Google Releasing an Office Suite 198
prostoalex writes "Google Apps for Your Domain is Google's entrance into the office productivity world, but contrary to popular expectations, the company is not shipping word processor or spreadsheet for corporate use just yet. Google, Inc. bundled e-mail client (Gmail), shared calendaring environment (Google Calendar), instant messaging client (GTalk) and HTML page generator (Google Page Creator) to be used across specific domains. The service will be ad-supported, reports the Associated Press." From that article: "The free edition of Apps for Your Domain is, like Google's main site, supported with ads. By the end of the year, the company also plans to launch a paid version that will offer more storage, some degree of support, and likely, no ads. A price for this edition hasn't been set. Providing e-mail and other applications for businesses moves Google closer into what has traditionally been turf occupied by Microsoft Corp. Earlier this year, Google released a program that builds simple Excel-type spreadsheets but lets users access them on the Web."
Google Spreadsheet (Score:5, Interesting)
Also it's pretty slow, so that's a big downside as well.
As a user of Writely and Google's Spreadsheets.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:2, Interesting)
My main concern... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to use exclusively OpenOffice and I think it is great, but there is one thing that stands in the way of it being wildly used: design. For all it's greatness, it doesn't look very good at all, infact, it's kinda ugly. Meanwhile, I just downloaded Office 2007 which looks, and feels, amazing. Say what you will about Microsoft, but they sure as hell nailed it with Office 2007. Not only does it look great, but their revamp of the toolbar system (the ribbon) is fantastic. Very slick. Right now, I do everything with it.
OpenOffice needs like 10 professional designers to really hunker down and figure out a way to make it look better. That's easily the number one complaint I hear from people when I try to convince them of using OpenOffice.
Re:Most people aren't interested in computers (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:4, Interesting)
Adding functionality wil be easy ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Since its all client-side javascript, I can see them addressing both bloat and functionality by having users custom configure what functions they need the spreadhseet to have, and having only those javascript libraries loaded by default.
This would also open it up to 3rd-party developers, who could submit their scripts as add-ins.
Want your spreadsheet to automatically text message you when a certain field hits a critical value? Want your spreadsheet to email a diff when Joe Luser saves it? Wnat yur spreadsheet to look up stuff in an external database based on a crc64 of the values in other fields? No problemo.
Google Calendar (Score:4, Interesting)
Google has a good start on a superior replacement for Outlook.
For the rest of the office suite, there's OpenOffice.
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:3, Interesting)
It's hard.
They keep telling that the next version will be great.
I stopped believing when I switched from msoffice97 to msoffice2000 and its magically dissapearing menu options, remember that?
Now I use openoffice, and in the places where it's different from msoffice, it makes a lot more sense.
Now I'm using msoffice at work, I am kind of forced to use msoutlook2003, and I can't make sense of this. Funcions are really hard to find, for example, search is awful (google desktop makes it somewhat better) and to see message headers (to see why it doesn't respect spam assasin headers, broken header parser, not a usability issue, though) I need to use right button menu - options (!!).
I'm not wasting my time trying yet another version, that I have learned in more than 10 years that has a big chance to be crappy.
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:3, Interesting)
OTOH, there is a lot to be said for keeping graphic development like charts local, rather than shared among a group. The workflow I envision is using Google Spreadsheets for data collection and shared reference resources where its collaborative nature really shines. Then develop summary reports and graphics by downloading and importing into Excel or OpenOffice and having at it.
I shudder to think of what business graphics produced by a committee would look like, or how long it would take to decide what color to paint each of the slices of the pie. Also, developing locally would help assure that the impact of the graphics on your audience wasn't diminished by their prior exposure to the rough drafts.
If I were planning an office tools entry (Score:3, Interesting)
Powerpoint is the weak link in the chain of MS Office hegemony. It does the least of the MS Office suite to justify its proprietary format. Building a web standards (or defacto subset of standards) based application means immediately every desktop computer has a compatible player.
Next GWT provides a toolkit for creating "active content" that runs in our presentations, a nice "aftermarket" for small software developers. Add a halfway composer/ide with webdav support and it could become, for many, a replacement for FrontPage as well.
Re:Adding functionality wil be easy ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Shared Hosting killer service? (Score:2, Interesting)
- Gmail
- Google Calendar
- Google Chat
- Google Web Page Creator
It sounds to me more like a competitive shared hosting solution for small business, rather than an office suite.
(More info: http://www.h3rald.com/articles/view/google-apps-f
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:3, Interesting)
Aw, make that image go away from my mind. *shudder*
Just want to mention that I regularly get sent pictures for use in ads and brochures... in Word. They call them "Word images", accordingly. "Hey, I just sent you a Word image of the diagram you asked for."
Thanks Bill. Thanks indeed.
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:demand? (Score:4, Interesting)
Google is a corporation. Google probably knows, or at least very much should know, what a corporation needs in terms of security in an office package, particularly in light of the behaviour of its competitors. Assuming Google wishes to go down this road they would need to be prepared to offer secure solutions to potential corporate clients. I would be astounded if they haven't already thought of that.
Sheesh, they are pretty smart guys, they aren't jumping in head first with a half-finished product. The volume of beta products shows they are prudent, and apparently concerned with delivering quality. If they want the corporate world there's a good chance they can eventually take it.
Writely is good. It is already capable of completing the vast majority of real everyday WP tasks. It is fast and simple - far faster and simpler and more appropriate than Word for most things. Word already has far too much stuff crammed into it, and the new version seemingly even more deadwood than the current.
It may be marginal, but a corporation could save money and increase productivity by switching to this product once it is fully ready. The only issues would be ones that you raised - which are solvable...
I'm sure the demand is there.
Re:Define serious. 90% of businesses are tiny. (Score:5, Interesting)
Link to your Statistics ? (Score:1, Interesting)
Do you have a link to the statistics on the world usage of Excel?
Is that 10% based on your own observations?
It really depends where you work at.
For example, working at a cube farm with data entry temps, does not compare with working in a 4th floor, full of engineers and statisticians.
Re:Link to your Statistics ? (Score:2, Interesting)
I knew I'd get that.
It's a rule of thumb that 80% of the users only uses 20% of the functions. I think that for Excel it's much more extreme, because so many people uses it, and there really isn't very many powerusers out there.
I wasn't talking about the place I work, I really don't think that company matters much to the world market of spreadsheets.
If course there are large groups of powerusers here and there, but I doubt that it's even 10% of the users. And I'd say you're a poweruser if you use just 10% of Excel.
It's kind of like a car. There's a lot of users, but not very many know more than what you need to know to drive them. And even that is often lacking. (Peoplo not checking for oil, not checking the lights, have fog lights on when there's not fog...)
I guess most people use far less than 10% of the thingies you could do something with in your car. Ask around, how many people has operated their fuelpump manually? Read errorcodes from the enginecomputer? Upgraded firmware in it?
privacy concerns (Score:3, Interesting)
assuming they put up the increased functionality of a word processor and spreadsheet (even presentation,) then they will practically be able to read the documents of everyone. it's like giving your ideas, corporate secrets, intentions, plans, etc to google for them to see. even if they are for "ad purposes", it is still scary. basically, they already know me inside out from the searches i make (even though i disable cookies by default, my isp gives me an almost static ip add.)
no thanks. i'll keep private data with me. i've got open office just in case the free argument goes into place. i'm beginning to appreciate microsoft now as google is able to collect much more information from me than them.
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:3, Interesting)
them:"My Word is broken!"
me:"How's that?"
them:"it's only printing two pages"
me:"how many should it have printed?"
them:"four."
me:"What's the last thing ir printed out?"
them: BLAH BLAH BLAH
me: "well that's the last thing on the document, is it in reading layout?"
them: "no
It displayed on four pages so they want to see it print on 4 pages. Sad really.
Re:Google Spreadsheet (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm a data analyst, and I know there are times when the figures are enough, and other times when charts and graphs get the point across much more quickly and accurately. Go read Edward Tufte, and come back when you've learned something.