> Wrong, but it does match the public misconception. It's commonly believed that he's sitting on nearly half a billion dollars, and facts to the contrary won't even slow down those who will try to collect.

So where did those coins go then if you say he doesn't have them.

A Bachelors of Arts in anything scientific generally implies that you're not going to get enough exposure to anything you'll actually be doing, much less an associates. So sure, if you want to develop a program that teaches things they could pick up for $20 out of a book and make your college thousands, then 'Associates of Applied Science' sounds perfect.

Because no brakes are better then some brakes, everybody knows that.

They're a Ruby on Rails shop, what were you expecting?

> How is this a bad deal for the city or it's constituents?

Because it teaches them how much the telcos screw them over.

Daily 12.000.000 usd worth of bitcoin is converted on biggest exchange

Converted maybe, withdrawn? Hell no. Withdrawing USD from any of the exchanges is next to impossible.

> Bitcoins strength lies in its ability to be used as a payment processing network - and at a fraction of the cost of traditional payment networks (visa, mastercard, paypal, SWIFT, etc).

It's only fractional the cost for people receiving money. It doesn't cost me anything to send people money using USD.

~nt~

And never get another one again. Unless it's PR spokesperson for the KKK.

An oily rag, left outside, in the sun, on hot asphalt.

Garage conditions are usually the exact opposite.

> There might be /some/ argument that it's depriving the already super rich hollywood producers of their revenue but generally that assumes anyone who pirated something would have otherwise bought it which is certainly not the case. Most piracy is by children who don't have any money and could not have bought the content anyway.

Then do without. Problem solved. Oh wait, this is the 'EVERYTHING SHOULD BE FREE GIMMIE GIMMIE GIMMIE' generation.

> And you are apparently perfectly ok with the possibility that they could be completely wrong.

Yes. It's not a diagnostic tool. It's a "Hey 5 out of 7 people wearing red shirts die in star trek. You're wearing a red shirt, you've got good odds you might die"

It's because instead of listening to what the users want, they plow ahead with stupid UI-redesigns to make Firefox a slower, buggier Chrome clone. I mean sure, the new UI is spiffy, but they can't fix a nearly ten year old bug with find.

~nt~

Chart for the lazy.