Slashdot Log In
Metallica Vs. Harvard
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Mon Sep 11, 2000 08:28 AM
from the god-I-hate-this-crap dept.
from the god-I-hate-this-crap dept.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Metallica v Harvard
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 315 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Re:The arrogance of it all ... (Score:3)
Columbia (Score:4)
I sugest others do likewise
NOOOOooooo...... (Score:3)
--
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
Ha, Ha, Ha (Score:5)
-- Crutcher --
#include <disclaimer.h>
Companys dictating policy? (Score:4)
Yet, there are no arrests, no fines. No statement saying "What you are doing is illegal and if you are caught, you will be punished." Granted, enforcing the law on a wide and free network is difficult, and we aren't quite sure how to do it effectively yet. However, something that effects all of our rights in a legal sense is being battled by advocates for corporate interests (Napster Vs. RIAA, in this case). The people, on the other hand, have no advocates, even though it directly effects them.
If this trend of determining matters of legality on the Internet by companies instead of law makers, we will end up with a set of 'unwritten' laws developed by whomever has the most persuasive lawyers (read: money) and detach the citizenry from the lawmaking process altogether. The democratic process may be slow, and might not make sense all the time, but at least can be accessed (in theory) by the people.
If a University can be forced to change it's policy by a company for fear of a lawsuit, regardless of the legality or ethics of that policy, we could all be in big trouble.
Missed the point. (Score:3)
Um, dude. That was a cunning oblique referrence which couldn't possibly be misconstrued by any university.
One of the biggest copyright cases in the late 20th cen. had to do with universities providing students with photocopied books or compilation books of photocopied articles, without paying for the rights to republish. Professors were going to their university copy shops and handing them a stack of academic articles or a text book, and saying "Make a copy of this for every member of my 30 person class, and sell it to them when they come in." So in that case, instead of (or in addition to) going to a bookstore to buy a textbook, you go to, say, the campus Kinkos and buy your photocopied book from them.
There was a lawsuit. The universities lost. Universities generally don't pull that stunt any more -- while they may photocopy, they pay for the rights to do so. (If you want photocopy rights, generally one can buy them through the Copyright Clearance Center, and organization which administers rights precisely for that purpose.)
So that line about photocopying was actually an oblique threat: "We won over the wholesale photocopying issue, we can win over Napster."
----------------------------------------------
Someone has the right idea... (Score:5)
Stupid? (Score:3)
I've never been much of a fan of Metallica which I found a bit too commercial (how true that has proved to be) preferring the likes of Black Flag, Motorhead, No Means No among others during the glory days of hardcore metal in the 80's, so it's no loss for me. But I suspect there are soon to be ex-fans of Metallica at 11 major American Universities.
As bugs would say, "what a maroon!"
Why universities (Score:3)
1) Broke students (I was a broke student...) who REALLY like free stuff, and have enough time to search for music they want.
2) Big bandwidth (back in my day we had a vax cluster that was neat,and gopher! now I hear they have really really fast interntet, but I digress) by making universities stop allowing napster et al. server set ups you reduce the number of high speed connections to mucic.
3) Single point of responsibility for many people. Let them deal with there students.
Personal responsibility? The law doesn't punish individuals for their violations (yet....) So they're trying anything
Who needs Napster (tm) at a College? (Score:4)
Metallica...scourge of higher education... (Score:3)
It does seem pretty dumb from a logical point of view, but it falls into the same category as many other lawsuits and such nowdays -- Sue whoever is easiest to get the most money from rather than suing the guilty party.
Nevermind that it is the students at the schools, the majority who are over 18 and thus legally responsible for themselves as adults (In the U.S.) However, we all know this type of stupidity works in the courts. We have too many previous examples of these things already and I'm sure Metalligreed will win if Harvard doesn't bend over for a buttrock band of elderly hicks. After all, Lars' rights are more important than those of a college or the students that don't do anything wrong (both of them.) Nevermind that if there is a big settlement to Metallica, or if they win in a court case, that the schools will raise tuition and make everyone unable to afford school, and drop out, get a job at McDonalds, and listen to Metallica music while complaining about how much life sucks and how they can't make any money...but then again, maybe that's the idea.
BoZ - who would be leaping for joy if a giant meteor was heading directly to destroy the Earth.
Copying in the Library?? (Score:4)
Ok.. So, what are all those photocopiers for?? I take it that these people went to Uni to study something.
If they did, then, I'd hazard a guess they they did copy the books in the library for reference..
I know I did, and so did everyone else on my degree.. And everyone else there!! How else were we to be able to study effectively??
I think they've gone far enough with all this napster attacking. It won't do any more good, apart from to get Metallica's name in the press even more, and increase the disdain felt for them by people who have a reasonably sensible view of life.
The courts are already dealing with this, so why try and pre-empt things with possible hints at legal proceedings in the future? They'll never block everything, and will only waste valuable resources trying to do so.
The world will end up working as it will, despite the lawyers and the nit-picking legislation that's being waved around by the clueless.. So I wish they'd just lighten up and stop trying to stomp on anything and everything they can see...
Reminds me of an old joke:
Q: What do puppies and large corporations have in common?
A: They feel the need to piss on everything just to try and prove it's theirs.
Malk
Re:NOOOOooooo...... (Score:3)
I've just cut all the network cables in my office anyway, can never be to safe, oh hang on, forgot the modem cab
[Connection reset by peer]
University of Tennessee solution (Score:4)
Note, I have not seen the written policy, this is what several very knowledgable people told me that they do and are planning on doing.
First, neither Napster, nor anything else, is blocked. Free speech is king, so no filtering is done by the school.
They have had a problem with the dorms eating up so much of the total bandwidth, slowing down staff and administration along with the dorms themselves. So, the plan is to put the dorms on a seperate network and seperate gateway from the rest of the school. Quoting a friend "if the students want to gring their network to a hault trading music and videos, let them, it's fine with us."
I am not sure if Metallica has heard of this yet, but if they decide to force censorship on that university (with 20,000+ students) they will probably have a fight on their hands.
Visit DC2600 [dc2600.com]
Really In Touch (Score:3)
This just shows how in touch lawyers are with the real world. All students copy books in the university library. Professors do it, too. They copy to take pages back to their dorm rooms for studying purposes. They copy to write term papers (who says plagiarism's dead?!). Professors copy entire novellas for the express purpose of handing them out in class (students are notorious for not wanting to go to libraries, and libraries are notorious for never having the book).
Fair use copying goes on every day, and to compare the Internet to a library where nothing gets copied is to completely misunderstand how college libraries are used.
I'll be sending a letter of my own... (Score:3)
I don't even use Napster (or Scour, Gnutella, etc). A good chunk of my MP3s are from my own CDs, and the rest came from my friends' computers. I don't like Metallica (on the basis of their music), so I don't think I have more than one or two of their songs, and I think I even have a tape with those songs somewhere. They're never going to stop peer to peer trading unless they a) block all incoming ports to each IP, or b) hire packet nannies to inspect every transfer for copyrighted material. But even though a ban on Napster would be easy to work around, I would be deeply saddened if they were to cave in to legal pressure and enact it. If freedom of information(*) doesn't stand at universities, where will it stand?
-John
(* - I don't consider piracy to be a form of freedom of information - but restricting the right to run certain types of software that does have even a slim chance of being used with legal motives is a VERY bad thing)
Don't be mean to TMBG... (Score:5)
--Brogdon
Re:Really In Touch (Score:4)
You said the magic words..."fair use copying". People are copying a page or two, not whole books. If people started flocking to libraries and copying whole books (maybe they have free copy day or something that makes it economically feasible) do you think they would just let it happen? Do you think they would allow their resources to be used to copy hundreds of books a day? Not a chance, but because the resource is net access and it's music instead of books it's suddenly okay? If Napster was used for fair use by most people you would have a case. But I would guess that 90% of people use it download music so they don't have to pay for it. It's not stuff they have on CD already, it's stuff they don't have and want without paying for it. LAst time I checked, that's not covered under fair use.
TMBG is Hardcore Geek Music (Score:3)
The only problem of TMBG for me is that they remind me of a stupid ex-girlfriend. does anyone get the NFS joke? I don't. Oh yeah... get the full version of TMBG - Boss of me off of napster -- it rules!
Ya know what we need? (Score:4)
Although, I bet I know what will happen, the band with the most money will win.
Demonstrations (Score:3)
I wonder, have there been pro-Napster demonstrations on campuses? When I went to school, people would demonstrate over any damn thing. Certainly stuff much less important than this (er, like sacking the basketball coach?).
Not that I think it would be a particularly intelligent thing to have a demonstration about, but some of the stuff people occupied buildings for at UMass/Amherst was a lot dumber.
-
The arrogance of it all ... (Score:5)
How about this hypothetical position, Lars. You might not like it, but I think this is one that you would find to be very likely:
Re:TMBG is Hardcore Geek Music (Score:3)
documents on reserve (Score:5)
Yes, they do. I went to a small liberal art school that when a book was rare or very expensive, the professor would put a few copies of the book on reserve in the library. What this meant was that the student could check the book out for only 2 hrs at a time and it couldn't leave the library. What many students were encouraged to do was to make photocopies of the pages that they needed to read so that they could take the copies outside of the library, highlight and make notations, etc. (also considered fair use). They weren't reselling these photocopies, but were using the copies because of the restrictive properties of the original (out of print, extremely expensive, etc.)
Doesn't this refute Mr. King's argument?
Isn't paying $18 for a cd a restrictive property of the music industry?
And please don't say that the mp3 version of a song is just as good as the original, we all know that's not true.
Re:Someone has the right idea... (Score:5)