Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Entropy Project Closes Up Shop

Posted by CowboyNeal on Sat Jul 10, 2004 11:28 AM
from the calling-it-quits dept.
k0fcc writes "In a disappointing move to privacy enthusiasts, the Entropy Project's creator has released a statement that the project is shutting down. Entropy was a very popular, and some say faster, alternative to Freenet which supported a number of different cryptographic protocols. The creator alluded to the possibility that the project could continue if a new owner could be found."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Ironic (Score:5, Funny)

    by Chairboy (88841) on Saturday July 10 2004, @11:33AM (#9661334)
    (http://hallert.net/)
    Does anyone else find it ironic that a project named 'Entropy' has come apart?
    • Re:Ironic by TWX (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:39AM
    • Re:Ironic by fermion (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:42AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Ironic (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Barto (467793) on Saturday July 10 2004, @11:45AM (#9661388)
      (Last Journal: Friday June 09 2006, @07:26AM)
      Considering irony is [princeton.edu] "incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs", ironic would be a project named Entropy staying together. A project named Entropy coming apart perfectly congruous IMHO. So there.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Ironic by BCoates (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @02:44PM
      • Re:Ironic by aminorex (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:05PM
        • Re:Ironic by EvilAlien (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @07:01PM
      • Maybe... by jellybear (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @07:28PM
      • Re:Ironic by Bios_Hakr (Score:2) Sunday July 11 2004, @06:30AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Ironic by xmas2003 (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:50AM
    • Re:Ironic by mrbarkeeper (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:51AM
    • Re:Ironic by hawkeyeMI (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:07PM
    • Not sure where else I'll be able to use this... by Exatron (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:10PM
    • Hashes aren't unique! by welsh git (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:41PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • that was fun... (Score:5, Funny)

    by elykyllek (543092) * on Saturday July 10 2004, @11:33AM (#9661337)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Considering I just got this installed, configured and working 5 minutes ago.. this is great news...
  • GNUnet (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 10 2004, @11:35AM (#9661342)
    There's still GNUnet [ovmj.org]!
    GNUnet is a framework for secure peer-to-peer networking that does not use any centralized or otherwise trusted services. A first service implemented on top of the networking layer allows anonymous censorship-resistant file-sharing. GNUnet uses a simple, excess-based economic model to allocate resources. Peers in GNUnet monitor each others behavior with respect to resource usage; peers that contribute to the network are rewarded with better service.
    • Re:GNUnet by throwaway18 (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:50AM
    • Re:GNUnet by cutecub (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:06PM
      • Re:GNUnet by eldacan (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:18PM
      • Re:GNUnet by NoMoreNicksLeft (Score:3) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:57PM
        • Re:GNUnet by Mind Booster Noori (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @04:53PM
          • Re:GNUnet by NoMoreNicksLeft (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @06:30PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:GNUnet by Mind Booster Noori (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @04:40PM
    • I2P by redcliffe (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @09:25PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Erm (Score:4, Interesting)

    I don't mean to be snarky, but "very" popular? Does Freenet itself qualify as "popular", much less "very popular"? Does /anyone/ semi-normal (i.e., not a techno-geek, or a rights-geek) use Freenet, and if they do, has anything significant ever been published on it?

    Freenet seems to me to be one of those ivory tower projects that has little relation to the real world. Proof? No search engine, and very little chance of ever having one. How the hell can it ever be useful? [/rm101 resists making a dig about their choice to implement in Java]

    • Re:Erm by xanadu-xtroot.com (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @11:50AM
      • Re:Erm by topynate (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:16PM
    • Re:Erm by hawkeyeMI (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:09PM
      • Re:Erm by thinkninja (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @01:06PM
        • Re:Erm by Nf1nk (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @01:28PM
          • Re:Erm by OverlordQ (Score:3) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:43PM
        • Re:Erm by paganizer (Score:3) Saturday July 10 2004, @08:41PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Erm (Score:4, Informative)

      by Neophytus (642863) * on Saturday July 10 2004, @12:13PM (#9661500)
      Just to bite the Java troll, may I cite the example of Azureus [sourceforge.net] as an example of a Java program done right(tm). Runs fast, is responsive and doesn't use the godawful swing toolkit (it uses SWT [eclipse.org] instead).
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Erm by r00zky (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:16PM
      • Re:Erm by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:33PM
        • Re:Erm by r00zky (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:53PM
          • Re:Erm by r00zky (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:55PM
          • Re:Erm by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @02:54PM
            • Re:Erm by Mind Booster Noori (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:16PM
      • Work is underway... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:42PM
      • Re:Erm by NoMoreNicksLeft (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @01:01PM
    • Re:Erm by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:36PM
    • You don't know what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:45PM
    • Listing Engines Exist Today by nurb432 (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @12:58PM
    • Re:Erm by ultranova (Score:3) Saturday July 10 2004, @02:05PM
      • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @06:05PM
    • Re:Erm by BCoates (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @02:31PM
    • Re:Erm by Jhan (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @02:34PM
      • Re:Erm by topynate (Score:1) Saturday July 10 2004, @05:13PM
        • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @06:58PM
          • Re:Erm by topynate (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @07:25PM
            • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @07:34PM
              • Re:Erm by topynate (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @07:59PM
              • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Tuesday July 13 2004, @06:54AM
      • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @06:09PM
      • Re:Erm by Reality Master 101 (Score:2) Saturday July 10 2004, @09:00PM
        • Re:Erm by Reality Master 101 (Score:2) Sunday July 11 2004, @11:24AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Erm by amphibian (Score:1) Monday July 12 2004, @05:58PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Some say faster?! (Score:5, Funny)

    by sulli (195030) * on Saturday July 10 2004, @11:51AM (#9661411)
    (Last Journal: Monday October 22, @04:01PM)
    My 11 year old VW Jetta is faster than Freenet. In 5 pm Bay Bridge traffic.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by cool_st_elizabeth (730631) on Saturday July 10 2004, @12:01PM (#9661456)
    Now it's official.
  • Anonymity and Entropy (Score:5, Interesting)

    by trifakir (792534) on Saturday July 10 2004, @12:23PM (#9661544)
    Yep, anonymity is a favourite topic of conversation of me and my colleagues. Frankly, I do not understand the concerns of the "Entropy" project leader. Here is why:

    1. Theoretically, it is impossible to have anonymous communication [cornell.edu] on the Internet.
    2. In practice it is a balance of resources. The trick is that it is much cheaper to publish contents anonymously, than to trace the origin of an information. Therefore projects like Hacktivismo - Six/Four [hacktivismo.com], Crowds [avirubin.com], Freedom-Net [freedom.net], Tarzan [mit.edu], Onion-Routing [onion-router.net], etc. make sense.

    Furthermore, it is often the content which speaks more about the authorship, than the chain of technical events that leads to the publishing of the information. In Slashdot, for example, I have chosen not to show my e-mail, etc., but by reading my comments even a 10-years old kid can make a deduction about my real identity. Does it make sense for me to use IP-tunneling then?

    Finally, I do not understand the author. He just seems pissed. Maybe he will reconsider his opinion and revive the project. Is he sick from the lies (?) about the crypto-protocols used in the software which is written? IMHO the theory proves quite stable and if there is a room for attacks it is more in the implementations than in the protocols themselves. How many broken cryptosystems do you recollect (I know, I know "the knapsack", but it got broken on the conference on which it was presented).

    Still, even with this project retreating, the subject remains interesting.

  • Pros: IPv4/IPv6 based network, static IP addresses, free domain names, all traditional TCP apps work, easier to understand.

    Cons: Still small, restrictions on who you can invite, win95/98 not supported very well, some dullards have trouble understanding how anonymity works (if it uses TCP/IP your address can be tracked!).

    In particular, I need to find people that favor linux/unix (even OSX would be fine), would be willing to invite others, and plan on residing in any country other than the USA for the next few years. Bandwidth usage is negligible, and I'm willing to prove it.

    I'd also be willing to mentor those interested in setting up their own similar network, the more the merrier.
  • Tried it, looked suspicious (Score:4, Interesting)

    by vadim_t (324782) on Saturday July 10 2004, @12:53PM (#9661684)
    (http://sheelab.homecreatures.com/)
    Okay, first impression was:

    "Wow, great project!". It was like Freenet, only faster, lower latency, some stuff was cooler. It looked really promising. It was much easier to install in a chroot jail than Freenet.

    However. From what I saw, I wouldn't trust it for any serious purpose. It looked like the author was only interested in using it for testing his own crypto algorithms, and as anybody who read on this stuff should know, rolling your own crypto is a really bad idea unless you're really, really good, and then make sure it gets well tested for a few years.

    It had a nice possibility of restricting the node to chosen allowed crypto algorithms, but none of the available ones was in widespread use. I mean, AES, DES and Blowfish weren't in the list last time I checked. That makes me rather suspicious.

    I voiced my concerns once in the Entropy forum, and the author replied saying this is basically a research project and not intended for serious use (IIRC).

    If somebody does decide to continue with it, I certainly hope that one of the first things that will be done is to put some tested crypto in it instead of a bunch of homebrew methods. Nothing personal against the author, but I believe that if it was easier to trust it, it could become more popular.
  • Oh no ... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Entropy (6967) on Saturday July 10 2004, @12:57PM (#9661701)
    Ack!

    What are they doing to me???!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by sudog (101964) on Saturday July 10 2004, @01:12PM (#9661773)
    (http://www.goaway.com/)
    Is there any way to copy out the full contents of the CVS repository itself into another archive? The full development (and not just the latest version of it) is valuable to programmers who wish to learn more about the development process itself that went into Entropy.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by One_6453 (740362) on Saturday July 10 2004, @01:20PM (#9661827)
    Is it a sign of the times or the miseducation among us o rour own stupidity that someone has come up with such a term? I mean one who values ones privacy is termed an enthusiast thus denoting that one is almost but not quite on the fringe of society when it comes to privacy issues. More like a gun enthusiast
  • There is one alternative called Mute [sourceforge.net], which solves one key problem with Freenet or Entropy which is that it is searchable.

  • by pyrrhonist (701154) on Saturday July 10 2004, @02:06PM (#9662103)
    The author of Entropy has ceased development, because he heard somewhere [slashdot.org], that apparently [slashdot.org] someone [slashdot.org], not exactly sure who, had solved [slashdot.org] the problem [slashdot.org].

    Jeez, dood [slashdot.org], this article was about Entropy... ;)

  • by Metaframe (795729) on Saturday July 10 2004, @02:30PM (#9662247)
    If you are looking for alternatives or an overview of the most important anonymous filesharing networks you should check out http://board.planetpeer.de Although it is living on a .de domain there are also english forums available.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Irony (Score:2)

    by Lord_Dweomer (648696) on Saturday July 10 2004, @04:10PM (#9662773)
    (http://haltingpoint.blogspot.com/)
    " The creator alluded to the possibility that the project could continue if a new owner could be found."

    Ah the irony....

  • by rwbaskette (9363) on Saturday July 10 2004, @04:12PM (#9662787)
    ...well that was random!
  • 10 replies beneath your current threshold.