"There are many who perceive countries that welcome immigrants to be gullible idiots that they can take advantage of"

And they'd be correct.

"Japan is starting to notice diversity is not a strength"

Japan never fell for that multi culti BS propaganda in the first place. Its a very racially homogenous country and all the better for it.

Phone 101 and you'll be lucky if anyone bothers to answer before you get a message saying to contact via social media or email or die of old age, so what do people do? They phone the emergency 999 number and clog it up. Though if someone has just stolen your car or chucked a brick through your window its an emergency for you.

Read the book, your degree program failed you.

A 300 foot cable in a built up area probably with lots of things it could get caught on? What could possibly go wrong.

Because Amazon! Because capitalism! Heck, probably because Trump somehow!

Sheesh, get with the program! ;)

Well, that's good - I hate a brash, rude, in your face drone ...

Your idea is that a NN which takes language as input, produces language as output... somehow has layers inbetween not related to language? Where do you come up with these ideas?

I stand corrected, this clearly shows that BYD cars are the best

If this is a topic you actually care about, there is a strong rec for this book, probably the best on the topic. You have the mental capacity to handle it.

"If there is, it is extremely weak, below the scale of Higgs interactions, on the scale of gravity"

And you know this how? Where is the proof that these forces can't exist given we have no way to measure them?

"The best fit to the data is a particle that doesn't interact with baryonic matter or itself."

Since when? The CBR gives no such indication, just a general indication of the spread of baryonic matter in the early universe. It says nothing whatsoever about dark matter.

Having "medicine security" is a good thing. You don't want all your medicine manufactured by a country that considers America an adversary.

It's a logical error to make an analogy, without also demonstrating that it applies to the situation. (Common mistake when people discuss legal things, which is why such conversations are often confusing).

No, I would not. I would care that you turn your brain on. If somehow you manage to do that, return to this comment, find the main point, and respond to that.

LOL Poe's Law applies to that comment. (In case you're serious, read some Karl Popper and help yourself. Or this one if you don't have the reading comprehension for Popper.)