Intel kills Consumer Electronics 78
bribecka writes "Saw this on CNet News.com: Intel has decided to phase out its consumer electronics division. This division was responsible for digital cameras, digital audio players, and other gadgets. " Not really surprising considering the way things are these days.
Intel (Score:1, Insightful)
Unless you consider the Pentium class of processors "consumer grade".
Re:Intel (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Intel (Score:1)
You obviously have never worked for Intel.
The only "entrepeneurs" inside Intel are the ones who made a real business from scratch and were devoured by the Borg. They won't be ready to run a division until the implants are completely set.
The Intel Play microscope... (Score:2, Insightful)
However, my nieces and nephews have easily gotten my money's worth of play out of this item, and it has spark more than enough questions/curiosity.
While it is a low-fi item, with crap software, I would have to say that I have enjoyed owning it.
Ever looked at the writing on an M&M? My nieces & nephews have... and it made them relieze many things...
Re:Oh no! (Score:2)
That is, unless you were only using it as a way to remember which company to buy consumer electronics from.
Not in it for the right reasons... (Score:4, Interesting)
they will now have more time (Score:5, Funny)
I can imagine the commercials now... someone injects some blue blood into a test tube, and comes out with a warped and deformed Blue Man.
Then, as the scientist shoots the miserable spawn, a caption appears:
"Intel P4: Accept No Substitutes."
Re:they will now have more time (Score:1)
Fuck you! (Score:1, Offtopic)
It's a shame, really... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's a shame, really... (Score:1)
But....but....but... (Score:3, Funny)
Oh the humanity...
Ironic that.. (Score:2)
"Music, Pictures, Video
Intel Takes Technology Beyond the Processor"
MP3 player (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:MP3 player (Score:1)
Re:MP3 player (Score:1)
Nope (Score:1)
ya know... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:ya know... (Score:1)
Phew!. The first thing I thought was, "THEY'LL NEVER TAKE AWAY MY TI SPEAK-AND-SPELL!!!!"
Plea to Intel... (Score:5, Interesting)
Please release the specs and documentation associated with the products you've discontinued. For example, the Intel Pocket PC Camera [linux.com], along with your other webcams.
Thank you.
complex
Re:Plea to Intel... (Score:2)
Please release the specs and documentation associated with the products you've discontinued. For example, the Intel Pocket PC Camera [linux.com], along with your other webcams
This is actually a really good point. I've wondered myself why companies that no longer sell/support a product don't just open it up wide. THis goes for software as well as hardware specs. Is there really that much competitive IP tied up in a discontinued product that they can't let it out?
By releasing the specs of a hardware device, or publishing the source for a device driver or video game, are companies really going to be giving away that much? (Oh no! They'll see how wonderful our coding style guideline is!)
Re:Plea to Intel... (Score:2, Insightful)
Radical concept... (Score:1)
What about starting a fund of some sort that could buy off (relatively) cheap sell offs of this sorts?
I know there just have to be some geeks out there with money to burn!
Seriously.
Re:Plea to Intel... (Score:3, Informative)
One reason may be that the product may use some component that the company doesn't want to open up even own. For example, a piece of software may depend on some proprietary library which the company doesn't own (and, thus, doesn't have the authorization to open up), and opens itself up to legal trouble if it opens up. A hardware component may be partially designed by another firm and again the company is opening itself to lawsuits if it releases the information. In these cases it is very expensive to research whether or not a product can be opened, and this is a very difficult process if it wasn't originally designed to be open.
The consumer part of intel was always secondary. (Score:3, Insightful)
Intel is sitting pretty right now (relatively speaking, considering the state of the industry), and also PCs have already reached saturation as well. So they probably don't need "more" -- considering that consumer electronics is so far removed from Intel's core competencies anyways.
Re:Yes YAhoo baby (Score:1, Informative)
Those supposed "Yahoo" links are actually goatse links
CHANGE THAT TITLE (Score:2, Informative)
The title of this story is "Intel kills Consumer Electronics"
There is a magazine called Consumer Electronics, who may not be too happy about that title. I actually thought that Intel somehow did the magazine in.
I highly advise that the title be changed to something like "Intel Kills Consumer Electronics Division".
Re:CHANGE THAT TITLE (Score:1)
Oh wait - did I just mention Slashdot and accuracy in the same sentence? Sorry...
Jenova_Six
It's a relief and a shame. (Score:1)
It's also a shame though, when the peripheral market shrinks a little bit.
Makes sense (Score:4, Insightful)
Declining global economy - Electronics are "luxury items" and therefore are cut first from consumers' budgets.
Less name recognition - Intel is widely recognized as a leading chipmaker. But for audio players PDA's and such, most people weren't aware, or simply went for bigger names like Rio or Palm.
Also note they are closing their Online Services Division, as well.
This will be best for the company. Focus on what it does best.
Re:Makes sense (Score:1)
If you are calling their processors what it does best, its scary to imagine how bad their other products are.
Re:Makes sense (Score:2)
In case you didn't notice, Intel owns 80% of the microprocessor market, and AMD will be bankrupt next year.
Re:Makes sense (Score:1)
Actually, they killed Intel Online Services and Intel Internet Media Services months ago.
Jenova_Six
Just thoughts (Score:4, Interesting)
Example: How many consumers really want an MP3 player in thier home entertainment system? We love it (and spend lots of time talking about the best way to do it), but does the average consumer?
I think this may be a trend. Geeks think of cool things, and start doing them. Someone in marketing says "Hey, look what the engeneers are putting together for themselves... if they want it and can do it... maybe we can market it!" A few months later geeks are interested... but marketing is looking at consumers not geeks... and projects get abandoned.
I mean, think about it, when's the last time you saw an add for a portable mp3 player on TV. I've just recently heard a few radio adds for car stereo with mp3 support... but nothing like the Rout 66 project.
They make consumer electronics? (Score:1)
Re:They make consumer electronics? (Score:1)
We made videos and Flash pieces and web sites all about their digital cameras, internet terminals, web cams etc. So yeah, they had a lot consumer devices, many of which have yet to see the light of day. Other than the Intel brand, these things really had no compelling reason to be puchased.
Intel's a chip company. They aren't creative enough to really compete in the consumer/"digital hub" arena. This is all probably for the best.
Intel Kills Consumers (Score:5, Funny)
It plans on killing off the consumer base.
"Consumers are starting to get smart," tertiary chief marketing analyst Joe Nooty said, "They are realizing that they don't actually need to upgrade from a 866MHz Pentium III to a 2.0GHz Pentium 4 to have a good Internet experience."
"We don't appreciate how our clients becoming unemployed and unable to think about buying our absolute latest product," said another marketing person, "It's time to give them the axe and redefine the market."
Execution of human beings, except for those employed by Intel, will commence in Q1 2002. The new Pentium 5 (or Pentium Pentium, codenamed Pentium Squared) will debut and will offer a fish-friendly interface.
"The reason for the fish-interface is simple. The world is 75% covered by water. We'll make a killing in sales by targetting the largest body of species in the world," claimed Nooty.
Intel representatives refused to answer our calls when we asked sent in questions such as: How do you plan to make "money" off of fish? Where will all these human consumers be burried? What will Intel do as a lone-standing human civilization? And did you ask Microsoft how they plan to port Windows XP (for eXPired) for oceanic fauna?
Re:Intel Kills Consumers (Score:1)
*Second time submitting this post (what the hell is an invalid form key?)*
Intel was TERRIBLE at consumer products. (Score:5, Informative)
In my opinion, Intel was TERRIBLE at making and marketing consumer products. They would sell a product with important details still buggy.
For example, I bought an Intel computer video camera. There was software to record videos, but there was no way to compress them so that the videos could be sent by email.
There was software to record audio, but there was no way to pause the recording. Each period of recording had to be a separate file.
Intel sold a PCMCIA network adapter that didn't work with Sony laptops. There was a piece of paper in the box that said to visit a particular web site. The site said that the adapter did not work with laptops using a particular chipset. The main site for the product did not mention this, however, and there was no link between the two..
U.S. government corruption: What should be the Response to Violence? [hevanet.com]
Re:Intel was TERRIBLE at consumer products. (Score:2)
I bought the regular middle-end camera, but it wouldn't work for more than 20 seconds on my K6-2 system. Tried everything, evetntually gave up.
I tried it on my Compaq Laptop, worked just great.
Tried the high-end camera at work, and just like the middle-end camera, the image quality was PERFECT(no weird lighting situations, etc).
Too bad really. For several dollars more, you could do away with grainy or poorly lit webcam images.
Re:Intel was TERRIBLE at consumer products. (Score:1)
But actually, don't get mad at either.. The Vaio is a piece of crap. My Vaio drains the battery MUUUUUUCH faster than my thinkpad.. I also hate how the function keys, the volume wheel, etc etc are all soft keys, meaning you need drivers to get it to work... What a pain... And they didn't work with XP either. And my touch pad on my Vaio is very very quirky... Its so bad, I have to take an external mouse wherever I go.... The eraser point thingy on my thinkpad is much easier to use, and MUCH more reliable. The touchpad on my Vaio always jumps erratically at times, randomly clicking and dragging/screwing things up.
Besides, I like the keyboard illuminator on my thinkpad
Not very wise (Score:4, Interesting)
When the economy picks up in a few months, Intel will spend a bunch of money re-opening its Consumer Electronics Division. So will all the other megacorps who are having a contest to see who can lay off the most employees, shut down the most divisions, and finish the year in the black. I think people ("consumers" in business parlance) are just a little scared about spending money right now and are delaying purchases--rather than becoming introspective about overconsumption and all the other things that make America the Great Satan. When everybody feels a little safer again, the money will start rolling up the pyramid into the vaults of the upper caste yet again. Besides, the holiday shopping season is almost here.
While I was whoring for my undergrad business degree, I remember my profs always speaking of the risks of doing business, etc... I'm beginning to think that only applies to sole proprietors. Historically, corporate owners were only liable to the extent of their investment. With the $100,000,000,000+ US that Bush is trying to give to the megacorps, how can any of them still believe they will lose money this year?
Re:Not very wise (Score:2)
But the whole point of diversifying is to find those businesses that are easy when you're rich and durable when you're not.
Intel is doing the right thing shaking itself out of a subsidiary business that turns less profit and leaving it to more focussed competitors.
As for your question about the bailouts, $100 billion is nothing in this economy. Most popular mutual funds have $0.5-3.0 trillion in them. And there are a bunch of those.
Lots of companies will go the way of Intel's consumer-products division.
BTW, I'm predicting that this time next decade, you'll be able to walk into Crazy Great Satan's Hi-Fi store in Tehran and get the new Sony MD players and pay $US currency. The world changes. If you stop listening to the xenophobes worldwide and change it.
--Blair
Intel on appliances (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Intel on appliances (Score:1)
Unless you are somehow under the impression that a digital camera competes directly with 16-bit microcontrollers for consumer dollars, I really con't find even a tiny modicum of sense in this comment.
Oh, no! (Score:2)
Fade in scary music. Pan to Fentium, the little chipster busying reading BOFH. clickety-click.
Pan to vacuum cleaner. See the new mexican jumping bean robots disappearing up the tube. Pan to the TV set, where the volume is at full, on channel 3.5, with Barney singing a duo with HAL.
Handspring Wireless Ethernet Module (Score:2)
JOhn
Re:Handspring Wireless Ethernet Module (Score:1)
Jenova_Six
I wonder what this means... (Score:1)
Not surprising... (Score:1)
Shouldn't that be... (Score:2)
Wait a minute. That is the next story...
They aren't dropping just cameras and such... (Score:1)
"Dot.Station, a countertop terminal powered by Red Hat Linux that lets people surf the Web, exchange emails and make phone calls." is one of them.
It should be noted, that the hanhelds and the PC devices market is one that linux has a strong foothold in and surpasses any other OS.
One could fear that witht he eclipse of these, the linux popularity could be crumbling very, very fast.
I surely hope that wouldn't happen too fast and too much, but facts are out there, unfortunately...