Actually that's the proper way to design these, of course with some kind of backup way in (usually via a PIN). Only emergency exits and similar should "fall open" in case of outages and even there of course great care should be taken so this can't be easily exploited.

You might have gotten rid of your managers, but I'll bet somebody is still doing all these tasks.

Right...new managers have been spawned from within existing employees - think agents in The Matrix - that's why the productivity increase was limited to 3x :-)

Meetings with more than two people are susceptible to ego games - definitely not productive.

yeah, the last 'innovation' in movie going was Stadium Seating.

Last thing I saw in theaters was The Force Awakens Star Wars reboot. Star Wars was the only thing I felt would be better viewed on the big screen.

Vividly remember sitting through 45 MINUTES of previews. Not again.

I'm not even a manager and there are, at present count, 30 hours of meetings on my calendar. I go to less than half, I just let the meetings sandbag my calendar so that new meetings are difficult to schedule. Either you know me and we have a reason to meet, or fuck you.

The actual managers are much worse off. Corporate life is stupid.

I've only ever had one COBOL class, and that was in the late 1990s. I was sure I was going to hate the language before ever setting foot into the classroom. After setting foot into the classroom for a couple days, my concerns turned out to be unfounded. COBOL was much worse than I could have anticipated.

That aside, isn't COBOL's ability to process vast amounts of data quickly due to the massive I/O abilities of the mainframes it tends to run on? I have been told over the decades that a mainframe's I/O abilities dwarf those of even high-end Intel/AMD server. If that's true, then COBOL isn't fast due to any inherent strength of the language, but rather is fast because of the I/O abilities of the hardware.

Just put it in context: Today Russia struck the Pechenihy Reservoir dam in Kharkiv.
Russia launched the war because they thought it would be a quick and easy win, a step towards reestablishing a Russian empire and sphere of influence, because Putin thinks in 19th century terms. Russia is continuing the war, not because it's good for Russia. I'd argue that winning and then having to rebuild and pacify Ukraine would be a catastrophe. Russia is continuing the war because *losing* the war would be catastrophic for the *regime*. It's not that they want to win a smoldering ruin, it's that winning a smoldering ruin is more favorable to them and losing an intact country.

And the trailers before the movie starts will be replaced by ads, and not (only) ads for other movies.

You know, like what's been happening in theaters for years.

Have you ever actually tried using Numpy in C?

You can tell how serious someone is about performance based on whether or not they bring out a profiler. If they don't use a profiler, they aren't serious about performance (or maybe they're just clueless).

What do you want to program?

Modern C++ didn't get rid of the gotchas, it just added more of them. It's fine if you're working by yourself, but you can't prescribe what features other people will use (including the writers of libraries you want to use). But old C++ was fine when working by yourself too.

You can add types to your variables in Python. You can use typescript with Javascript.

You can also introspect your types in Ruby, so his point is moot.

There is also the question of why you would add type checking to a dynamic language: if you don't want a dynamic language, why did you choose one? But the reality is most of us don't choose languages anymore, we choose libraries and have to accept whatever language they are attached to.

The author is claiming that Python is readable.

A lot of lawyers prefer checks because a signed check is proof of intention. Not only is it signed, it often has a "reason" memo written.

This can also work in behalf of the person writing the check (in court). For example, if you pay your rent by check, the landlord shows the intent to accept it when they deposit the check. Whereas if you pay with direct deposit, the landlord can claim they had no intention to accept the money.