As someone who's started a new position and using classes with No comments, I can say I've wasted a good deal of time trying to figure out what certain public methods and certain classes do. They've used good naming conventions, but even so there is some subtly about what is done that could have used some explaining, plus looking through 1000s of lines of code before using a method isn't time effective. Its would be far easier for me to read through method header with inputs/outputs than to slog through code trying to figure out if this is the method I want. I don't want every line commented (I've seen that some placws), just the jist .

I came from an internal api writing group, and those using our code would just ask us questions if they couldn't figure stuff out, and we rsther they didn't so we documented ..

Examples or some test code I agree are super useful.

There were so many slab based finger gestured multi-touch phones with almost no buttons before the iphone. Really?

The ability to install applications without going through the carrier buy in was pretty novel too.

    And Eric Schmidt was on the apple board, and at the iphone intro so google knew were this was going. If you look at andriod prototypes before the iphone, they are basically blackberrys.

One expects the ideas to be copied eventually, but not verbatim. I think Jobs was in the right to be pissed. They worked on this thing for years. Even microsoft came up with a different UI, which I think is better for everyone than to have companies just cloning.

I know someone who bikes a lot (From california to Massachusetts this year.) He has a wireless bike computer, which basically measuses each time your wheel goes around, and sends it wirelessly up to a little display on the handlebars. This worked great till he turned on his LED light, then the link was severed. By repositioning the light he could get the computer to work mostly. But computer isn't a key to functionality as brakes.

  I think as a proof of concept this is fun, I would caution against testing at night.............

Bikes are a interesting engineering compromise between "make it state of the art" and "keep it simple/exposed/fixable" engineering. We'll see if hub brakes/ belt chains and other "advances" make a mark..

Apple is the only company that survived the MS pc consolidation years. They lost the PC battle, but they were the only ones to really survive. CPM, TI, Atari, Commodore all failed.

With OSX apple took UNIX and made it a mainstream OS. Showed how to make it easier for consumers which is finally happening to linux. Even MS started to invest in there OS too. Competition helps us consumers.

I started with the Mac Clones, which Steve killed. I got a form letter from apple, I was mad, but got over it.

I have to admit really like the Apple Products. The less is more and focus on user experience really appeals to me.

Firefox is really the bees knees for web development....
firebug for javascript...

http://getfirebug.com/

and the poorly named web developer plugin for css make firefox a potent tool.

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/

I was a notes programmer a decade ago... (wow...) I went to a talk on CouchDB and It all seemed strangely familiar.

Basically lotus Notes is a NoSQL database with an email and calendar program attached. Of course anything was better than "lotus script" but I can see why this stuff is very appealing. I think some of the couchDB developers are former notes developers are involved in the NoSQL movement.

My point is by connecting to the internet you are basically connecting the entire outside world into your home and that has lots of not appropriate materials for kids (as the real world does, particularly cities which are a good representative slice of people, and the majority now live). Its up to parents to supervise this matterial. Google already has filter ("safe search"), they work with mixed results.

Much the same way responsible parents don't let kids play with knives, explosives and poison, but will still let them go out and play, even bike around town (depending on age).

There is children's software that doesn't require the use of the internet, although its not as common as it once was.

A internet sandbox might work well for young children, but by middle school they'll figure out how to go around it.

A whitelist is very expensive and technically quite difficult, as most pages load content from a large variety of hosts. Plus as has been pointed out there is a fuzzy line for some material (heck Harry Potter is out in some parents minds). Not to mention threats from hackers and trojan horses.

A tip that seems to work is to set up computers in family spaces (a corner of the living room) where all activity can be watched.

The World isn't for children and the internet is part of that world. This is a fundamental thing.

Just as you wouldn't let a child run around un-supervised in a city, you don't let them run around free on the internet. Suburbs were supposed to be a child safe environment, but ultimately they aren't either (I would argue they are about the same as cities, but thats getting off topic).

Some web sites are for kids, but to allow them on the internet they should be supervised.

The internet is not the same as TV where there is much greater control of what is coming in. The internet is all about interacting, while TV is about consuming.

There are services that promise to make the internet "safer" but I doubt they work well. I wouldn't trust them.

I've seen this system before too in a friends condo building. A code typed in the "buzzer" box call a phone number. If that number is a cell phone than that person can be anywhere. She lets in fed-ex and UPS while at work.

As of now, music on amazon and itunes is DRM free.

It won't be too hard to top the itunes interface for syncing though..