Comment: I hope... (Score 1) 295
Comment: Re:Seems partly justified (Score 1) 227
But that's not what the law says and not what was meant by the people who wrote it.
The company ripping of MapleStory made a lot of money doing so and the fine was too light if anything.
Judges intepret and apply laws, they shouldn't be writing them or basing what they think the penalty should be on what they think is right. That is the job of the democratically elected legislature. No one voted for this judge.
Comment: Re:exponential version growth (Score 1) 309
Comment: Don't really need them anymore.... (Score 1) 91
Comment: Re:Seems Reasonable (Score 1) 248
If I build a TV station and I decide I don't want to broadcast your crap, it's not censorship. You are guaranteed a right to speak, not a right to be heard.
Comment: This does not equate to intelligence or virtue (Score 1) 171
Comment: Re:Hmmm (Score 1) 466
Comment: Probably the same (Score 1) 619
Meat from a lab can be made from the same molecules.
If your tongue and your stomach can't tell the difference, what does it matter? *shrug*
Comment: Re:In the middle of the greatest deficit... (Score 1) 108
Bankers paid back all of the money from TARP with interest. It netted the US treasury a profit to spend on Pell Grants, food safety, and whatever other benevolent things you think government does.
The portion of TARP that did loose money was that which was invested in GM and Chrysler. Many billions lost - but that was solely to bail out the unions, not the companies. If they had gone into bankruptcy, they would have shed their union obligations and continued making cars.
It was comrade Obama's venture socialism in 'green jobs' that cost taxpayers.
Stop pretending you speak for the 99%. Get a job, anonymous coward freak.