Making the Jump From Web To TV 67
PreacherTom writes, "No stranger to the tech-savvy, video bloggers are the next phenomenon to go from online to the mainstream. For example, Internet celebrity Amanda Congdon just finished broadcasting her cross-country relocation from New York to L.A. on the Web. The former host of Rocketboom, one of the most popular of the video blogs, with roughly 211,000 daily viewers, has a new gig as a contributor for ABC. She's not alone. In fact, major movie and TV studios are increasingly looking to the Web for new talent for both on- and offline projects."
Re:This is new? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There's another way (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought the same thing about that show "Cheaters", and damn if Joey Greco didn't get stabbed in the gut within a month.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Not too many .... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe a "Surprise, douchebag!", maybe even a camera crew too.
Seriously, stigmatizing people with such deviant behavior does not make the behavior go away; it simply drives them farther to the margin. If you're going to single out individuals, you're an ass for not giving them an option to seek help in place of humiliating them---yes, that's blackmail, but if you insist on fighting what you perceive as a wrong wi
Rock On! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm so hard up that I have to watch some b-rated barbie talk on her blog
Tom
Re: (Score:2)
Who? (Score:5, Interesting)
"Internet celebrity", uh, yeah... Just what we need, more Paris Hiltons and people who are famous for something trivial, or even nothing.
All I know is I wish I could view youtube clips on my TV without any file conversion(making it look worse), or hooking up my ipod, etc. I watch YouTube clips 100 times more often than Comcast's skimpy "On Demand" programming. I wonder if some day people will say "watch youtube" instead of "Watch tv".
You'll have to view my vblog... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Then again I have a PSP and Rocketboom was one of the first vodcasts to have a PSP version one could download directly using the PSP's browser. Nowadays with the RSS and the
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I understand. If you use component or DVI, then open YouTube, there's no file conversion.
.flv? You can play them directly in WMP if you like.
.flv with WMP.
Or do you download the
1. Download FLVSplitter [sourceforge.net].
2. Put flvsplitter.ax in \Windows\System32.
3. Run regsvr32 flvsplitter.ax
4. Associate
Re: (Score:2)
YouTube on your TV (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I must be the only person who found Amanda via Ze, rather than the other way around.
Have your very own Amanda! (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Rocketboom was a way cool and quirky 3 minute daily show. As I understand it, Amanda didn't get paid much doing the show, and was a struggling actress.
Re: (Score:2)
podcasts++, videocasts-- (Score:2)
Re:podcasts++, videocasts-- (Score:5, Funny)
Its just one of many things possible now with powerful notebook computers and wireless internet.
Right now I am driving down the motorway typing on a full qwerty keyboard and theres no probl%^^^&^!"$^%$[NO CARRIER]
Non-representative sample (Score:5, Insightful)
I asked the twenty people around me if they'd ever heard of this person. No one has.
I went to her site. A lot of bandwidth to tell you that she's famous and will be on TV soon. She points you to her own entry on Wikipedia (which looks suspiciously like her web site). The web site says that she's famous and will be on TV soon.
I suspect one of the editors of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, it's BusinessWeek.com making the assertion that she's the "latest 'cewebrity'" - complete with the, uh, clever "cewebrity" joke. Slashdot is just reporting on BusinessWeek.com's story.
Although, based on the article over at BusinessWeek.com, simply replacing "/." with "BusinessWeek.com" provides a likely true statem
I must be living under a rock... (Score:1)
Who? (Score:1)
SNL has done it (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
You could use some help as well. I am sure what you meant to say is "I can't help you with your spelling..." Also, using contractions in formal writing is generally frowned upon. Normally I would not consider a Slashdot post to be formal, but your nitpicking indicates otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From the SNL castmember bio:
Ze Frank is the bomb!!! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Eh? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ew. I mean, why "jump" backwards?
TV (I'm not talking about the art of making movies here, I'm talking about television programming) is 99.99% meaningless mindsturbation. Of all the technologies humankind has come up with, surely television is the one that has almost completely failed to reach the potential it offered.
The web, on the other hand, is able to actually be endlessly engaging and at least does contain enormous amounts of worthwhile content available at any hour of the day if you simply seek it out. We can interact, as we do here, we can study endless hours, we can create content for others to study, we can visit other places and societies, we can search out reviews and counter-opinions. The web strongly defies the pressure from commercial entities to reduce it to its least common denominator.
Television... that is not the case. Television, as near as I can tell, is constantly reaching for the least common denominator, and what's more, getting there without any trouble at all. Faux News. Lost. Survivor. Infomercials. Religious broadcasts. Medium and Psychic Detectives. Blind Date. TV is like a sewer of the mind; all decayed, toxic matter, nothing suitable for human consumption.
Honestly, the most valuable thing I've seen on television in the last few months was an HGTV show that gave tips on how to go about room renovation. The only worthwhile news show on the box is the bloody daily show, and "science" on television seems to simply mean Yet Another UFO Show For Rubes.
Jump from the web to TV? No, I think the correct phrase might be "Fall from the web to TV", or "Slip from the web to TV", or even "Television claims another victim."
Re: (Score:2)
Now, if only international copyright laws and/or paranoia would be cleared up enough that I wouldn't need to use prox
a better story (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
George Lucas?
this is no biggie (Score:2)
what is this... (Score:1)
Pure Pwnage (Score:1)
No TV (Score:1)
I think it's a generational thing. Lots of young people are now tuned out of TV, tuned out of newspapers. Their default space is online - chatting via MSN, reading myspace, blogs, youtube. TV is something they switch to when there's something they really want to see.
Re: (Score:1)
Why does it annoy you that the web-successful are seeking an audience through a bigger screen size? Say, you don't suffer screen envy, do you?
It's a money thing. A revenue thing. The profit motive gets diluted on the internet, so if you want to add some digits to your paycheck, you must seek the delivery chan
wasn't it that TV was being brought to the web? (Score:1)
Wake me up when Joanne jumps (Score:1)
I think Joanne Colan is fantastic!
Must watch more Rocketboom...
The last gasp (Score:2)
I believe that the minute a major network gets their hands on new talent, especially from the likes of YouTube or other vlogging community, it could very well end up in the removal of the elements that made the individual popular in the first place. Since their first priority is revenue, I'm convinced that they're likely to take whatever they get, and dumb it down to appeal to the widest possible audience. Therein lies the charm of YouTube et al. If you're not popular on YouTube, it's not YouTube's problem.