Hey, I'll be happy if ALL of the web ads transition to "viewable by AI only". They're not gonna impact me, in that case...

I'm quite clear that this story is in fact about how it doesn't actually protect you like a real VPN. The confusion is intentional. It's fraud because it's intended to deceive.

Ludus Latrunculorum was popular for a while.

Covered under fireworks.

Which mental illnesses have been determined to have biological causes? Having a treatment which is somewhat effective is not evidence btw

You can do that in the USA too, but it costs extra.

Dealerships truly are the worst part of the car ownership experience

It seems like the fight goes back and forth about "just cameras" vs "cameras + sensors", when all I can make of it is that the REAL answer lies in how good the hardware and software is processing the incoming data?

Tesla, for example, scrapped the cameras + lidar idea, largely out of frustration that both inputs often led to the computer interpreting the scene in conflicting ways. "Camera visual seems to indicate that's just a light pole on the side of the road but lidar image shows it may be a person starting to walk into the road." (Maybe that's a poor specific example, but I heard talks about it saying things along these lines were the struggle.)

If Waymo is arguing humans can only do so much with our eyes, so "superhuman levels of driving" require more? Again, it seems to me like more CPU power and better software is that "more"? Computers can do math FAR quicker than my brain can... and that's been true for decades. Superhuman levels of driving safely seem like they could happen with systems just using cameras OR systems collecting data from multiple sources?

Absolutely

I see you've never been in one.

Google and Waymo have explicitly and repeatedly said that they are fully liable for accidents caused by their vehicles.

You're right, but the problem is going to be location in many cases. Would a former data center make a great public library? Technically, it might. But when it was built out in the middle of some farm land, where they originally got a good deal on the land by buying some farmers out who were willing to sell? Now, it might not make so much sense.

Or as an example closer to home for me? Our own city is fielding requests to construct data centers right now. There are rumors about our now closed-down steel plant being a potential site. Great for the guy who owns the property and wants to unload it. But a data center there would mean tearing out and removing an existing environment that was good for manufacturing. If you said ok -- no more steel made here but we could do cement, or process glass? That would be an equivalent replacement that would bring back the lost jobs. A data center really won't ... and if it closes? I'm not sure people would want it as office space in that part of town.

"approximately match" does not mean "no better than", but thanks for proving you don't understand any of these words. It means to have similar results to.

But I have it on good authority from many authority figures that police are responsible adults who keep us safe!

This is why Qualified Immunity should not exist, full stop

Tesla turns off FSD right before collisions to fuck with the stats. If you believe their stats you're a stupid tool.

Cuck.

If we do that, their faces won't have a look of hate on them at the time.

Cuck.