
The Community Blackboard 90
The Boston Globe has a column by Ellen Goodman about a community blackboard, a monument put up not for a dead president or war hero but to free expression. Read more about the project.
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.
Re:DeCSS and Scientology ? (Score:1)
that's the difference between a web page and a blackboard...you don't need a court order to remove offending material from a blackboard.
now, what happens when someone starts erasing while someone else is writing? i can't wait to see the police reports from that one.
"man arrested for putting a stick of chalk up another man's
Some Backstory (Score:5)
Sometime around 1995 or 1996, the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Speech [tjcenter.org] had the idea that we should have a monument to free speech. They created a board, and asked for submissions from the public sometime in '98ish, IIRC. They got a lot of submissions, some quite creative, but the best one (and thus the winner) was the idea of having a chalkboard. Well, the board selected that one, though surely they knew full well that they were opening a can of worms.
City Council, as you can imagine, was not thrilled with this. The location of this monument was to be directly in front of city hall. It hadn't occurred to them that they were setting themselves up for a 60' wall; they were thinking maybe a small sculpture or something. So the topic was debated before council, and the general consensus was "what if somebody says something bad?"
Council finally voted on it a few weeks ago, and it, fortunately, passed. It very nearly didn't. The tricky thing about a proposal like this is that there's no turning it down. Once the genie is out of the bottle (to use the GPL comparison), anybody voting against it can be derided as being anti-free speech. Perhaps not fairly; one could be opposed to it for asthetic reasons, as Councilman Toscano was. (I think he actually voted against it for those very reasons.)
My mother (a commentator for NPR [radioessays.com]) had a reading at the TJ Center just last week, coincidentally. I spoke with the director of the center about this very topic, as it's a hot one in town. We talked about some of the practical problems.
What if somebody erases somebody else's writing?
Tough. We can't very well pass a long against erasing other people's ideas. In fact, that would accomplish the very opposite of what is intended by this monument. (BTW, I call it a "memorial," because of Charlottesville's serious First Amendment violations, like the youth curfew [curfew.org]. So everybody has to accept that whatever they write could be erased immediately afterwards.
What if it's used for commercial purposes?
That's speech, too. Let it happen. It would be great if it were so popular and oft-visited (people don't tend to congregate by City Hall, save for during Fridays After Five [fridaysafterfive.com]) that, say, Trax [rlc.net] started writing their weekly line-up on that wall. That would be OK.
What if people write hate-speech? What if the KKK writes nasty things?
They get to do that. Other people also get to erase it.
People will inevitably spray-paint it. Won't it be ruined quickly?
Perhaps, but there's an easy solution. This chalkboard will have a surface that is spray-painted on. If it gets defaced, it's easy to cover over the defaced area so that people can keep writing.
Will it ever be fully erased? By whom?
It hasn't been fully decided how often to erase it, whose job that will be, etc. Mostly because nobody knows how popular it will be. Could be daily, could be weekly, could be monthly.
What if somebody says something defamatory?
What if somebody puts up posters that are defamatory? There are laws in place to handle this. No problem.
The timeline for this is that it should be in by the end of 2002. The City is in the process of changing the whole layout of that area of downtown, so I think that they want to roll this work into that. Waiting until 2002 gives the TJ Center time to raise money, too, which is important. If anybody is interested in donating to this project, you can find contact info on their site [tjcenter.org]. BTW, this is all recreated from memory, so I apologize for factual errors and such.
-Waldo
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
"Make random acts of beauty and senseless violence."
Kind of a "make Love AND War".
Not Logged In (Score:1)
-Waldo
Re:First thing to do with it... (Score:1)
-Waldo
Of Course! (Score:2)
Anyhow, yes, UVa definitely gets the prize for doing this far, far ahead of C'ville. I feel foolish for not thinking of that.
-Waldo
Re:Some Backstory (Score:2)
Re:WEB interface (Score:1)
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Wow, Scott McNealy was right - we really don't have anonymity any more (I know, he said privacy, but it's close enough). This boggles the mind - the Klansmen out burning crosses at midnight or bank robbers with ski masks aren't going to obey the law anyway, so all this does is clamp down on anonymous political speech in the public arena. Even the founding fathers used pseudonyms; what do you think they'd feel about these dumb laws?
We could get rid of the KKK by performing random house-to-house searches for white supremacist literature too, but you don't see any states adopting that policy, do you? Wait, I better stop before I give people ideas :)
Caution: contents may be quarrelsome and meticulous!
Re:Heh (Score:1)
Heck, you're not allowed to put DeCSS on your web page either, but I don't imagine that was your point :)
Caution: contents may be quarrelsome and meticulous!
Re:Experiences with College "free-speech" wall (Score:2)
I was constantly tempted to paint over frat party advertisements with "THIS IS NOT A BILLBOARD" in huge letters. But I thought there was a pretty good amount of legitimate artistic expression overall.
(Pomona class of '98)
Anonymity by default? (Score:2)
This is a forum in which most if not all messages will be anonymous. It seems to be very hard to keep signal above noise in this kind of forum.
Of course, there's plenty of censorship built in, in that unpopular / socially unacceptable statements will be more likely to be erased.
I wonder if they've considered the fact that 'good' people will use the chalk and 'bad' people will use paint...
DeCSS and Scientology ? (Score:3)
High tech version in Gothenburg (Score:2)
Quite a fascinating thing to watch. The cube quickly became a popular meeting place though, so many messages were along the lines of "I'm 10 minutes late" or "Meet me at the other place instead".
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Also, by just allowing the world to view the board will affect what is written.
If you want to see what the board says, then just visit it. If instead, you want to publish opinions on the web, well there are plenty of ways to do that.
In the "great minds think alike?" department (Score:2)
I was just discussing the idea of a public writing slate over on irc.indymedia.org today. Specifically, I've been mulling over locating a large piece of white paper and pasting it up along one of the construction barriers in downtown Toronto, with some markers and an invitation to express oneself. I figure with the loads of ads for CDs, movies, dance parties, restaurants and future fucked dot.coms, why not give the people who walk by them a chance to say something of their own?
NOW magazine [nowtoronto.com] once tried a similar concept for an ad campaign [nowtoronto.com] (third item down). Large blank ads with the slogan "Speak your mind" and pens were put up in subway stations throughout Toronto, the idea being people could express themselves. The transit authority ordered the ads removed, but it was worth a shot.
We need more community forums in the community, not just on a server in some far-off state where only those "in-the-know" are aware of them.
Re:DeCSS and Scientology ? (Score:2)
Picture it. Among the posters for music, movies and dance parties, there's a section of nothing but sheets of 8x11 paper with source code on page after page, with a single word above it in huge Impact-font letters...
"DeCSS"
Wonder how long it would last...
Re:This is a giant stall. (Score:1)
If that happens, which it probably will, I think it will be a good reflection of american culture in 2001.
Just think, in 2100 kids can look at pictures of it in history books and see how _good_ things used to be.
Balls the Size of Grapefruit (Score:1)
They mention raising "private funds" to build the thing, but unfortunately aren't real clear about how one goes about making a contribution.
Scientology will just picket the board (Score:2)
Re:How long untill... (Score:1)
- - - - -
Re:How long untill... (Score:2)
?Those who would trade their liberties for a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.?
Another good one:
If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money it values more, it will lose that, too.
-- W. Somerset Maugham
- - - - -
Re:Monument??? (Score:2)
Monument [dictionary.com]:
- - - - -
Monument??? (Score:4)
Oh, wait...
- - - - -
Free speech approved by the establishment. (Score:1)
When did a slate become confrontational???
SERIOUSLY, after a hit on the bong, and a bit of converstation, my friends and I will come up with several ideas that are simple but clever. But we are not allowed to excersize them freely on public land. But because these two are officially licensed architects, they can come up with "fulid, dynamic, controversial space" for the public to excersize their opinion. Thousands have alread put up graffiti walls or comment boards on their web sites. How does this differ?
LS
Re:website (Score:1)
In my opinion, it just shows the truly cowardly nature of students who are unable to face their problems head on in a constructive and thoughtful manner. Instead, you get anonymous posts bashing other human beings for no reason except that there is a personal dislike for them. Well, I'm sorry, but take your problems to the problem itself and discuss it... Work it out... Find a solution. Don't go and act in childish ways. Deal with the matter with maturity and respect.
The education system in this country is not the fault of the parents, the government, the schools, the administrations or the teachers. These people are just trying to educate a bunch of kids who have no respect at all for educating themselves, who are the real center of the issue. I feel sorry for the teachers of our country, who are hit from both sides every day, ridiculed by students for just trying to do their job and then lambasted by the parents for not educating their children. It's just a sad state of affairs.
The students cry to be treated like they have important thoughts to say, but websites like the ones you pointed out just go to show the real nature of their minds.
This, of course, brings us back to the "community blackboard," which I foretell will become a breeding ground for hate messages, incoherent scribblings, marketing drivel and goat.sex writings. That's the nature of the beast and just goes to show the truth about who we are as human beings. Once you remove the responsibility from people of standing behind their thoughts and ideas in a face to face medium, they turn into a bunch of raving lunatics.
--
Re: (Score:2)
Hey... (Score:2)
k.
--
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people
are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
Experiences with College "free-speech" wall (Score:4)
This has, of course, garnered some controversy. E.G when someone painted a quote from some Adam Sandler stand up skit mentioning lesbians or something. Most of the things painted on it are pretty inane, and mostly stupid. Sometimes taggers get creative and put up some interesting tags. It's used as kind of an advertisement a lot.
Sometimes there are protests/real causes that get featured. Most people ignored the wall. A lot of the painting involved frat related party advertisements.
I liked that it was supposed to represent freedom of speech, but at least in our closed, college community, it was a big billboard for advertisements most of the time. Also it was pretty stagnant. Sometimes at night some group would whitewash it and paint the whole thing with some slogan, which would be noticed by everyone the next day.
Guess this post isn't saying much, but as you can tell if you don't filter the responses to a
--
"What thou shalt not, I shalt did!" -Bart Simpson
Re:How long untill... (Score:2)
Mark Duell
Give it a week... (Score:2)
Monument?? More like a tombstone. (Score:1)
www.aclu.org -- True defenders of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Re:WEB interface / FREE vs ANONYMOUS (Score:2)
This is a FREE SPEECH monument, not an ANONYMOUS SPEECH monument.
If someone wants to spend the day filling this board with 'goatse.cx' grafitti, that's fine. But they gotta show up and spend the time right there in front of onlookers to do it. And the onlookers can smile at them while erasing the junk.
Not to say ANONYMOUS SPEECH has its values, but I like this just the way it is.
Re:Experiences with College "free-speech" wall (Score:1)
Advertisement and DeCSS (Score:1)
A few have made strong points on the issue of copyright as it obviously refers to our favourite decryption software. While that's publishing the code of a readily available yet technically illegal product, don't we have more to worry about from legal campaigns? Anyone remember the 'Buried Angel' episode of the Simpsons, where it turned out to be an ad for a mall? And what about SuperGreg?
As clueless as the people who designed the opening credits and the title for Anti Trust were, some advertisers are getting pretty smart.
So is there anything in the wording of those that commissioned this to suggest what they'd do about it being used for commercial gain?
Freedom of speech is like... (Score:1)
(Sorry if this is unintelligent, I'm tired and going off to bed now. I promise.)
- Steeltoe
Re:How long untill... (Score:1)
Linus has,in fact,grown,and explosively-JonKatz
Re:Monument??? (Score:1)
Linus has,in fact,grown,and explosively-JonKatz
Re:Monument??? (Score:1)
Linus has,in fact,grown,and explosively-JonKatz
I'm amazed... (Score:2)
BTW, read the article. Well written.
Re:Uh, one minor correction (Score:1)
Uh, one minor correction (Score:2)
I think you mean "True defenders of part of our Constitution and some [aclu.org] of the Bill of Rights."
If I were to join the ACLU, I'd have to join the NRA, too, just to avoid being seen as an anti-Second Amendment advocate. (And I'm not about to do that, because the NRA's leadership is preoccupied with the notion that the industry I work in [gdconf.com] is devoted to corrupting America's youth [colorado.edu].)
Here's some homework for those of you who belong to the ACLU: ask your leaders why they don't have the balls to post a link to http://www.aclu.org/library/aaguns.html [aclu.org] on the otherwise-exhaustive "Issues" list on their front page.
Re:Uh, one minor correction (Score:2)
I do, too, and I'd like to sign up and help them fight the good fight. But I can't deal with that kind of hypocrisy.
but you can't please all of the people all of the time
I agree. It's more my problem than theirs, I suppose.
TThe community blackboard isn't in Boston (Score:1)
WEB interface (Score:2)
Better idea is huge LCD screen with from
somewhere on the net, through which anybody
can post comments.
Good idea! (Score:2)
The speech will be there. Might as well let people use chalk and a board, and encourage it!
I found the quote interesting as well. "After all, if the first amendment were up for a vote today, it might not pass". Scary, but true.
------------------------------------------
Erasure policy (Score:2)
A Community Blackboard Webcam would save its ideas (Score:1)
Now, which true-believer is willing to install / operate a web cam for our edification...?
Seriously, I've been campaigning for a SlashDot clone in a number of areas of political & organisational life...
In this connection, I heard a well-positioned UK unionist (speaking to an Adelaide audience of Adult educators & students at one of its TAFE campuses) say that:
BTW, it's not like union members don't have access to computers and the Internet...
He also told the audience that British Telecom employees get one day off (in 5) for Internet-based training - from memory - in their own homes!
Can someone confirm this "rumor"...?
(Maybe DEC was right -not- to have unions... e.g. in Sweden)
Bill^H^H^H^HChalkboard Liberation (Score:2)
Check it out! You could do it too, and on the cheap!
---
Lawyers: On your marks, get set... (Score:1)
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Maybe they even could attach a robotic arm so people on the net could add to the board. Or maybe that's just going too far...
Re:Some Backstory (Score:2)
People will inevitably spray-paint it. Won't it be ruined quickly?
The University of Virginia, in the very same town, already has something similar to the free speech monument.
I'm referring to Beta Bridge [virginiaonlinemag.org]. No chalk here--just paint. Beta Bridge works because it takes *effort* to post there. You have to paint a fairly large surface, and you have to guard your work all night to make sure nobody paints over it. IIRC, it's an unwritten rule that you don't paint after Sun-up. The bridge is nominally controlled by the adjacent Delta Upsilon fraternity house, and you also need to put "Thx DU" somewhere in your work.
I won't go into the history of why people are allowed to paint this bridge, or why DU controls Beta's bridge, but it's quite a colorful story and it ought to be available online somwhere.
More Beta Bridge (Score:3)
Here [cavalierdaily.com] is what happens when people decide to get controversial with it.
OK, enough of this. Just do what I did. Use Google. [google.com]
Re:This is a giant stall. (Score:3)
I don't see why people would be offended at the sight of Sendmail rewrite rules.
--
later they used the word, "chiseled" - poor choice (Score:2)
I worry about NOTHING people write with chalk, or erase, etc.
I worry about what they PAINT, and what they CHISEL.
That makes the statement that we Americans just can't handle free speech anymore, and perhaps we just plain don't deserve it, either. Sad day when the first permanent mark goes up on the monument.
First thing to do with it... (Score:1)
Re:How long untill... (Score:2)
I can see the headlines... (Score:1)
Computer Hacker Hospitalized with Severe RSI After Several Failed Attempts to Scrawl Complete DeCCS Code on Community Blackboard
I mean, it'll just have to happen, right?
--
Re:Uh, one minor correction (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re:Uh, one minor correction (Score:1)
Maybe you would be more interested in the Libertarian Party..they are NOT the same as the ACLU, even though a lot of their views are the same. Here are their views on gun control http://www.lp.org/issues/gun-rights.html. I think it might fall right in line with yours
Jaysyn
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re:I wonder... (Score:5)
Jaysyn
Millions Flying to SC (Score:2)
This is a giant stall. (Score:4)
@#( &#%& #$(*(& jews! @#(&%@# &%* nigga sh#@( &#*^
And it will gradually fill up with spray paint and permanent marker and pretty soon sane people will just walk by without responding in any way. Eventually, it will be declared an eyesore cesspit of racial slurs and four-letter words and will be torn down.
Let's face it: we all have free speech, but when do Americans ever speak publicly? Usually only when they're upset about something. Moving free speech to the street like this will just give people on the street who aren't in a hurry (i.e. those that basically live there) a place to vent all of their anger at institutional capitalism and perceived systemic wrongs.
Not that I'm against free speech. I just don't think this'll last, because people don't like to help ugly free speech along if they can avoid it.
Re:Experiences with College "free-speech" wall (Score:1)
We have one at my school (Roanoke College) too...affectionately known as "the Rock," it's a pillar that mysteriously appreared one night after the school (temporarily) banned alcohol on campus...a lot of enterprising students showed up, dug a hole, put a keg in it, filled it with concrete, and put a huge slab of stone upright on top, decreeing that there would ALWAYS be alcohol on the Roanoke campus.
Over the years, the Rock has had quite a lot painted onto it, and now every few years people scrape off the accumulated paint to make way for new generations, and while it's usually nothing more than a big stone bulletin board, you occasionally see something interesting painted up there (like the paraphernalia for Duck Day, where a group of fun-loving students go out every year and stick rubber ducks on every tree, bush, and building in sight...can't imagine who would do such a thing...). Overall, it's a pretty nice thing. But this is a liberal arts college campus...doing it in the middle of a town is gutsy and I'm surprised it got approved.
Re:Heh (Score:2)
For those who want other places to put DeCSS, check out the popular 42 ways to distribute DeCSS [zoy.org].
--
Re:Hey... (Score:1)
--
How long untill... (Score:3)
I go with Ben franklyn on this one: "Those that exchange comfort for saftey deserve neither"
The Lottery:
eh.... (Score:1)
Don't get me wrong, I support free speech, but this wall isn't free speech so much as it is a place to leave a temporary message. According to the FAQ [tjcenter.org]:
The whole thing seems more like an art exhibit than a public place for free speech. And frankly, it isn't all that exciting.
Instead of this... (Score:1)
"FP FP FP FP FP FP !!!!"
From the FAQ (Score:2)
In the meantime, feel free to draw little penguins on the sidewalk in indelible ink. Barring that, note that large concrete structures passable as a venue for artistic expression is currently available at every office building in the downtown area. Do not think yourself limited to only concrete, metropolitan glass and flora are right at your fingertips.
Dancin Santa
Defamation, Threats, etc. (Score:1)
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Anyway, enough with the mushy stuff, I just hope I'll be first in line.
Re:I wonder... (Score:3)
Re:Monument??? (Score:1)
I look forward to the time when the city of Frankenmuth, Mich., erects a giant stein in the middle of town, as a monument to free beer.
----------
I wonder... (Score:5)
To a certain extent I believe them. On the other hand, maybe it won't be so bad, at least at first. When some kid finds out that he can write "my teacher is a weenie" and nobody will punish him for it, he'll have learned what "free speech" is all about.
And some mornings, there will be 4-letter words written accross the wall in 6 foot tall letters. And maybe somebody will stop by on their way to work and erase them and write a poem up in their place.
All in all, it'll be a fascinating experiment. And even if it "fails", due to vandalism, it still will have encouraged people to think about freedom of speech in everyday terms, which has to be a good thing overall.
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Someone will write a swear-word on the wall, with paint, so
The poet won't be able to use the eraser on this, so
Buckets of turpentine must also be provided, so
We can therefore expect some really wacky poetry.
I do think that this is a really creative and wholly worthwhile endeavor. It will be like an analog version of Slashdot.
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
I'm serious. [onlineathens.com]
Really. [aclumich.org]
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
Commit random acts of kindness and senseless beauty.
Pity it never caught on....
-----------------
Re:Uh, another minor correction (Score:1)
website (Score:2)
Heh (Score:1)
Damn, guess that means no illegal mp3 trading...
Ways to circumvent (Score:2)
1) hire lackees to scribble all over blackboard, rendering the writings of others unintelligible.
2) hire "janitors" to "clean" the blackboard (from site: "regardless of what is on it, the slate will be cleaned by maintenance staff on a regularly scheduled basis. Thus, everything placed on the monument is temporary.")
3) do nothing. why the hell would i want to walk all the way to a towns square to scribble something in chalk when I can post something on the internet?
Re:It's free speech until.... (Score:1)
Surely the whole point of free spech, and this project, is that you can afford to give "people too much latitude". In fact you have to do so. If it is a right it can not be taken away.
Re:This is a giant stall. (Score:2)
An example; there's this weblog called heavybias.com, where people are encouraged to enter topics that cause controversy, and the more controversial a topic is, the higher it is scored. You will be amazed by the lack of controversy on that site. They could not produce a flame-war to save their lives. Pretty much every comment is as balanced and politically correct as you can get it.
But I am still pretty sure your prediction will prevail, there's just too many clueless kids out there. Time, random, and big numbers will prove that you're right.
Re:How long untill... (Score:2)
You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself.
Another way of putting it (Score:1)
There are a bunch of advantages to the physical version though. First is that net forums can be ignored more easily than 6 foot high letters in the middle of the city. Also, there is no need to worry about a 'digital divide', because it is free, lo-tech, and easy to use.
Perhaps some copycat projects are in order, so let's see how this one turns out. And heck, there are very occasionally intelligent things written in bathroom stalls.
Re:I wonder... (Score:1)
It'd be more like a physical version of Wiki [c2.com].
Personally, I'd just use the blackboard to do math problems.
Chaos-Order (Score:1)
The real beauty of this blackboard might not be the representation of free speech, but rather what kind of statements can be formulated and agreed upon by an entire town. At first everyone will want to write what they want on the blackboard. However, once the blackboard is filled people will start looking at what they have written, trying to combine similar statements to save space. Erasing words you don't like will actually improve the message of the board, making it more closely match the entire town's opinions. Eventually the board will reach a state of stability, with few people changing it, because everyone will have had their turn at free expression and refined their message.
This board will create a polarization of the town. Maybe the entire town, if the citizens are generally like-minded, will agree on a certain set of statements or philosophy to depict on the board. On the other hand, the writings might divide themselves into distinct groups, each of which will battle for its own voice. However, I don't think these groups will erase their ennemy's writings and replace them with their own. They will find it more effective to write their opposing viewpoints next to their ennemies' writings. Counter-arguments are always most effective when contrasted with their opposing statements. If they stood alone, having erased the opposition, they would be subject to their own criticism.
Anyway, back to free speech. I only partly see how this board encourages free speech. Obviously, everyone can add thier own opinion or attitude to the board--at least, everyone who gets to the board before it fills. However, the ability of other people to erase the work of free speakers does not seem to go with free speech. The right to burn books opposed to your viewpoint is not included in your right to free speech. The erasure of messages on the board, whether to attempt to "wipe out" that argument or simply to free some space, seems to indicate that it is all right to burn your opponents books.
In the end, I think this board will be more of a collaborative tool for the town than a free speech community board. However, the blackboard will still be able to act as a monument to free speech because it does have the basic qualities of an open democracy.
}