Comment Re:But of course! (Score 1) 43
Nice bit of fiction, but here's what actually happened when Sgt. John Basilone fixed a machine gun under fire. The results look a little different, don't they?
>"I've only seen two manufacturers who really understand that security cameras should actually be secure, Axis and Pelco."
I would add Hanwha to that list as well. Again, not cheap, but serious stuff.
>"So this isn't at all what you asked for, but I'm going to throw it out there anyway: Ubiquiti. You'll pay more and they're all PoE rather than wireless, but if you spend the money and run the wires (hey, you have to run a wire for power anyway, might as well use it for data, too) you won't regret the results."
I second that. Have a system at work and was impressed and bought one for home. You can do everything with their gateway and also stream to other devices at will. Everything under your control and stored locally. And their stuff is constantly improving. At home using the Cloud Gateway Max, U6 Pro WiFi, G5 Turret Ultras which are not that expensive and have a great picture, basic AI that works well, look great, super easy to mount and aim. And Unifi WiFi stuff is near the best. So you can have a great gateway/firewall/console, plus WiFi, plus video up in no time, and manage it all via a web page.
WiFi should never be used for cameras. It is too unreliable, too easy to fail, too easy to jam, too frustrating in every way. Running that cable is a hell of a lot better in the long-run (pun intended).
first of all, a 56 billion dollar collapse is not a back swan event. its a nothingburger with no contagion risk. second of all, it's not going to collapse so long as corporate debt markets are available.
im not an MSTR investor, but i have been paying attention to what they're doing. their stock never deserved the premium, and MSTR is leveraged, but i wouldn't call them over leveraged to the point of liquidation.
Form a social club
College is about training the mind
A combination of human professors and AI tutors seems best
But an export ban is not. And it's often said that the power to tax is the power to destroy... it turns out that works both ways. If you can ban exports, you can accept a fee in exchange for not banning them, which is effectively a tax. Not sure if it would hold up in court, but it turns out that nobody willing to challenge it will have standing.
>"MY prediction is that I will never buy a pair of these from anyone."
Me neither.
>"They are just another over priced 3D TV type product as far as I am concerned."
I love 3D TV. And it wasn't over-priced; maybe added 5% to the cost of my TV choice at the time? Totally different thing than being a Glasshole.
>"Seems like everyone wears contacts, gets lasik, or something?"
None of those work (or work well) for loss of near vision, which will happen to all of us. And many of us don't want to have to put on and take off reading glasses 1,000 times a day so we get bifocals or progressive lenses and just wear them all day.
Don't believe me? Get back to me when you are 40 or 50...
Civilization, as we know it, will end sometime this evening. See SYSNOTE tomorrow for more information.