Slashdot Log In
2006 Nebula Awards
Posted by
Hemos
on Mon May 08, 2006 08:35 AM
from the in-the-news-today dept.
from the in-the-news-today dept.
Embedded Geek writes "Locus is reporting on the winners of the 2006 Nebula Awards (as determined by voting by fellow SF authors). Joe Haldeman picked up the Novel award for Camouflage while Kelly Link took home both the Novella ("Magic for Beginners") and Novelette ("The Faery Handbag"). Off the printed page, Joss Whedon beat out Battlestar Galactica with his script for Serenity. You can check out the final ballot here or look at past winners here."
Related Stories
[+]
Games: GDC - Ron Moore Keynote 180 comments
Ronald Moore may have done a lot for the Trek series of shows, but recently he's been making new fans with his work on the Battlestar Galactica title. He was invited to speak at GDC to relate ways in which intelligent folks can adapt an existing franchise. He focused on not only adapting and improving the original, but maintaining the core goodness of the inspiring work. Read on for notes from his talk. Update: 03/22 22:11 GMT by Z : Fixed Adama/Psylon spellings. I need a nerd-friendly spellchecker.
[+]
New Battlestar Galactica Spin-off Series Announced 473 comments
An anonymous reader writes "The Sci-Fi Channel's hit series Battlestar Galactica may soon be joined by a 50-year-prior prequel series, called Caprica. To be co-exec produced by Ron Moore and David Eick, the new series will follow the tale of the creation of the Cylons."
[+]
Games: Galactica's Moore Keynotes GDC Track 29 comments
Gamasutra reports that Battlestar Galactica producer Ronald Moore will be keynoting the Vision track at this year's Game Developer Conference. From the article: "'Ronald Moore was presented with the challenge of reinventing a beloved story, which is a challenge often presented to producers of games,' said Jamil Moledina, director, Game Developers Conference. 'His example of creating one of the most brilliant and successful science fiction masterpieces in recent Hollywood history is a perfect inspirational case study to capture the imaginations of the game creation leaders who attend GDC.'"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Meh. (Score:3)
(Last Journal: Tuesday December 19 2006, @05:12PM)
Glad Joss Whedon got something for Serenity.
Re:Meh. (Score:5, Informative)
They are also available online:
- Magic for Beginners [sfsite.com]
- The Faery Handbag [lcrw.net]
Haldeman stories in COMICS. (Score:2, Informative)
Marvano is responsible for the artwork.
http://www.bibliotheek.haacht.be/Mijn%20afbeeldin
Haldeman deserves it for sure... (Score:4, Informative)
Reading the finalist listing though, I've seen that there is the damn fine novel 'Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell' by Susanna Clarke. Very amazing book, superbly written, it even has annotations in essay style, definitely a contender which I recommend to anyone interested in reading a good novel and as a fantasy genre initiation (though I would never define it as 'fantasy').
Even though I put off my judgement until I have read Camouflage, if S. Clarke lost to Haldeman, then it must be a damn fine novel indeed.
(Speaking of runners-up, John C. Wright is also quite good, his Golden Age series give some needed fresh-air to the hard-sf speculative fiction genre.)
Re:Haldeman deserves it for sure... (Score:4, Informative)
I recently finished reading this novel, and it was outstanding. I highly recommend it. Incidentally, it won several other awards, including the Locus Award, the 2005 World Fantasy Award, and the 2005 Hugo Award. You can find out more about it here: http://www.jonathanstrange.com/ [jonathanstrange.com]
Re:Haldeman deserves it for sure... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://del.icio.us/Abcd1234/)
camouflage (Score:1, Offtopic)
(http://sinoc.org/denis/)
I wonder about the Nebulas (Score:5, Interesting)
I haven't seen Wright's fantasy anywhere (despite living in Virginia about an hour from his home), although I'd buy it based on the wonderful Golden Age, so I can't speak to it.
At least to me the only entry on that list worthy of the award is Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, but I suspect it's simply too strange for most of the folks to vote for. But it's everything an award like this *should* recognize- beautiful world building, wonderful characters and a prose style that really sets the tone for a different world. (I can't remember the last piece of fiction with laugh-out-loud footnotes). It's not an easy read, but it's a *great* read nonetheless.
There's simply so many other good books published in the last year to have this list. If you want fantasy, where's The Prince of Nothing series? I don't know if Banks' The Algebraist is eligible since it was published in England earlier, but even though it's not Banks' best it still outclasses almost the entire list. Olympos wasn't perfect, but again should have been up there.
Re:I wonder about the Nebulas (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.sff.net/people/Daniel.Dvorkin | Last Journal: Friday October 12, @01:42PM)
And in this sentence, we have everything I dislike about literary criticism in a nutshell.
Not everything that's easy to read is good, of course; most of what's easy to read is crap. But pretty much everything that's hard to read is crap, because if you have to struggle to read it, then its other qualities just don't matter.
The critical world has pushed for almost a century now the idea that good writing has to be difficult -- which has led to a glut of truly awful, highly praised mainstream fiction, and the marginalization of good storytellers into genre fiction. Folks, the writers who created the literary canon of the 19th century and before weren't trying to show off their distinctive prose style. (For the great stylists, that was just what came naturally.) They were telling stories, and they wanted lots of people to read those stories.
Now, I haven't read Norrell, but people whose judgement I trust have told me that it's exactly the kind of pretentious crap that has ruined mainstream writing and is now invading SF, thickly layered language games that distract the reader from any virtues the story itself might have. In contrast, Haldeman's prose is always elegant and concise. I voted for Camouflage, and I'm glad it won; it's not his best ever (I'd say that's actually All My Sins Remembered, not The Forever War, as good as that was) but it's very good stuff.
Re:I wonder about the Nebulas (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday June 28 2005, @12:57PM)
Reading a textbook that's challenging and not fun may be worthwhile if it teaches you some valuable skill. Reading (or even worse, writing) "literature" that's a struggle to get through is not "worth doing". It's merely pretending that you're doing something worthwhile - it's neither entertaining nor valuable; it's just stupid.
Met Joe (and Jack) (Score:1)
ok I'm stupid what's the difference between... (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 03 2005, @02:25PM)
From:
http://www.sfwa.org/awards/faq.htm#6 [sfwa.org]
* Novel -- 40,000 words or more
* Novella -- 17,500-39,999 words
* Novelette -- 7,500-17,499 words
* Short Story -- 7,499 words or fewer
* Script -- a professionally produced audio, radio, television, motion picture, multimedia, or theatrical script
The Nebulous Awards (Score:5, Funny)
(http://192.168.3.14159265/ | Last Journal: Sunday September 29 2002, @11:21AM)
Best Whatever - Whats-his-name
Best Ya Know - That one guy
Top Thingamajig - Some hot chick
Honorable Mention - Whoever
Kelly Link (Score:4, Interesting)
For the uninitiated, I like to describe her as a sort of "female Neil Gaiman" for her similar fairy-tale sensibilities. But really I find her writing much more mature and abstract.
Her first short story collection, Stranger Things Happen, is now available as a free download [lcrw.net] under the Creative Commons.
This is the problem with having only americans (Score:1)
Serenity (Score:2)
Then... once in a blue moon... I'll see a movie... and after the movie has ended... I MUST go and see it again!
Serenity was this last scenario.
I have to tell ya, It's been a L O N G time since I have seen a movie that I have enjoyed this much!
Serenity ROCKS
"Camouflage"? (Score:1)
But Camouflage was a major letdown. The first half is quite good, and contains some really interesting speculation about alien worlds and beings. Then the book dissolves into an ordinary thriller with overlong, meaningless passages à la Ludlum, without the trills. It just feels like padding.
All in all, a bit of a lazy effort.
YMMV, of course.
Olrik
Re:This award is bogus... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Uhhhhh .... (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday February 11 2003, @02:39PM)
about SGI enterinng Chapter 11. The article that
I responded to seemed in the wrong place and this
has mysteriously drifted into the Nebula thread.
Buggy software or I'm on drugs, take your pick.
Re:Charles Stross.... (Score:2)
Other homourable mentions are, as you've pointed out, Richard Morgan for Woken Furies and Alistair Reynolds for Century Rain (although this one is probably a year too late, I haven't read Pushing Ice as yet).
Worthy of note is that all of the above are british writers with the exception of Dan Simmons.
I wonder when the books I've mentioned were published in America and if they were eligible, then I'd be very interested to understand why they weren't included.
Re:Bring me up to date (Score:2)
Hopefully you'll enjoy this small selection.