Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

The LEGO Desk

Posted by Hemos on Sun Aug 27, 2000 05:43 PM
from the lego-prints-on-thumbs dept.
It's a prety amazing sight to see. Check out how a full size desk is made of LEGOs - complete with drawers, and holes for wires. 35,000+ blocks of joy, and a lot of glue. Yum.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The LEGO Desk | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 110 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Lego Tux! by /dev/kev (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:34PM
  • Re:Disgusted by Tony Hammitt (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:12PM
  • Re:The joy of a tight labor market. by kawlyn (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:34PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by tagishsimon (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:16PM
  • Re:Is LEGO a proprietary standard? by wynlyndd (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:35PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by nomadic (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:19PM
  • Kids' stuff by Scorcher (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:40PM
  • Re:Offtopic but interesting... by jallen02 (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:49PM
  • Mirror (Score:5)

    by a.out (31606) <brad@sarsfiTEAeld.ca minus caffeine> on Sunday August 27 2000, @05:41PM (#824036)
    Seems the site is *really* bad right now, Might have something to do with the fact that they are serving all of their pictures through a cgi script ?. Oh well.

    Mirrored HERE [dhs.org]
  • Re:Can you imagine . . . by DickBreath (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:51PM
  • Re:Disgusted by Nagash (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:57PM
  • Newspaper Article about this by The Dev (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:46PM
  • Re:The joy of a tight labor market. by Lotek (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:58PM
  • Re:Can you imagine . . . by MeDD77 (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:57PM
  • Mirrored... by kobaz (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:57PM
  • Re:I'm very cheap... by extar-bags (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @06:03PM
  • Even more Offtopic...IIRC? by roberte1342 (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:10AM
  • Re:wowie! by nsanit (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:50AM
  • Re:Even more Offtopic...IIRC? by LMacG (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @01:58AM
  • Re:Woah! Cool! by LMacG (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @02:03AM
  • Lego Mosaic by Hairy_Potter (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @02:10AM
  • soldering irons by Mr.roboto (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:01AM
  • Something odd by ChodeMonkey (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:01AM
  • Re:Even more Offtopic...IIRC? by gulped (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @03:05AM
  • Re:Is LEGO a proprietary standard? by Schwarzchild (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:36PM
  • by Grant Elliott (132633) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:41PM (#824053)
    The main reason Lego bricks are more expensive than their imitation counterparts is the molding process. Lego spent a great deal of time and money perfecting their molding process. The plastic used is much stronger and holds color better than those plastics used by the imitators. In addition, Lego molds their product to a seemingly absurd tolerance (.0005 cm, I believe). It isn't as crazy as it sounds. If you start building a complex model, you'll be thankful for the accuracy and strength of Lego bricks. The other companies do attempt to make their bricks the same size. However, they cut back on costs in the molding process. As a result, the pieces don't fit as well. They are cheaper; they just aren't nearly as good.

    From its earliest days making wooden toys, the Lego company prided itself on quality. Every toy got three coats of paint. One line of ducks was actually recalled in order to have the third coat applied. Lego might cost more, but you get a much better product. And of course, Lego offers a much larger variety of pieces than any of its competitors (especially Technic pieces).
  • Whoops by whatever999 (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:43PM
  • Who was it? by joshua.aos (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:51PM
  • by tagishsimon (175038) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:54PM (#824056) Homepage
    LEGO have a fairly blunt attitude to the protection of their trademarks and brand ... their legal rubric [lego.com] talks in terms of protection of "characteristic product features".

    They are also dogamtic about the use of the LEGO trademark on websites- Hemos, take note, assuming you ever bother to read posts... I know this was covered well last time Lego was mentioned but, one more time, from the above linked page:

    Proper Use of the LEGO Trademark on a Web Site

    If the LEGO trademark is used at all, it should always be used as an adjective, not as a noun. For example, say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGO BRICKS". Never say "MODELS BUILT OF LEGOs".

    I suppose it is too much to ask that this is the last time we'll ever see the LEGOs word on /.

  • by Jeff Mahoney (11112) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:57PM (#824057)
    .. yeah, and that the case itself could interlock onto the desk surface.

    Having lego drinking glasses and other such things would do wonders for desk neatness.. nothing could tip over!

    The guy who built this stuff is my new hero.

    -Jeff
  • Can you imagine . . . by esjewett (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:59PM
  • Why the desktop isn't smooth... by dead_penguin (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:05PM
  • Re:He was actually PAID to do this? by konpyutaa (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:15PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by jkorty (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:43PM
  • I don't dig these large scale models by The Masses (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:46PM
  • Re:He was actually PAID to do this? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:47PM
  • Re:Why the glue? (Score:3)

    by Chris Pimlott (16212) on Sunday August 27 2000, @06:24PM (#824064)
    How the hell does this guy write on anything?

    With the stylus that clips onto the side of the screen of course.
  • I'm very cheap... by NoWhere Man (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:52PM
  • Re:Why the desktop isn't smooth... by Astarte (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @06:29PM
  • Re:He was actually PAID to do this? by Cyberkidd (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @06:35PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by AndyL (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:57PM
  • better stories... by animallogic (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @06:49PM
  • Re:better stories... by nmx (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @07:07PM
  • Re:Is LEGO a proprietary standard? by ptbrown (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @07:09PM
  • by fudboy (199618) on Sunday August 27 2000, @07:12PM (#824072) Homepage
    Yes, if there are any LEGO Group employees listening, I would like to see your blocks made out of carbon fiber or space-age ceramics or something. Then we could build actual tools and machines from them, as they'd be quite strong.

    There are added benefits:

    whatever material you choose will revolutionize that material's place in the world. The volume of LEGO production is so immense (are you up to billions per year yet? per week, maybe?) that the infrastructure needed to supply this material will get a big boost and drive prices down in all industries using this material (palm and laptop cases, auto components, etc) This will be good for everyone.

    With cheap and simple gluing techniques and immensly sturdy brick materials, people could build actual structures and drive the building supplies home in a compact car. This is good for Europe in particular, but maybe also in places like Siberia, Africa and Bangaladesh for all sorts of natural disaster/infrastructure reasons.

    Let me add that I am assuming another LEGO form factor would be developed, with full sized structures in mind. I'm thinking in the 40-60cm range.

    :)Fudboy
  • The Plural of LEGO is LEGO by mindpixel (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:09AM
  • Lego Clock in background? by Bobby Orr (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:45AM
  • Re:Is LEGO a proprietary standard? by Frizzle Fry (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @04:50AM
  • Lego toilet by anal0gue (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @12:53PM
  • Re:Kids... by west (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @05:21AM
  • Ouch... (Score:4)

    by Legolas-Greenleaf (181449) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:01PM (#824078)
    wouldn't that hurt the bare bum?

    it would leave an interesting pattern, but still...

    i've looked at love from both sides now. from win and lose, and still somehow...

  • Great! by ackthpt (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @05:23AM
  • The joy of a tight labor market. by Lotek (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @12:58PM
  • Re:Lego Clock in background? by Butterbur (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @05:27AM
  • by R3 (15929) on Sunday August 27 2000, @12:59PM (#824082) Homepage
    One heck of a profession!

    Maybe LEGO should come up with certification or something:

    LCBB - LEGO Certified Block Builder

  • Re:The joy of a tight labor market. by Azza (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:03PM
  • Re:Absurd Design? by mr.ska (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @06:32AM
  • Why the glue? (Score:3)

    by cot (87677) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:00PM (#824085)
    I would have thought one of the "cool" things about a lego desk would be the ability to reconfigure it. Gluing them all together makes that kind of hard.

    I would have thought that you could design it such that the normal locking action of the pieces was strong enough to keep it together.

  • Woah! Cool! (Score:3)

    by Accipiter (8228) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:07PM (#824086)
    The guy who requested this desk must have some real serious value because A) He had the balls to ask for this, and B) The company *agreed*!

    Anyway, you don't get the full scope of the desk until you check out the pictu res [ericharshbarger.org].

    He doesn't say how much he was paid, but he says that it was "worth [his] time."

    Two Words:

    Very Impressive.

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

  • Re:Ouch... - don't you know anything by intmainvoid (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:09PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by slashdoter (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:10PM
  • wowie! by vinnythenose (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:26PM
  • Re:Disgusted (Score:3)

    by Wonko42 (29194) <ryan+slashdot&wonko,com> on Sunday August 27 2000, @02:29PM (#824090) Homepage
    Next time someone asks for such a stupid thing, why not try to talk them into donating to charity? Wasting thousands of dollars on a glued together lego desk is so far beyond reasonable that it can't even be expressed in words.

    So you're saying that anything that costs a lot of money and isn't entirely necessary is unreasonable? By this logic, if I get a raise and decide to buy a new sports car, in spite of the fact that my current car is in perfect working order, it is unreasonable for me to by the sports car. I should, instead, donate my extra money to charity. Is that what you're saying?

    I say: If you've got extra money, spend it on whatever the hell you want.

    --

  • Re:The joy of a tight labor market. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:31PM
  • Re:Lego toilet (Score:3)

    by DickBreath (207180) <danny@suEINSTEIN ... minus physicist> on Sunday August 27 2000, @02:37PM (#824092) Homepage
    Imagine the difficulty of cleaning the bowl.
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by Crag (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:37PM
  • Perhaps cuz the site got slashdotted? by cryptwhomp (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @04:58PM
  • Kids... by chuckw (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:38PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by esme (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:39PM
  • Mindstorm by Alternity (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:14PM
  • Not to be confused with by gurgeous (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:18PM
  • The Guy's Contract by HerrNewton (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:18PM
  • Re:Disgusted by Crag (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @07:57PM
  • Re:LEGO: Not Open Source... by Andrewkov (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:27PM
  • Re:I'm very cheap... by kingdork (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:30PM
  • Been there, done that by Phaser6047 (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @07:58PM
  • Re:Disgusted by JimTheta (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @05:39PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by empesey (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @08:35PM
  • Re:I'm very cheap... by Zaffle (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @08:39PM
  • Re:Disgusted by iElucidate (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @08:43PM
  • by JoeShmoe (90109) <askjoeshmoe@hotmail.com> on Sunday August 27 2000, @08:53PM (#824108)
    Seeing what the guy did with the desk border (a repeating pattern of 1x1 bricks in red, blue, yellow, and white) something occured to me...

    With such a large surface and so many 1x1 bricks the guy could have actually made an image. All someone would have to do is open a nice desktop image (like some wallpaper of a nature scene or a space scene or hell, render something cool) and then convert it to a 2-bit (4 color) image. Scale to the size of your LEGO desktop.

    For example, if the total desktop is 640 x 480 LEGO units in size, that's more than enough resolution for a very impressive image.

    Damn, if I ever built my own lego desk, I definitely think that's the way to go. Maybe this is the next step in LEGO? Lego dithered art?
  • Re:Been there, done that by Midnight Ryder (Score:2) Monday August 28 2000, @07:29AM
  • Re:get started on your own project... by Tribbles (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @09:05PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by Axemaster (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @09:15PM
  • Re:The joy of a tight labor market. by Nostradumbass (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:11PM
  • by Trans (209035) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:13PM (#824113)
    I'd be laughing my ass off now if I were him. Come on man, have some fun!
  • Just Wait.. by RAruler (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:15PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by cot (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:19PM
  • Re:Woah! Cool! (Score:4)

    by Accipiter (8228) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:24PM (#824116)
    Woop!

    Seems this dude does lots of other cool models [ericharshbarger.org] as well. This guy sure knows his Lego.

    Also quite impressive, is his Model of Tux [ericharshbarger.org]!

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

  • Re:About the desk-Drawers by mattdm (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:25PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by DickBreath (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:45PM
  • get started on your own project... by karmma (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:48PM
  • Eggo My Lego by flyneye (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @02:53PM
  • Absurd Design? (Score:3)

    by Luminous (192747) on Sunday August 27 2000, @02:59PM (#824121) Homepage Journal
    I am curious why the designer of the desk didn't desing it so large sections were glued together and then interlocked. Let the entire top of the desk be three sections so other sections can be snapped on. Need to do some writing, snap on the flat surface and the pen holder. Going to be doing some heavy duty computing, snap in the ergonomic sections.

    Also if the entire desk is actually several components, then shipping becomes easier.

    A more impressive design would combine the computer and the desk, but until I get the money, time, and skill to do it, I guess I should just sit back and be impressed.

  • Re:Why the glue? by Ranger Rick (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @03:06PM
  • Re:Is LEGO a proprietary standard? by SlashGeek (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @09:24PM
  • Expanding with mindstorms by cra (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @09:39PM
  • Re:What would have been TRULY fantastic... by enneff (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @09:41PM
  • Re:Just Wait.. by enneff (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @09:43PM
  • Re:Can you imagine . . . by rtscts (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @10:49PM
  • Re:What would have been TRULY fantastic... by StarFace (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @11:45PM
  • Re:wowie! by iktos (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:14AM
  • Re:Just Wait.. by StarFace (Score:1) Monday August 28 2000, @12:55AM
  • Here's a direct picture link by Vassily Overveight (Score:2) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:27PM
  • by zlite (199781) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:27PM (#824132)
    Given how expensive LEGO is and how simple the APIs are (pretty much raised dots spaced X on blocks shaped Y) you'd think there'd be a host of generic clone/competitors. But there aren't. MegaBlox come close, but if you've tried to mix and match LEGO and any of the look-alikes, you'll find that the substitutes don't fit well and are made from a different plastic with different surface finish and color. Kids reject these imposters every time.

    Why is this? Does LEGO sue anyone who makes an exact clone? Surely any patent expired long ago (plenty of other people make raised-dot-and-hole building blocks). Can you copyright *dimensions*?

    I know the brand is the big thing, but as a parent with LEGO-hungry kids (actually they're into Duplo, the toddler-size blocks, which are obscenely expensive) I'd happily buy a no-name if it worked. But there's nothing out there that does. Is this market failure or something more sinister from LEGO HQ?
  • Re:Lego Desks vs. "Emissions-free" vehicles? by Legolas-Greenleaf (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:27PM
  • Re:Why the glue? by slashdoter (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:27PM
  • by plastik55 (218435) on Sunday August 27 2000, @01:28PM (#824135) Homepage
    Some physicists are in the habit of using Legos for making small adjustments in optics. This is because the studs have high enough friction that you can tweak two blocks relative to one another and they'll stay in the position you set them at. it stays bent. My freshman physics prof gave a demonstration on interferometry this way; he had a mirror mounted on a stack of legos (IIRC), which he could tweak by hand until it was at the right position.
  • LEGO & Tinkertoys? by Schwarzchild (Score:1) Sunday August 27 2000, @01:32PM
  • Actually. Lego does sell in bulk. It was on /. a while back.
    http://slashdot.org/articles/00/06/14/1242242.sh tml

    The link to the site is....
    http://www.lego.com/bulk
(1) | 2