1. "'internally consistent and scientifically accurate entertainment'" Such a thing does not exist, at least not in a way to suit common people. Entertainment is usually science fiction.
2. Not a strawman at all. The parent specifically was calling out on where the facts are wrong. The thing about science fiction is that it is just that, fiction. If the story requires an atmosphere capable of a large storm on mars, so be it. Calling the actions of a person strange is also irrelevant. The times are different. Things we do today would also be considered strange 30 years ago, likewise I see people do strange, daft, and stupid / incoherent things today, so claiming the actions of some person don't make sense ... flat out doesn't make sense.
3. I'm not, I'm attacking you for your stance that a science fictiony movie needs to be scientifically honest, and for supporting "that guy" who whinges about the lack of scientific accuracy in a science fiction movie.
4. For implying that everything is shit or less shit in a thread discussing a movie that is widely considered "not shit", I'm going to call you "that other guy".