Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Remind me,,, (Score 1) 245

It would be nice to see these entities seized by the IRS and large parts sold off to their competitors. That would certainly stop such huge grants and subsidies in favor of smaller ones spread out. Then your horrible poor and middles could fill the new positions and enjoy the revenues spread amongst their communities.
With the previously owned bits spread out, then we will see some innovation flourish because the new humbled titans will have to do something for US today to stay in the race. Your rich professionals/entrepeneurs will move along to THE NEXT BIG THING. Maybe, even at one of the companies owning a piece of their ass.
There are many possibilities of just what could happen, I doubt anything ever happens as straight forward and predictably as you set forth.Too textbook.

Comment: Re:Big enough sample size (Score 1) 549

by flyneye (#43761757) Attached to: Of 1000 Americans Polled, Most Would Ban Home Printing of Guns

Hmmm, statistics about guns, what could possibly go wrong? Money is usually my answer. Money makes the world go round, greases the tracks for a night on the town. It picks you up when you're feeling down, when you're out, you'll wear a frown. So step right up and pick the card and lay your money down.

Comment: Re:Big enough sample size (Score 0) 549

by flyneye (#43761695) Attached to: Of 1000 Americans Polled, Most Would Ban Home Printing of Guns

Yes you are right , random sampling has produced loads of desired results, the best money can buy.
With only 1000 samples, you can always try again in short enough time to make press, if you didn't like it the first time.

I'm sure I can trust that you believe you are right because you sat in enough classes to soak up theory about the theoretical, then they gave you a sheepskin. Happens all the time. Personally I blame those with teaching degrees who taught those who wished to teach,etc. until each iteration contaminated by culture, politics and mental health, declined the information to the poo on our plate today.

Lies, damned lies and statistics.

Statistics are barely good for anything and never cover enough criteria and variables to represent accurately, opinion.
Perhaps you should've degreed in information theory.

Sorry, I'm hungover and mean as a rattlesnake today.

Comment: Re:Big enough sample size (Score 2) 549

by flyneye (#43761575) Attached to: Of 1000 Americans Polled, Most Would Ban Home Printing of Guns

Are you kidding me? You can't get from county to county, let alone state to state with any hope of finding a uniformity between them that could be construed as an average. You couldn't poll 1000 homeowners out of 750000 in a city over taxes and have it work. This is the equivalent of closing your eyes and tossing a dart over your shoulder to win the teddy bear.

Just because they offer up their cockamamie methodology, doesn't make it any the less; smoke pumped up your butt.

Interesting theory about sample size,let me make it clear for you. Take a digital picture with the same number of pixels as the adult population(we'll even narrow it down to adults) then, pick a thousand random pixels to represent the picture. Hell, I'll make it even simpler, squeeze that same picture down to 1000 pixels. Whadda ya got? Crap. What did Rationalize-Ruse produce? Crap. What happens when you digest their info? Disgusting picture isn't it? Another good reason to question everything by those professing to be experts.

Comment: Re:Noted that no event is yet scheduled for the US (Score 1) 44

by flyneye (#43761365) Attached to: Happy Culture Freedom Day!

Amen! Let's just hit the reset button and settle on 4 years for Copyright and Patent. If you haven't made your money by then, get off the pot. There's a world of innovative people out there who deserve a living. I mean really, what have you done for us today? I mean besides Patent/copy troll and waste the time of the tax dollar fueled court system that could otherwise be doing something to improve the world. 4 years, no more, no less. Period.

Comment: Re:Big enough sample size (Score 1) 549

by flyneye (#43761277) Attached to: Of 1000 Americans Polled, Most Would Ban Home Printing of Guns

1000 people could never be a good sample size. It could hardly cover all walks of life in our 50 states, let alone combinations of political, religious and cultural criteria.
Anyone with an HTML editor can claim to be some professional data gathering business. Frankly /. polls get closer to the truth of things and I wouldn't accept it either.
The only thing this unReasonable-Ruse is good for is producing media talking points from midair in order to sway public opinion in the cattle they are able to affect.
I fart in their general direction and laugh at their lame attempt at reproducing some community college level effort and trying to fob it off as genuine and scientific.
Proof that any moron can call themselves professionals, I am reminded of all the 3 stooges films in which they attempt business endeavors ending in spilled paint, foot in a bucket, BOP! OW! C'mon Moe! Woo Woo Woo Woo! Wise guy huh? I'll teach you to print guns.

Comment: Re:You're disgusting. (Score 1) 199

by flyneye (#43759149) Attached to: Sorry, Larry Page: Tech-Industry Viciousness Is Here To Stay

You lack reading comprehension: I pointed out a jealousy over a friend (unisex) unless of course you're asexual which would make your assertion amusing.
It works on conservatives too and most religious affiliations. Nothing a savage headhunter might prize more than "turning out" a Metrosexual. Birds do it, bees do it, even educated trees do it. The Craigslist section I mentioned has something for everyone. I mean if you can't get laid there,( could be you, if you talk to others like you do here) you might as well pack it up and go do that research in the remote arctic, that you've been meaning to get around to.

Stay the curse.

Working...