Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:FCC? (Score 1) 194

You keep insisting, not only in this article but also in other Stingray-related /. articles, that the NTIA allows the Feds to do whatever they want radio-spectrum-wise

I have said no such thing. In fact, whenever people like you try to twist what I've actually said into this lie, I've corrected you in public.

Once again, I find myself wasting time responding to people who either cannot understand the difference between "not subject to FCC rules" and "not subject to any rules", or who deliberately ignore the difference so they can lie about what I've said.

There you go again, trying to sidetrack and obfuscate the central issue. Neither the NTIA nor any other federal law or regulation allows Stingrays to be legally used in the manner that law enforcement has used them. That's why Stingray use by LE has been so secretive in the first place.

The fact is that the US government has been taken over by fascist oligarchs who wipe their asses with the Constitution, Civil Rights, Due Process, and Rule of Law, thus it is no longer the legitimate government of the US and has exactly the same type of authority that the Crips and Bloods have in L.A.. The power of fear, guns, and violence.

The US Government has slowly over the decades morphed to an ongoing organized criminal enterprise.

Strat

Comment Re:Default Government Stance (Score 1) 194

The FBI's activities are specifically authorized by a host of laws. That you didn't bother to learn about them doesn't invalidate their existence.

There is nothing there or in the NTIA that allows law enforcement agencies to violate FCC rules, especially without a warrant. Please point out the specific law that, in your opinion, authorizes such activities by law enforcement.

And even if such interference was allowed, that still does not invalidate 4th Amendment protections both for the intended targeted individual(s) nor the innocent people in the area whose civil rights are violated in the course of Stingray use.

Strat

Comment Re:FCC? (Score 1) 194

While I know it would never happen, I would love to see the FCC get involved in this. Spectrum is kinda their domain

But the FBI use of spectrum is not.

You keep insisting, not only in this article but also in other Stingray-related /. articles, that the NTIA allows the Feds to do whatever they want radio-spectrum-wise which simply and plainly is not the case.

I have to wonder if either you're that stubborn & obtuse, or do you get paid to shill?

Strat

Comment Re:Can disrupt? How about INTENDED to disrupt! (Score 3, Funny) 194

1) I thought some operators were locals.

2) NTIA may well help manage spectrum, and the Feds certainly can use their reserved spectrum however they wish. But that does not grant them immunity to use any spectrum they wish, however they wish. Carriers (and their customers) have paid dearly for that spectrum which gives it many of the characteristics of private property. There certainly is a well-established expectation of privacy. (This is supposed to be a nation of laws not lawmen.)

Comment Re:Nice resolution (Score 2) 96

Raises hand.

I mostly got over motion sickness with my old VFX1. Never for Descent II though. It is about software more then anything. Up should remain up. Heli and driving sims work pretty good. Fixed wing less so. 3d shooters are OK but the devil is in the details.

In my experience the DK2 is no better then the VFX1 for motion sickness (Both working side by side). When the VFX1 shipped it was terrible, but once the VFX1 was running on a GHz processor and refreshing at 200fps, which is much faster then it's old interleaved 30Hz screen, it became OK.

The problem people working the motion sickness problem face is they are naturally being desensitized. So whatever they think will help with nausea does.

That said: I never get motion sick IRL. VR has mostly been no big issue. Two exceptions: Descent II (VFX1) and Alien Isolation (DK2, I have no explanation for why Alien Isolation is so bad, but it's very pukey. Still not hours for recovery, but 15 minute gaming limit.)

Comment Can disrupt? How about INTENDED to disrupt! (Score 4, Interesting) 194

Is this StingRay thing even FCC licenced? What about the operators?

Looks like it performs indiscriminate MiTM attacks. Particularly egregious, since it could probably be tuned with software to only intercept those EEIDs for which a warrent was issued.

No time for a warrent? Then how did the device magically appear on-scene? It was called-out, and so could a warrent be.

Comment Re:This is completely bogus! (Score 2) 52

Did you move the slider at all? It is in fact noteworthy that the page shows Israel has nearly doubled the size of its nuclear arsenal since worldwide arsenals peaked in '86.

Given the neighborhood and Iran's intent to make their own nukes, can you blame them?

Likewise, it's worth noting that Israel is *not* a member of the NPT.

...so who would they sell the tech to? Sometimes it makes no sense to bother with something when you're not liable to violate its precepts.

Comment Re:Lost focus (Score 1) 52

The tiny fraction can still wipe out the human race

Maybe, but that would depend on the location, timing and distribution of those explosions. If the balloon went up in 1987, yeah, the human race would pretty much be fscked. Nowadays, I'm not so sure that would be a given, considering that a not-insignificant percentage of those weapons would be destroyed in their silos, are undergoing maintenance at any given time, would fail to detonate completely or cleanly, or a whole host of other factors (and if either the US or Russia abstain from the exchange, then all bets are off as to the doomsday factor entirely.)

Slashdot Top Deals

Going the speed of light is bad for your age.

Working...