Your views will not survive contact with the reality. Citations:
don't raise cattle: Cattle ranching harms the climate
don't do energy-intense manufacturing: Steel industry emissions are a big contributor to climate change.
don't do resource extraction: Environmental groups oppose Bill to boost mining
don't drive cars: Car culture is driving us to disaster

Environmental groups demand we don't do energy-intense manufacturing, don't do resource extraction, don't drive cars, don't have data centers, don't raise cattle, etc. Did anybody ask them how would US look like if all their unreasonable demands met?

I think it goes way beyond being incivility. I see it as actively trying to silence disagreement. That is, taking active steps to prevent others from voicing their opinions.

They are still raping everyone's privacy.

Unfortunately, picking Human Rights is not an option anywhere. Forced and Child Labor Abuses Found in 75% of Lithium Battery Supply Chains.

2035 goal was infeasible for a number of reasons, but the key one is lack of key raw minerals. That is, even if consumer preferences and per unit costs were not an issue, you could not make enough batteries using current technology out of currently existing materials. Exponential growth in material availability just did not materialize.

We absolutely should be skeptical about dubious medical diagnoses and other kinds of of fraud accountable. However, this misuse of medical system to perpetuate academic fraud has nothing to do with race.

Stop pounding the table, we already know you have nothing of value to say.

The entire 20th century history is a counter-example to your new argument. Hundreds of millions killed by various "simply be replaced by another one" and you still think that some kleptocracy is warrants tearing down the system. You are just another clueless rebel without a cause.

Your attempt to disown what you just posted is both sad due to its feeblemindedness and funny due to its absurdity.

I think /. exist because this content is valuable AI training data. This is probably why registration of new accounts is gatekeeped. Sadly, this means that insanity you tend to post is training AI. It is like toxic sediment layer in the humanity knowledge's archeological record.

If this is true, and not just faking it to get ahead, then future society will be drastically different from what we have today and not in a good way.

I do have to say that nothing of value will be lost, because a society that allows people to get incredibly rich or incredibly powerful is pretty much broken

This is insane. Nothing of value is lost when society collapses? I think you are well beyond exaggeration and into stupidity. Just pause and consider what places without it look like.

A very good question. I read through that 2015 thread, which was around elections, and subjectively, it does not appear to be as hostile as a regular political thread in 2025, which is not around election time.

The inevitable consequence of making X advantageous in a competitive system is that you will see more of X and X-like for any value of X.