What if my religion prohibited me from dealing with disabled? Should I have to incur expenses for disabled access?

Ha, I'll bite.
Those racists would have hidden it, law or no law. The homophobic are doing it right now:
http://janariess.religionnews.com/2015/01/28/mormon-leaders-advocate-gay-rights-protections-religious-freedom/

This, let the free market sort it out, sounds great when it doesn't affect you. It's typical white or wealth privilege telling people that whatever bothers them is just a minor inconvenience and they should ignore it until it goes away. Meanwhile, they would never tolerate something like that affecting them.

There's always someone willing to argue that privacy is only necessary for those with something to hide. It's always proven to be a specious and foolish argument. I'm also a pretty public person who tends to overshare. That doesn't mean I don't value privacy.

So, typical GOP nightmare...
Sounds like in any other group he'd look like a raging lunatic, but in the current GOP he sounds like a moderate.

Thanks, I am interested to hear more about the real Lindsey Graham, if he becomes a strong contender. Cruz is a joke, he's the only one who doesn't get it. Jeb is basically Sisyphus, there's no way I could vote for him.

I was just reading about Lindsey Graham and he is not casting himself as someone who pays lip service to social and fiscal conservatives. He's claiming he wants to break it to these people, gently, that their crazy. Not the swift kick in the ass that most of them deserve, but a start.

I like nano because the screen has all the commands you need right at the bottom. It's my go to editor. I don't have to flip back and forth between a help screen and a working screen (and an reading screen) like vi.

License plate scanners are a precursor to facial recognition. It's not something we can ignore.

Sure, you'll have clothes and a phone and maybe food, but you'll have to live in dormitories and you won't have access to parks and beaches, those will be for contributing members, not leeches...

What your saying is like when I hear people saying everyone has cell phones, flat tv's, and the internet now. They're so much better off. This discounts that we also pay a way higher percentage of our income for healthcare, housing, food, and energy.

In my experience, he's usually the one with the balls to say he can do it, with no idea how and no idea whether he has the resources. He then tries to line up people who can almost do it while paying almost enough to make it worth their while.

He's basically a glorified dispatcher who has delusions of grandeur because he has his fist in the money pot.

wow, that's below the belt, worse the youtube comments...

Wow, to a more objective observer, it looks like Netanyahu is being the dick. He's inflexible and acting up so that Adelson and his crony's can use him to tar Obama. Looks like it's working on it's intended audience. Nobody with any brains thinks "decisive military action" will be anything but bad for everyone involved or nearby.
I know this "incompetent for the position" is a newer emphasis from the wingnuts, I try to keep abreast of the far-right and far-left talking points. That allows me to identify you and categorize you appropriately.

My apologizes if any of these words are too big, read it slowly and use a dictionary if you have to.

When I did this with my uverse router it would "forget" the passthough rule every couple of months. I finally gave up and just use nat redirection to my server.

I haven't seen hairyfeet on here in awhile. I think he has some sort of bipolar issues. He's said a handful of useful things in the past, but he's just as likely to go off the deep end as he is to reasonably debate.

There's alot of crazy in that post. Those disinterested majority will quickly become interested when someone is dumb enough to try force. Look what happened to the south, read 1861 The Northerners were really disinterested in dying over the South's stupidity, but they came around quickly when the South went full derp.