Building a Dead Silent PC

Jouster writes "The folks over at HardCoreWare.net have finally lost it. They built a PC that's well over twenty times quieter than their comparison PC (40 dB versus 65). And it's no sluggard, either: P4 2.80 GHz, 7200 RPM hard drive and--get this!--an overclocked to the max GeForce4 Ti 4200! The only fan in the entire system is in the PSU."

Re:20 times quieter?

It's a logarithmic scale. The volume of the sound goes up ten times for every ten decibels. Here's some math [wolfram.com] and a comparison chart [everything2.com].

Re:20 times quieter?

sound is measured in terms of power intensity... W/m^2 and is converted into decibels by taking the logarithm to base 10 and multiplying by 10... i.e., 10 log_10 (X)... so 3 dB is a doubling in sound intensity (not 2 dB)

Re:20 times quieter?

mod this one down plz!!!

+10db is twice as loud to the human ear!

So the 65 db down to 40 db should be something like 5-6 times less loud to the human ear!

Its the energy that is 10 times as big when you go up 10db!

Example:
A 10W stereo plays x db
A similar stereo with 100W plays x + 10 db
A similar stereo with 1000W plays x + 20 db

Re:20 times quieter?

+10db is twice as loud to the human ear!

You're right, but I'm not wrong. For a full explanation [slashdot.org]

Re:20 times quieter?

Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...

Decibels is a logarithmic scale.

So 10db is 10x (power), 20db is 100x and so on.

This might seem like they are understating the case, but in general 10db is considered to sound like "a doubling in volume" so a difference of 40db is roughly 2 to the 4th or 16x.

Fiddle with a few db more and you can easily justify "20x quieter."

Re:20 times quieter?

HAHA its so true. I just read another post i was goign to reply to but saw you so let me go off here. The wattage of a stereo doesn't matter. Its does matter in that its part of the equation but not the total measurement. I have seen peizo electric and other speakers that run off fractions of a watt that can put out over a hundred decibles. I hate all this crap about "i have a 500w stereo, oh yah well mines 600w". Some speakers can make it up to 130dB but will start to distort at 110dB, where as some wont distort up to 115dB but can only go to 125dB. Which one would you rather have? Im tired of people doing stupid things with speakers. Running 1kw systems in their drunks using $5 cables that have way over acceptable limits of capacitance. And dont even start on capacitors they sell for subs in your trunk. Thats just total bullshit. When the sub runs out of power its because of impedance on the line most likely from bad connections (solder em if you really want good sound) or just plain bad wires (10 gauge wont cut it). Personally im going to stick with my mono radio output and take the $1000 i saved and do something better.

Re:20 times quieter?

Please explain how something can be 20x quieter...how does this math work?

It doesn't. Something can't be 20 times less than something else. You can either have something which is 1/20 as quiet as something else or something which is 20 times LOUDER than something else. It is complete nonsense to talk about something being 20 times less or 20 times quieter.

This is a common mistake which people make, you can see it all the time even in professional settings. You will often see people saying stuff like, "This will be three times less costly than other solutions." It's a sad state of affairs but I think that math skills are seriously deteriorating.

Sound from the computer

If you can hear the sound from your computer its a sign that your music is way to low

Not as loud, but its still a space heater

Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink, air flow design, etc for ever since the blueg3 to keep there from being too many fans in the system.

However, an Apple still puts out much less heat overall and I notice the article didnt even try to find a quiet cdrom. I have 2 in my PC and both are loud as the dickens.

Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater

And what aboutthe floppy drive? Those things are rarely used these days, but can be terribly noisy.

Easy: take it out. Since last year, I've been building PCs sans floppy drives. IMO, floppies have very little use these days; files are regularly larger than 1.4 (or 2.8) MB, making floppies pretty useless. Most modern BIOSes can boot directly from CDROM. I've been using USB flash drives (a friend has a "pen" style, I like to use Compact Flash w/ a USB adapter), they're faster, and to the topic, make no noise whatsoever.

I remeber taking over the lab to download the 20+ floppies for Slackware back in '93...

Silent iMacs and Monster Heat Sinks

The slot loading "original" iMac (aka the gum drop) had(has) no fans, quite hardware, and vents on the top of the case. I don't quite know if Apple's eMacs and LCD iMacs have a similar set up, however I'd bet that they have fans.

Nevertheless, Apple still strives to build fairly quiet boxes when ever possible. I mean hey, look at the fan to heat sink ratio in this box: http://www.apple.com/hardware/gallery/pmg4_august2 002_480.html Honestly, I've never seen a bigger heat sink within a consumer PC. One could fry 10 strips of bacon on that beast.

Re:Not as loud, but its still a space heater

"Those who forget the apple are doomed to reinvent it. Apple has been using large heatsink"

Who said Apple invented large heatsinks,airflow design, etc?

I have been using large heatsinks, low powered quiet ducted fans, and passive coolers since the pentium days. My current machine has an 80x80mm heatsink with copper base embedded in it with an 80mm silent fan and its cooling an athlon XP 2100. The rest of my system is setup such that I have minimal airflow for the required cooling. Ducted air, large heatsinks, copper bases, etc etc..

People have known about large heatsinks, passive cooling, etc way way way before Apple Computer started making PC's with passive heatsinks on it.

Also, your post is irrelevant considering that Gateway, Dell, HP, Compaq has been doing the exact same thing in (many) of their systems as well for years. (check out dell optiplex, Gateway E-series, I dont know the compaq models, but I have seen some like this).

Then consider the G4 cube. it was fanless, nice innovation. But then they put a loud as hell hard drive in it, the power switch went off intermittently due to overheating (it was heat sensitive) and they put a fan in it anyway when they put the 3D Video cards in it. (this video card fan was like a 40mm fan spinning fast as hell and it was not very quiet at all, all on top of a very very small heatsink which had plenty of room to be larger)

Next, you are going to tell me that Apple invented thermodynamics? Please. Don't try to pretend Apple invented everything. They didn't. And they are far far far FAR from the ppl who started making silent PCs. Everyone has been making silence (and mostly, reduced noise) since the begining of cooling weather it be for cars, power lines, space shuttles, oil pipes, computers, whatever.

silence overrated?

i used to always strive to quiet my computer more and more, undervolting fans to 7v or 5v, i had my p233 absolutely SILENT, except for the loud hard drive.

but now, building my new system, i have 4 moderate (sound) volume fans, but they really dont bother me. they produce a calm whir, and they're actually kind of soothing at night :P

but the whole silent pc thing isnt all that hard, really. just put in some panaflo L1A's (undervolted if necessary), a seagate barracuda IV, and you are good to go. i dont see why people go to such extremes, for little to no improvement.

Re:silence overrated?

i dont see why people go to such extremes, for little to no improvement.

It's called the noise floor, and while it may not matter much to you in standard computing environments, it matters a lot in non-standard ones. Like if you're building a home theater PC. If your PC runs at 40 dB then forget hearing anything below that -- which can be either quiet passages in music (classical or rock - both have 'em) or downkeyed scenes in movies. Turning the volume of the system up isn't an option unless you want to constantly change the volume during a movie so you don't lose your hearing during action/climactic scenes.

Additionally any noise like a PC can interfere with subtle nuances in music or movies, which is equally bad. With a 20 dB noise floor you may be able to hear sound queues for things you can't hear with a 40 dB noise floor.

So it's not little to no improvement - it can be pretty substantial in the right environment. Personally I'm looking to build my next PC to be quieter, not because it's going to be a HTPC, but because I'm tired of having an absurdly loud PC. I'm not going to take it to extremes, but I will try to purchase quieter components.

I have to wonder......

exactly what this will do to component life. As you can see from the graphs they posted, the CPU and graphics card do run noticably hotter than with the stock cooling.

To me, the small amount of noise created by a the stock CPU fan and graphics card cooler are worth the bit of extra noise.

A very quiet case fan might be a good addition to this to help draw heat out of the case. That big plastic window doesn't help add anything to radiational cooling from the case, either.

And my athlon isn't *that* noisy, especially when it's tucked away underneat the desk.

Re:I have to wonder......

Radiant heat transfer is on the order of 10-100x less effective than convective cooling (like with a moving airflow). Radiant transfer varies as the fourth power of temperature, and does not turn significant until you get to temperatures that would a) fry any component you can name and b) give you a really good burn when you accidentally brush it with your leg.

So the window, apart from looking stupid, doesn't really hurt anything. : ) 'Cept the faraday cage.

Re:I have to wonder......

Semiconductors aren't that sensitive to moderate heat, in the way that it would destroy them; if they get too hot, you will just have system crashes, random resets, etc. (as if that isn't bad enough).

No, but heat kills bearings. So, the hard drive will probably be the first component to fail, especially with today's sensitive drives.

Another mid-term problem would be the electrolytic caps. They will dry up over time, which will introduce sporadic instability/reboots at first, and you'll be driven mad searching for the cause. Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.

So, if you want a silent PC, you'd be better off buying cool components in the first place. It's just too much of a hassle (and expensive) trying to silently and reliably cool high power CPUs and graphics cards.

ESR meter

Almost impossible to detect without special equipment, i.e. an ESR meter.

If you do decide to get one, just remember not to put it next to your RMS meter. they'll both get totally out of whack.

Quiet PC?

Yeah, it's called putting a PC in another room and accessing it via vnc/ssh. You won't hear a thing.

Longevity? Hardware Burnout?

I think it's great that these guys did this, and I'm quite impressed at the hardware statistics and performance for such a quiet system. Although, there is a conspicuous lack of one element from the whole article...

Longevity.

While I've been desperately wanting a completely quiet computer that runs decently for some time now, I don't have the money to invest in a solution that is going to last only for a year or so. I guess I wish these guys had done more extended testing of their system.

Has any other /.er made a comparable system? How has it lasted?

Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but an overclocked GeForce 4 Ti with no active cooling makes me anxious, and somewhat hesitant.

Re:Longevity? Hardware Burnout?

My solution to making my PC quite was very simple: I built a big-ass sound-insulating box for it. The box itself is made of particle board, lined with acoustic ceiling tile and carpet. I cut fan holes in the side of my original case, and mounted three fans to blow directly onto the CPU, memory and graphic board.

The fans on the side of my case pull in air from a 20" long carpet-lined duct--it acts a lot like a car muffler. The air moves through, but the carpet absorbs nearly all the sound (the sound needs to make two 90 degree turns to escape the air channel). There is a similar duct in the back of the case for outgoing air.

My 'new' case has more airflow than the computer originally had, so my internal temps are only a little higher than they used to be. I built the box with a weekend and ~$25. Now I can leave my computer on all the time without making my ears ring. If you've got access to a wood shop, it's a very effective way to make a quiet PC.

Most Apple products have been silent.

Most Apple products have been silent.

Its one of the main reasons people like to buy them.

Even some of the G4s (cube) keep the fan off unless critical.

powerbooks are similarlysilent unless emergency fans kick in.

The balance of other modesl, such as imac are designed with columnar "chimney effect" air flow out the tops.

And many famous apples have no fan at all whatsoever, not even on powersupply : Apple II, IIe, IIc, IIgs

Many musicians like the newer macs with sampler gear because they don't have to worry about systyem sound so much.

External D/A in usb allows noise free amplification far from motherboard on most all mac models in last 3.5 years.

Mac lovers hate noise it sems.

I wish dual cpu AMDs could be made much quieter.

I can think of one idea to get even cooler

Those are some gigantic heatsinks. The processor heatsink alone is frigheting enough. But there does seem to be one solution that can be even quieter and can cool both Pentiums AND Athlons...

Water cooling! [koolance.com]

It's certainly different, using water to carry off and circulate the heat. Obviously, it requires a large degree of trust, as one leak can short out your entire system in a heartbeat. I've been around these beasts, and they certainly seem quiet enough.

I imagine they would be great for overclockers :D

Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler

No.

Heat exchangers want to maximize surface area, not mass. You are trying to present the maximum surface to the surrounding airflow, cooling by convection. More mass would simply be a thermal battery, storing heat on the processor. The thin heat sink fins actually remove heat from the processor by transferring it to the surrounding air.

Re:I can think of one idea to get even cooler

There's one more aspect to that. When you have very thin, long fins, like the Zalman heatsinks do, the thermal conductivity is too low for the heat to be transfered all the way to the tips. From what I can see on the photos, these heatsinks are not as efficient as they could be. IMHO the optimal heatsink would have a tree-like structure, whith thick 'stems' conducting the heat to many thin, but reasonably short 'leaves'. The Arkua [arkua.com.tw] coolers seem to somewhat follow this approach.

Old news

The PowerMac G4 cube [apple.com] (bottom of page 4, "Noise characteristics") was only 31 dB. That's 2,512 times quiter than this "silent" PC.

Re:Old news

2,512 times quieter than the 65 dB machine:

10^3.1 = 1,259
10^6.5 = 3,162,277

3,162,277 / 1,259 = 2,512

Re:deciBells

I'm not sure where this 20x quieter thing comes from, but generally. a 10dB increase in sound output is considered "twice as loud." Note that a 3dB increase is twice as much energy (well, 3.0something, but close enough). Similarly, -3dB is the "half power point."

Your physics teacher will tell you that 10 dB is a 10x difference in the intensity of a sound wave.

Your psychology teacher, or your friendly local audiophile, will tell you that a 10x difference in wave intensity is only a 2x difference in perceived loudness.

Most slashdotters, geeks that we are, payed more attention in our physics classes. As a result, I forgot about the perception issue until just now.

I am currently listening to 128 kbps mp3s on a $25 pair of headphones. Whether or not I am an audiophile is left as a exercise to the reader.

Explanation of log

Here, once and for all, is a log scale mathematics explanation. I'm still a student so I remember something about it:

Sound level is how loud a sound is to human ears. It can be measured in dB and an increase of 10 dB sounds ten times louder to human ears.
Sound intensity measures the energy of the sound, often in W/m^2. (Watts per metre squared.) If you multiply the sound intensity by the face area of your eardrum, you'll get the number of Joules per second (W = J/s) that your ear is perceiving. This scale is linear with human hearing perception, so double the intensity means it sounds twice is loud.

The Equation:
B = 10log(I/Io)

B = sound level in dB
I = sound intensity in W/m^2
Io = sound floor of human hearing, Io = 1x10^-12 W/m^2

So, doing the math, 40dB = 1.0 x 10^-8 W/m^2.

And 31 dB = 1.26x10^-9 dB

So therefore, 40 dB is 7.94 times more intense, and therefore 7.94 times louder to human ears.

(7.94 = 1.0 x 10^-8 / 1.26x10^-9 )

Note: the previous poster's comment about one being 2,512 times quieter than the other was for different values, and this information does not override that person's (correct) calculation.

Thank you, and have a nice day :-)

Great news for Beowulf clustering

According to my calculations, you can now cluster 100,000,000 PCs before their combined noise level reaches the threshold of pain!

Confusing headline...

My first thought was "Isn't a dead computer already silent?"

-A

Re:Confusing headline...

[haleyjoel]

*clinching blanket and pulling it towards face*
"I can hear dead boxen".

[/haleyjoel]

Already been done

See here -- it's GOT to be silent. [cynikal.net]

Also, ever hear of that new lampy thing called an 'iMac'?? Yeah, they're silent.

Google Cache

here [216.239.39.100]

Noise Cancelling Case

It seems to me that someone would have come up with a noise cancelling method by now. You know, something similar to the technology utilized by some headphones such as these [aiwa.com] by Aiwa. Basically you could sample the sound inside the case then invert the wave, and then play it back through a case speaker. Viola! Instant nose reduction. This would also dynamically address other noisy things such as cd-rom drives. Just an idea to make millions. -peel

p.s.- If you don't understand how this works you can also try it out with your home stereo and a song with a lot of base. Take your speakers and aim them at each other then take one of the sets of wires and switch the positive and the negative. You will notice the sound of the bass reduces dramatically due to an effect called phasing.

Re:Noise Cancelling Case

Unfortunately, general noise cancellation in three dimensions is a much more difficult problem than noise cancellation at a point or two (e.g. headphones).

I can't do that

I sacrificed the possibility of a quiet computer when I chose an AMD 1500+ for the CPU in my computer, so now I've gone to the other extreme and been proud of just how loud my PC runs. What I really want is a diesel generator that I can use as a long term UPS because then when I want to show it in top form I can just pull the pullcord and it will be the loudest computer for miles around. Also, I will put a fart can on its exhaust system, I hope the cops don't catch up with me for my modified exhaust.

What about fluids?

This is quite timely, with the release of Windows XP Media Center Edition [microsoft.com] creating the need for a silent box that won't detract from that $2000 sound system! They use mostly Zalman Tech [zalman.co.kr] heatsinks in this system for noise reduction, but I wonder whether air cooling will continue to be viable in the next few years? Fluid cooling systems were necessary for the Cray supercomputers of the 70s because of superior heat transfer characteristics. This may be the case in the near future if silicon densities increase much further. But fluid cooling is also good for silence as well. The LA-class fast attack submarine that I was on for a while used a chill water cooling system for the sonar display equipment. And you can imagine how much silence is paramount in that setting! (Of course, they also used magnetic rotating drums for display buffer memory, if you can imagine...)

"I've still got the scar"

Zalman CNPS6500A-Cu: $50
Zalman ZM17CU: $18
Thermaltake 420AD: $60
Seagate Barracuda: $80
Thermaltake Xaser II: $100-180
Being able to ditch the hotplate, and just warm food on your casetop: Priceless.

So what?

So some guys with a website bought a bunch of large heatsinks from other companies, built a computer that uses almost entirely passive computing and we're expected to do what? Commend them on their innovative use of a credit card? ;)

And it's not like super-quiet computers haven't been done before. Yawn. Boring.

Standard Issue

My PC has a button on the front that eliminates noise completely. It eliminates those annoying lights on the case too...

Some PCs are quiet anyway

In the process of building a PC-based PVR I was worried that the noise of a PC might be distracting when placed next to a TV set in the family room.

I needn't have worried. The PC I'm using is a 1.8GHz P4 with a 7200 RPM Seagate HD, Sony CDR/RW and DVD drives plus a top-spec video card.

The noise of the hard drive seeking when doing time-shift is about the only barely audible sound -- and you can only hear that if you mute the TV.

Some PCs are just very quiet anyway.

In my office I have two tower systems and two mini-tower systems with a total of 8HDs, 4 PSUs and 4 video cards. Once again, the loudest noise used to be the clicking of my IBM Deskstar drive until it died (yeah, mine too) and now there's just a very gentle white noise from the air being blown around by all those fans. It's certainly not noisy.

Just choosing your hardware properly will likely negate any need to take special care to cut noise levels.

obligatory post

imagine a paradoxally silently humming, mysteriously stealth, decibel absorbing, reality distorting beowulf cluster of those.

Totally silent PC

Even more quiet than some Macs.

Buy a mobo with a VIA CPU on it. Take off 486 CPU Fan/HS combo. Replace with a large heatsink. Build/buy P/S with no fan (VIA CPUs take very little power, so building one is not hard for someone with some electronics knowledge). Load up O/S through the network, put in a lot of RAM, no hard drive.

There. Totally silent PC. And it probably only cost you $200 CDN. Wow. Hard to believe, huh?

Even VIA [via.com.tw] themselves know their CPU rules for this. Stop using Intel/AMD if you want quiet and lower power, with enough horses to power most modern OSes.

Quiet?

I used to work for having a silent computer but now I've put away the computer in a closet, done some cabeling and I don't have to worry. (The closet is quite big, and chilly since it is on an outside wall that is badly insulated). Actually, clothes also dampen sound really well...

Cool...

This one goes to -11.

Sympathetic to their Cause

After sitting next to my computer for the past couple years, I almost believe that the noise coming from it has seriously hindered my hearing. It's hard for me to hear people whispering to me, and sometimes I can't even hear my profs in lectures.

This is one of the main reasons that I'll look toward a "silent" pc with decent performance, rather than a "Tweaked out" pc that'll make me deaf before I'm 30.

I gotta hand it to the guys at Hardcoreware.net. They went all the way with this, which is something i'd like to do...

Well, either that or just buy a Mac.

Re:Sympathetic to their Cause

After sitting next to my computer for the past couple years, I almost believe that the noise coming from it has seriously hindered my hearing. It's hard for me to hear people whispering to me, and sometimes I can't even hear my profs in lectures.

Thats all huh, I had the cops coming coz neighbors though i was digging up for oil everytime I put in the CD

Re:I wonder.....

Actually, dB is a logarithmic scale, so 0dB is not actually *zero* like you assume, as 10^0 == 1. You could have something that was at -1dB which would be quieter than that. On this scale, "complete silence" really doesn't exist. It all depends on how sensitive your measuring device is.

Silent PC?

So it can't scream in pain when it gets /.ed?

Closet PC...

A friend of mine had a great idea... which I eventually used... a closet PC.

For those of you with the advantage of having a closet in your room (ie, not living in a college dorm), just putting a door (sliding or closing) between yourself and your beast can probably reduce your PC to fanless levels (I barely hear my monitor more than my PC in da closet).

My PC: Athlon 900 w/stock fan, 4x80GB IDE drives, geforce2mx video, 300W PS + LOTS of fans

Challenges:
1) ACPI on my mobo sucks, and I can't resume with my wireless keyboard as easy as I'd like to
2) CDRW/DVD drives are still on the unit; I'd like to replace them with firewire/usb2 external devices, but haven't had the cash to do it.

Im interested in knowing if anyone else has opted for this low-tech, low-noise solution?

Misguiding headline

After reading the headline, I thought "cool, another one of those 'some guy blasted a PC into oblivion' page with pictures of bullets puncturing the case". Well, served as an incenting to read up the article...

Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news

CPUs and cases without fans are not very rare among brandname boxes (Compaq, for example), but I've yet to see a fanless PC PSU.

Is it really that hard make? I don't mind it to be heavier or more expensive - the reliability (no moving parts) and noise level are much more important in a lot of cases (pun intended :)

I was thinking about building one myself: old-style with a huge transformer, but then I heard that some powerful ATX PSUs can have their fans disconnected under reduced load. Can anyone clarify?

Re:Fanless PC PSU - THAT would be news

This [snookles.com] site has a link to a 300 W fanless ATX PSU. And a lot of other really good links too.

Cruesoe doesn't need a fan

As far as I know, the Transmeta Cruesoe CPU doesn't need a CPU fan, so it would be a good candidate for a silent PC.

My take on a Quiet PC

Bah, I'm sure my PC is at least as quiet as theirs. Again, the PSU fan is the only fan turning in the system. The rest of it is water-cooled through an extremely bodge-tastic radiator, like this [colour9.com].

As I'm using a decent pump, this is completely silent. And it looks scary.

Who tests these claims?

Is there any standard way/method of testing these claims that every vendor/organisation makes? For instance, I can think of a number of ways in which this claim can be twisted: Ambient sound, position/location of the computers, position of measurement, calibration of the dB meter, temperature of the air measured at various instants of time, material on which the computers stand, consistency of readings, etc etc...Who validates all these claims? How can we truly believe these "cheapass" claims (in the same words of the author) ??

Silence!

I'd accept a few degrees hotter silicon for the huge reliability boost of getting rid of the fans on the processor and graphics card (MTBF circa 15,000 hours in the real world contrary to their b.s. specs, divided by two since there are two of the little bastards). Your remaining fan in the PSU case needs a fan rotation alarm on it, and if unattended, some kind of thermal shut-off or redundant fan. One nice trick for quiet fans is to use one much bigger than you need and then run it at a slower speed. Another tip is to mount the disk drive and fans on Sorbothane [sorbothane.com] standoffs, and maybe stick a couple of slabs of Sorbothane on the walls of the PC case. One quibble with the article -- for best cooling, you want as small a case as possible, not as big as possible. The objective should be to maximize the velocity of the airflow over the heatsinks, and you do this by constricting the space around them. One innovative way this has been done is through the use of engineering foams like E-PAC [dmtgmbh.de] which allows the designer to create engineered air ducting which forces the airflow over the parts where it is needed. Some other people have asked why the PSU fan is necessary -- having just gone through CE and UL testing on one of my products, you can't imagine the kind of pain the test lab would make you go through if you took the PSU fan out of the PSU case. It's only a practical proposal for a major corporation with a lot of money and time to throw at it.

More hardcore than hardcoreware

The guys at Silent PC Review [silentpcreview.com] would scoff at the "hardcoreness" of hardcoreware.net when it comes to silencing PCs. After being on their mailing list for a year, I can tell you that they're waaay ahead of these guys in every aspect of PC silencing, many of which I've implemented myself.

Why no sealed case?

I've been using an acoustically sealed case from Noise Control [noisecontrol.de]. I really can't hear my PC anymore.

I also use one of Noise Control's modified Enermax PSUs and a Silverado CPU cooler. That's all I did to my PC to make it quiet, everything else is stock. A quiet case seems to be the most logical (and least expensive) first step if you ask me. If you can still hear any of your components after you've put them behind 2 cm of noise blocking fluffy stuff, you can start replacing noisy those one by one until the noise stops.

Noise Control now has their own fan control circuitry and new modified PSUs come with it built-in. Also, they have hard drive cages that catch vibrations before they reach your case. With all of that equipment it should be easy to quiet any PC.

I've built a dead silent PC.

It's not difficult to achieve.

Due to a hard disk error, my home PC is both dead and silent.

A few nights ago I awoke in my sleep

As soon as I woke I knew something was wrong. And looked around my room. Noticed it was darker than usual. After turning on the bedroom light I looked and saw my pc was off. Then I found out the power went out in the middle of the night. If it wernt for my pc and my wakeing up I could have been late for work.

I actually find the gentle hum and whirl of my pc comforting. along with the blinking yellow light and the faint green glow it gives my room.

DANGEROUSLY heavy heatsink!

The full-copper version of the Zalman P4 heatsink weighs 898g (that's about 2.1 pounds). That's nearly TWICE what Intel recommend as the maximum weight for a P4 heatsink. Moving the PC around with the heatsink attached could cause serious damage.

Zalman also do an alternative P4 fan, which still uses the copper base but is made mainly of Alumin(i)um. It weighs in at just 400g, which is much safer. It doesn't cool quite as well, but I believe it still does a very good job. The ~2700rpm fan supplied with the heatsink is pretty much inaudible anyway - I've got one in my system, and I'm very fussy about PC noise.

Could be quieter..

The Barracuda V [storagereview.com] is actually somewhat quieter [storagereview.com] than the Barracuda IV [storagereview.com] they used.

Use the extra leeway to add a few fans; don't forget, if everything's running close to their design limits now, it'll probably get hairy if you have a hot summer.

Plus it's really a good idea to keep components like HD's fairly cool. Let them fry and you risk reducing the service life of the drive and increasing the chances of data loss. You at least want reliable storage, right?

Also, you should be careful with that huge-ass Zalman cooler. They're very heavy, and will happily tear off the socket if you happen to move the machine anywhere. The full Cu version is about 200g heavier than AMD's maximum recommended weight.

Wow!! They created an IBM!!!

This is no major feat. This is so NOT a feat, that it's amazingly NOT one.

I own 5 IBM Intellistation M Pro workstations (Netfinity Servers by another name). They are dual CPU beasts that support (mostly externally - only 6 internal bays) 29 SCSI (UW2) and 4 EIDE (ATA100). They contain 3 massive case fans, one massive power supply fans and the CPU fans.

With the stock fans and a quiet hard drive, they are ungodly quiet. You can barely hear them with your ear on the case. With the stock drive, they are a little louder... a whopping 43 decibels with *2* XEON processors.

With a well selected drive and CPU fans (only 1 was the stock IBM fan so I had to find a silent one for the 2nd CPU), it drops below the 40 mark at 1.5 feet distance.

Oh... and just for those disbelievers, here's the pdf's to the manuals for the slightly louder of the Intellistations (I have 3 models... but this is the only one I could find online...)

M Pro [www.asso.pl]

- Rob

Re:A great accomplishment

"Always too loud"????

My atari 1040ST is silent.