Would you also care to argue
No, I would not. I would care that you turn your brain on. If somehow you manage to do that, return to this comment, find the main point, and respond to that.
BYD makes the best cars.
How do you know? Do you have a citation for that?
will certainly not be slop if you bring your own ideas to the chat room.
Then why use the AI at all? Just present your own ideas.
Brevity is a gift.
Despite what you may have read about curses of recursions which are completely divorced from reality outputs of LLMs are deliberately used to improve model quality.
"Using the outputs of LLMs to deliberately improve model quality" has nothing to do with model collapse. It reads like a PR release at best; at worst it's like LLM output.
There is also the Mountain Pass Rare Earth Mine in California.
It has been opened and closed several times as the Feds and state of California tussle over it.
California greenies want it closed. The Feds want it to operate, even at a loss, for supply chain security.
It is currently operating with DoD subsidies, but production needs to be ramped up.
No. It can't be properly expressive without understanding the story that it's reading. Punctuation is just not enough, it doesn't capture many different shades of meaning. E.g., an ironic statement should be read in a different tone than a factual statement, even with exactly the same punctuation. (That's one example out of MANY. Consider, e.g., the scene in "Alice in Wonderland" where she's talking about jumping off the top of the house.)
What was the title of my post? Perspective, that's all, picture that mount of billions in a different way. I also said it was 1 year of revenue but go off chief.
"Silent gratitude isn't very much use to anyone." -- G. B. Stearn