New Yorker on Miyazaki 196
An anonymous reader writes "The New Yorker issue of 17 January has an in-depth article on Hayao Miyazaki. It gives a nice look at the arc of his work, short interviews with him, and more extended interviews with his co-workers. Here is an interview with the article's author."
Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:1)
But even after viewing the link, I can honestly say I have never heard of him or his works. (just now, I had to check to see if I should say "him/his" or "her".
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:4, Insightful)
There is no shame in not knowing everything. Nobody knows everything. There are plenty of time in Slashdot where I need to look up some acronym, Just to know what the story is about. People have interests in different areas and know different things. So even a site like Slashdot which is ment to focus on technical and geeky people there are still a wide range of information that people may not have come across before in there life. The smartest people I know are the ones who are not afraid of saying that they are unfamiliar in that area and ask to learn more. The dumbest people I know feel that they know all the information and are afraid to admit that they don't know a thing about it. The reason why this is true is simple. The person who isn't afraid to admit that they dont have all the knowledge seek it out and learn more. Those who don't avoid the seeking of knowledge and fail to grow.
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:2, Insightful)
To stay on topic I think it's great that Miyazaki and ghibli are finally getting mainstream recognition in the western world, lots of good movies from that source.
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:1)
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:2)
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:2)
Re:Who is Hayao Miyazaki? (Score:1)
Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1)
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:2, Interesting)
But then, I'm not an anime geek. I tend more towards David Lynch and Atom Egoyan than most anime, so maybe I'm grossly misinformed.
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1)
One year they pretty much got their way and Visitor Q got taken out in the process. Screenings had to be cancelled... the
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:2)
Any film festivals in Feb or March? I'll be in New Zealand then.
How does the lobby feel about Peter Jackson's early stuff?
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1)
And as for the broadband thing, only just! We're emerging from the land of 128kbps over here very, very slowly. I got an email on Friday from my provider INTRODUCING a 10gb data-cap on my previously unrestricted plan, with no reduction in price.
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:2)
I was planning on looking for other Akashi Miike movies while I was there.
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1)
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1)
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:3, Insightful)
http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/films/#film_g_t [nausicaa.net]
Re:Not my style, but well deserved. (Score:1, Insightful)
Fascinating stuff (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Fascinating stuff (Score:2)
"........"
Re:Fascinating stuff (Score:1)
Re:Fascinating stuff (Score:4, Informative)
From Frederik L. Schodt's book Dreamland Japan, he said the Japanese back then produced extremely popular toba-e and kibyoushi books (that look very much like modern comic books in style) using woodblock printing in that the same way that manga artists produce their works in Japan today: a overall creator helped by a small group of assistants to complete each work. Indeed, today's Japanese manga is essentially like toba-e and kibyoushi production, only using modern drawing techniques and vastly larger reading audiences thanks to modern printing methods.
Mouse House? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Mouse House? (Score:2, Funny)
The Disney-Tokuma Deal .. (Score:1)
If they'd actually release them on the big screen, people would realize that even older Ghiblis (like "Porco Rosso" and "Laputa" are not only better-made (wrt. story, art, soundtrack) than the disney fare of their time, but also (still) better th
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
I'm VERY interested in what happens sociopolitically in Japan, when the millions of kids who grew up watching his movies (and consuming the themes of "dark, apocalyptic environmentalism" contained therein at very impressionable ages) are the ones running the country (what, 20-30 years from now?).
Do people think about the effect of "the Disney ethos" or people who were raised by hippies on American politics?
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
Everyone at PIXAR seems to talk about how his works influenced them.
Now if you or others have never bothered with anything related to Animation or Comics in the art world, then I can certainaly understand why the name might not be recognizable.
I think Spi
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:2)
Re:Why don't you just say he's an animation artist (Score:1)
BTW if you hold your view so strongly, then why post as anonymous? The parent deserves to be modded troll. And not for the views on anime, but for the insults oh so cleve
Might it not be... (Score:3, Insightful)
I had to do a search. May I suggest that the editors/posters re-read their submission instructions?
In related news, Wilbert Rideau [nytimes.com] has been released.
Re:Might it not be... (Score:2)
Oh, awesome -- i've been waiting to play that for months!
Re:Might it not be... (Score:2)
In this day and age, the burden of finding stuff out can be placed a little more on the reader. How hard is it to cut and paste in google?
Re:Might it not be... (Score:2)
Expo in Paris (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Museums in America (Score:2)
Museums in Socialist paradises... (Score:2)
Even in Vietnam I had to pay to enter to the national museum in Hanoi.
Re:Museums in Socialist paradises? (Score:2)
Re:Expo in Paris (Score:2)
Re:Expo in Paris (Score:1)
Re:Site Temporarily Disabled (Score:1)
A classic to be sure. (Score:5, Interesting)
this man really knows how to take you into a world of awe and amazement. He can take you to world filled with ancient gods, and mysterious magic, or to the skies and ancient forgotten cities who's only surving inhabitans are it's gargantuan robot caretakers.
I would have to say I dislike this being classified as Anime though, as while it is Japanese, it is nothing like any other Japanese animation. These are truly works that will outlive Miyazaki to become classics, and his own name will outlive him to become legend.
I highly reccomend this mans works to everyone here, even if you dislike anime, you may be pleasently surprised by the experience.
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:2)
Neither is it here in the U.S.
I think the guy was referring to the stereotype of anime, somewhat justifiably, that's built up based off of our more-commonly seen anime, like Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh, Dragonball-Z, Yu-Yu Hakusho, and a good many more. Those things are to Miyazaki as your typical Internet webcomic artist is to Charles Schulz.
Miyazaki actually expresses disdain for most anime (including his own) in the
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:2)
"SF and fantasy" is a very strange way to typo "porn"...
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:1)
"Anime" is a term just like "movie"; it's based off facts about the film, not subjective quality. Should we call Citizen Kane something besides "movie" just because so many other movies suck? Some anime is terrible, some isn't. Deal with it.
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:1)
I didn't say I hated anime, quite the opposite my friend, but I do not think this ranks with what most Americans see as Anime.
The differences I speak of are in the art, direction, and quality.
I do not speak of anime as a genre, I speak of it as a movement, and I for one do not feel this is part of that particular movement.
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:2)
Like the parent poster, without your clarification I would interpret this as ignorance on the fact that 'anime' != Dragonball & co, and that Miyazaki's work are not unique in being 'films' rather than cartoons.
Maybe they're not as amazing to your taste as Miyazaki's, but I would not classify the works of any of the following as fundamentally different: Grave of the Firefli
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:1)
Honestly, when I think anime, I think Naruto, Evangelion, love hina, dragon ball z, Trigu, cowboy bebbop, tenchi muyo, and a host of others. This is the movement, and Miyazakis work is far removed from it. Many of the movies you movies you mentioned were as well.
I'll also admit I'm very biased when it comes to Miyazaki's works, as he is simply my favorite director, and an exa
Classifying Miyazaki (Score:2)
For that matter, Miyazaki does a better job of creating a sense of place and an illusion of reality than most live-action filmmakers.
Re:A classic to be sure. (Score:1)
I just saw Howl's Moving Castle (Score:4, Informative)
I've been told a few critics around here (in France) were disappointed or something -- I haven't have the chance to read them yet. Many others were enthousiastic, and I join their rank!
Like many other Miyazaki movies, there's plenty of everything, for everyone, to be seen, felt, understood, admired. There's entertainment for sure, suspense, chasing, quite a bit of war, beautiful machineries and landscape, music, great characters (including a most excellent demon of fire!), etc. There's also a classical but well-told love story, some insights about power and corruption, and interesting and thought provokind depictions of age, old age mostly (an unusual subject for an animé, but very tastefully done), and young age in contrast to the elderly. There's also plenty of English-tale feeling, since the story is adapted from a recent (1986) English children-book. Miyazaki manages to blend the English and Japanese cultures masterfully.
Overall, and almost as usual with Miyazaki, this is a movie you can go see with your children (or nephews, or whatever), they will immensely enjoy themselves, and you certainly won't be annoyed or bored either.
To each their own (Score:2)
I just saw Howl's Moving Castle, Miyazaki's latest work, and I just have this to say: It's excellent!
To each their own, I suppose. I saw it on opening day (here in Japan), and to be frank I was disappointed. Not that it was a bad movie, by any means--it's just less than I expected for a Miyazaki work, and it didn't have quite the same touch his better films have had. If you haven't already been indoctrinated with Nausicaa and the like, then you'll probably find it very enjoyable.
Re:To each their own (Score:2)
But as you said, to each their own.
Re:To each their own (Score:1)
Maybe some peoples reaction to "Howl's" is the same way?
Is it just me? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Is it just me? (Score:2)
Re:Is it just me? (Score:2)
The actual New Yorker article is good, by the way. I didn't know much about Miyazaki before this; here's some things I learned from the article:
1) In addition to "Howl's Moving Castle" coming out (in movie theaters, presumably) this year, good versions of "Nausicaa
Coincidentally enough... (Score:1)
Rather odd.
Anyway... to make this post semi-legit, I figure it's worth mentioning a related 'news' item: Disney's Nausicaa version (with Mark Hamil and Patrick Stewart!) is due to come out on DVD next month.
Details (Score:2)
This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sorry this topic got hijacked. As an animation buff, I consider Miyazaki's work to be some of the finest in the genre today, and I dearly wish his body of work were much larger. Much like HR Giger (Alien), Miyazaki melds a strong sense of the organic into the fantastic in a kid- and family-friendly way. Miyazaki's work extends far beyond just Japanese culture. His vision utilizes influences as diverse as Alice in Wonderland and Jonathan Swift to tell his stories.
Miyazaki's flying machines look like they were grown in some massive garden or hewn out of a redwood tree using an ax, but with the added bonus that they can really fly. His cities are exquisitely and almost painfully rich with detail, with kitschy lofts, alleys, shops, and access roads that meld the charm of Old World Europe with the practicality of a cleaned-up New York City. Miyazaki obviously cares about place and time every bit as much as character development, which is why it is so easy to get lost in his anime. (My DVD player's pause button gets a workout every time I watch a Miyazaki feature).
There is a refreshing lack of the judgmental in Miyazaki's body of work. Like Samuel Goldwyn, he apparently prefers to let Western Union or NTT relay his messages. While Miyazaki obviously recognizes that there is great evil in the world, he also knows that even the most evil often have valid reasons that they did what they did, and he leaves it up to the audience as the court of last resort when it comes to their "guilt" or "innocence".
And the best part of statements like Princess Mononoke? Miyazaki's creatures and environments are not passive victims or Bambi - they have teeth and claws and weapons of their own, and they are not shy about using them if driven to do so. You gotta respect it when the deer breaks out a Weatherby .454 and starts shooting back.
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:1)
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:2)
"Much like HR Giger (Alien), Miyazaki melds a strong sense of the organic into the fantastic, but in a kid- and family-friendly way."
What do I win?
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:1)
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:2)
I knew Miramax cut out something from my DVD. Damn them!
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:2)
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:1)
Please tell us you don't really think Giger is kid-friendly. Or that you don't have children.
Re:This Guy Builds Worlds ... (Score:1)
japan only country w/ ageless adoration animation? (Score:2, Informative)
Are there countries other than Japan where animation is as popular across different age groups? I think that Japan is unusual, if not unique, in its animation and comic-book culture.
I think france is another country where animation and comic books are consumed at all ages. One can find grown men reading hard cover and paperback comics on the metro in paris and the average age of movie goers for animated films is definit
Re:japan only country w/ ageless adoration animati (Score:1, Informative)
despite im portuguese, belgium scene is huge, and has its own authors, culture, comic book dedicated streets etc
Re:japan only country w/ ageless adoration animati (Score:1)
I mean, we have Marvel, DK, etc.
My opinion on Anime (Score:1)
More Ghibli Please (Score:2)
It's also important to remember that the Ghibli approach to animation requires massive effort by a huge team of creative people. Again, t
Re:More Ghibli Please (Score:2)
Speaking of subtitles: I make it a rule to always watch Miyasaki movies in Japanese with English subtitles. That way you get a pretty authentic version of the dialog, even if the translators sometimes trip over English idioms. When you listen to the Disney soundtrack, you get a lot of gr
Bait and switch! (Score:3, Informative)
"The New Yorker issue of 17 January has an in-depth article on Hayao Miyazaki. It gives a nice look at the arc of his work, short interviews with him, and more extended interviews with his co-workers."
and clicked through. Pretty disappointing to find out that the actual article is an interview with somebody who interviewed Miyazaki, and includes no actual excerpts of interviews with him.
To sum it up, most of the article seems to be Margaret Talbot explaining her own opinions on and experiences with Miyazaki films to the New Yorkers Dan Cappello. She paraphrases something Miyazaki said in their actual interview maybe thrice throughout the story. Most of it is simply her personal opinion on his work or statistical/biographical info that is available to anyone-- which is fine if you've never heard of him, but rather boring if you have seen his works, already know that he is incredible, and would just like to hear what he has to say.
Disappointing to say the least! So where's the actual New Yorker article that the Slashdot story spent most of its time describing??
Re:Bait and switch! (Score:2)
In the New Yorker?
Reading comprehension (Score:1)
You could have found that out if you'd read the link you clicked on, and the submission in general. It's only bait and switch if there was an attempt to hide something.
In New Yorker magazine (a paper publication), of course. The submitter of this piece did the best he could do (other t
Re:Reading comprehension (Score:2)
If you read *my* post, you'd know I did indeed read the whole article. Judging from the other posts available at the time I posted, I have to note that mine was the only one that referenced the article anyways. I didn't see you complaining about how relevant and referential those who treated an article containing the word "Miyazaki" as
Re:Reading comprehension (Score:1)
Perhaps what I wrote was ambiguous, although I can't help wondering if you're just doing the same thing all over again. I said "read the link", by which I meant read the text of the link within the Slashdot submission, not the article. You're complaining because you clicked on a link without reading what the link said, and then were surprised when the linked article was exactly what it was billed as.
As to my meanness, I respond
He's not just an animator, though (Score:2)
"In a few short centuries, industrial civilization had spread from the western fringes of Eurasia to sprawl across the face of the planet. Plundering the soil of its riches, fouling the air, and remolding lifeforms at will, this gargantuan society had already peaked a thousand years after its foundation: ahead lay
Re:Frankly, I'm not interested in what Miyazaki sa (Score:2)
Re:Feh (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't pretend to know about anime, but every time I've watched a movie recommended by an anime geek:
1) It's been psuedo-porn, often featuring women being raped by tentacles or other such frankly pointless escapades.
2) The animation has been hilariously crap. Good animation goes a long way, and a lot of anime doesn't really cut it.
3) The d
There's a pattern. (Score:1)
Stage 1: Novelty-- Audience is interested in the big, flashy things: storyline, effects, character templates.
Stage 2: Basic familiarity-- Audience is familiar with all the general character types, storylines, and effects. They start looking for the real purpose of the