Slashdot Log In
Entropy Project Closes Up Shop
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Sat Jul 10, 2004 11:28 AM
from the calling-it-quits dept.
from the calling-it-quits dept.
k0fcc writes "In a disappointing move to privacy enthusiasts, the Entropy Project's creator has released a statement that the project is shutting down. Entropy was a very popular, and some say faster, alternative to Freenet which supported a number of different cryptographic protocols. The creator alluded to the possibility that the project could continue if a new owner could be found."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Ironic (Score:5, Funny)
(http://hallert.net/)
Re:Ironic (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday June 09 2006, @07:26AM)
that was fun... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
GNUnet (Score:5, Informative)
Erm (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday November 01, @12:01PM)
Freenet seems to me to be one of those ivory tower projects that has little relation to the real world. Proof? No search engine, and very little chance of ever having one. How the hell can it ever be useful? [/rm101 resists making a dig about their choice to implement in Java]
Re:Erm (Score:4, Informative)
Some say faster?! (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Monday October 22, @04:01PM)
Yeah, entropy ain't what it used to be. (Score:2, Insightful)
Anonymity and Entropy (Score:5, Interesting)
Furthermore, it is often the content which speaks more about the authorship, than the chain of technical events that leads to the publishing of the information. In Slashdot, for example, I have chosen not to show my e-mail, etc., but by reading my comments even a 10-years old kid can make a deduction about my real identity. Does it make sense for me to use IP-tunneling then?
Finally, I do not understand the author. He just seems pissed. Maybe he will reconsider his opinion and revive the project. Is he sick from the lies (?) about the crypto-protocols used in the software which is written? IMHO the theory proves quite stable and if there is a room for attacks it is more in the implementations than in the protocols themselves. How many broken cryptosystems do you recollect (I know, I know "the knapsack", but it got broken on the conference on which it was presented).
Still, even with this project retreating, the subject remains interesting.
Check out my own project. (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Saturday June 04 2005, @11:50AM)
Cons: Still small, restrictions on who you can invite, win95/98 not supported very well, some dullards have trouble understanding how anonymity works (if it uses TCP/IP your address can be tracked!).
In particular, I need to find people that favor linux/unix (even OSX would be fine), would be willing to invite others, and plan on residing in any country other than the USA for the next few years. Bandwidth usage is negligible, and I'm willing to prove it.
I'd also be willing to mentor those interested in setting up their own similar network, the more the merrier.
Tried it, looked suspicious (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://sheelab.homecreatures.com/)
"Wow, great project!". It was like Freenet, only faster, lower latency, some stuff was cooler. It looked really promising. It was much easier to install in a chroot jail than Freenet.
However. From what I saw, I wouldn't trust it for any serious purpose. It looked like the author was only interested in using it for testing his own crypto algorithms, and as anybody who read on this stuff should know, rolling your own crypto is a really bad idea unless you're really, really good, and then make sure it gets well tested for a few years.
It had a nice possibility of restricting the node to chosen allowed crypto algorithms, but none of the available ones was in widespread use. I mean, AES, DES and Blowfish weren't in the list last time I checked. That makes me rather suspicious.
I voiced my concerns once in the Entropy forum, and the author replied saying this is basically a research project and not intended for serious use (IIRC).
If somebody does decide to continue with it, I certainly hope that one of the first things that will be done is to put some tested crypto in it instead of a bunch of homebrew methods. Nothing personal against the author, but I believe that if it was easier to trust it, it could become more popular.
Oh no ... (Score:3, Funny)
What are they doing to me???!
CVS Repository itself.. (Score:2)
(http://www.goaway.com/)
Privacy enthusiasts? (Score:1)
Mute: The Searchable Alternative (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.maficstud...tarship_forehigh.jpg | Last Journal: Sunday July 18 2004, @12:33AM)
There is one alternative called Mute [sourceforge.net], which solves one key problem with Freenet or Entropy which is that it is searchable.
This discussions is about Entropy? (Score:2)
Jeez, dood [slashdot.org], this article was about Entropy... ;)
Overview of anonymous filesharing networks (Score:1)
Irony (Score:2)
(http://haltingpoint.blogspot.com/)
Ah the irony....
Entropy Project Closes Up Shop... (Score:3, Funny)