Comment Because OS X... (Score 1) 65
... is derived from FreeBSD. Microsoft could have saved the world literally trillions of dollars over the same time frame if they had done the same.
Long live BSD.
... is derived from FreeBSD. Microsoft could have saved the world literally trillions of dollars over the same time frame if they had done the same.
Long live BSD.
OSX is based on FreeBSD. Of course it changed the whole story.
That has nothing to do with "Linux" and everything to do with whatever software is managing your network. All the Windows-emulating network managers take away your freedom.
In FreeBSD, network interfaces are initialized at boot time and any configuration changes require re-running the startup scripts ala "service netif restart ". That will flip the interface up and down, but you're going to lose the connection anyway when the dhcp client runs. You can run the client manually, if you want, but you'll still lose connectivity either way.
I suppose you could use interface cloning to have a nearly "seamless" transition, only losing open connections.
"Apple has never offered a product that justified a large chassis. It used to be lots of slots, hard drives and other storage that justified it. Macs have never been about that"
I see you don't remember the 68k Macs OR the PPC Macs. Apple offered machines with lots of slots ever since the Macintosh II line. HTH.
Too much latency for RAM.
You mean running them on an external GPU? That doesn't take much bandwidth unless you're constantly loading new models.
Assuming it's remotely true (and there's good reason for thinking it isn't), it still means the FBI director was negligent in their choice of personal email provider, that the email provider had incompetent security, and that the government's failure to either have an Internet Czar (the post exists) or to enforce high standards on Internet services are a threat to the security of the nation (since we already know malware can cross airgaps through negligence, the DoD has been hit that way a few times). The FBI director could have copied unknown quantities of malware onto government machines through lax standards, any of which could have delivered classified information over the Internet (we know this because it has also happened to the DoD).
In short, the existence of the hack is a minor concern relative to every single implication that hack has.
They gave the Chinese government access to Chinese user's data years ago. They don't seem to have an issue with governments gaining warrantless access to their systems.
Chinese law doesn't require a warrant for such access and it may be done in secrecy (i.e. without informing the user) if necessary to perform duties. The problem with Apple in China isn't that they aren't following the law, it's that they are and the law is openly fascist.
Check his posting history and it's very clear that he is not.
If he is not a trollbot, he is so frothy as to be indistinguishable from one. Every comment is the same.
Mobile Firefox has become nearly unusable. It crashes on me at least once per day now. The memory leaks are worse than ever.
Dice isn't relevant here, it's B1zX
The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.