Having "medicine security" is a good thing. You don't want all your medicine manufactured by a country that considers America an adversary.

It's a logical error to make an analogy, without also demonstrating that it applies to the situation. (Common mistake when people discuss legal things, which is why such conversations are often confusing).

No, I would not. I would care that you turn your brain on. If somehow you manage to do that, return to this comment, find the main point, and respond to that.

LOL Poe's Law applies to that comment. (In case you're serious, read some Karl Popper and help yourself. Or this one if you don't have the reading comprehension for Popper.)

How do you know? Do you have a citation for that?

Then why use the AI at all? Just present your own ideas.

Brevity is a gift.

"Using the outputs of LLMs to deliberately improve model quality" has nothing to do with model collapse. It reads like a PR release at best; at worst it's like LLM output.

K-Pop Demon hunters is another example of "algorithmic content" (as they define it).

It's a random mix of things people like, throw them together and hope people pay for it. See also: CoD and Fortnite. No one cares if Star Trek and Star Wars stay separate anymore. I want to see Harry Potter riding a Bantha.

If you defend yourself in court, it largely has to be public. That is what they are doing.

The intent of the measurement is most likely to obscure rather than inform. (Can't be sure because the article is paywalled. It's also possible that electricity is the most relevant metric when you are thinking about how much it costs.)

'some' is a really funny way to spell 'most'

This is going to be one hell of shit show for Wall Street (probably not Main Street) but hoo boy is this going to pull down valuations of some big NASDAQ components... When OpenAI goes tits up, or as likely gets parted up and sold off in pieces.

As I said; I can default. A bankruptcy would let me even keep quite a lot of the property. Government printing is the same as that default, or at least the opposite side the coin. They get to keep their spending, your savings get devalued.

inflation isn't free, and it is not magic - (there are other reasons it might be better for growth than deflation) but in terms of government purchasing power, a growing economy without and increase in money supply would just mean the existing money buys more, so government budgets could just stay 'static' and effectively they'd be increased year-over-year in terms of real value/spend.

I come back to; for all intents my home budget really isn't so different than a sovereigns budget. The notion that maco and micro economics are different in terms of deficit and liability accumulation, is an article of faith, and that is all. Its not backed by anything but orthadoxy and wishful thinking.

And the reason there couldn't be some kind of dark electrostatic force which dark matter interacts with is? There could be an entire gamut of forces unknown to us that only interact with dark matter.

1) - Entirely correct; a block chain currency is stupid
2) - Also correct and the reality is governments need these things, which is why I think it would be about the dumbest move in history but..

lets again say your goals are
* Dodge the legislature and the existing body of law
* Get people to continue participating in your economy, while also doing something that will completely destroy any faith and trust in your ability to control a currency for generations because you're effectively going to swipe their life savings.

lets also assume you don't really care about (2) because you have the view, however misguided that you have the biggest guns and enough well-armed law enforcement and military assets that you can just go bust skulls and shatter hands or regime change any entity that won't comply with your edicts.

My engineering hat very much tells me that this had bad idea written all over it but; I don't know if many of the leading plutocrats and elected officials alike even have engineering hats.

People keep saying this but where is the real evidence for it?

We have been doing this pure fiat experiment for less half a century. It seems to me it works only as long as people are willing buy government bonds and that is only as long as they think the interest paid outweighs the time depreciation + whatever value they place on the 'security in terms of capital preservation'

This is exactly the same as my home budget, I can spend more than I make as long as people will continue to extend me credit ...

Once that stops working the government has to rely on balance sheet expansion to meet its obligations. the 2020s have proven deficits DO matter because if you pump the money supply, when there is any supply/production constraint the people that do have money take it off the side lines a buy the things they want by out bidding everyone else for it. Inflation skyrockets! In the market economy distribution of goods then becomes even more wildly unequal.

This too is actually pretty similar to my home budget in that I can default, file for bankruptcy and my creditors will be forced to take a lot of write downs, and I'll get to keep a lot my stuff. I can do this at least once.. (maybe some governments can get away with it more than once, maybe we don't know)