Yes, those too!
What can you do with a more expensive one that you can't do with a cheap one? My $100 Android seems to be able to run every ap I have downloaded. But then, I don't use it to play games, either.
If an individual life has negative value, then the total number of lives worth saving is 0, and there's no reason to care whether a particular act causes an increase in suffering or not.
It's a marginal cost. Reducing the number of people can reach a regime where there is a positive value to people once again.
it’s strong enough to survive a storm at sea or getting crushed between two icebergs.
An aluminum ball is strong enough to resist forces that have been known to crush steel hulls?
What fucked up ethical system do you have that doesn't start by saying human life is inherently valuable?
It is we who choose to make human life valuable or not. And there are easy to conceive global collapse scenarios such as a global famine where human life has negative value - each additional mouth to feed takes food from everyone else and causes more suffering.
My view on this is that the economic mechanisms of trade and private ownership of capital have done far more to make human life valuable than any system of ethics. One can say the same of technology progress, particularly in agriculture, transportation, and labor saving devices.
Irrelevant. This is an idea already proven viable.
Has not been proven to be economically viable.
Irrelevant. Not the only technology.
It is the technology the solution in the ARTICLE uses. The rest is pink unicorns.
It's the Indian-Asian boundary. India is a subcontinent on its own tectonic plate which has been crushing into Asia for a long time. The place where the plates collide is in the Himalayas. Those mountains are still increasing in altitude because of that.
Those double agents are not working in the interests of their country, they are working in the interests of the corrupt US corporations that control the US government.
You went way off the rails here. NSA has already done a lot to undermine corrupt and non-corrupt US corporations and nothing has been done about it. They still get their usual captive revenue stream (which let us note, will flow no matter how unhappy the business world gets about it). Just because large corporations are more useful to the US intelligence community than you are doesn't mean that they're in charge. It just means that the large corporation has some opportunity for profit as long as they continue to play ball. The tail, corporations aren't wagging this dog.
Do you really believe that curbing the power of businesses is going to result in the NSA spying less or hinder the other power grabs that the US federal government routinely engages in?
One of the huge things routinely missed in this topic is that business versus government is the huge informal division of power in democracies throughout the world. Making businesses absolutely subservient to government is another step towards tyranny. Sure, I don't think it's a good idea to let businesses rule our societies. But neither do I think it's a good idea to cripple them so much that they can't help us resist tyranny from the government side.
I can't help but think that you are an unwitting shill for a statist ideology which seeks to knock out the obstacles to rule.
You are wasting your time arguing against government meddling in markets. This
The same applies to the healthcare business, where we have reached to point that going to a doctor's office is no different to going to the DMV.
e.g. flow batteries:
They do that already with pumped-storage. Reversible hydroelectric. There are also some liquid batteries. Li-ion is just too expensive and maintenance-intensive to use grid scale.
Agreed. Especially with the subsidies, i.e. my money.
So what you are saying is that it's up to Hollywood to dictate what is acceptable in society?
How do you learn what is acceptable in a society? By watching people do stuff and get praised or reviled for it. What does Hollywood do? Show people doing stuff and get labeled heroes or villains. They're an efficient propaganda machine, for good or ill.
Like any form of censorship web blockades can sometime lead to overblocking, targeting perfectly legitimate websites by mistake.
This is also happening in the UK where Sky’s blocking technology is inadvertently blocking sites that have nothing to do with piracy.
Link to Original Source
A little bit of finesse and you can cause a massive loss of face. That will get a chinaman's attention.