependent territories. Look it up. The word "of" in the sentence you quoted means "which are associated with", not "which are part of".
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1)
Some info: Wales is 8000 square miles, 160 miles long by 60 miles wide. If you want any more info go to: Wales Statistics [data-wales.co.uk]
Re:Wales? c'mon. (Score:1)