Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Rio Riot and Lyra Personal Jukebox

Posted by michael on Sun Jan 13, 2002 04:19 PM
from the nylon-cd-case-seems-more-cost-effective dept.
dschuetz writes: "SONICblue has the new Rio Riot up on their home page. It looks to me like an iPod killer -- 20 GB hard drive, very nice interface (better than Apple's), built-in FM tuner, powerful "DJ" functions, Lithium Ion batteries. And, at $399, it's priced competitively. The only question is -- how big is this thing? SONICblue has lots of other great systems out there, like the ReplayTV and Rio Receiver (which runs Linux), so the possibilities for hacking and otherwise extending this device are very good." Another submitter sends: "MP3 Newswire has a story on the RCA LYRA Personal Jukebox, a 20GB MP3/mp3PRO player that is the first portable to use the updated digital music compression scheme co-developed by its parent company Thompson. The new Lyra sells for $299. In related news, SonicBlue has released its first jukebox style player, also a 20GB unit called the Rio Riot that sells for $399. Both articles have pictures of the new players."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Rio Riot and Lyra Personal Jukebox | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 403 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Still USB (Score:5, Insightful)

    by S-prime (550519) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:23PM (#2833513)
    Sure, it's got a 20gig drive and an FM radio, but given the fact that it still uses a USB connection, how long is it gonna take me to transfer all my fmp3's?
    I, for one, will stick with my iPod.
    • Re:Still USB (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Shuh (13578) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:30PM (#2833545) Journal
      Yeah... but Apple better get its iPod out there cheaper because it's only a matter of time before USB-mp3-player buyers realize the USB connection technology is too slow for 6Gb and now 20Gb drives. When that happens, will they pay $400 for the *only* IEEE-1394 version? Hell no. They will wait around for the USB2 versions to come out in a year and then buy them by the gazillions -- thereby marginalizing IEEE-1394 and helping that bus technology bust into wide acceptance. This in turn will be the springboard USB2 would need to make a stab at the already-established IEEE-1394-based DV camera/editing market.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Still USB (Score:5, Informative)

        by Jeffrey Baker (6191) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:41PM (#2833616)
        USB2 is pretty pointless for non-computer devices. IEEE1394 devices can talk to each other, point-to-point. For example, you can have a 1394 camera interfacing directly with a 1394 editing console which in turn interfaces with a 1394 VTR. USB and USB2 devices require a computer to run the show. Thus you would plug your USB2 camera, if there will be such a thing, into your computer and your VTR into your computer, and use them. If you don't have a computer arbitrating USB traffic, the USB devices are useless.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Still USB by eggz128 (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:05PM
          • Personally... by Pope Slackman (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:47PM
        • Re:Still USB (Score:4, Insightful)

          by stripes (3681) on Sunday January 13 2002, @05:38PM (#2833820) Homepage Journal
          USB2 is pretty pointless for non-computer devices.

          No, it is pointless for devices that you might never want to hook up to a computer :-)

          IEEE1394 devices can talk to each other, point-to-point. For example, you can have a 1394 camera interfacing directly with a 1394 editing console which in turn interfaces with a 1394 VTR.

          I don't know anyone who does that, which doesn't make it useless, but does make it less valuable. In fact everyone I know with a DV cam would much rather put the movie on their computer and edit it in iMovie or something.

          In fact the one place I know people wanted to use device-to-device FW it failed them. None of the new high end DSLRs want to look for a hard drive to write files on, they all want to have a computer suck them out. So no using the cute little portable firewire disks to store digital pics in the field, you need a bulky laptop, or a costly "digital wallet", and definitely no expensing the iPod for use as a storage device with your EOS-1D...

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:DV editing on FireWire… (Score:5, Insightful)

            by stripes (3681) on Sunday January 13 2002, @06:40PM (#2834040) Homepage Journal
            iMovie is just a toy for home movies, Final Cut Pro 3 is the bomb for computer editing.

            iMovie is also about $900 cheaper (or is it "only" $600 cheaper?), and people have done more then home movies in it. I do admit that FCP3 is far less limited, and if you need 10 video tracks and more then 3 audio tracks, and cuts/fades/effects not in the 80 or so iMovie has, then it is a much better thing to use. iMovie is a lot more then a toy, it's a great starter tool. FCP3 is a lot better, but frequently not needed.

            Digital Cameras might be able to use USB2 better, but I still prefer those 3" CD Sony Mavica uses. I just they would take pictures faster, drop into memory first, then write to disc.

            You are not likely to ever get the CD writer in the Mavica as fast as the faster flash cards (or maybe even the microdrives). You want to bust on iMovie for being a toy, and then you talk about the Mavica? The D30's the bomb :-) Or really the EOS-1D, I mean don't you need 8 frames per second and huge image buffer? Doesn't everyone need to have a five stop correction range and ISO 3200? :-)

            The 3" CD writere will also always be bigger then CF writers, so you won't see a digital ELPH (PS100/PS110) using one. They are almost as small as the iPod after all...

            [ Parent ]
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • not pointless at all by markj02 (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @08:15PM
      • Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by denjin (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:30PM
      • Re:Still USB by Matthew Weigel (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:58PM
      • USB2? by hearingaid (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @11:53AM
        • Re:USB2? by hearingaid (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @09:58PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:31PM
      • Re:Still USB by aka-ed (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:16PM
        • Re:Still USB by aka-ed (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @09:28PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Still USB by RustyTaco (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:45PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • That doesn't matter. by TheOnlyCoolTim (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:32PM
    • Re:Still USB by alfredw (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:40PM
      • Re:Still USB by mr100percent (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:23PM
        • Re:Still USB by alfredw (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:09PM
        • Re:Still USB by penguinboy (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:27PM
          • Re:Still USB by mr100percent (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @02:13AM
        • Re:Still USB by chriso11 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:58PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Still USB by GSloop (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @02:15AM
          • Re:Still USB by SlamMan (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @10:21AM
    • Re:Still USB by Geek In Training (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:59PM
      • Re:Still USB by Geek In Training (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:39PM
        • Re:Still USB by Geek In Training (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:14PM
          • Re:Your Wife by Geek In Training (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:43PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Still USB by harlows_monkeys (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:36PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 20gb too small, usb does suck ,maybe 400gb+ better by the_march_hare (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @11:04PM
    • Still USB by gremlin_591002 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @11:25PM
    • Re:Still USB by davesag (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @02:38AM
    • Recharge via USB? by Ryano (Score:3) Monday January 14 2002, @06:34AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Well... by Pludodog (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:25PM
    • Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:29PM
    • Re:Well... by nemui-chan (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @08:36AM
      • Re:Well... by AtaruMoroboshi (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @10:15AM
  • Close by dadragon (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:26PM
    • Re:Close by jcr (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:30PM
    • Re:Close by mikeylebeau (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:36PM
    • Re:Close by mikeylebeau (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:40PM
    • Re:Close by nemui-chan (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @08:39AM
    • Re: iPod killer by Geek In Training (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:46PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • iPod Crusher maybe? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SirDrinksAlot (226001) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:27PM (#2833527) Journal
    The iPod is so popular because of the size. This thing uses a laptop harddrive like all the others. The iPod it self could fit inside these mp3 players that use laptop drives. It also uses USB. Please, do the math on how long it would take to transfer 20 gigs on USB.
  • UI by damiam (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:27PM
    • Re:UI by Paradoxish (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:31PM
      • Re:UI by mr100percent (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:28PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • USB is a bit slow for this... by mjpaci (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:27PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Very nice by Paradoxish (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:27PM
    • Re:Very nice by educated_foo (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:35PM
      • Re:Very nice by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:11PM
    • Re:Very nice by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:39PM
    • Re:Very nice by heffer (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:15PM
  • not an ipod killer by Stone Rhino (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:27PM
  • No firewire by yggdrazil (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:30PM
  • Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jeffrey Baker (6191) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:31PM (#2833552)
    It looks like it has approximately the same interface as the iPod, is as big as a paperback book, and interfaces over USB. USB is 12Mbps. It would take 3.9 hours to populate a 20GB disk.

    This thing is no iPod killer. The great thing about the iPod is that I can put it in my pocket, and the firewire interface is so fast that I don't need to put ALL of my MP3s on it: it takes only seconds to load a fresh collection.

    • Re:Huh? by Geek In Training (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:53PM
      • It's bigger though... by denjin (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:33PM
      • Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by GoRK (10018) <johnl@nOSPAm.blurbco.com> on Sunday January 13 2002, @05:50PM (#2833871) Homepage Journal
        Well that's because you need a carrying case for it! Not only does it have four times the capacity. it's four times the size!

        If price were the only feature that people based their decisions on, then why are people driving the new VW bugs? This HDD may be 20GB but if I'm carrying around a 20GB HDD, and I find myself needing to take a couple gigs of photoshop files home from the office or vice versa, I sure as hell wouldn't use this to do it! An iPod would be right on task, though.

        Someone could produce a portable player with a 160GB Desktop HDD powered by a lawnmower battery with a small color screen that you could carry around in your backpack (included of course) for the same price as the Rio Riot or the iPod. It could make you download all your files via a 115200 baud serial connection, and then I could dish out the same argument you just did to defend it.

        Seriously, it's a different product for a different market. It may be a bit pricey, but then again, it's your choice to buy it or not. If apple could price iPod cheaper and it would increase the demand for it enough that it would benefit them to lower the price -- you know what -- they would. They have smart marketing people setting the price on their stuff. It's not like they just make it more expensive because they want to see who's stupid enough to buy it.

        ~GoRK
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Huh? by stripes (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:12PM
          • Re:Huh? by GoRK (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:14PM
      • Re:Huh? by RustyTaco (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:59PM
        • Re:Huh? by Geek In Training (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:08PM
          • Re:Huh? by stripes (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:27PM
          • iPod Carrying Case (was:Huh?) by shking (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @12:05AM
          • Re:Huh? by Geek In Training (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @12:50PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Huh? by stripes (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:57PM
      • Re:Huh? by Matthew Weigel (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @08:20PM
      • Re:Huh? by SlamMan (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @10:34AM
    • Re:Huh? by Skuld-Chan (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:57PM
      • Re:Huh? by usunoro (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:20PM
        • Re:Huh? by sct (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:15PM
        • Re:Huh? by Skuld-Chan (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:57PM
    • Re:Huh? by Jucius Maximus (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:05PM
    • Re:Huh? [shameless plug] by tomaasz (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:53PM
    • Then go get an IEEE-1394 interface card! by MtViewGuy (Score:3) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:56PM
    • Re:Huh? by Dun Malg (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @12:34PM
      • Re:Huh? by Jeffrey Baker (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @03:16PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Still just an mp3 player? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:31PM
  • No Firewire - No go by agentfive (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:32PM
  • Huh. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by American AC in Paris (230456) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:32PM (#2833560) Homepage
    It looks to me like an iPod killer


    That's funny. I had heard that the iPod was lame. [slashdot.org] Why would we need an iPod killer?


    (In any case, it's still using USB. That's gotta be painful for moving 20GB of music...)

    • Re:Huh. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by SpookyFish (195418) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:55PM (#2833666)
      I am not a big Apple fan, but the iPod is FAR from lame!

      Besides Firewire, it has 32 meg of ram, more than any other HD based player -- more buffering, less HD access. It uses the memory to store the file database as well, so there is no wait for the hard drive to spin up to navigate through files/folders.

      The 1.8" HD allows it to be much smaller & lighter -- about half the weight and size of the next-smallest HD based player. 5 gig is the largest 1.8" drive available right now AFAIK, but that will change soon, I am sure.

      The only way to get a smaller/lighter fairly large capacity player is to use the 1GB Microdrive + a CF2 compatible memory player (with questionable battery life).

      Instead of these oversized behemoths, why won't someone else use the 1.8" drive and make a player that is Win/Mac compatible (natively) that has Firewire AND USB?!

      /comment
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Huh. by SilentChris (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @08:48AM
    • Re:Huh. by nemui-chan (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @08:49AM
  • make it play vorbis (Score:3, Offtopic)

    by austad (22163) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:32PM (#2833561) Homepage
    Once someone releases one that will play my Vorbis files, I'll buy one. I re-encoded my whole collection into Vorbis, and now I'm much happier (re-encoded from the CD, not from mp3's).

    Until then, I'll do without one.
  • "iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by EvilStein (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:32PM
  • design (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jrs 1 (536357) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:33PM (#2833566) Homepage
    what is it with all this non-mac hardware? it's like apple have hired *all* the good minimalist product designers in the world and every other product has to be designed with virtually no sense of style[1]. it's the same for all the iMac-a-like computers and even mobile phones. can someone please design an mp3 player with reasonable specs (which this seems to have) and doesn't look like a NURBS experiment gone wrong?

    [1] noted exeptions: palm's computers and the sony playstation 2
    • Re:design by yggdrazil (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:40PM
      • Re:design by Concertina (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @01:31AM
    • Re:design by cgori (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:28PM
    • Re:design by Xthlc (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @10:32PM
  • Battery life by madenosine (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:34PM
  • iPod killer? Hardly. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bbum (28021) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:34PM (#2833573) Homepage
    That it uses a 20GB hard drive means that it is at least twice the size. The 5gb hard drive used in the iPod is significantly smaller than the 2.5inch form factor required by the 20gb drive.

    The Riot has a USB interface... the iPod uses FireWire (1394b). End result? You can completely replace the contents on your iPod in less than 15 minutes. Even loading 5gb onto the Rio is going to take something like 10 hours -- 20gb would likely take something like *two days*.

    It is unbelievably handy/convenient/cool to be able to reload your entire portable music collection in a matter of minutes. I can get up in the morning and select 500+ tracks -- 50 albums or several playlists (depending on how I have things organized) -- based on my mood, desires, whatever... and the iPod is completely reloaded and ready to go by the time I'm out of the shower and ready to catch the train!

    All in a device that slips conveniently into a pocket, is light weight, and incredibly tough. Did you know an iPod bounces when you drop it? Mine does-- and it still works fine.

    Not too mention that having a 5gb FireWire hard drive in my pocket has proven to be damned convenient on numerous occasions. My iPod was used as a temporary holding spot for data or for sneaker net transfers no less than 4 times last week simply because it was the fastest and most convenient way to move the data around! USB wouldn't have cut it-- try moving 1gb of data across a USB bus in under a minute. (Sure, USB 2.0 can do it-- but who has USB 2.0 support on their MP3 player?)

    Don't get me wrong-- the Riot is *very cool*. But it isn't an iPod killer. They are completely different products.

    Personally, I don't need an FM tuner and really don't want a device that doesn't fit in a pocket.

    There will be those that will reply with 'but do you *really* swap your entire playlists on a regular basis? I don't and I don't miss it...'
  • do we really need 20GB by kawaichan (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:35PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Stop worrying about USB... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jarodss (243400) <jarodss AT hotmail DOT com> on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:37PM (#2833588) Homepage
    Reading the early comments and seeing everyone complaining about it being USB.

    Take a look at most "pee-cee"s today, how many have Firewire? Most people don't have Firewire, they do have usb though.

    So stop saying that everything needs to be firewire, yes it will take a while to fill a 20gig mp3 player with a usb connection, but how many times are you going to need to reload 20 gigs of music, if your like me you get a few cds a month and rip them at the same time, at that point I have between 2 and 4 hundred megs, and that doesn't take long to transfer with a usb connection when I only have to do it once or twice a month.

    And on a side note, does this thing act as a portable hard drive? I know some of the harddrive/mp3 players do and that would make it even more useful, with my 11 or 12 gigs of mp3 and a divx video or 6 in the rest of the space i'd be set, even my parents have usb on their pc.
  • USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by Wakko Warner (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:37PM
  • Size/Weight, and iPod (Score:3, Insightful)

    by pneuma_66 (1830) <cristiana AT cloud13 DOT com> on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:39PM (#2833596) Homepage
    After reading the article, and reading sonicblue's page, i still couldnt find two key specs for this machine, size and weight. I really think that this is because that the iPod is much smaller and weighs much less.

    I own an iPod, and I prefer having a tiny device, that i can fit in my pocket, or even in the cellphone compartment on my bag. Also, the riot is still USB, i couldnt even imagine how long it would take to fill up the drive. I have a hard time waiting for the three or four minutes it takes to fill up my ipod.

    Everyone also says that the 5gb on the ipod is not enough, and i thought that also, until i got one. I can hold around 700 songs encoded at 192k on the hard drive, which is 2 days worth of music. Now when are you going to listen to the complete 8 days worth of music on your Riot?
  • Didn't Atari make one of these? (Score:3, Flamebait)

    by Lally Singh (3427) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:39PM (#2833598)
    I swear I've seen this device before. My younger brother used to play video games on it. It had the thinnest cartridges... And as everyone's pointed out, iPod killer my hairy ass...
  • Notice how... by nicwolff (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:39PM
  • I want a 0gb MP3 player (Score:3, Insightful)

    by KILNA (536949) <kilna@kilna.com> on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:40PM (#2833607) Homepage Journal
    I'd much rather have a wireless network connected device capable of streaming the music off of my home machine and various other places on the net based off of my listening preferences. The thing I like about the radio is its ability to introduce me to new music. The thing I hate about the radio is its complete inability to know my preferences. Freeamp [freeamp.org] is a step in the right direction, but I still haven't managed to get any decent recommendations from it. Music Match [musicmatch.com] makes an attempt as well, but their interface is practically unusable to me. And neither recommendation system is in the form of a net-enabled portable unit yet. *sigh*
  • Remember: PC Software for iPod! by rbruels (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:40PM
  • Looks good, but... (Score:5, Funny)

    by cosmicg (313545) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:42PM (#2833620)
    I'm holding out for the inclusion of "Amplitude Modulation" technology. I read a preview of it in the July 1899 issue of American Electrician-- it looks like it will be *the* format for christian and sports talk broadcasts.
  • This thing is big and ugly and useless by Durindana (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:43PM
  • rio by crystalplague (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:48PM
    • Re:rio by SuiteSisterMary (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:59PM
    • Re:rio by David Price (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:26PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Too bulky, but has an interesting feature by John Jorsett (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:49PM
  • iPod interface by elchulopadre (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:50PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • rio dj (slightly ot) by Webz (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:50PM
  • In dash HD based MP3 player by vw_bob (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:52PM
  • Yesss! An iPod Killler! (Score:3, Funny)

    by phloda (530937) on Sunday January 13 2002, @04:57PM (#2833673) Journal
    I did a quick comparison of the old iPod to Sonic Blue's new Rio RIOT. Although tech specs are still forthcoming, the Flash technology tour of the Rio RIOT made it easy to tell that this is absolutely an iPod killer.

    old iPod: One Boring Scroll Wheel, 5 buttons

    Rio RIOT: Scroll Wheel, Game-Boy Pointer, and five buttons, including two on the left side for volume!

    old iPod: IE1394 (what issat?)

    Rio RIOT: USB! Everyone has it! Soon it will be five times as fast with USB2 technology!

    old iPod: looks like a zippo, sized like pack of cigarrettes

    Rio RIOT: ergonomically styled like Game Boy Advance, in sleek charcoal plastique!

    old iPod: select by artist, album, or manual playlist

    Rio RIOT: intellegent audio wizard detects your favorites and plays them back for you!

    old iPod: made by Apple, a company going out of business

    Rio RIOT: produced by Sonic Blue, a recognized leader in MP3 technology!

    I think the message is clear. Sonic Blue has an iPod killer on it's hands with the Rio RIOT. Thank you Slashdot for letting us know quick!
  • Riot by lavaforge (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:59PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why are these things still costing 400 dollars? by t0qer (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:00PM
  • Anger at Apple?!?!?! by toupsie (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:06PM
  • Not quite there, but almost by HawaiianMayan (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:08PM
  • CF MP3 Player? by jonbrewer (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:09PM
  • Does the RioVolt even _play_ MP3's???!!!! by joetee (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:14PM
  • Priced Competitively? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by SuperMacNinja (78474) <gus.redvsblue@com> on Sunday January 13 2002, @05:16PM (#2833746) Homepage
    So everyone complains that the iPod is overpriced at $399 but this Rio product is "priced competitively" at $399? This just blows my mind.
  • Never again, SonicBlue by zbuffered (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:20PM
  • You ALL miss the point... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:27PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Look big... by stripes (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:34PM
  • Here's an image with some scale (Score:5, Informative)

    by mike_lynn (463952) on Sunday January 13 2002, @05:35PM (#2833804)
    Find it here [impress.co.jp].
    Apparently it's from the 2002 International CES. The page [impress.co.jp] it's from is in Japanese, but has several other pics showing front/back/side.

    Oh, here's [winsupersite.com] one more, even closer up, from SuperSite.
  • MP3PRO by xercist (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:35PM
  • iPod is not an MP3 player by moyix (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:37PM
  • Rio/Apple by Dutchmaan (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:39PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Sondra by IceFox (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:43PM
    • Re:Sondra by Fred Ferrigno (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @11:21PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • iPod killer? (Score:3, Redundant)

    by sporty (27564) on Sunday January 13 2002, @05:45PM (#2833849) Homepage
    Man, the size and weight difference is huge! The only way these devices would kill the iPod is if you dropped them on top of an iPod. And even then you'd have to drop the Rio from a very great height since the fringgin' iPod's are durable.
  • Lyra Personal Jukebox by green42 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:46PM
  • Great, another product they won't support. by zerofoo (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @05:48PM
  • patents? by markj02 (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:02PM
  • AM Radio by nexex (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:03PM
  • I will buy: by SomeOtherGuy (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:04PM
  • More info... by vukv (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:05PM
  • 20Gb mp3 player? old news. by nchip (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:05PM
  • IPod Killer by halo8 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:10PM
  • no fire = no killer by gralem (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:12PM
  • consider Archos by markj02 (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:31PM
  • USB? by Vegeta99 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:31PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Archos Jukebox Multimedia by KommissarHorizon (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:33PM
  • MP3 CD players (Score:3, Informative)

    by duren686 (463275) on Sunday January 13 2002, @06:34PM (#2834015) Homepage Journal
    Personally, in terms of money per storage space, I like my MPTrip clone [genica.com].. I rarely ever listen to more than 11 hours of music at a time, and this thing works wonderfully. Despite the warning on the page, it actually does read CD-RW's, and when I have to change it, it takes about 9 minutes and I'm done. Best of all, this thing is er.. competitively priced [easybuy2000.com], and it's a very high-quality first-gen mp3/cd player.

    If you're willing to spend a bit more and don't mind not having Duren686's Personal Seal of Approval, you can try the AVC Soul Player [easybuy2000.com]. I've never used one, but I've heard nothing but good about it, and as an added bonus, the upgradeable firmware gives it the possibility of reading OGG files.
  • Yeah, it looks big and heavy, it can probably destroy an iPod with one blow.
  • Missing a great iPod feature by Shrike89 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:58PM
  • USB is fast enough? by tsm_sf (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:08PM
  • Hard Drives in MP3 Players (Score:3, Insightful)

    by guttentag (313541) on Sunday January 13 2002, @07:15PM (#2834150) Journal
    It seems like all the new portable MP3 players achieve huge capacities by using hard drives for storage, but I'm not sure this is a great thing.
    • Battery life. A hard drive contains moving parts that need to be spun, and that sucks up battery life. Laptops spin down their hard drives often to lengthen battery life. Thse players may do that as well, storing the current song in memory, but "spinning up" the drive to copy it to memory is still going to take a lot more out of the battery than a flash memory card. One AA battery lasts 30 hours in my Rio PMP300.
    • Hard drives fail. I've seen plenty of desktop hard drives fail. I can't imagine the failure rate for drives that bounce around during your morning jog or your morning race to catch the train. My Rio has taken a lot of abuse over the last 3 years, and I've never had a problem.
    If you want to carry 4,000 songs with you, it's great that you can do that, but are there companies still providing new options for people who aren't moonlighting DJs? :oP
  • Interesting by moyix (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:16PM
    • Oops :| by moyix (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:20PM
  • This is not a portable unit by asv108 (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:29PM
  • Moodlogic by elrond1999 (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:37PM
  • Why the anti-Apple bias? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BeBoxer (14448) on Sunday January 13 2002, @07:45PM (#2834234)
    I don't understand why there is such an unreasonable anti-Apple bias around here. First we have the story about the Shuttle where poster feels compelled to compare it to the iMac. "I find these little gems cuter than any iMac I've ever seen!" What kind of crap is that? Do you know what cute means? The shuttle case looks just like any other case, only smaller. It's not cute. It's not cool. It's just a small case that is just as ugly as a regular ATX case. At least the iMac and iMac2 had innovative designs. And they both would qualify as "cute" by most people's definition. The Shuttle is certainly not cute.

    Then we have the "iPod killer" from Rio. Eh? The thing looks like it's the size of a brick, and I'm sure just as fun to carry around. And why is the Rio "priced competatively"? They used all cheaper components than the iPod, yet charge the same price? And that's competative? And the iPod is "overpriced" because it uses higer quality components for the same price? What the hell are you people smoking? The iPod uses a brand new high tech hard drive which lets the whole iPod be the size of just the hard drive in the Rio. The Rio is plastic, versus metal for the iPod (can you say more durable?) And what makes the reviewer think the interface is better than Apple's? Has dschuetz actually used either one? I doubt it.

    Is it going to show up as a generic USB mass storage device? Or am I going to have to use some half-assed experimental driver to get it to work under Linux? I would say the chance of Linux support is low based upon the support they've given their other products. Sonic Blue might use Linux internally in their products, but have they provided Linux drivers for anything? Ever? Certainly not for their MP3 players. As far as I can tell, any MP3 player which doesn't show up as a generic mass storage device (like the iPod does) is nothing but a Window's centric RIAA-pandering product. I don't know why Slashdot editor would think that was cool. The only reason to not have an MP3 player act as a generic mass storage device is to keep the RIAA happy. And unless the company actually provides Linux drivers (which Sonic Blue does not) you are resigning yourself to half-assed buggy support. Bah.
  • (Physical) Size matters by Gumber (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @07:58PM
  • Using the iPod on a PC by seefried (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @09:12PM
  • Not an iPod killer ... yet by jlower (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @09:15PM
  • SMDI and everything else people seem to forget by abe1x (Score:2) Sunday January 13 2002, @09:49PM
  • mp3pro by malkman (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @11:16PM
  • It's too big by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @12:11AM
  • i pod killer hahahaha by linuxbert (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @12:33AM
  • Kind of Like (Score:3, Insightful)

    by spacefrog (313816) on Monday January 14 2002, @12:58AM (#2835071)
    Saying this device is an iPod killer reminds me of the people driving souped-up Camero's who rattle on and on about how they "toasted that Porsche at the stop light" and feel that is an accomplishment. Dragstrip performance is important, well, at the track. You can't compare that to a well-rounded package and expect me not to laugh.

    In this analogy, the iPod is a shiny, brand new 911. A wonderfully and carefully engineered piece of precision machinery. An art form.

    The Rio product is heavy, clunky, and ugly. It really only beats the iPod in one area: capacity. So what? Would you rather fill an iPod with six gigs of music in five minutes, or fill the Rio with 20 gigs in five hours? Hmmmm.

    The two products being compared cost the same . . . .

    And to those who complain about the fact that not every PC has firewire: Anybody with a screwdriver and a spare 10 minutes can add firewire for about $30. Get over it.
  • Good Product by Wheaty18 (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @01:25AM
  • Archos Recorder 20 is worth the wait (Score:3, Informative)

    by Zarnoff (20196) on Monday January 14 2002, @02:04AM (#2835179) Homepage
    Archos has a 20GB mp3 player/recorder (analog and digital hardware mp3 encoding on the fly), it's only slightly larger than the iPod and uses USB2.0 (about 12MB/sec, not firewire but a vast improvement over USB1.0).

    It's $369 and available Feb. 1

    http://www.archos.com/us/products/product_500277.h tml [archos.com]
    http://www.archos.com/order_desk_na.html [archos.com]

    -z
  • Archos Jukebox Recorder 20 (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Namarrgon (105036) <namarrgon@gmail.CHICAGOcom minus city> on Monday January 14 2002, @03:09AM (#2835244) Homepage
    This [archos.com] is more like it.

    Pros:
    - 20 GB drive
    - USB2 (i.e. Firewire speeds, but still backwards compatible with ubiquitous USB1 when you need it)
    - Records :-)
    - 10 hour life
    - Usable as portable harddrive; you can put non-MP3 files on there and get them off again (unlike iPod)
    - Cheaper: US$369

    Cons:
    - 350g

    Summary:
    It ain't as small & sexy as an iPod, but it's undoubtably more useful. ALL your music on tap (OK, a lot of it at least), a portable drive that plugs anywhere and is usably fast, and it records too :-)

  • hard drive players are crippled by battery life by Luke_A_P (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @07:52AM
  • Ipod or Riot ??? NONE !!! I'll go for ARCHOS by titirezad (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @08:10AM
  • iPod Killer by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @08:29AM
  • Don't forget about... by mblase (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @08:30AM
  • Anybody tested the new navigation system? by krazyninja (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @09:32AM
  • Obligitory Ogg post by drew_kime (Score:2) Monday January 14 2002, @11:53AM
  • I"ll still stand by my Rio Volt SP250. by shadowlight1 (Score:1) Monday January 14 2002, @12:13PM
  • Riot Dimensions Here! It's Mega-Huge! by MeowMeowMan (Score:1) Tuesday January 15 2002, @09:31AM
  • Re:An FM Tuner? by SuperGordito (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @04:59PM
  • Re:Who cares? by duren686 (Score:1) Sunday January 13 2002, @06:51PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 23 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2