Comment: Re:Not news to me (Score 0) 485
He is not debunking anything though, it's all pseudo science that is as harmful to real understanding as that which he is trying to debunk. The summary mentions Adam Savage so to compare with myth busters, which does not always get it right, is fair. Adam and Jame usually test something very specific, If you do X then Y will happen. They don't try to prove Y can happen or Y happened. There are always testable preconditions or actions.
This guy is not proving anything other than $Deity is not a required condition, not that $Deity was not present or responsible when the event is stories to have happened. Suppose I show you I can make girl disappear with smoke, mirrors, and a try door. That does nothing to prove they last guy did not use "real" magic.