It is important to not that list is by market capitalization, not by units sold or market share. And market capitalization is a collective fantasy with zero connection to how well a company is doing in the market.
The A stands for "another," the G stands for "grift," but I can't figure out what the I stands for.
You're missing the point. It's not about electronics per se, but DRM. Audio quality is irrelevant.
Not for the majority of people buying vinyl.
So, unless that electronic turntable is monitoring what it is playing and cross-references that to a database of your licensed music, or needs a stupid app to work (I hope I'm not giving them ideas...), then your argument is moot.
Why do you believe that won't happen? Were you born yesterday? Imagine the personalized marketing that could be done with that info. No, I'm not kidding.
But you still can't tell the difference between thousand dollar audio cables and a wire coat hanger. Or a banana.
The vinyl may not be subject to reprogramming after the fact, but the turntable is . . . an electronic device.
Audiophiles are gullible cult members, even more so than wine snobs.
Flock has really screwed up its marketing. It feels like they are a bunch of Techbros that don't understand peoples fear of privacy violations.
It isn't that they don't understand. They don't care. Why should they? The law doesn't apply to them, and lesser being exist to be controlled by their superiors. Just ask them.
You've jumped head first into the bottomless pit of TDS.
Found the TDS sufferer.
Jimmy Carter (notable for being a Democrat) was as low, as was George W. Bush, Harry S. Truman (another Democrat) was lower, by 2%. Only Nixon was substantially lower, by 10%.
You could have stopped after the fourth word.
Though, technically, I suppose you're right: It isn't possible to lie more than "every word out of one's mouth," and all politicians lie as much as Trump. Most of them at leas try to be subtle, where he doesn't.
There are multiple definitions of "monopoly" in different contexts (eg. economic vs. legal)
And none of them really apply to the third largest company in the field.
I'm having a hard time seeing the third largest company in the field as a monopoly. I believe the correct term would be cartel, or conspiracy in restraint of trade.
NO!
Kalshi IS specifically designed for insider trading, BUT it loses all value if every schmuck out there can do it
If everyone can do it, then it's not insider information.
That's the usual way, but calling it a "fine" is stupid and confusing. "Penalty" is the correct word.
Or just not let it connect to the internet.
Computers don't actually think. You just think they think. (We think.)
