With that aside: yeah well maybe GNOME.
I don't think you are using "maybe" correctly here. Maybe is used to indicate there is some level of doubt.
Also note that they only put that in there because the lawyers told them they had to. This means this technology represents a fundamental and systematic novel risk they do NOT have under control.
Exactly. This means that an average user taking reasonable precautions would be impacted. No dumb users falling for exploits are necessary to exploit this. What a mess.
In the age of widespread AI with superuser permissions we need to create a secure and authenticated prompt. There now must be a difference between what used actually typed in as a query/prompt and text that AI may have across that contains query/prompt. This means security redesign.
What apartheid state has the minority population voting and membership in parliament?
If you look deeply into how Israel handles citizenship, there is a large Arab population that historically lived in the area that were not granted citizenship. That is, Arabs that allowed to vote are minority of the total population. More so, Israeli politics setup that Jewish parties would never form coalition with Arab parties, as such these voters are further disenfranchised.
Are you seriously saying Israel is no different than white South Africa?
Yes. To qualify that, there is also anti-white racial violence, maybe even genocide, that is happening in South Africa. The likely outcome that would happen in Israel if Arabs allowed to vote and form majority.
Do you think France's "no go" zones are healthy and proper for a functioning western democracy?
I think I made my views on Islam very clear. Let me know what you would like me to further clarify.
If you're American that means a Democrat.
Layoffs are ugly and devastating for impacted people. There is absolutely no reason to believe that Harris administration would have been any better. Point to me something in her platform that you believe would have made a difference in this situation.
No, you were responding to a different study by a different author because you did not even bother to click on the link to see what study I cited.
In turn, this demonstrates that you fundamentally do not care about evidence or science, as you are outright dismissing without reading anything that contradicts your views. That is, you will selectively consider only evidence that supports your views.
No amount of careful planning will ever replace dumb luck.