Why would somebody who believes in objective truths like science, want to live in a country where the ruling class has complete, un-challenged power?
These are not particularly exclusive to each other and right here in America we are in the middle of supposed "smart guy authoritarianism", the tech executives have thrown down to have a ruling class and government with "complete, un-challenged power", there's a reason the 2024 election has been called "revolt of the bosses"
Where you have no control or influence over what is done with your work?
That's what they are paying for, it's contractual. You're gonna get as many resources as you need to do the work you want to work on but it's for the benefit of the state, make no mistake about that. That's the agreement.
Where one day you could be doing science stuff, and the next you could be imprisoned with no due process?
You likely would not be imprisoned for your science work so long as you were doing it as agreed. It's political extracurricular activities that are gonna get you in trouble, particularly as a foreign national.
Which country are you talking about?
EU here... Housing in the city is so expensive that minorities can't find a home there. Hope that helps.
So they end up living in slums. Cities have slums we just don't like to think about them. Occasionally right wing media will talk about them because there's a lot of Filth and crime like you would expect when everybody is dirt poor and being abused. Although honestly they don't even really bother with that anymore because they found they can just make shit up about actual nice cities and right-wing idiots will believe literally anything.
I mean they had a guy on Fox News pretending to be antifa who literally is the same guy who was pretending to be a violent black lives matter protester a few years ago. That is the level we are at people.
The hilarious thing is that the suburbs aren't sustainable. Even though people in the inner city make very little money and get treated like shit there's a lot of them because of how well, population density works and so the poor people in the inner cities subsidize the well-to-do people in the suburbs. Without the subsidies the suburbs can't pay for their roads in schools and cops.
It's basically an elaborate way to keep some form of slavery going even though we're not technically allowed to do that anymore. But again it's not sustainable because we are gradually breaking down the economy so much that there just isn't enough money to go around anymore. Capitalism is being dismantled in favor of a weird feudal system that benefits the very very top 10,000 or so people on the planet
We'd like to think so but how many other things in society would we say the same about, particularly in fashion but people still buy it. Go into any mall that deals with high fashion and selling $600 shirts and Ballenciaga $6000 ugly coats but those companies are always doing well.
I remember so many saying the same about the Apple Watch when it launched and here we are on like it's 8th generation. Social signaling is very very strong.
There are lots of reasons to own an iPhone. I don't think an iPhone "sock" is one of them.
Good thing when you buy an iPhone it doesn't include this sock? Nobody would argue with that statement?
Good virtue signal nobody was asking for though?
the product "speaks to the bond between iPhone and its user"
What kind of pretentious BS is this? Oh. Wait. It's Apple. "Pretentious bullshit" is, what, 90% of their brand strategy?
The biggest problem with Apple for users probably isn't any of their anticompetitive shit, but rather their bifurcated OS. Software which could be sold on both platforms is commonly only on one or the other. Tablets have enough screen and enough power to do real PC jobs but are prohibited from doing them because Apple wants to sell you both an iPad and a Macintosh. Android-based tablets can run emulators to get around these problems, or run full apps which can run on ARM Linux in Termux or another solution. TBF Google seems to have Apple envy and is aiming to lock down their systems more and not less so maybe they will throw away this advantage.
You used a whole lot of words to still be describing collective punishment, which is still a war crime under the 1949 Geneva Convention.
But do go on about why that's perfectly fine in the circumstance of a brutally oppressive authoritarian regime and how the "western media" got it all wrong.
And 10 of those past 15 years were under Democratic administrations that actually cared about environmental concerns.
5 of those years have been Trump doing as much damage as possible. Imagine where we might be without a 2/3rds effort.
As the trials of life continue to take their toll, remember that there is always a future in Computer Maintenance. -- National Lampoon, "Deteriorata"