Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not that new (Score 1) 59

And so instead you see a bunch of lenses moving around which are considerably larger than the object they're trying to conceal, and furthermore would only work if all of them are oriented towards one particular viewer (viewers off to the side wouldn't be subject to this illusion.)

In other words, the Predator's plan of catching Arnie would fail pretty fast once his rear most lens bangs into a tree, knocking the whole thing out of alignment. Maybe Arnie doesn't see the predator, but he sees a strangely warped tree giving him plenty of warning which direction NOT to travel in in order to get to the choppa.

Comment Free bumper was PR (Score 1) 304

They denied many people had them but eventually fixed it anyway with a free bumper.

That didn't *fix* anything though. As was widely reported at the time, ALL phones lose signal dramatically with a death grip, iPhone or no, even with a case.

I never used a case or bumper with the "Antenna phone" and need had an issue dropping calls.

The free bumper was just PR.

I imagine somewhere in Apple's labs they are testing strengthened cases

Possibly, but I think that will only come into play with the iPhone 6s. I'm sure they will consider it more strongly.

Comment Re:Very outdated info (Score 1) 316

It will slowly gain traction among iOS developers, and some will use it for new code, but that doesn't mean it will be dominant by any means.

I don't think you understand, for new projects it pretty much already is.

The fact remains that there are billions of lines of Objective-C code out there. If you honestly think that developers are going to rewrite all those billions of lines of code

Of course not but over time refactoring will rid you of much of that.

I'm not saying all of that is going to be re-written, but within a year I don't think many projects will be started that do not use Swift at the outset.

Now if Apple were to release an Objective-C to Swift translator,

In effect they already do by automatically generating Swift versions of any header files you want Swift to see. That means it's zero cost to call into any existing code from Swift.

If anything, they're usually not cynical enough to adequately model developer apathy and resistance to change..../em

You REALLY do not understand the iOS development community. I would agree with you in any other context, I have been a developer in a lot of worlds, from backend to front end dev. In any other community of developers you would be right; for iOS development you are so, so wrong - primarily because iOS developers are used to constant change anyway, the language changing is just one more change. If it makes you even a little more productive people will use it - and Swift does that quite well.

My predictions are also very, very conservative...

Comment Re:Rent a Tesla for $1 (Score 1) 335

The only time I've ever had a rental car was when somebody side swiped my 1996 salvaged title Lexus LS400 that had a lot of miles on it. The rental company would only give me a 2011 Dodge Sebring since the Lexus was only worth (blue book) about $3,000.

Although the interior looked nice as the car was basically brand new, overall it drove like a piece of shit compared to my (much cheaper) Lexus. If they would have thrown such a pitch at me, I would have happily told Dodge how much even their new cars suck hairy ass and balls compared to something Toyota made 15 years earlier.

Transportation

State of Iowa Tells Tesla To Cancel Its Scheduled Test Drives 335

puddingebola writes: Conflict continues between state governments and Tesla. From the article: "Iowa joined a growing list of states tussling with Tesla Motors' business model when it told the company to cut short three days of test drives earlier this month in West Des Moines. The Iowa Department of Transportation said the test drives were illegal for two reasons: Tesla isn't licensed as an auto dealer in Iowa and state law prohibits carmakers from selling directly to the public." While the article touches on the legal restrictions on selling cars in Iowa, it seems that Tesla was only providing test drives.

Comment Front pocket is fine (Score 2) 304

I wouldn't ever carry a bare phone or one with just a silicone bumper in a front pocket

I have for years without issue.

And that includes the iPhone plus.

Theres simply not enough force to even come close to flexing the phone, much less bending...

Back pockets are I think more worrisome but even there - the Plus (as the tests show) is pretty damn rigid.

Comment Re:Apple = cash cow for scumbags (Score 1) 304

70 lbs is easy to bend just moving around in tight pants

Perhaps if you are the Hulk, unlike you I wear a phone AND PANTS all the time and I can verify no such forces are exerted from normal wear (and that includes Jeans which are the Iron Maiden of phone holders).

Executive summary: MONEY GOOD

Summary for everyone else: I have a Plus in my pocket and looking at what should get bent soon, pretty sure it's you,

Comment Exactly, reality says "not an issue" (Score 4, Insightful) 304

So, if the phones are bending in real world situations, they are by definition defective

Except they aren't.

Apple sold 10 *million* phones over the weekend. Of those, Apple says they have six complaints. And we haven't seen that many pictures from real owners.

So the reality is that the iPhone 6 is not defective, a few have undergone more extreme forces than is reasonable. In the end a large flat object can be broken, that's just physics and no amount of design will change that.

If you plan to put ANY phone through more extreme forces than normal, get an Otterbox and call it a day.

Comment The Poiint (Score 1) 304

If they only test the phone on the middle, what's the point?

A) Most people with phones in the back pocket would have strain excerpted roughly from the middle, not some offset point.

B) With the 6 Plus the distance from the center to the volume buttons is so small I doubt there would be any change in the results. Forces distributed across the device find the weakest point even if it is offset.

Comment Yes, reality is a defense (Score 4, Insightful) 304

but the 6 bends at nearly HALF the pressure of the 5

Neither figure matters if the pressure actually put on the phone in your pocket is 1/10th of 55 lbs.

To phrase it differently since you seem to have a personality tailor-made for being "misled by statistics", if the only force a device undergoes is 10-20lbs, why does it matter if a device can sustain a million pounds of force, or 30,

Remember that in realty Apple's has reports of just six actual phones being bent.

I have a 6plus and have been using it in my pocket. After sitting or leaning over or whatever, there is zero bend or even flex to the thing. To actually bend it would take enough force I'd be concerned about my own structural integrity.

Comment No Way (Score 1) 304

Strawman. At least some of the reports of bending were from people claiming they put the phones in their front pockets.

Well hello, Counter Strawman.

In reality the 6 plus works fine in front pockets - I know. I've been using it for days and there's not even a hint of bending from having the phone in your pockets.

Furthermore that was the point of the tests consumer reviews did, under normal packet use these things are not going to bend - especially in front pockets.

Slashdot Top Deals

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...