Drug Testing For Olympic Chess Players? 344
Lawrence Person writes: "According to this AP wire story, they're thinking of adding chess as an Olympic sport. The downside? Mandatory drug testing. 'He's using steroids to move that pawn!'"
Twisted Mentat cheats... (Score:1)
They's probably using the Geriatric Spice to see what their opponent's next move is too!
olympics expansion (Score:1)
Why not? (Score:3, Informative)
And as others have pointed out, there's more than just steroids that can be used to improve performance. Imagine a drug that can be used to simply keep the mind more alert for a longer period of time (the side effect being the need to sleep for several days afterwards to make up for it). I would surmise that a chess player that has taken such a drug would fair better than one that hasn't considering the length of some chess matches.
Irrelevent... (Score:3, Interesting)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the banned substances are chosen on a sport by sport basis. Therefore, perhaps steroids would be allowed for chess. Just not some concentration-enchancing drug. Or rather, the IOC has a certain set of standards, and the individual sports have others.
Canadian Olympic Snowboarder Ross Rebagliati tested positive for marijuana use [mountainzone.com]. The IOC has no minimum amount set for marijuana use, but the Internation Ski Federation did...
Re:Irrelevent... (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure they wouldn't consider it 'performance enhancing' for CHESS, though.
Testing olympic athletes for drugs is absurd... (Score:1)
Deford argued that we shouldn't worry about testing athletes for drugs, because many Olympians do it anyway. Drugs are becoming incresingly more difficult to detect, and increasingly being used by athletes. Even when drugs aren't detected, even the mere speculation of drugs can sully an athlete (like in Lance Armstrong's case.) If we want a level playing field, he suggests, don't test for drugs.
*[A Sports Illustrated link on /.? The age of the apocolypse is here, I think...]
This is getting ridiculous (Score:2, Troll)
Not a big deal (Score:2)
History: Litterature used to be an official sport (Score:2, Interesting)
All this happened around the year 1900.
There's lot of stuff hidden in the old history books
Not all enhancing drugs are steroids (Score:2)
Re:Not all enhancing drugs are steroids (Score:1)
Where in the??? (Score:5, Funny)
M.Blue,our Energy police says you switched to 220V (Score:2, Funny)
Olympic Squad : What the Hell ! A spare disk !
Blue : Well, yes, whats wrong with that ?
Olympic Squad : Please follow us, M. Blue.
We will also have to check your steppings. Using a higher voltage and starting this spare HDD motor as a fan Facility let us think you might have Overclocked during the competition
Blue : No, It's Wrong ! I never did this. Anyhow, you have no right to discompile my log file. DMCA is still here to protect us ! And I just had the file pass through Rot-13 ! You Can't beat me without trepassing your Law ! You can't Decrypt without my aothirisation !!!
Blue Squad : Under bill 1-2007 (Bill Gates against The World / USA) I have to read yor rights !
You have the right to stable power supply ! Everything you write can be used to prosecute you. You cannot defrag during your detention time. Any use of non licensed source within your code can put you up to 5 years in Prime Number Calculus Detention Center
Blue : Noooooooo !!!! I won't support this !!!
I will BSOD if you come closer to the plug ! I warn you ! It will make a messy memory Dump in the news !!!
Olympic Squad : Stop him ! I have a QNX floppy here with me. You won't suffer, I promise !!!
To be followed
011 100 000 011
Re:Where in the??? (Score:3, Funny)
Are humans the only competitors? (Score:5, Funny)
Nooo.... They're overclocking Deep Blue!
LSD as performance enhancing drug? (Score:2)
But they don't say which is which. So, would it be an unfair advantage if my opponent could smell his next move? What if he was so fearful that my Bishop was going to strap him to a wall and go Inquisition on him that he played with more ferocity?
I have a hunch that such abuse would have you busted back to playing old wooden puzzles [ridiculopathy.com].
In other news: The PC Turns 20 And We Are Supposed To Care [ridiculopathy.com]
Re:LSD as performance enhancing drug? (Score:2)
Tried this in the 1969 Continental Junior. Results from early rounds were spectacular. Next day, however was dismal.
Occasional attempts to repeat the experiment showed mixed results. As there is no ready means to ascertain dosage level of street acid, I can't quantify, but small doses generally produce better results.
Also tries a few semi-serious games on Iboga (1 gram of raw bark) which shows promise.
Also worth recalling is the No-hitter [sirbacon.org] pitched by Baseball great Doc Ellis of the Pittsburgh Pirates under the influence of LSD on June 12, 1970. Ellis recounted the experience in a 1987 interview with High Times magazine., not apparently available online.
Go (Score:2)
But I hope go [usgo.org] is next.
According to the Nihon Ki-in, there are at least 7 million go players in Japan alone. That's 5-6% of the population! Go is rampant in China (add maybe 36 million players to the previous number!) and very much so in Korea (maybe another 5 million players there). In the US, it's not as well known as chess, but I'll bet more people could/have/would play it than other esoteric olympic events like fencing or whatever that gymnastic ball and ribbon stuff is.
But the big question: Is go more or less TV Friendly(tm) than chess?
Afro Man Plays Chess (Score:3, Funny)
Damnit. (Score:5, Funny)
Should this be considered humor? (Score:2, Insightful)
If they don't exist now, someone, somewhere will develop a drug that will improve your chess game. How do you then impliment drug testing? You could go 2 or 3 sets of olympics before the arguments are over. By then, chess would be as much of a joke as weight lifting.
Another notion is whether chess be in the olympics. I believe that it was previously stated that the olympics were origionally to display skill in military arts. And what are they now? Is hockey any more martial than chess? At least in chess, you're eliminating the opposition. (though as a Canadian, I'd hate to see hockey removed from the games). And then there's synchronised swimming (ew)
Won't Happen (Score:5, Insightful)
posted by an irrate fencer, a sport that is in danger of being cut because we aren't "TV Friendly".
W
Re:Won't Happen (Score:1)
Re:Won't Happen (Score:2, Funny)
Solution? Skin fencing!
Huge mistake (Score:2)
A chess master might get an advantage from taking Ritalin in one constest but even that is doubtful. It is a very powerful drug that messes with several areas of the brain. If you are a chess grandmaster you almost certainly don't suffer from ADD. Like if you had ADD how did you get there? You might well suffer from dyslexia which is the problem that many Ritalin victims actually have it being easier to prescribe an addictive drug than diagnose the problem.
One of the ironic things about high school and college abuse of Ritalin is that the kids who take it so that they can concentrate hours at a stretch would almost certainly learn more if they took regular breaks. Fatigue is the brain's signal to the body that it needs a rest. Transfer from short term to long term memory appears to work best as a background task while the variables are not locked by another process. It is better to take regular five minute breaks than try to sit down for hours at a stretch.
LSD may have helped the Beatles write Sgt Pepper but I don't think anyone considers that it would have helped their creativity over the long term if they had kept taking it.
Dangerous... (Score:5, Insightful)
If Chess is added to the Olympics, it's only a matter of time before many many other "mental" games are petitioning the Olympic Commission for admission to the games. Instead of allowing the Commission to be very judgemental in what they allow, it'd make better sense for a mental Olympics to be wholly created outside of the existing Games, IMHO.
Poker, preferably Hold'em. :) (Score:1)
I understand your concern. Before chess, or anything else (including anything so trivial and wimpy as triathlon
Let's face it, pretty soon the World Chess Champion will be a human only because computers are excluded from play. Hell, pretty soon your laptop will consistently beat the (human) World Chess Champion while you watch (the DeCSSed version, shh, don't tell anyone) of Matrix V and recompile Linux Kernel version 4.4 at the same time.
Poker, thank God, is different. As explained by The University of Alberta Computer Poker Research Group [ualberta.ca]: Now, if I haven't yet entirely hijacked this discussion, I will just have to try harder.
See also:
rec.gambling.poker [rec.gambling.poker] [Usenet]
IRC Poker Server [cmu.edu]
Greg Reynold's Gpkr GUI [anet-stl.com]
World Series of Poker [binions.com]
Great Poker Forums [twoplustwo.com]
Card Player Magazine [cardplayer.com] [Currently down, but well worth a look.]
Poker Digest [pokerdigest.com]
Gambler's Book Shop [gamblersbook.com]
And now, if you will, may we please have a moment of silence for Stu Ungar [pokerpages.com].
Re:Poker, preferably Hold'em. :) (Score:1)
> Champion will be a human only because computers
> are excluded from play.
Well, how soon we forget [slashdot.org] and forget again [geocities.com] that weightlifting does, or shortly will, suffer from the "humans only" badge of honor, i.e. limited ability monkey sideshows of the real stuff.
Re:Dangerous... (Score:2)
In other news..... (Score:2, Funny)
His gold medal status is pending until further review.
Re:Dangerous... (Score:2)
The real problem is that there are only so many sports that can be included in the olympics before it becomes impossible to house all of the athletes.
Re:Dangerous... (Score:2, Funny)
It's about physical activity. The Biathlon derives from military activities (as do any shooting activities. Is Archery in there?) The Marathon run might, too, as might horse events. Don't know the origin of the steeple chase nor the triple jump.
Anyway, the more cereberal among us should applaud the addition of brain games in a world where mere physical skill pointlessly is held up over mental abilities.
And speaking of military, let's not forget the brutal, bloody carnage that is the real-world counterpart to synchronized swimming.
Re:Dangerous... (Score:2)
What does it matter if the sport was derived from military activity?
Re:Dangerous... (Score:2)
Slashdot gets slapped with a copyright-infringement lawsuit.
Slashdot announces the change to Mental scipmylO 2002.
Woah... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Woah... (Score:3, Interesting)
Massive ratings?....of course not...but SOME ratings if they actually got televised, sure. :) Of course, the number of actual events that get televised during the Olympics currently is absurd. Basically, it must have an American in it, and look very dynamically interesting. When was the last time you saw Table Tennis or Fencing or Judo or hammer throw or any of the other gazillion events televised?
(I can't help it) (Score:3, Funny)
- Robin
PS - how would they handle drug testing for the crack team?
This is a scam!! (Score:2, Funny)
Why? Because Big Blue would always fail the drug tests due to extravagant arsenic and lead counts! This is discrimination!! IBM should sue!!!
Bridge too (Score:2)
Mental games in olympics: why? (Score:3, Interesting)
To grok this we need to go back to the original Greco-Roman games. The games were feats of athletic skill and battle strategy, which were definitely essential survival skills during those days.
Today, while these skills are still important, the mental aspect of strategy and tactics has become far more important.
When a panoply of technologies can deter even the largest crowd (audio detterence technology, microwaves meant to temporarily blind people mounted on tanks are all part of the "nonlethal" arsenal) the controllers of these technologies are at the crux of social decisions.
The Int'l Olympic Committee is supposed to consider the social relationships of the Games, their deeper meaning, etc. along with all the cash and entertainment values of the Games. Perhaps, by adding chess, this social value is their primary consideration.
(It certainly won't add any entertainment or monetary value to the Games!)
Medical Marijuana (Score:2)
Would these individuals be barred from competitive chess?
Only if it is speed chess (Score:2)
I don't think any network will need to cover a regular chess game live. Even golf moves faster.
Re:Only if it is speed chess (Score:1)
Or chess players on speed...
normalize the quasi-sports (Score:2, Funny)
Contestants compete in a giant chess board shaped pool, each team representing the appropriate chess piece (pawns, knights, queens etc.). Teams alternate turns with their rhythmic gymnastic ribbons fluttering non-stop as they try to get the ball in the other team's net with table tennis paddles. Equestrian referees with badminton raquets shall penalize players who foot fault or allow the ball hit the sand. The match shall be declared upon completion of a flawless SDE (Synchronized Drowning Event) by either team.
Anyone with me? I say we petetion the IOC for recognition of this event...
Forget about the olympics (Score:2, Insightful)
Citius . Altius . Fortius (Score:2)
Not every activity/hobby should become an Olympic sport.
Re:Citius . Altius . Fortius (Score:2)
an olympic sport?? (Score:2, Funny)
E.
Actually, there's a problem: (Score:3, Interesting)
Seriously, seing as they usually play multi-game matches, and I've heard of many matches over the course of, say, 8 hours or more, couldn't this stretch out??
Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:5, Interesting)
How about Ritalin or some other drug to improve concentration skills. What about some kind of coolness-under-fire drugs to block out the pressure? Are there drugs that won't 'zombify' a person, but keep them focused?
Just asking...
You Betcha (Score:4, Interesting)
I have numerous 2nd and 3rd hand accounts of the use of some prescription drugs (including ritalin) being used to aid concentration during long study sessions. (Obvously it isn't hard for medical personnel to get them or to know the side effects.) How widespread this practice is or how effective it is, I have no idea but it does appear to happen and apparently to some degree.
Maybe that's why I was never a curve wrecker in college. Everyone else was doping... Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket...
Re:You Betcha (Score:2)
Re:Please Post Evidence (links?) (Score:2)
Re:You Betcha (Score:2)
Luckily most good programmers are freaks of nature.
Steven
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2, Interesting)
It would be a huge mess if you started trying to apply different drug-use standards to different sports. Imagine the confusion and potential for error...
class A - swimming, track & field, gymnastics and wrestling - no steroids, no amphetimines, etc
class B - fencing, skeet shooting, curling and equestrian events - no steroids allowed, but amphetimines are ok.
class C - chess - take whatever the hell you want
"no, no, no -- please just make it easier for us to know what we can and can't take by having one standard for everything!"
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2)
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2, Funny)
Alternatively we could numb the grand masters brain cells with alcohol [firebox.com]. http://www.firebox.com/product.php?id=115
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2)
You think feeding a bunch of World-class chess players (who are always RUSSIAN) a bunch of ALCOHOL will make any difference whatsoever ?
How many russians do you know ?
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2, Informative)
A friends girlfriend, a pharmacist to be, offered to give me beta blockers. I didn't accept, but she insisted that they'd make it hard for me to be nervous.
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2)
These drugs would be okay for Quake, etc, but not for Chess, given their side effects inhelping a person going postal.
On the other hand, Olympic Quake sounds like fun
Re: Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:1)
In particular, they advise limiting oneself to 4 cups of coffee over a 6 hour period, reduced to 2 if you are also drinking cola type drinks.
They don't mention caffeinated peppermints or Bawls, though.
Re: Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:4, Informative)
In many sports, there are strict limits for caffeine. It's possible to get busted in tests just by drinking too much coffee. Usually 300-500mg of caffeine pushes you above the limit (12mg of caffeine in 1l of urine). Since there is usually 40-60mg of caffeine in one cup of coffee, 10 cups of coffee would be too much.
Re: Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2)
Re: Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2, Informative)
It keeps you focussed for a longer time period. That's not the same thing
Re:Performance drugs for chess? Sure... (Score:2)
Blade Runner? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Blade Runner? (Score:2, Funny)
[Mr Kasparov]Judge!. I think that my oponent has been using drugs again
Ok, that was a bad joke, but I couldn't resist
Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Interesting)
FP?
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2)
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Funny)
The players would get into a philosophical discussion on the underlying meanings of the game or they might feel sorry for the pawns since they always get the shaft.
Re:Can anyone think of any drugs (Score:2, Interesting)
The article on espn stated that doctors for the World Chess Federation said that caffeine and steroids and other drugs can give a person an endurance advantage when a match runs into the 5th or higher hour, which can lead to an unfair advantage in favor of an individual using an IOC-banned substance.
I find it kinda strange that the same drugs that allow Mark McGuire (sp?) to hit dingers also gives the brain an endurance lift.
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Interesting)
The increase in cognative speed and the general projected confidence could be extremely useful in a chess match.
You'd have to be very careful about the tendancy to over compensate though...
http://www.erowid.org [erowid.org] has more information on various chemicals, some of which could be interesting in this discussion.
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Informative)
As for the feeling of "speed of thought", that's exactly what it is - a feeling, nothing more.
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Can anyone thking of any drugs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Um, caffein is not an illegal drug. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Um, caffein is not an illegal drug. (Score:2)
Re:Perhaps there should be a separate Olympics (Score:1)
i would totally dismiss Q3 accomplishments in the face of most athletic accomplishment.
the people at the top of these fields practice many hours a day, through intense physical stress/injuries. the mental discipline it takes is absolutely incredible. and i wouldn't be shocked if there reflexes were far superior to most q3 players, as both of the activities you mentioned rely greatly on fast twitch muscle and body/eye coordination. if these people spent the same playing q3 as 99% of q3 players, they'd be better.
Re:Perhaps there should be a separate Olympics (Score:2)
i don't mean offense, but it seems really obvious you've neither 'thrown a metal ball' or 'ran down a track' in a seriously competitive way.
I would turn this right around and say that you've never been involved with or been a serious spectator in either competitive Quake 3 playing or a serious chess competition.
the people at the top of these fields practice many hours a day, through intense physical stress/injuries. the mental discipline it takes is absolutely incredible.
And Quake 3 players don't spend thousands of hours practicing and becoming experts at their game? Chess players often start their careers as young children to fully develop a brain that can make the leaps required for chess.
. and i wouldn't be shocked if there reflexes were far superior to most q3 players, as both of the activities you mentioned rely greatly on fast twitch muscle and body/eye coordination. if these people spent the same playing q3 as 99% of q3 players, they'd be better.
Wow that's quite a blanket assertion: The Quake 3 world is just waiting for the day that a 100m athletes comes over and wipes up the field. Sorry, but that is proposterous. There are millions of players who partake in computer gaming, and of those the best of the best of the best, with the best mental abilities (for the requirement) and the best reflexes, move to the top. This idea that "naturally superior" superhuman track and field athletes could be the best Q3 player if they only wanted to is absolutely, positively proposterous (no different than me claiming that the top Q3a player could be the fastest runner and the longest jumper if only that's what he wanted to do). Let me guess: a baseball player would automatically make a great chess player?
Re:Perhaps there should be a separate Olympics (Score:1)
you're absolutely right, i wasted much,much more of my college years playing unreal tournament. i enjoyed it more than quake, but that's just my preference. i was never in a serious chess competion, but only because i never wanted to shell out the $15 or so it took for entrance fees. last i checked, i could stand my ground at a +1700 level. i also played several sports.
And Quake 3 players don't spend thousands of hours practicing and becoming experts at their game? Chess players often start their careers as young children to fully develop a brain that can make the leaps required for chess.
i'm sure that lots of q3 players spend even more than thousands of hours playing that game (that's only averaging 3 hours a day for a year), and i'm not being totally insensitive to their efforts. i'm just saying it's more difficult to train as an athlete than it is as a gamer.
Wow that's quite a blanket assertion: The Quake 3 world is just waiting for the day that a 100m athletes comes over and wipes up the field. Sorry, but that is proposterous. There are millions of players who partake in computer gaming, and of those the best of the best of the best, with the best mental abilities (for the requirement) and the best reflexes, move to the top. This idea that "naturally superior" superhuman track and field athletes could be the best Q3 player if they only wanted to is absolutely, positively proposterous (no different than me claiming that the top Q3a player could be the fastest runner and the longest jumper if only that's what he wanted to do). Let me guess: a baseball player would automatically make a great chess player?
it is no different than you claiming that the best q3 players could be the "fastest runners and longest jumpers". barring certain aberrations (really obese quake players, athletes too dumb to turn on a computer), these would probably have a large intersection. as i said, both groups benefit from a higher percentage of high twitch muscle fibers and higher than average body/eye coordination. who knows, many of the better q3 players might be able to be quality sprinters/shotputters
the reason you don't see 100m sprinters overrunning the quake world (and vice versa), is that they don't care. anyone who's trained heavily in sprinting isn't going to give it up to spend a couple of months getting instantly fragged on a quake server. no 1334 quake players are going to sell the computer and start doing wind sprints and stadium runs...
i spoke to strongly when i said that i would "totally dismiss Q3 accomplishments in the face of most athletic accomplishment". however, i do feel that many athletes that compete at very high levels work harder. it's just my opinion, and it doesn't mean anything.
however, when you say something like:
It is sad to see a jock like attitude on Slashdot of all places berating those people "sitting on their ass" because they aren't competing in the traditional sense. Sorry but I respect the guy who has the most frags more than I respect the guy who throws a metal ball or runs down a track: While both have little value in the real world, the former seems like more of an accomplishment to me.
you have to know that there's going to be some reaction.
Re:Perhaps there should be a separate Olympics (Score:2)
That said, there are many real sports that have been introduced to the olympics that I don't believe belong there. Mountain bike racing, for example. I am a mountain racer myself, but I don't think it makes a good olympic sport, since it isn't simply a test of an athlete's skill and endurance. Anything can happen when you are on a trail!
The olympics should be track & field, swimming, and wrestling. Nothing else. And absolutely no friggin' games!!! (basketball, baseball, football, water polo...)
Re:This is just ridiculous (Score:2)
Re:This is just ridiculous (Score:2)
Yeah, and the Gold for First-Posting could join Golf as only the second contest in which a NEGATIVE score is a good thing! :)
(I'm sure there are plently of contests in which a negative score is desirable, but please don't ruin my lame little joke with logic.)
Re:This is just ridiculous (Score:2)
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:3, Insightful)
And even fewer of us probably remember, and still celebrate, "Chad is Bad" day.
Steven
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:2, Insightful)
i'm glad you could share.
let's see if I have this right. people who think they're smart because of great skill with a game of strategy are way off base. here's a question: how much difference can you really point out between chess, a mathematical proof, and computer programming... they all require very similar cognitive processes. perhaps you can prove me wrong, or give me a pointer to 'scientists' who have proved it.
as for chess clubs having poorly-socialized members, and linux user groups coming in a close second... i'd like to direct your attention to the following... [despair.com]
and last of all. you say that chess is stupid, and magic and d&d are real games of strategy that demand true intelligence. how about this... maybe some chess players think that fantasy games are immature? i don't, but just a thought.
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:4, Interesting)
But not all chess players are like that. I worked with someone who was a member of the chess federation. That is he had a ranking (low as it was).
Some people would say that being able to hack computers takes a special kind of mental skill. I guess any group of people can sink to snoberism, and yet another group of similar people will rise above it. There are assholes in any group.
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:3, Insightful)
Now while I don't agree with that, since it's been proven that different experiences can help develop the functioning of different parts of the brain, and I would imagine thousands of games of chess in childhood would warp anyone's brain... anyway, there's a point here somewhere.
The point I'm trying to make is that just because you someone may think differently, it's an amazingly concieted assumption to make to assume that it's "stupid".
And no, I can barely keep the names of the pieces right, I'm not a chess fanatic.
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:2, Insightful)
Scientists have proved that all it takes to be a good chess player is a good memory. So why do we treat these people as though playing chess is a sign of intelligence ?
Rarely is anything about the mind proven, just speculated and corelated. If all it takes to play chess is a good memory, then why has it take so long for computers to compete with grand masters level chess players. Computers have superior memory to people. It is becuase computers lack abstraction and reasoning skills, two basic component in what you call imagination.
Re:Chess - A stupid game for stupid people. (Score:2, Insightful)
So, you spend a fortune on a rip-off card scheme and say that chess is stupid? At least when you buy a chess set, all the pieces are included.
Re:Caffiene (Score:1)
Re:Doesnt belong in current olympic makeup (Score:2)
>this includes chess and other non-physical competitions.
Swifter. Interesting that I see that and you don't...
Re:Actually (Score:2)
The fact that one small group may believe it doesn't make it true, or even worth everyone else bothering with. The rest of the world sees this and laughs. Remember, this article was put in as a funny, not as a serious question.
Chess is not a sport. Nor are poker, backgammon or mental arithmetic, since none involve any physical skill at all. Snooker/pool/billiards may _just_ make it in there, since it requires considerable hand-eye coordination, which is physical skill. Chess only requires the hand-eye coordination necessary to close fingers over a piece, move it to another square and hit a timer button.
Grab.
Re:Actually (Score:2)
Re:Mental Olympics (Score:2)
Re:Mental Olympics (Score:2)
Re:Chess in the Olympics (Score:2)
Of course, curling is kinda a minority sport, and one of the weirder ones they've included.
Chess, on the other hand, is in a totally different league - it's solely reliant on mental ability. A quadraplegic could play it as well as someone with full use of their limbs. This isn't true of any of the other sports (AFAIK). Quake would still require fairly physical skills, so I wouldn't count it as the same sort of game. I'd still love to see it as an Olympic sport though :)
Re:Gee, a nice broken sport. (Score:2)
My Toyota Camry can run a mile in well under 40 seconds. Cars can beat people because the mile run is related to only one variable - speed.
There are not many games left that a well designed machine can not beat the entire human population at.
Visit a trailer park (Score:2)
I don't see why the presence/absence of games in a particular category should preclude them. Physical games? Caps, pissing contests, propane tank hurling, bumper-shining, beer can skeet, etc, etc, etc. I can easily come up with a hundred games that I've actually played (grew up in rural Canada) that are physical, but aren't in the Olympics.
Oh, and for the record: you don't need to appease the non-athletic crowd. Most of us are smart enough to not waste our time with media-driven 'events' in the first place :)