No, it's trolling, not 'dialogue' you're after. I'll just have to assume you know of nothing illegal going on with the deal, and are just repeating the same old right wing bullshit that we all hear on the TeeVee three days previous. Feel free to prove otherwise. Or keep playing your little charade. You really are classic.

The mistake was ever to consider this dialogue.

There was no 'dialogue'. You're just doing 'drive-by'.

You're the one repeating all the wild claims about the deal. If you don't want to answer directly, you don't have to. One can easily be derived from the somewhat amusing responses you do give. This is precisely exactly the way Hillary dodges in her press conferences, which is actually half the fun of watching, and you are providing the same kind of entertainment. It's like you're running her show.. You make a good team.

As usual, non-responsive, but it is an answer.. sufficiently confirming that you have no idea, and you are just barking old propaganda.

Understatement of the the century!

Oh, and you "know" all of the politics and legalities and intrigues.

No, I'm asking you a simple question, and all I get is Limbaugh O'Reilly.. This of course is standard procedure, so your responses are what I expect, non-responsive. This is like a Hillary interview. Bob and weave...

Hey! You ever work graveyard for ten years? The guy asked a question! Alright? I was probably at a Cubs game when the announcement came over the wire (I would have to check to see if they played at home that day), or I was watching Munster reruns. Things get a little fuzzy. I'm sorry!

So you don't know... just more charades... eh...

Well, you still leaving me wondering if anything illegal was done, or are you just barking.

So when I get in my 18-wheeler and plow through your car, it's cool.

Well, using a truck to occupy the same space at the same time as the car is highly discouraged in civil society, but natural law is in your favor.

I have 0 accidents, 0 claims and 0 tickets on my record.

Well, as far as they see it, you're way overdue...

Autonomous cars will probably not be able to get away with a zero liability claim...

If a car has a greater liability claim against the operator than an elevator, then it is not 'autonomous', it is assisted driving.

Regardless of the semantic charades and diversions, will congress vote on it (or maybe they already have)? Is there anything illegal here? To me, it all sounds like the same game as the fast track bullshit on trade. The president isn't alone in this "betrayal", because this is how normal everyday business is conducted, since the beginning of time. And if I am to believe the polls, then it appears that most people are just hunky-dory with it. d_r will vote for a democrat no matter what, and you're off *Waiting for Perot* So, there ya are!

Everyone knows automobiles were endowed by the Creator with inalienable rights to have everyone get out of the fucking way.

Well, technically that's true. The "rights" of mass and momentum endowed by the Creator are absolutely inalienable (inviolable by man) as far as we know.

Legally, bicyclists come out a bit ahead of automobiles and a bit behind those of pedestrians when it comes to "rights". In some places, all bets are off...

With guns?