Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Why 128bit? (Score 1) 326

by Bengie (#40104093) Attached to: Sales of Unused IPv4 Addresses Gaining Steam

The goal with IPv6 allocations is to give more than enough IPv6 address space. They want to prevent an organization from needing to come back to request more and also to avoid fragmented route prefix advertising in the core Internet routing tables.

Here your answer why 128bit addresses are used. You don't hand out address based on need, you give something so large that no one could use it all.

Comment: Re:Hoarding? (Score 1) 326

by Bengie (#40103763) Attached to: Sales of Unused IPv4 Addresses Gaining Steam

Exactly. They were issued these blocks in good faith. They are hoarding them, and they dont own them - they need to return them so they can actually be used

You make it sound like they are doing something they shouldn't. In reality, IPv4 was a proof of concept and anyone was allowed to join the "beta" network. "Here have some IP addresses, free of charge, they're yours until we make the "real" protocol.

IPv4 takes off and now these companies who got these large /8 blocks have no restrictions because that was the contract at the time. We can't just change the contract on them because we don't like it anymore.

Comment: Re:IPv4 forever? (Score 1) 326

by Bengie (#40103525) Attached to: Sales of Unused IPv4 Addresses Gaining Steam
"Hey guys, we have a new toy, here's some numbers you can have". 25 years later.. "shiat"

It may have been /., but some site had an interview with the creator of IPv4 and he said it was just a proof-of-concept, but it took off before IPv6 was finalized. Once IPv4 become too popular, IPv6 went to the back-burner for a bit.

Comment: Re:Regulation (Score 1) 326

by Bengie (#40102797) Attached to: Sales of Unused IPv4 Addresses Gaining Steam
Sorry, our version of the internet no longer works. Sounds like a great beginning to a class-action suit after many software/consoles/etc break. I'm sure Ipv6 will take off before it becomes much of an issue. Anyway, many network engineers have talked about how ISP level NAT for broadband connections is more expensive and more of a head-ache than just switching to IPv6.

Comment: Re:Exactly why we don't need IPv6 (Score 2) 326

by Bengie (#40102343) Attached to: Sales of Unused IPv4 Addresses Gaining Steam
The point isn't to have enough IPs for every user, but to have enough IPs such that the chance of collision is low. The other thing you miss is the ability to merge large corp networks. If you have to merge two companies with two datacenters with 100,000 machines each, the chance of a colliding IP address with only 4 bytes is quite large.

Never have so many understood so little about so much. -- James Burke

Working...