Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Back for a limited time - Get 15% off sitewide on Slashdot Deals with coupon code "BLACKFRIDAY" (some exclusions apply)". ×

Newly Spotted Frozen World Orbits In a Binary Star System 34

An anonymous reader writes A newly discovered planet in a binary, or twin, star system located 3,000 light-years from Earth is expanding astronomers' notions of where Earth-like planets can form. At twice the mass of Earth, the planet orbits one of the stars in the binary system at almost exactly the same distance at which Earth orbits the sun. However, because the planet's host star is much dimmer than the sun, the planet is much colder than Earth. "This greatly expands the potential locations to discover habitable planets in the future," said Scott Gaudi, professor of astronomy at Ohio State. "Half the stars in the galaxy are in binary systems. We had no idea if Earth-like planets in Earth-like orbits could even form in these systems."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Newly Spotted Frozen World Orbits In a Binary Star System

Comments Filter:
  • The summary clarified "Binary Star" for Slashdot readers. That seems unnecessary, or my opinion of Slashdotters is far too 2002.

  • It's a rebel hideout

    • Or Tatooine [wikipedia.org] (due to the fact it orbits a binary star system, not the climate).
    • by l0ungeb0y (442022)
      Considering the article states that this planet has an estimated surface temperature of 352 Fahrenheit, it would make Hoth seem like a tropical resort, considering warm blooded animals like Tauntauns were able to survive on the surface. Hoth would have been more like the Antarctic, around 70 Fahrenheit by comparison.
      • by l0ungeb0y (442022)
        Fuck /. -- it removed the negative characters from my post WTF? Those numbers should read -352 F and -70 F. Why it stripped out the "" I do not know.
        • by nadaou (535365)

          another UTF8 related tragedy

        • by Talderas (1212466)

          That does make your post quite hilarious.

        • by RockDoctor (15477)

          it removed the negative characters from my post WTF?

          Simple - your keyboard is mapped incorrectly. It inserts some high-numbered UTF character into your text when you press the key marked with the hyphen glyph and intended to insert the character with ASCII code 45.

          Hang on - are you composing your replies in a word processor instead of using a text editor?

  • by yesterdaystomorrow (1766850) on Sunday July 06, 2014 @01:39PM (#47394359)
    We know nothing about this planet's atmosphere. The low flux of energy from its star tells us that its stratosphere (if present) must be very cold, but says nothing about its surface temperature. It could have a much deeper troposphere, and thus a much stronger greenhouse effect than Earth has.
    • The size of the planet puts limits on the atmosphere. And at 60 K, it's colder than Neptune. No depth of troposphere can turn a Neptune or Pluto warmer than Earth.
      • No depth of troposphere can turn a Neptune or Pluto warmer than Earth.

        Neptune's interior temperature is thought to be 7000K. Venus, a bit smaller than Earth, has a surface >500K hotter than its tropopause. I see no physical reason that this super-Earth couldn't have much more atmosphere than Venus. 220K from tropopause to surface would get you to liquid water.

  • "Winter has arrived."

To restore a sense of reality, I think Walt Disney should have a Hardluckland. -- Jack Paar