Only jail clears the mind.
Only jail clears the mind.
Well, it's funny how something with "the underpinnings of how X11 does it are actually decrepit and inefficient and compare poorly to other strategies that leverage different entry points that Wayland actually preserves" still manages to solve the problem, and Wayland doesn't.
X11 isn't perfect. Nobody's ever argued that. It's just nobody's really asking for a replacement, and if they were, they wouldn't be asking for Wayland. X11 is an extraordinary piece of technology, it takes some gal to claim everyone should just throw it out and replace it with a ground up rewrite that adds no new features and doesn't support the major features X11 is famous and loved for.
It's not like init/SystemD, where init really was a bug ridden piece of garbage that's needed replacing now since before Linux itself came on the scene, and SystemD implements everything init did but does it right.
The antidepressants is what made them suicidal and violent. The reason they took the antidepressants to begin with was mental illness.
Without the 95 percent of all tax subsidies and subsidized national and state land lease rates, this would be true in the US and Canada for both Wind and Solar.
Both would be cheaper than heavily subsidized fossil fuels, including coal.
Hayden said that losing the first Crypto War on the Clipper Chip did not stop the US government from obtaining the information it needed.
âoeIn retrospect, we mastered the problem we created by the lack of the Clipper Chip,â he said. âoeWe were able to do a whole bunch of other things. Some of the other things were metadata, and bulk collection and so on.â
So... "don't ban encryption, we don't need to!"
1. Hire them. No, I don't care what your excuse is. No, I don't care what your HR execs and your frat brothers on the board tell you. Just do it.
2. See 1.
3. See 1.
4. RTFM. See 1.
5. Repeat as needed.
Thus endeth the lesson.
Your summary is missing the 500lb gorilla, which makes it extraordinarily misleading to anyone following the discussion.
Let's correct and add information to one dubious statement here:
And, one of my own questions: Why do we want/need PE binaries when ELF are extensible [the "E" in ELF] and have widely supported tool chains? Answer: Because MS is pushing it.
No, the answer is: Because Microsoft only signs PE binaries.
And then let's go up to:
why do you bother with the MS keysigning of Linux kernel modules to begin with?
Here is the 500lb gorilla: Because most implementations of secure boot only accept keys signed by Microsoft.
So in order to get a random Linux-based distribution to run on a generic secure boot enabled PC, your choices are either to remove secure boot (which isn't always possible), hope that the firmware maker included your distribution's key (highly unlikely), or have it signed by Microsoft, which means going the PE route.
ELF may be superior to PE, but that doesn't make it a solution to the problem that RedHat raised. X.509 keys may be an international standard, but they have nothing whatsoever to do with this.
It was a legitimate issue to raise, and it was handled badly by Torvalds and others. A legitimate response would have been "The inability of our kernel to be installed on what's likely to be the majority of computers in a few years is a small price to pay for using superior technologies", not "RedHat just wants to give Microsoft blow jobs", which is immature, pathetic, and doesn't answer anything.
In this case, it's a poor example, because RedHat wasn't showing any signs of proposing this because they wanted to please Microsoft. RedHat was, instead, saying they felt practical concerns meant that accepting Microsoft has de-facto control over the signing process needed to be recognized.
But if they did? What's wrong with "please" or maybe "serve", as in "If RedHat wants to serve Microsoft, then..."?
Where I was coming from was this:
Windows 8.1 didn't really fix the major problem people had with Windows 8.0 (the lack of a Start menu and insistence on having a touch-oriented Start Screen by default)
People hated Vista because of the slow speed, poor memory handling, and the permission dialogs, all of which were (mostly) fixed in 7 (albeit I suspect the permission dialogs were fixed by the third party developers who stopped doing the things that caused them to come up.)
So 8.1 wasn't really the 7 to 8.0's Vista, it was more of one of the service packs that made Vista more usable later on its life. 10 though seems like... it's a whole new Vista. And 8.1 was a nice tablet operating system even if it was horrible on the desktop, whereas 10 seems to be fairly poor everywhere.
Here's hoping they fix it soon. Otherwise I'm going to have to see if I can restore 8.1 on my tablet...
No, it's not. It's entirely appropriate - she points out that the questioner is trying to paper over the extent of the abuse she's receiving as a result of conversations on the LKML by requesting only LKML posts be quoted.
She illustrates why that's absurd (though it apparently flew over your head), and then, after that, goes on to quote abuse from the LKML itself as requested.
It sounds to me like she's getting an extraordinary amount of hate messages solely as a result of her (1) being involved in kernel development and (2) having a disagreement with other kernel developers.
I'm struggling to understand why so many on Slashdot think that's acceptable. But then many support a hashtag campaign whose initial goal was to drive a female developer to suicide because they thought a journalist had written good reviews of her products in exchange for sex. So nothing about some here showing a complete lack of human decency surprises me any more.
She's arguing for a more professional communications style. If anyone spoke to (or emailed) me at work the way kernel developers are frequently quoted as communicating with one another on the lists, I'd pass the message on to my boss, and expect them hauled up in front of HR if they carried on. What's more, I've seen this happen (once, in my more than 20 years of professional experience.)
Anyone posting on Slashdot that they think this is normal, or that it's somehow how males normally talk to one another, is in for a shock when they graduate from whatever high school they're from and attempt to get a degree and/or a job. Office or academic politics is often vicious, but you accuse a co-worker of sexually gratifying a corporation in email, and you can expect consequences, at minimum a talking to, and quite possibly (job) termination.
I cannot believe so many here think this is normal behavior, or even acceptable. Yeah, we're all obnoxious assholes on Slashdot, but that's because we're not working together here and we're letting off steam.
You're talking about reading the ODBII data. That's a very different application to an information display that most drivers will be using routinely. So if nothing else, there's probably a good chance that many of those downloads were professionals who work on cars. Most of the rest were presumably enthusiasts who enjoy tweaking, and if you reckon you've personally saved $5-10K just on diagnostics with Torque then clearly you're not a typical driver.
Windows 8.1 worked fine in "just" 1Gb (my tablet ran it with that, it was a very smooth environment.)
People were expecting Windows 10 to be the "7" to 8.0s "Vista" (boy, is that a confusing sentence.) I think Windows 10 though is the second coming of Vista. I'm hoping "what comes after Windows 10" (I'm not sure how the marketing will go) to be rather more memory efficient.
Technically Windows 10 runs in 1Gb, it's running on the same tablet right next to me. But it crawls. All the smoothness of 8.1 is gone.
A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. -- Ramsey Clark