Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Pump it up (Score 1) 298

by UnixUnix (#35278490) Attached to: Has the Second Dotcom Bubble Started?

Is a bubble coming? Well, is a valuation something passably sophisticated -- or is it a version of "Facebook has 500 million users... how much is a user worth?...oh, say, 100 bucks... presto, $50 billion!"

Maybe Google's IPO idea of "e * appropriate power of 10" lends a false air of accuracy -- all those digits! Not pulled out of thin air either.

PS. Ads? What ads? Facebook has ads?!?

Comment: Hindsight is 20/20... (Score 3, Insightful) 738

by UnixUnix (#33956500) Attached to: China Now Halting Shipments of Rare Earth Minerals To US
...but even so, was it THAT difficult for a number of US Administrations to realize the strategic inportance of rare earths, instead of standing idle while US production dwindled into nothingness? So now, hello urban mining. Good thing I still have my old cell phones, they might fetch a price.
Science

Moving Monopoles Caught on Camera->

Submitted by Thorfinn.au
Thorfinn.au writes "Science Daily is reporting on magnetic monopoles.
For decades, researchers have been searching for magnetic monopoles — isolated magnetic charges, which can move around freely in the same way as electrical charges. Magnetic poles normally only occur in pairs. Now a team of researchers at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in Switzerland and University College Dublin has managed to create monopoles in the form of quasiparticles in an assembly of nanoscale magnets and to observe how they move using a microscope at the Swiss Light Source (SLS) to make the magnetic structures visible.
As with the elementary monopoles, which were first predicted by the British physicist Paul Dirac in 1931, each monopole is connected by a "string" to a monopole of opposite charge. The two monopoles can nevertheless move independently of each other. These results are not only of scientific interest, but could also provide a basis for the development of future electronic devices. The results are published online in the journal Nature Physics (Oct. 17, 2010)."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:Lies, Damn Lies and Theft! (Score 1) 525

by UnixUnix (#32369252) Attached to: Sudden Demand For Logicians On Wall Street
Front-running, sub-pennying and similar shady practices are indeed part of the landscape. However, almost all high-speed traders do it. The issue seems (to me at least) to be something else: how to out-do opponent momo (momentum trading) algorithms. There there is room for detecting others' strategies and adapting yours accordingly to gain an advantage.

Comment: Re:Practical Joke? (Score 1) 525

by UnixUnix (#32368986) Attached to: Sudden Demand For Logicians On Wall Street
It is not necessarily a joke. Ordinals do show up in the study of finitary objects. E.g. formal deductions in Peano Arithmetic are finite strings of symbols, but their proof-theoretic analysis leads to countable ordinals up to epsilon_0. Or, the analysis of Goodstein sequences or the Hydra game again proceeds most smoothly by assigning countable ordinals to numbers or tree nodes. Closer to CS, program-correctness work going back to Dijkstra involves ordinals (I still remember him staring at the blackboard working out the order type of a particular case). To be fair, their usage here in the analysis of trading strategies, which are finite AND BOUNDED objects may be a bit of overselling. Enjoy it until HFT gets banned!

Work expands to fill the time available. -- Cyril Northcote Parkinson, "The Economist", 1955

Working...