UK is free to fine UK citizens for visiting 4chan.

I do not have a way to say how representative such views of a typical environmentalist. I don't believe I am engaging in nut-picking and I am open to seeing counter-evidence. I came up with these links by searching for key phrases (e.g., methane emissions from cows) and people (e.g., Suzuki) from memory and there were many similar links to chose from. Do you believe these views are not representative? If so, what makes you think so?

This is a valid criticism. My view is that I use expressing concerns as a proxy to opposition. I admit, the Science.org article must be read uncharitably to support my point, but then a) I didn't expect anyone to engage me in good faith debate b) I was demonstrating a point rather than engaging in nuanced debate of the issue. Here is cleaner example:Northwest Indiana environmental activists oppose Nippon Steel's potential Gary Works investment.

I think you are downplaying this, or at the very least "decent faction" putting a lot of unpaid overtime in making your point. I see this aspect as corel tenant of environmentalism. That is, misanthropy is essential part of worship of Gaia.

Then most of us would starve to death.

I do not, because most of such claims presuppose that the environment is static and pristine. The reality is that there is a great deal of change without any human involvement and often times what humans do is insignificant. While I agree with the goal of protecting humanity's habitat, it ought to be viewed as such - our habitat that should be utilized for humanity's needs.

Fully agree. However, even if they agree to pay, there is no equipment (transformers, etc.) or manufacturing capacity to produce equipment fast enough to ramp energy production to meet the AI data center demand. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpEEDnV1gXw

Your views will not survive contact with the reality. Citations:
don't raise cattle: Cattle ranching harms the climate
don't do energy-intense manufacturing: Steel industry emissions are a big contributor to climate change.
don't do resource extraction: Environmental groups oppose Bill to boost mining
don't drive cars: Car culture is driving us to disaster

Environmental groups demand we don't do energy-intense manufacturing, don't do resource extraction, don't drive cars, don't have data centers, don't raise cattle, etc. Did anybody ask them how would US look like if all their unreasonable demands met?

I think it goes way beyond being incivility. I see it as actively trying to silence disagreement. That is, taking active steps to prevent others from voicing their opinions.

They are still raping everyone's privacy.

Unfortunately, picking Human Rights is not an option anywhere. Forced and Child Labor Abuses Found in 75% of Lithium Battery Supply Chains.

2035 goal was infeasible for a number of reasons, but the key one is lack of key raw minerals. That is, even if consumer preferences and per unit costs were not an issue, you could not make enough batteries using current technology out of currently existing materials. Exponential growth in material availability just did not materialize.

We absolutely should be skeptical about dubious medical diagnoses and other kinds of of fraud accountable. However, this misuse of medical system to perpetuate academic fraud has nothing to do with race.

Stop pounding the table, we already know you have nothing of value to say.

The entire 20th century history is a counter-example to your new argument. Hundreds of millions killed by various "simply be replaced by another one" and you still think that some kleptocracy is warrants tearing down the system. You are just another clueless rebel without a cause.