Clearly you didn't read the link. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/1... CCP hates human rights and are not afraid to admit it.

Why? What would that accomplish?

Ukraine had "unfair" elections, so Putin stole Crimea from them. It's super logical.

What gun manufacturer was ever sued for violating export curbs? I think you should spend more time on Wikipedia.

In a civilized world, the US and China would have a mutual extradition treaty so criminals could face justice.

Unfortunately for the CCP, rejecting human rights is one of their top four most fundamental principles. We can't have an extradition treaty with a country that doesn't even pretend to care about its people.

What era are you thinking of when Chinese officials weren't corrupt? This guy is being accused of corruption by the CCP.

Oh yeah, that was amazing to you? What is the conversion rate between light years and mythical man months?

The lack of anything concrete in your post makes it sound remarkably like CCP copypasta.

Because they grow very well there. The dry climate makes disease much less of an issue. This leads to higher yields and cheaper fruit in the stores. Of course it comes with externalities like subsidization of the use of a scarce and dwindling resource.

Honestly don't even worry about it, instead go back and play the 2016 Doom, it's the best of the reboot series. Ton of fun and the soundtrack is killer.

This article is textbook misinformation.

Read the title and the only quote referenced from the declassified document is: “These officials highlighted that, prior to the visit (from Joe Biden), the Poroshenko administration and other Ukrainian officials expected the U.S. Vice President to discuss personal matters with Poroshenko during the visit, and had assumed that the U.S. Vice President would advocate in support or against specific officials within the Ukrainian government”.

Then they quote some op-ed's and some private intelligence analysts but it's all just words from people, unsubstantiated. Then they get the conclusion of the headline with just that and of course, of course it's the Nuland thing. It always is because that's all there is and it's nothing. That's it. Nothing declassified supports the conclusion but they make it anyway. Zero journalism done, there's a reason this is only on substack and X.

"Well your Honor, we've got lot's of hearsay and conjecture, those are kinds of evidence.".

So two of them snuck in by getting nominated? The other two were already around. What about Hegseth and Gabbard? They're not neocons too right?

What's the even the angle here?

Trump wants the war.
Trump is easily manipulated into the war.
Trump doesn't want the war but is a shit judge of character and/or is unable to stand up for himself.

Name names, who sneaked in and how did they do it?

Sure, she's not giving warning she's making a threat. It should be a empty one but look at the current administration she's shilling for.

How many free Flock cameras can we install to entice you?

Well, I'll have to admit, I didn't have "learning that someone on Slashdot believes that the Cold War was a myth" on my bingo card for today.