Right now there are people creating art, literature and music that will still be enjoyed a hundred years from now.

I seriously doubt any "useful" thing you do will be remembered by anyone by then.

You know, I like to both cook and play guitar, but I really don't think they work well together. An alfredo sauce covered pickup is a terrible thing and I'm pretty sure it's not good for the strings to use them as cheese knives.

Umm, really, you see and hear wider spectrums when high? You might *think* you do, but that's simply not the case. Having a wider color spectrum for vision is fascinating- I used to be a tanker and the thermal sights on them give a very different view of the world. Obvious stuff in normal vision like trees fade into the background while things like warm blooded creatures and engines stand out like beacons. (Oh, and a lot of clothing is pretty transparent, a fact that always amused my troops when we did demos at airshows.)

/These are the only two enhancements on the list that make any sense at all- all the rest are easily purchaseable as you note. I voted for wider sound spectrum personally

Why? Seems to me to be a good idea- electric motors have gobs of torque even at standstill (Hence the use in locomotives) Why not put a second engine in that performs best where the V12 is at its worst? So long as you can keep the weight of the system down enough it should be a big win.

A good landing is one you walk away from. A great landing is one where you can use the airplane again.

Reminds me of the (possibly apocryphal) story about one of the initial meetings between Apple and IBM engineers back when they started work on the PowerPC. The IBM folks were aware that Apple had a very laid back atmosphere and so they made sure to ditch the 3 piece suits in favor of polo shirts and chinos. Of course, the Apple guys had the same realization about corporate culture and showed up in 3 piece suits.

Except that you need the infrastructure and logistics capability to launch a thousand missiles. That's *not* cheap or easy

This. Most of us in the IT leadership at the college where I work have Ph.Ds. Nobody blinks an eye, and we have a deal where we teach a class a year as well- helps us remember the actual goal of the college is. The networking guy has a masters in EE and does a lot of work with the astronomy department on the side.

It can even be a bonus in other ways- one of our newer guys in datasystems teaches CS at a local community college on the side, and ended up recruiting one of his best students directly into an open position- he already knew what he was capable of.

Of course the alternate version of that story

PHB: We need to add features X, Y and Z to our legacy inventory system
IT guy: The code is a giant pile of garbage, it would be cheaper and faster to rewrite the whole thing.
PHB: Ok, give it a try
(Six months pass)
PHB: How's the new inventory control system?
IT Guy: Going great- we just need some more time to get it functional
(Six months pass)
PHB: How's the new inventory control system? We really could use it
IT Guy: Almost done. We just need to make sure it supports the latest standards
(Six months pass)
PHB: Need that inventory control system guys...
IT Guy: Well, the standards have been in a bit of flux and when you're trying to put out really modern code you need to deal with that. By the way, we need a lot beefier server to handle the load, ok? It's a bit slow right now
(Six months pass)
PHB: Um, hello?
IT Guy: Really, it's almost done. It's going to be amazing! We're in the process of rearchtecting the main DB module to support Foobar 2.6 right now since Foobar 2.5 wasn't quite ready for prime time.
(Six months pass)
PHB: Look guys, we have to have this *now*. The legacy code can't run much longer without maintenance.
IT Guy: Well, here's my notice- I found a great new job programming cool Ruby code with a startup. I've put some comments in the code that should let you figure out what it does. It should build fine provided you only use the exact environment I specify and the front end works on a beta version of Chrome I downloaded. Go ahead and ship!

I always tell my students that Wikipedia is a great place to start learning about a topic.

It's a lousy place to stop. Cite nothing but Wikipedia and you're going to get a crappy grade.

(Cut+paste from Wikipedia and I haul you in front of the honor commission, along with nice color coded pages showing exactly what was lifted.)

Same reason they call porn actors/actresses "talent"

I got one and commented (favorably) in the other tablet thread, for which I was told that the iPad mini will blow away the Nexus 7 and that I sounded like a douche.

Clearly you should avoid the Nexus 7

Why? Not buying from a company that engages in business practices you dislike is one of the very few powers ordinary consumers have. Don't like Apple's sue-happy policy? Don't buy, and let them know why.

As I mentioned in the other tablet thread, Apple better worry about the Nexus. It's flat out a better device than the iPad- yes, it's smaller, but going back to iOS on my iPad feels like stepping back in time. Really, it's not close anymore- Apple's sat on their laurels and has decided to sue rather than innovate, and iOS 6 has a ways to go to catch up.

As far as the profits argument, that's very true, just like it was back in the early days of the PC vs. the Mac. Apple has always had better margins than the commodity makers, but that doesn't matter since there will always be another member of the horde to take the place of anyone squeezed out. I own some Apple stock and I'm beginning to worry about it- the parallels to what happened to the Mac are beginning to look awfully obvious.

Then again, I bought the stock back in 1998 at something like $2.50/share adjusted for splits, so I probably shouldn't complain too loudly...