Gore Puts Internet For Auction On eBay (Updated) 150
The folks over at SatireWire have got a pretty amusing article regarding Al Gore's newest fund raising effort. The fund raising in politics these days - sheesh. Updated 6:00 GMT by timothy: AntiNorm writes: "As of 9/17 0538 GMT, the auction is no longer valid." Seems like all the good auctions get pulled.
Re:Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:2)
Re:Algore. Opening bid:$0.01 (Score:1)
Budist Munk bids: $0.03
Big Oil bids: $0.04
Chineese National bids: $0.05
Hmmm even with all of Algores biggest supporters, he's worthless.
Say what you will, but I bet Al Gore can spell Buddhist, monks, andChinese.
I had to highest bid (Score:1)
Gore (Score:2)
Well, the most technically astute president in the last several decades (and perhaps ever) was Jimmy Carter, who was a nuclear engineer. He was also the last man who had a credible claim to being a "Washington outsider," and one of the most honest men who has ever occupied the White House. And he was a mediocre president, at best.
Thus, I'm not necessarily faulting Gore -- he at least knew who to listen to, whether he himself was technically savvy or not. So if I were voting just on the basis of who would most likely be net-friendly (and not just follow corporate interests and the wishes of the national security apparatus), I'd give him the nod. But it's real hard to get much enthusiasm over either of the major candidates.
Re:Satire or truth? (Score:1)
The moderators must be stoned today. This one was even better than Trent Lott and the paperclip.
Do not teach Confucius to write Characters
Re:For Sale (Score:2)
I wish the politicians would just grow up!
--
News just in... (Score:2)
Guess owning the net does have its downsides.
Re:Just A Hint Of Truth (Score:1)
Re:Just A Hint Of Truth (Score:1)
Re:Plus confusion over the word "initiative" (Score:1)
Re:Does this mean Trent Lott will be auctioning... (Score:1)
Re:you're no better (Score:2)
It ain't done yet, it seems to me.
Some people are still taking the initiative in its continued creation.
Thanks to Al for his contributions in Congress in the eighties and nineties. And thanks to some of you out there who are taking the initiative in other spheres now! - Steve
Re:British versus American pronunciations (Score:2)
It's called a router, because it provides the route for packets from A to B. I can't think of what the row-te from A to B is supposed to be!
:-)
Re:Satire or truth? (Score:1)
Re:Gore didn't say he "invented" it (Score:2)
As someone who sweated bricks bringing my employer, a community college, onto the Internet in 1993, I knew first hand that it takes a lot more to bring Internet access to students than just bringing it to the front door, including internal wiring, computer purchases, and the biggest part, local desktop computer management.
So when the initiative to wire up every classroom came down, I wondered if they'd also hire the army of techs to take care of it all.
Of course, they didn't.
Instead, locally, we have some poor underpaid state sod who runs around to a dozen or so schools under his watch and re-ghosts the labs and goes away, which makes the computers usable for about half a day until various students, both intentional and accidental, re-trash the install so the computers sit unused again until the poor sod gets back there in a few weeks.
Yeah, there are better ways to do it. We install NT on our classroom desktops with strict ACLs and policies to prevent local changes as much as possible. Of course, NT by design is pretty braindead in this area so you have to have system directories with change access to everyone else it won't work at all (imagine /bin as 1777) so problems do happen, but not as often.
But that's the point, these schools everywhere don't have the resources to develop better solutions to net use in the classroom, so they rely on limited techs doing the impossible while the computers sit unusable for most of the time.
And don't get me started about how the teachers themselves often never got the training to use it.
In a lot of poorer areas, their school's Internet connection is a few PCs in the library and that's it.
But hey, literally it may be true. Every school has Internet access. So we can call it a "success" I guess... :-(
Re:you're no better (Score:4)
1990 was an example, not a fact... (Score:1)
I suspect what he was referring to was his introduction of the Supercomputer Network Act of 1986 which provided funding to Universities to sponsor computer development.
I don't think Al Gore was trying to take credit for something he didn't do. I think you are not giving enough credit to the people who put forth the funding for what amounted to a good idea.
Good ideas are a dime a dozen... The key is convincing others the idea is good, and getting someone to help bankroll the development.
And that's all Al Gore said was that he recognized it as a good idea long before other politicians did. Basically saying he's more progressive than the other old codgers.
And that's saying a lot for a Congress where only about 30% of them even know how to use a web browser today.
Just wait... (Score:1)
"[F]irst he called me a rat and now he's paid someone to make fun of me for discovering the Internet...boo...fuckin'...hooo!!!" - Al Gore
The saddest part of this whole situation is that one of these two idiots in just over three months will be the most powerful man in the world. Forget fathom, plague, or nuclear holocaust....THAT scares the livin' **SHIT** out of me!!!
-J
Re:Just wait... (Score:4)
"Information Superhighway" vs the Internet (Score:2)
The internet has been around since the 1960s, and it has always been peer-to-peer. and its been around a lot longer then Gore's tenure in congress. The 'net is decentralized access for everyone, not just the giant media corporations.
That dosn't mean gore didn't try hard to mold the 'net into the IS after everyone got hooked up. Gore pushed hard for the CDA and encryption restriction. Aperantly he didn't really understand what the net was or how it worked. As for wireing up the fediral government? well, thats good I suppose, but accessing government documents isn't really something that lots of people do.
His exact quote was "During my tenure in congress, I took the initiative in creating the internet"
And on the other side, we have 'the dubya', gees, whats the point of getting out of bed this november....
Re:you're no better (Score:2)
Try again. Have a look at RFC675 [isi.edu]. Read the title carefully. Notice the date? December 1974. AFAIK that's the first known occurrence of the word "Internet".
In September 1981, RFCs 791 [isi.edu], 792 [isi.edu] and 793 [isi.edu] appeared, defining IP, ICMP and TCP (note the "I" in "IP") in the final version which is still theirs today (minor options and exceptions nonwithstanding).
There is nothing wrong with having been using the Internet for nearly ten years in 1990.
In fact, even though the word hadn't appeared yet, the "official birthday" of the Internet is generally taken to be April 7, 1969, the day of publication of the very first RFC [isi.edu] by Steve Crocker. See "Thirty years of RFCs" [isi.edu] for more historical considerations, and also the the Internet timeline [isi.edu].
Great (Score:1)
Re:Ebay is already a joke (Score:1)
Yay UK politics. We have three major parties, and they all tell the same lies, walk the same walk. It's boring. Why can't someone just stand up and tell the truth: "You want better services? Better Policing, a better NHS, better education and a better life? Then we need to raise taxes. Will you seriously miss a 1 pound Income Tax rise? One pound a week? Not much is it...". Now that would be refreshing.
off-topic, but funny (Score:1)
Jaeger
www.JohnQHacker.com
GodHatesCalvinists.com
Re:Gore is a much better "geek" canidate than Bush (Score:1)
It would take a LOT of balls for a candidate to get up on some major TV talk show and say "I'm opposed to filtering the Internet -- let the parents monitor their children themselves." Not even a major candidate like Gore could do that and still have a lead in a tight race like this.
Re:I wonder.... ( An example of e-crime - geessh ) (Score:1)
Letterman + Internet (Score:2)
"5. I invented the internet, and I can take it away. Think about it."
Gore was a pretty good sport.
Re:What is the going price (Score:1)
Judging by the number of politicians selling out, I'd say its fairly low. High supply, comparatively low demand, all that economics stuff. But they are in positions of power, and they do have to get re-elected, so that must raise it some... I'd say that stock options would do just fine. ^_^
-RickHunter
Re:you're no better (Score:1)
Re:you're no better (Score:5)
In the late '80s the military insisted on cracking down on "unofficial use." Many schools and contractors wound up having to justify their access, and came up short. Efforts to start member-supported networks, such as CSNET, got a lukewarm reception since they (1) cost too much (no more 100% government subsidy) and (2) did too little (email and limited file transfer only). It took an act of congress to get these folks hooked up again: the ARPANET was split into the MILNET and NSFNET (NSF == National Science Foundation), with the latter offering subsidized access to any academic institution that wanted it and paid its share. And it was after this split that users starting refering to it as just "The Internet" (though from time to time I heard ARPANET referred to as "The ARPA Internet" back in the '80s).
Guess who wrote the bill that funded NSFNET? Or the National Supercomputing Initiative which built its backbone? Or the one somehwat later that lifted restrictions on commercial use? Yup, Smilin' Al (or, rather, one of his staffers wrote the bill and he sponsored it).
When you look at it from a technical perspective, saying that he "created" the Internet is a clear absurdity. But from a legislative and public policy perspective, it's hardly an exaggeration. I'm not convinced that Al "gets" the Internet any more than W does. But he did manage to listen to someone on his staff who "got" it. (And I've been racking my brain to remember the guy's name--I met him briefly while I was working at The RAND Corporation.) It's too bad that so few technophiles go to work as congressional staffers; it leaves me with some doubts as to whether Gore wasn't just "lucky" to be involved with the Internet.
Oh how funny! (Score:1)
Re:you're no better (Score:1)
I guess I'm in the other 1% then... I was using the net (when it was still called the Arpanet) back in '82 using a 2400bps acoustic coupler. None of this graphical WWW shit back then!
Re: (Score:2)
Credit where its due can be found here (Score:1)
The aution is funny, deal with it.
Gore's inability to grasp technical issues or his misreprentation of them to further his own ends is not as funny. He's supported restrictions on crypto exports, wants to shut down oil drilling, and favors coal burning. A dude with a poly sci undergrad and a law degree sets himself up for such attacks when he attempts to publish works way outside his field. "Earth in the Balance" is a very scary read indeed. It was published a while back and parts of it might sound stupid now, so don't expect open source Al to put it on the web anytime soon.
Re: (Score:1)
I'll bet... (Score:1)
Re:politician auction (Score:1)
I wonder.... ( An example of e-crime - geessh ) (Score:2)
Hmmm, what kind of idiot would it take to buy something from someone who isn't really Al Gore?
Oh. Oops - I forgot the calibar of people on the net...
Another story for e-crime pundits I guess...
Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:1)
Re:I wonder.... ( An example of e-crime - geessh ) (Score:1)
It's a _satire_, a joke, fake news. There is no auction, not even a fake one, on eBay.
As written in the 2nd paragraph of the linked article: the 'auction' lasts for 10 days, starts at $1 and hopes to get $400B.
Re:Gore took credit for something beyond him (Score:1)
Sorry, but someone beat you to it. (Score:3)
http://www.whattheheck.com/ebay/algore. html [whattheheck.com]
Re:eBay URL (Score:1)
eBay URL (Score:3)
http://cgi.ebay.co m/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=439118853 [ebay.com]
=================================
Re:Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:1)
Seriously though, I almost start puking when I hear people talking about "row-ters" because it just seems so... so... American. Anyway....
Re:Jean... (Score:1)
Terminology (Score:2)
The terms "internet" and "internetworking" have existed from the beginning as names for the technology. But until the MILNET split, no one called the network which used those technologies "The Internet." It was "The ARPANET."
This is why politics suck. (Score:2)
Take off your weisenheimer hat for a moment and try to be fair while considering this.
Marc Andreeson created the Mosaic browser under a government grant to support high performance computing. The grant program was created by legislation authored by Al Gore. Maybe Andreeson would have got alternate funding, or maybe he'd have worked on something else. But Mosaic is clearly a watershed event; Gore didn't write it, but without Gore it might not have been written.
Do a little research:
1986 -- sponsored Supercomputer Network Act (remember back when all the Internet goodies used to come out of NCSA?), and Supercomputer Network Study Act.
1988 -- sponsored the National High Performance Computing Act (which funded Andreeson's work).
1992 -- sponsored the Information Infrastructure and Technology Act
1996 -- worked to support deregulation allowing cable companies to sell Internt service.
I'd call this a pretty good record for a young senator with no personal technical background. It's all the more remarkable in that I doubt very much the good folk back home in Tennesee were clamoring to have the nation's universities hooked up over high speed WANS.
Now, what exactly did Al say about all this? That he "took initiative on creating the Internet." Is there hyperbole here -- sure. It makes it sound like that when he took part in supporting research initiatives and policy changes he knew exactly what it would all turn into. The emphasis on supercomputers shows he was probably off the mark -- aiming to connect researchers to large computing utilities the way people are connected to large power plants.
The fact is nobody knew this computer networking thing would be the driving force in the new economy.
That the thing about technology -- sometimes the seed has to be planted even when you don't know what it's going to grow into. This is where you need government involvement in technology -- to do things which ought to be done but whose commercial fruits are unpredictable.
Now, there's a lot of Al Gore's current positions that make me uncomfortable. The V-chip thing seems quixotic to me. Did you ever see a piece of home technology the parents could work but the kids couldn't? Kids'll be blackmailing adults so they can watch "Survivor". Also, when people start getting up on a soap box about protecting children on the Internet I get a rash. Hint to parents: put the computer in a public place and make it clear there is NO privacy to be expected on the Internet.
So, there are legitimate reasons to be a bit leery of Gore, just like any body who has the particular skills to get himself into the position where he very well might become president.
But, if you are making your evaluation of one of the leading contenders for presidency of the United States on the basis of the "Father of the Internet" joke, you're a joke yourself -- as a citizen.
Re:Why not read... (Score:1)
Re:Terminology (Score:1)
Re:Gore took credit for something beyond him (Score:1)
Now the fact that people knew this and were happy with him as a president... not _that_ speaks volumes.
Re:you're no better (Score:1)
How about none of the above.
The government has grown since he and Bill have been in office, the only part that has been "shrunk" is the military.
He didn't have jack to do with the internet.
The economy growth that we were enjoying is due to Ronny and the Republican congress. Read your economics texts and pay attention to how long it takes for top level inputs to actually affect the economy.
We have suffered through the most corrupt administration in the last 100 years.
P.
One thing I'd like to know (Score:1)
Re:Plus confusion over the word "initiative" (Score:2)
OTOH, there was that entire year I can't remember due to too many drugs...
Re:Gore took credit for something beyond him (Score:2)
Good point. It demonstrates just how morally corrupt they are.
BTW--I'm not saying the Republicans don't have their fair share of morally corrput members either. If it were up to me, I'd trash the whole damn morally corrupt government and start over.
Re:Terminology (Score:2)
Cool; perhaps you did. Nobody I knew did, but I'm hardly omniscient. However, what it was called has little to do with my original point: the "Internet" of the day (whatever it was called) isn't what we call the "Internet" today.
Perhaps a bit of residue left over from the changeover of the early '90's will convince you. Network 10 (addresses where the first octet is "10") are not routed over the Internet. Addresses in this range are used for internal networks, for testing, and what-not. Well, guess what the first octet of all ARPANET addresses was? Yup, it was 10.
Back when I first started working for them, RAND's address on the ARPANET was 10.0.0.7 (and not coincidentally, they were about the seventh node to join the ARPANET). At the time of the MILNET split, RAND received the new address 192.5.14.* (along with a few other class C's) which it has today; needless to say, the old address, like the ARPANET itself, no longer exists.
My original point remains: several acts of Congress opened up and funded the Internet as we know it today, legislation that came out of Gore's office. You can love him or hate him for other reasons, but he at least deserves credit for that.
Re: Just a big Joke (Score:1)
Don't you guys get it... It's a joke!!! Someone is trying to auction off the internet and they just made up the story about Al Gore. Send the story to Segfault [segfault.org].
I though
Although it was a good joke...
Re:I'll bet... (Score:1)
Is there some sort of law that says that the only well-done partisian website can be www.gwbush.com? He's certainly the most original.
Re:Why making fun of gore? (Score:1)
Could be worse, could be this beggar (Score:1)
Does this mean Trent Lott will be auctioning... (Score:3)
Satire or truth? (Score:2)
British versus American pronunciations (Score:1)
Silly Fools. The Internet Is On My Hard Drive. (Score:5)
Once (as the story goes), and I'm not sure how, but I accidentally clicked on something and I got a message saying "Are you sure you want to delete The Internet?" Boy, was I scared. I know a lot of work went into that thing. But I guess if I deleted it, we could all go home.
driver's licence - question (Score:1)
Re:This is why politics suck. (Score:2)
Somewhat recently there was a great piece which showed how he has changed from someone supporting tobacco and guns and opposing abortion to just the opposite. The man's an opportunist and an authoritarian one at that. Remember his wife...
Me, I don't vote. It's a stupid way to select leaders. The majority don't know any more and are no more noble than a minority. Most people are twits. It's bread & circuses time folks.
Re:I'll bet... (Score:1)
What does this mean? (Score:1)
Are you really a government worker? Your studied incoherence makes me think this could be an attempt at a troll.
If you are an actual government worker and this is the best prose you can produce, well, I'd better accelerate my plans to move all my assets offshore.
Clinton... (Score:1)
Re:Silly Fools. The Internet Is On My Hard Drive. (Score:1)
Re:This is why politics suck. (Score:2)
YES!
I'm a liberal democrat. I think of this as the politics of decency. I think it is hypocritical for liberals to collect material on Mr. Quayle with the intention of destroying his stature. Look -- Quayle had a talent for misstating himself, and while this may have been enough to disqualify him from high office it does not necessarily make him stupid. However, the press picked up on this and amplified it out of proportion; it turned him into a one dimensional caricature.
For some it as a political vendetta, but what it was really about was that the press likes a good story whether it gives a true picture of the man or not. Remember their depiction of Ted Kennedy in the 1980 election; you may hate Kennedy, but he is not a moron. In fact he is widely considered by his peers as one of the best parliamentarians on the Senate.
Gore has made a career out of having his gaffes under-reported. There was a great bit I recall seeing once--perh. in the National Review--which demonstrated that he may very well have had more moronicisms than Quayle.
Which goes to show how intellectually empty the excercise of reporting misstatements is. Gore is an exceptionally intelligent person, with a tremendous capacity for hard work, and superb memory for facts. However when you speak as a politician, you have to be on guard that nothing you say can be taken out of context and spliced together in a way that twists your meaning. No wonder all we get from politicians is emotionalistic gobbledygook.
In any case, if story gets out that a politican makes mistakes when he speaks extemporaneously, he's going to get exactly the same treatment. Quayle was crucified because he jumped onto stage (literally) as a young unknown and everyone questioned whether he had the weight to do the job. That stuff doesn't stick to Gore because the lazy media already has decided what the story is on him: hard working, but a cold fish -- too much intellect and not enough heart.
Me, I don't vote. It's a stupid way to select leaders. The majority don't know any more and are no more noble than a minority. Most people are twits. It's bread & circuses time folks.
You are horribly misquided on this one. It is true that if you can identify a minority of the population who are reliably intelligent, informed, reasonable and wise you could give over government to them. It is also true that if you can identify a minority of the population who are reliably intelligent, informed, reasonable and wise then the moon is made of green cheese -- a falsehood implies anything. If the history of the 20th century shows anything, it shows that governments that cannot be replaced by the people are extremely dangerous to them.
Not voting is volunteering to be a slave. Not voting because voters are stupid is volunteering to be a slave to stupid people.
If the public is uniformed, inform them. If they are ignorant, teach them. If they are foolish guide them.
Re:Plus confusion over the word "initiative" (Score:2)
Yes, that's true. The trouble is Gore exaggerates as he breathes:
1) He claimed to be a co-sponsor of the McCain/Feingold campaign finance reform bill -- but Feingold and Gore have never been in Congress at the same time. (Kernel of truth: he supported the bill)
2) He claimed to have discovered Love Canal. But his first involvement was a year after Carter declared it a federal disaster area. (Kernel of truth: he sponsored Congressional hearings on Love Canal)
3) He claimed to be the inspiration for "Love Story". (Kernel of truth: he did have contact with the creator of Love Story)
4) He claimed that as a journalist his investigations put people in prison. (Kernel of truth: someoine he investigated was convicted and fined)
5) He claimed that in Vietnam he came under fire. (Kernel of truth: As a military journalist, he did walk some patrols in downtown Saigon, and may have arived on the scene shortly after shooting had stopped)
6) He claimed to have been the initiator of the Earned Income Tax Credit, which was passed before he entered Congress. (Kernel of truth: he did support the EITC in Congress)
The question thus becomes; does Gore exaggerate deliberately or unconsciously? The first answer is very disturbing; the second would betray either a tendency to self-aggrandizement (fairly harmless, esp. for a politician) or to a lack of self-confidence (a potential problem in a crisis situation).
I think it's probably a tendency to self-aggrandizement, which really is a minor character flaw of little importance in a Presidential election. But given that I'm not voting for him anyway, I'd like everybody to think he's deliberately lying to get votes in an act of contempt for the intelligence of the American people
Steven E. Ehrbar
Re:Gore took credit for something beyond him (Score:1)
Pan
Re:I'll bet... (Score:1)
--
Re:For Sale (Score:2)
Yep. For a nice comparison of our two candidates, visit Billionaires for Bush (or Gore) [billionair...orgore.com].
But I'm still voting anti-Bush.Re:For Sale (Score:1)
more brain fodder... (Score:1)
by Declan McCullagh
"Gore played no positive role in the decisions that led to the creation of the Internet as it now exists -- that is, in the opening of the Internet to commercial traffic," said Steve Allen, vice president for communications at the conservative Progress and Freedom Foundation.
Since 1993, Gore has become one of the most prominent people in the Clinton administration on issues related to high technology. He hosts visiting businessmen and takes pride in personally announcing new technology initiatives such as Internet II funding.
He also took the lead in supporting the Clipper Chip and continued restrictions on the overseas shipments of encryption products.
High-visibility events can be prone to embarrassing slip-ups. At one recent White House event, Gore introduced Cisco Systems CEO John Chambers, who he had met with privately earlier that day.
Gore told the audience how much he valued Chambers and one of the products Cisco produced. But he mispronounced "routers" as root-ers.
geez, he is our hero!
Re:Plus confusion over the word "initiative" (Score:2)
I guess whether or not it's a lie depends on what your definition of "is" is. (Oh wait, that's a different guy...
I have lots to criticize Gore about. Let's not even get started about illegal campaign contributions, selling American nuclear secrets to the Chinese, etc.
That wouldn't be news for nerds, that would be politics for hotheads.
Gore didn't say he "invented" it (Score:2)
Some apparently would have us believe that the Internet's creation was completed prior to 1980. Silly stuff. As Vint Cerf said in '93 (http://cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/vinton-cerf -testimony [cpsr.org]): "In 1982, there were about 100 computers on the ARPANET and a few score others were part of the NSF-sponsored CSNET which also used the Telenet public data network. In 1993 there are over 1.5 million of them."
So what happened between '82 and '93? Well a whole bunch of people took the initiative in a great many spheres... and in Congress no one more so than Big Al. Among his various initiatives, apparently, was a 1986 legislative effort calling for interconnection of the 5 super-computing Centers, with fiber optic technology, including the one in Illinois where Andreesen et al later developed Mosaic.
Gore's sufficiently cognizant of the Internet's history to know that no one person or group of people "invented" it. And it wasn't created at any particular time; it was the creation of many people over many years. And in Congress, the main chap was Al G., right? Or who am I forgetting?
- Steve R.
you're no better (Score:5)
It's sad that instead of giving the guy some credit, you have to mock him over and over again because of a little exaggeration that happened years ago.
Re:Does this mean Trent Lott will be auctioning... (Score:2)
Agreed. Nothing entertains me more than seeing Jay Leno rip the side I'm voting against and then turn around and rip the side I'm voting for. Though I do require that his jokes actually be funny, on both sides of the fence.
--
Re:Gore is a much better "geek" canidate than Bush (Score:2)
Yeah, that would be too close to supporting genuine family values. What the public wants is censorship under the code name of "family values". (Or "protect the children". Pick your code name on the basis of your political leanings - they both mean the same thing.)
--
Re:Just wait... (Score:2)
Consider that while international politics are a factor, most of what George W. or Al will do will be of minor interest to people outside the US. However, the US economy has a huge influence on the world economy, and to a large extent, Alan Greenspan regulates its growth.
What is the going price (Score:5)
Does E-bay auction entire politicians? Or do they just auction votes on individual bills?
Re:I'll bet... (Score:2)
Re:Gore took credit for something beyond him (Score:2)
Illegal campaign contributions, FBI files, White Water, Juanita Broderick, hmmm...I'd say clinton lied about FAR MORE than a simple blow job.
Or is this all part of that same "vast right wing conspiracy." Hmph.
Re:Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:5)
Re:Gore didn't say he "invented" it (Score:2)
As former FCC Chair Reed Hundt indicated, Gore deserves a portion of the credit: [fcc.gov]
"On a personal note, many years ago I had a conversation with then-Senator Al Gore about his wish to see a schoolgirl in Carthage, Tennessee be able to learn from the limitless resources of the Library of Congress, without being barred by time, distance, and lack of money from such opportunities. He explained to me -- and this was long before the Internet was invented -- that fiber optic cable would make the connection between the schoolgirl and a bright future.
From this conversation came this Commission's desire to include classroom connections as an essential goal of universal service. President Clinton in several State of the Union speeches and many other appearances mobilized a national commitment to this goal. And as Vice President, Al Gore has never let a week, or perhaps a day, go by without working to bring to every schoolchild the opportunity to learn on the information highway -- a term he coined.
Thanks to the untiring efforts of Senators Snowe, Rockefeller, Exxon, Kerrey, Hollings, Congressman Markey, Secretary of Education Riley, and many others the Commission was given the legislative mandate to fund connections to every one of two million classrooms in all 100,000 schools in our country. School groups from all over the country supported these congressional initiatives and then pursued their implementation in our rules.
-- Steve
Re:you're no better (Score:3)
I think perhaps you should heed your own advice.
I don't think any reasonable person believes that Al Gore believes he created the Internet. Calling Gore the inventor of the Internet is mocking the fact that he (as many politicians do) tried to give himself more credit than he is due. He screwed up. In all likelihood he simply mixed up his words and it didn't come out the way it should have. But he said what he said, and it has turned into a joke. Nobody is taking away Gore's achievements.
Plus confusion over the word "initiative" (Score:3)
In legislative context (e.g. Congress), an "initiative" is a formal step that's part of making something law, before it gets voted on by the entire body. When Gore said he "took the initiative in creating the Internet", it was a miswording and political exaggeration, not an outright lie. I'd say he "sponsored the initiative to extend the Internet to the general public." Whether or not those initiatives deserve any credit is another point of debate (but I certainly give no credit to the business world, as another poster does).
And he popularized the term "information superhighway", which of course we all find annoying. But he did communicate the concept to a lot of unwired people.
No, I'm not a Democrat, I'm just tired of misinformation. Criticize Gore (and Bush and others) for real problems, not made-up ones. Jokes I have no problem with; I liked the SatireWire article and the Letterman appearance (the first funny Letterman in a while, eh?).
Re:I'll bet... (Score:2)
Now don't go "Nucular" flaming me!
Vote [dragonswest.com] Naked 2000
yawn (Score:2)
politician auction (Score:2)
--
Re:Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:2)
Quit ripping off Letterman's show (Score:2)
For Sale (Score:3)
The Republicrats,
c/o Corporatism, Inc.
Stay tuned for sponsored debates between a rich white guy in his 50s with strong family political connections, and a rich white guy in his 50s with strong family political connections. Debate topics will include whether there should be a prescription drug benefit as part of medicare, or whether medicare should pay for prescription drugs. Also on the table are whether taxes hould be cut, or whether we should cut taxes.
Act now to get your piece of this exciting product! Auction closes in November!
Re:Why not read... (Score:2)
We also got it in Vermillion SD @ USD in the early 90s.
Re:Why is Al Gore claiming Internet paternity ? (Score:2)
ebay links (Score:3)
If you're quick you can also get an Al Gore voodoo doll [ebay.com]. Aparently you can also get Al Gore's driver's license [ebay.com].
Campaign slogan (Score:3)
"I gave you the Internet, and I can take it back"
--
Kiro