More like maybe!

"Wearables won't break through until they can work without a phone, partnership chief Glenn Lurie said" -- Yes, I want to replace my old school Casio Data Bank 150 calculator watch ASAP! I do not want to use a mobile phone with the watch. I still want basic features like long battery life, scheduler, phone directory, calculator, alarms, etc.

And the crappy CBS show it is based on.

What information in the ruling are you basing this on?

I'm not sure this is true. I'm not sure it's false either, but being exempted from paying for a specific form of BC seems different than being exempted from paying for a specific medicine. Many medicines have multiple clinical uses.

I can't even get fast speeds on dial-up since they connect from 24000-31200 even on 56k modems. :( Also, no DSL because COs are too far (over 20K ft.). :(

Funny. I put 6:40 AM for my wake up alarm and say that's enough sleep for me. ;)

Or do all of those. Burying without destroying it? LOL.

And they can be standalone without a phone. I want it to replace my old school Casio Data Bank 150 watch!

No, but I trust actual experts, like this one.

Maybe if the "window" was a huge display with enhanced angle of view and live overlays they WOULD have though. It seems like this is the point of the invention more or less.

Right, and the entire point is to make flying (and landing) easier the vast majority of the time by enhancing what can be seen, right?

Right, so instead of packing just explosives, pack a tiny battery and explosives, in the "new battery". It's theater.

Just replace the explosive the bomb maker was going to pack in the battery compartment with a tiny battery plus almost the same explosives, and as a bonus they can side load and use a "My Little Detonator" app.

Someday airliners will have instruments that will allow a properly trained pilot to fly in zero visibility conditions ....

Pretty sure "landed using instruments" and landing automatically are different things.