DSA members in the House went from 2 to . . . 6. Out of 435. Just a tad over 1%. The rest are party members of long standing from one party or the other, and the total number of DSA members is less than the Democratic majority in the House, so the long standing members of the party can easily ignore them.

The Senate went from 0 DSA members to . . . 0 DSA members.

Biden (or, rather, the puppeteers handling him) did nothing for three years, and the same party leadership is still in charge.

You sweet, summer child. Hang on to that dream, since it's all you'll have for a long, long time.

Indeed. Clearly, the issue is that Russia doesn't allow men to compete in women's sports. Oh, wait, that's actually been standard for Russia since the USSR days!

And yet, those laws have not been changed, and there's no one even talking about doing so.

So perhaps your broad, sweeping, universal statement is so much bullshit.

If you really believe what you're shoveling, you should jump off a bridge now to avoid the Christmas rush. How can you stand to live in such a terrible world?

Just like how the consumer is 100% responsible for charges on a stolen credit card? Except, of course, that's not the case, the consumer is only responsible for the first $50, and zero after it's reported.

Your narrative needs some work, son, to be more believable.

At this point, nobody knows what risk the airline carries. That's where you're wrong. The law hasn't been settled yet.

And you ignore the regulatory concerns, because they don't fit your narrative.

But has always relied on financial details being handled by people who can be held accountable. Right now, when an AI routinely commits federal crimes like hacking government web sites, nobody is held accountable.

Once the law shakes out on who is responsible when that AI agent decides to upgrade your ticket from cattle car to 1st class at 20 times the ticket price, I imaging the airlines will adjust their policies. Or that leaks your financial information to millions of other people, for that matter.

Whether or not federal regulations regarding passengers identifying themselves in person for checking is another matter.

Honestly, I wouldn't feel safe flying on an airline that didn't ban AI agents.

I'm sure they'll send a sternly worded letter. Maybe even two. If they're feeling ambitious enough, they might even have the UN countersign it.

There's no reason the Democrats will do anything more than they during the last three years of Biden's administration.

At this point, years into humiliation after humiliation after humiliation for Putin, I seriously doubt he has any missiles of capable of actually launching, and question whether he has any nukes that would detonate.

If he had them he'd have used them by now.

There's no way to prove drinkypoo isn't a broken bot, written by a drunken mutant cover in Cheetos dust.

That's the plan. Obviously.

Has been. But that has largely ended. The beginning of the end was the massive invasion by bots several years ago. The final nail in the coffin was the IPO. Now that MBAs are in charge, the only thing that matter, and the only thing allowed, is eyeballs to sell.

Was known for. No more.

The only way this can go is for fewer and fewer people using Reddit, until the MBAs have looted it for every penny they can get, and they sell it off to some suck who believes they can "fix" it. Like so many other social media sites before. Remember MySpace? Or Friendster? Or Google+? Or Vine? Or Omegle?

Since that's the plan, I'm sure you're right.

You cannot moderate out all outrage inducing stuff without turning your conversation into an echo chamber where actual discussion literally isn't allowed, only parroting the moderators' opinions. The reason for that is that there is no possible objective definition of outrage. What outrages you is simple, factual truth to someone else, and what outrages them is the center of your world view and beyond question. That is human nature.

The internet has always reflected this reality, even before it was opened up to the public, because the internet reflects people, and people are like that. They're all crazy in some way or another, they're all assholes at some point, and they're all idiots more often than not. Who is which at the moment depends on who you ask, and it's very difficult to ask anyone but yourself.

Become? When was it not? The only thing that changed is that technology has made the cheaper.

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table."

All its posts are on topic, if the topic is broken bots spewing nonsense.