If they don't do anything novel, then why would a mathematician use it for this type of paper in the first place? Hmm.

Correct. The proper response is "I don't answer questions". And if they detain you, "I don't answer questions without a lawyer present".

They're hard to find though, because the interstellar medium of hydrogen and helium gas between the stars absorbs ultraviolet light.

It's a good thing hydrogen does that because our hydrogen atmosphere keeps us from getting big-time sun-burn.

So you're saying your family is made up of liars? Neato.

You get hard for corporal punishment. Hard man. Soft brain.

You, sir, are mentally incompetent.

It broke specifically because it was overloaded, much like your pathetic little brain. Please seek help.

Capitalism thrives on hypocrisy, it's just the thing to keep the masses of idiots stupiding along at their jobs so the wealthy can buy their 47th yacht. Texas literally has a vested interest in non-solar power (specifically oil and gas — they produce around a quarter of our natgas) so they need to keep advertising it so they can sell it, but they're not actually stupid so they also are doing solar and wind. Solar's easier to deploy without hassles because bumpkins can't see it from their pickups, plus Texas is prime sun country, so it's more solar than wind.

Of course, we have a name for people who are not stupid, and sell people a product which they know will destroy them because it allows them to live a life close to kings, and it is evil.

The proper question is why should you be required to answer such a question if it's not related to a traffic stop. Your response is riddled with assumptions that first, the officer is investigating another crime, in which case indeed they may have questions to ask. A robbery? Do they have a description of the vehicle? Does it match yours, even minimally? If not, they really don't have any evidence on which to base a further expansion of the stop. Nonetheless, if you go to trial, you're not going to be required to say yes, that was my car. Let them prove it was your car. And in this case at the stop, all of what you're describing is more or less entirely inadequate for detention. Innocent until proven guilty is part of this. If they have reasonable suspicion, of course they can expand on the stop. If they're just fishing around, where you're coming from, where you're going, no.

You forgot about derivative works.

The definition is pretty fuzzy and varies for different types of media but the general standard is recognizable elements were reproduced.

No court has yet quite taken that up that I know of but you don't need to reproduce a work in full to have a derivative work which could be a copyright violation.

You don't need any of that shit to graduate high school any more. I got an associates with just business math.

This is why you believe this bullshit. You're abdicating your thinking to the machine and then sucking down what it gives you.

Avoiding oversight IS nefarious.

If they were testing then they should have put that in as the reason.

Don't make excuses for those who should be held to the highest standard.

I don't, that's why I'm armed.

I've so far resisted getting a CCW but I think it's time to stop resisting that as the nation becomes more lawless from the top down.

I think what you both haven't noted in this thread is that this is what Amazon does, and it's killing local retail because it can stock more things. Over time they open more warehouses and stock more stuff near you, so they can do it more effectively. So this absolutely IS what is happening, except the store itself is going away and leaving only warehouses.

Is the device powerful enough to run games limited by the RAM with satisfactory performance?

That's exactly why those people are still doing it. Enablers.

It's really management's fault, though, not whoever ran the meeting, unless they are the same.