Today's AI is useful for some things, tomorrow's AI will be useful for more.
Unfortunately, AI is the fad of the day, and marketoids are rushing to cram immature AI into anything they can imagine.
While it's plausible that some of these ideas will be useful, most are annoying slop and worse.
If something is good, people choose it voluntarily and even pay for it.
If something is impossible to turn off, it's most likely not good
As nice as YouTube science content can be, shows like PBS Nova are still better because they had the budget to do better and the incentive to get it right.
Every graduate is not identical
Talent is real. Effort is real.
A talented student who works hard will do better that a not so talented student who slouches through college socializing, binge drinking and cheating on exams
The line "fruitful area for policy intervention" is especially troublesome, as it assumes that government can somehow make the inferior students succeed as well as the best
>":Roll Eyes: Would they kick their own babies out once they hit ten million?"
Their population is in DECLINE, like almost all Western nations. There is ZERO chance of that happening. They will very likely allow immigration, but with hard caps and based on their own criteria, not just anyone that wants in or crosses their borders without permission. Those criteria will likely be based on things like knowing the language, having valuable/compatible skills/education, already having family there, understanding and likelihood to assimilating to general Swiss values, etc.
>"What this really comes down to, like all immigration debates, is racism. They don't like the color of the skin or the religion of the immigrants."
And you couldn't be more WRONG.
Most people don't give a damn about the "color of the skin." What they care about is *CULTURE* which is a set of beliefs and the way people act. That is NOT "RACISM".
And not liking someone else's religion that wants to push alien values that are incompatible with most of the native citizens is, guess what, ALSO NOT "RACISM".
So do us all a favor and stop using the word "racism", it is so unbelievably overused and abused now, it means almost nothing.
>"Until recently the only way to access the cameras from mobile was through the cloud service, you could access the device over https directly but then it wouldnt let you view video if you were doing so on a mobile device."
No, you could also use a VPN and access it directly as well. Granted, MOST people that want to use the app (and it is certainly not required) will not have a problem with using a cloud login in the app just for notifications and to stream the video. That is very "normal" for most any platform. But the video and settings are still coming directly from your own physical box. Unifi's cloud is just directing and connecting you to your box own box. And that communication is all encrypted.
>"Their IPv6 support is also very poor, and there are a lot of networks using CGNAT for legacy service so inbound legacy traffic is not possible."
They have made lots of improvements in IPV6 in 2025. If you haven't seen their stuff in a year, you would be pretty amazed at how quickly things have advanced.
>"There is no option to configure IPv6 through the web interface"
Yes there is. But I can't speak on the details, since I don't use it. But I see the settings.
>"There's also no built in dynamic dns support which is needed if the ISP keeps changing your prefix."
Yes there is. I am using it now. That has been available in the web user interface for years, I think. When last did you last use/look at Unifi's gateway???
He keeps differentiating, flying off on a tangent.