Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Sales TAX? VAT???? (Score 1) 913

Here's a shocker: whether you tax income or consumption, you're taking the same amount of money out of the economy. The only difference is who you're taking it from. So you should do whichever one is easier and that has the degree of progressivity or regressivity that you want (if you're concerned with that at all). And keep in mind that taxes are made to be spent, so what comes out of the economy as taxes goes right back in again and ends up as somebody's income (maybe even yours!). Society is no poorer, it's just that someone different holds the loot.

Comment Re:Missing option: (Score 3, Insightful) 913

The average total effective tax rate (federal income, payroll, state and local taxes property sales etc.) for billionaires is around 31%. Are you telling me you get taxed more than Bill Gates?

But OK, I'll indulge. Let's abolish taxes. No more army. No more navy. No more state or local police. Or justice system. Now try holding onto all your hard-earned cash. Do you prefer paying 30% of your income to your federal, state and local governments or to a private security firm that may or may not just take your money and run (then you'll have to hire another firm to go track them down!).

See? The social contract isn't such a bad deal after all.

Comment Re:Business focus, not consumer focus... (Score 1) 913

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/just-how-progressive-is-the-tax-system/

Total taxes paid (federal, state and local including payroll, sales, property, etc.) for bottom quintile: 18.7% of income.

18.7% of income is not no taxes.

The average for the highest incomes is around 31% of income. That includes the top 1% of earners.

Earth

Submission + - SPAM: Giant rubber snakes to capture wave power?

Roland Piquepaille writes: "UK researchers have developed a prototype of a future giant rubber tube which could catch energy from sea waves. The device, dubbed Anaconda, uses 'long sea waves to excite bulge waves which travel along the wall of a submersed rubber tube. These are then converted into flows of water passing through a turbine to generate electricity.' So far, the experiments have been done with tubes with diameters of 0.25 and 0.5 meters. But if the experiments are successful, future full-scale Anaconda devices would be 200 meters long and 7 meters in diameter, and deployed in water depths of between 40 and 100 meters. An Anaconda would deliver an output power of 1MW (enough to power 2,000 houses). These devices would be deployed in groups of 20 or even more providing cheap electricity without harming our environment. But read more for additional details and pictures showing how the Anaconda works and how these systems could be used in farms of 20 or more."
The Internet

Even Before Memex, a Plan For a Networked World 119

phlurg writes "The New York Times presents an amazing article on 'the Mundaneum,' a sort of proto-WWW conceived of by Paul Otlet in 1934. 'In 1934, Otlet sketched out plans for a global network of computers (or "electric telescopes," as he called them) that would allow people to search and browse through millions of interlinked documents, images, audio and video files. He described how people would use the devices to send messages to one another, share files and even congregate in online social networks. He called the whole thing a "réseau," which might be translated as "network" — or arguably, "web."' A fascinating read." (You may be reminded of Vannevar Bush's "Memex," which shares some of the same ideas.)

Slashdot Top Deals

nohup rm -fr /&

Working...