Russia holds more of the territory it claims now than it did in November 2022
https://www.bbc.com/news/artic...
"More" is doing a lot of work, the front has expanded like 5%, we can look at this. Also Ukraine is like 2-3x on casualties. And we have to take perspective, Russia is/was the 3rd largest military in the world, Ukraine still is massively the underdog. Holding lines like this for so long says something.
I don't see how telling Ukraine's leaders that they need to cut their losses is "taking all agency out of the Ukrainian people/"
I am sure here in America if we were fighting for our literal homeland we wouldn't appreciate a country capable of helping us instead telling us to give them up while we are willing and are literally fighting right at this moment. Yes it robs agency. Everything else you wrote is cope to justify removing that agency because it suits your... something, I never understand the Russia defenders, what are you defending? it's clearly the immoral position. Saving money? That can't be it.
Perhaps you forgot that it was the overthrow of the elected government in 2014 that started the war. That was agency.
This entire paragraph is empty words, why write it?
The moral claim that they are "wrongs" is only applied when it is convenient.
Oh bullshit, we are capable of holding those positions just fine. Iraq 2003 was immoral. Russia in 2014 and 2022 is immoral. Easy, i'm a human being with a brain, I can process this.
And immoral in its own right, given it serves no clear purpose other than to let the Ukrainians kill more Russians before the war is over.
And this is just more justification for an obvious immoral action, the unjustified invasion of a nation. Something we all apparently understand? The alternative you propose is to just let an immoral actor succeed at an immoral action because... again, money? If we're talking American boots on the ground, yeah we can maybe get a little more in the weeds but this is just horseshoe tankie "America bad" blended with America First "Russia good".